Next Time Nike Is Tempted To Run A Feminist Super Bowl Ad, Just Don’t Do It

Nike’s big celebration of women is actually demeaning.

Daughters Of The American Revolution Doubles Down On Letting Men Infiltrate Its Ranks Against Members’ Wishes

‘It’s ridiculous that we're having to talk about this, having to fight so hard to keep our women's society free of men.’

‘The Substance’ Blasts Beauty Standards While 62-Year-Old Leading Lady Demi Moore Chases Them

'The Substance' suffers from one fatal and hypocritical flaw in the form of its leading lady, Demi Moore.

Trump Orders Federal Government To Recognize Men And Women Are Different

'If federal policies promote such an obvious falsehood that men can become women, the government will forfeit all credibility.'

Rep. Luna torpedoes Democratic narrative about Hegseth's views on women with Glenn Beck



In a conversation Wednesday with Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck, Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R) blew up Democrats' preferred narrative about Army veteran Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's pick to run the Pentagon, along with the egalitarian conceit that women can or should perform all roles in the U.S. military.

Luna, who served in the U.S. Air Force from 2009 to 2014, earning the Air Force Achievement Medal along the way, highlighted Democrats' desperate efforts to twist Hegseth's past comments regarding women in the military into supposed disqualifiers during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.

"Pete never said that he never wanted women to serve in the military," said Luna. "In fact, it's quite the opposite."

Hegseth has long emphasized the need to maintain high standards for combat, even if that means fewer female service members on the battlefield — something he reiterated in his opening remarks, stating, "Our standards will be high, and they will be equal, not equitable."

"It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated. … We've all served with women, and they're great," Hegseth told the titular host of "The Shawn Ryan Show" in November. "But our institutions don't have to incentivize that in places where, traditionally — not traditionally, over human history — men in those positions are more capable."

As Luna indicated, Democrats were more than willing to distort Hegseth's views on the matter.

Blaze News previously reported that Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) asked the two-time recipient of the Bronze Star at his hearing Tuesday, "Should we believe you think the two women in this committee who served in the military made our military less capable?"

'There are different standards for women and men.'

"No, their contributions are indispensable," Hegseth said of the former female service members. "My comments are about having the same standards across the board."

Luna noted further that gender equity in terms of representation in various roles in the military is problematized not only by physical disparities between the sexes but also by the social and psychological realities that have manifested naturally as a result of these objective differences over the course of eons.

"There are certain rules that women should not be subjected to in the military," said Luna. "So in a lot of foreign countries, you will see there will be women-only sniper teams and/or women-only teams that will see certain combat. Now, I preface this by saying that there was a study that was done, and it shows that when women were placed in harm's way ... the natural instinct for men was to protect that woman. And that's the right thing to do. That's that 'toxic masculinity' that the left tries to attack us with all the time."

"That's human nature," said Beck. "We're born with that."

Luna noted that while a noble instinct, it could undermine the work of co-ed teams. The congresswoman provided the hypothetical of a female service member taking fire, then suffering an injury on a special forces team. Luna suggested that whereas if the injured party was a man, his comrades would likely maintain focus on the mission, in the case of a woman, the men on the team might instead feel compelled to rush to her defense.

"It could ultimately result in ... more casualties, more people getting hurt, and then also jeopardize the success of the mission," said Luna. "And so I think when we're looking at military policy as a whole, we need to take these things into consideration."

— (@)

Recognizing that Hegseth is a prime target for demonization because he is a white, Christian male, Luna seized upon the opportunity and the relative safety of her identity to push the point home, stressing that men and women are not interchangeable and there are certain roles for which women should be ineligible.

"There are different standards for women and men. That's just a fact," said the congresswoman. "It doesn't mean that women aren't as good as men. I think there's been cases where women can be better snipers than men are."

After a RAND-led and Congress-ordered study determined that women were not only "injured at significantly higher rates than men" but were "failing at noticeably higher rates" than their male counterparts — the ACFT pass rate for women enlisted in the regular Army was 52%, whereas the pass rate for men was 92% — the Army jettisoned its gender-neutral Army Combat Fitness Test in 2022 and lowered standards for female soldiers.

After stating that women should not be required to register for the draft — something former Democratic Sen. Jon Tester (Mont.) pushed for with Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) before voters rejected him at the ballot box — Luna underscored once again, "Women should not be placed in certain combat roles in the military."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

No, The Military Should Not Be Sending Women Into Combat

Hegseth was correct in his original assessment that women should not be deployed to the trenches to fight America's wars.

AP has to fix headline for its hit piece on DeSantis nominee to UWF board, Scott Yenor



Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) made eight new appointments to the University of West Florida's board of trustees on Monday. Among them was Scott Yenor, a professor of political science at Boise State University and a Washington fellow at the Claremont Institute.

Whereas individuals at the university appear happy to have Yenor aboard, scandal-plagued liberals such as Debbie Wasserman Schultz and elements of the liberal media were prickled by the appointment of a conservative both supportive of the family and keen on "dismantling the rule of social justice in America's universities."

In its rush to discredit Yenor ahead of his likely confirmation by the Florida Senate, the Associated Press distorted the truth this week and found itself having to correct another headline.

The Thursday article appears to have originally been titled, "DeSantis appointee to university board says women should become mothers, not pursue higher ed," but has since been retitled, "DeSantis nominee for UWF board says women shouldn't delay motherhood for higher ed, career," and fitted with a correction noting that Yenor has advocated prioritization of motherhood, not for women to opt out of education altogether.

'There can be no great countries without great families.'

In the hit piece, the AP's Tallahassee-based education reporter Kate Payne clutched pearls about the professor's warnings about the dangers of DEI — which a damning Network Contagion Research Institute and Rutgers University study revealed in November "may foster authoritarian mindsets, particularly when anti-oppressive narratives exist within an ideological and vindictive monoculture" — as well as about the declines of traditional marriage and American birth rates.

After trying her best to tether Yenor to the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, about which the Associated Press previously spread falsehoods, Payne quoted from Yenor's 2021 speech at the National Conservatism Conference in Orlando in an apparent effort to damn him with his own words.

Payne was evidently prickled by Yenor's Chestertonian critique of America's denigration of the institution of motherhood and his characterization of universities as "indoctrination camps."

"Our feminist culture points women, especially young women, away from marriage and family life through its celebration of careerism. Thus more and more women, every generation, delay marriage and increasingly forgo marriage," Yenor said in his speech. "As women delay and forgo marriage, they're increasingly likely to delay and forgo having children."

"We lie to young women when we tell them that it is easy to become pregnant whenever one wants in life," said Yenor. "Never does anyone say to the young women that the peak period for pregnancy is between the late teens and the late 20s. Rarely are young women told that their ability to conceive children declines quite a bit after their late 20s and declines rapidly after the mid-30s. Ancient people used to pray to the gods of fertility. We pray to infertility gods."

"There can be no great countries without great families," emphasized Yenor. "And today, America is destroying family life."

Yenor, whom leftist journalists have long been trying to get fired for membership in religious, pro-family groups, told Blaze News last year that the anti-natalist messaging he has railed against largely comes down to a "set of mores and manners that are the natural result of our sexual revolution and its associated ideology."

'My most important work of my life was being a mother.'

"'I think you need to wait to get married until you have a job and are stable.' Well, that's a great way of delaying marriage, and marriage delayed and deferred is much less likely to happen. That's a form of cultural messaging that's widely accepted," said Yenor. "Whereas previously, it was thought that marriage would be a foundation for life; that you kind of learn to live together with another person and go through life's struggles and have moments where you weren't prosperous. And now we have marriage as a kind of capstone to all of life's achievements."

"That new cultural messaging obviously leads to different kinds of marriages and later marriages and fewer children and more fertility problems. The fertility problems themselves are the result of waiting until you're 30 to get married," continued Yenor.

Payne packaged her AP article with comment from a single and, of course, critical voice from UWF, faculty union president and earth sciences instructor Chasidy Hobbs, who called Yenor's comments "disheartening" and "offensive."

"My most important work of my life was being a mother," said Hobbs, unwittingly reinforcing Yenor's argument, "while also working as a professional woman in a career that I find almost as important as motherhood — to help the future generation learn to think for themselves."

"Publishing quotes pulled off the sparsely stocked shelves of dirt every time Yenor successfully advocates for reform in higher education (which he does often!), [Payne] has done the intrepid journalistic work of adding a new headline to his @NatConTalk speech of 2021!" tweeted Andrew Beck, vice president of communications at the Claremont Institute and partner at Beck & Stone.

"Given the current decline of vast swaths of America's higher education institutions and the decay of its culture, I'm not sure how many, except for the most militant, reality-denying feminists, would naturally think these statements are unfounded, outrageous, and worthy of broadcasting when you can hear hundreds of women saying the same thing on social media every day," continued Beck. "All this shows that it is not Professor Yenor or Governor DeSantis who are out of line, but Kate and the Associated Press, who are out of touch with Floridians and what they want out of their universities: to do better, so that America can be better."

Yenor noted on X, "What @AP's reporter considers awful are things that are increasingly music to people's ears."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Demons Must Be Delighted At How Badly Americans Have Butchered Marriage

As Screwtape told Wormwood, 'The aim is to guide each sex away from those members of the other with whom spiritually helpful, happy, and fertile marriages are most likely.'

‘Sarah’ McBride Isn’t Just A Congressman In A Dress But A Trojan Horse To Force Men Into Women’s Spaces Everywhere

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Screenshot-2024-11-21-at-5.03.19 PM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Screenshot-2024-11-21-at-5.03.19%5Cu202fPM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]McBride and his allies want women to give up privacy and safety, and all of us to give up our integrity and become complicit in their lies.

The brutal truth: Why women ditched Democrats for Trump



Americans are tired of being told their intellect is limited by race or sex — especially women. Like other groups, women have long been taken for granted by the Democratic Party, as if pro-choice talking points alone are enough to secure their blind loyalty to the rest of the party’s platform.

“The View”co-host Sunny Hostin certainly thinks this is the case, calling Trump’s victory a “a referendum of cultural resentment” merely because Americans overwhelmingly refused the policy platform of “a mixed-race woman married to a Jewish guy.”

No, women didn’t vote for Trump because they are 'so severe upon their own sex.'

The Sunny Hostins of the Democratic establishment refuse to engage in serious self-reflection that could explain the surge of women and other traditionally Democratic groups voting Republican in this election. Are women simply suffering from a mass self-hatred that enticed them to vote for Donald Trump? Or have Democrats made a critical mistake in assuming that abortion is the only issue women care about politically?

Kamala Harris bet on winning the women’s vote by making reproductive rights the center of her campaign. This strategy isn’t new — Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and other Democrats have used it before. However, this approach has arguably become one of the Democrats’ gravest miscalculations, and Harris paid the price.

Over the past four years, women have faced the same economic pressures as men — buying groceries, filling gas tanks, and dealing with higher interest rates. Men aren’t the only ones who care about the economy, and no matter how often politicians chant, “My body, my choice,” it can’t drown out the financial strain of Bidenomics. Women, like men, wanted economic solutions and found them with Trump. For them, Kamala Harris and “my body, my choice” were not nearly enough.

Women’s bodies seem to matter to Democrats only when it comes to abortion. After the COVID pandemic, women have led the push for greater medical autonomy, nutritional transparency, and broader access to holistic, cycle-based health care. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promised to address these issues by holding Big Pharma and Big Food accountable, and women rallied around him in droves. But instead of supporting RFK Jr. and the women’s issues he represented, the Democratic Party labeled him an “anti-vax conspiracy theorist,” dismissing both him and the women he galvanized. Is it any wonder they followed Kennedy across the aisle to Trump?

Democrats also seem indifferent to women’s health care standards beyond abortion access. Women are continually overprescribed birth control as a blanket treatment for almost any ailment, wreaking havoc on their bodies. When outlets like Evie magazine highlighted how Big Pharma profits from pumping women full of synthetic estrogens, the Washington Post labeled the writers “conspiracy theorists.” But don’t worry — if birth control fails, Democrats will ensure you still have access to abortion.

Yet the “my body, my choice” mantra doesn’t seem to apply to women’s sports, bathrooms, or sororities. Kamala Harris might have played Beyoncé’s “Girls Run the World” at her rallies, but when her party cheers for an Algerian man beating elite female athletes or celebrates Lia Thomas while dismissing Riley Gaines as a “right-wing extremist,” the pretense of “women’s empowerment” becomes hard to believe.

Women are also tired of being told by the “woke elite” that they’re “fatphobic” if they don’t laud Lizzo as a health and beauty icon while Adele and Rebel Wilson are criticized for promoting “unhealthy” beauty standards through their weight loss. According to MSNBC, fitness is a sign of “right-wing extremism,” so it’s supposedly better to sit on the couch and pop birth control.

When Democrats celebrate being an overweight, unhealthy, androgynous “menstruating person” over a mom who works out, wears dresses, and drinks raw milk, they risk alienating a significant portion of their base.

The Democrats assume women have an obligatory, blind allegiance requiring them to support any woman running for office regardless of her policies. Such an assumption that a woman’s political capacities are limited to a candidate’s sex is not only an insult to women’s intelligence — it’s frankly anti-feminist.

In response to Sunny Hostin: No, women didn’t vote for Trump because they are “so severe upon their own sex.” Like birth control, your party prescribed “my body, my choice” as a cure-all for any political ailment afflicting women over the past four years of Biden and Harris’ policy failures. Trump’s platform actually listened to women. You took them for granted.