Commencement speaker praises AI and globalism — graduates crush her with boos



A commencement speech went off the rails when a speaker got an unexpected response when she brought up artificial intelligence.

Last Friday, graduates from the University of Central Florida returned for their commencement but were seemingly shocked when one of the guests started speaking about technology that could replace them.

'All right. OK. We've got a bipolar topic here.'

The graduates came from the College of Arts and Humanities and the Nicholson School of Communication and Media, so it came as no surprise that an audience of future artists, designers, and media professionals were none too pleased with what the speaker chose to discuss.

"Profound change. Change is exciting. Very exciting. And let's face it, change can be daunting," speaker Gloria Caulfield told the graduates.

Caulfield is an executive from Tavistock Development Company, a major development firm in Central Florida, and she was keen on delivering points that mirror World Economic Forum policy.

"The rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution," Caulfield continued, but this time, she was met with a chorus of boos.

Caulfield was paralyzed and turned to the dais and asked, "Oh, what happened? OK, I struck a chord."

She then asked the audience, "May I finish?" as she laughed. The speaker continued, only for the crowd to react oppositely to her next remark.

"Only a few years ago, AI was not a factor in our lives," Caulfield said. The crowd erupted in huge applause, again sending the speaker into shock.

RELATED: A twisted German just forced a chatbot to simulate a scarily realistic nervous breakdown

- YouTube

The boobirds would make another appearance though.

Caulfield attempted to say the audience was split, stating, "All right. OK. We've got a bipolar topic here," but when she said, "Now, AI capabilities are in the palm of our hands," she was hit with more monumental boos.

The crowd remained subdued for the remainder of the speech though, which only lasted about 11 minutes in total, throughout which Caulfield described AI use as the next "industrial revolution" several times.

She compared it to the launch of the internet and the widespread use of text messages, which she seemingly thought the audience would tell her she was silly for mentioning; she asked for no "giggles" during those remarks.

"I know it sounds amusing, but at that time, we had no idea how any of these technologies would impact the world and our lives," Caulfield continued. "These were some of the same trepidations and concerns we are now facing. But ultimately, it was a game changer for global economic development," she added.

RELATED: That customer service rep with the American accent might still be an Indian guy — here's how

Gloria Caulfield (L), 2025 in New York City. Sean Zanni/Patrick McMullan/Getty Images

Aside from a sometimes hostile graduating class, Caulfield delivered fairly standard globalist talking points that mirror the WEF's pursual of the fourth industrial revolution.

The WEF said in January that its work, moving forward, will focus on AI innovation, energy transition, cyber resilience, and "frontier technologies."

Caulfield also praised previous "revolutions" for creating jobs at Apple, Google, and Meta, before claiming that AI "alongside human intelligence" will help humanity solve some of its greatest problems.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Canada’s Mark Carney Can’t Even Challenge American Hegemony Without American Help

Canada's brave new challenge to American military power requires American weapons and technical support.

‘Gross’: WEF elites push for fake, lab-grown meat



Social media users reacted to elites discussing the consumption of lab-grown meat products during the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, this week.

A video clip circulated on social media on Thursday of Andrea Illy, an Italian businessman and chairman of the coffee company Illycaffè, pushing for the adoption of tech foods.

'This, I know, it’s kind of a cultural revolution.'

Sam Kass, a former White House chef and senior policy adviser for nutrition under former President Barack Obama, said, “A lot of what we’re starting to see are these replacements for these core foods. I’ve tasted a bunch of, you know, ‘future coffee, fake coffee.’ How do you see that application?”

Kass asked for Illy’s opinion on the matter, noting that, while the technology of cultivated food is “smart” and “interesting,” “from a values perspective” and as a chef, he does not want to see a future “where we’re starting to drink coffee from a factory as opposed to from a tree.”

Illy responded, “There is a terrible cultural resistance from [the] consumer to accept tech foods. But in my opinion, they represent the way forward.”

“We know from statistics ... that 70% of the ecological footprint of agriculture is due to animal proteins,” Illy continued.

RELATED: Say no to synthetic: America needs real meat, not lab slop

Andrea Illy. Photo by Robin Marchant/Getty Images for illy caffe

He argued that the “excessive consumption” of meat “is the first cause of noncommunicable diseases,” which he claimed is “the number one health problem in the Western society.”

Illy suggested reducing meat consumption to a “healthy” level, while considering “the environmental impact.”

“Why should I use animals when I can cultivate meat and get only the best part of it?” Illy questioned.

RELATED: Bugs for thee, beef for me: How big business monopolizes meat

Andrea Illy. Photographer: Jose Sarmento Matos/Bloomberg via Getty Images

“This, I know, it’s kind of a cultural revolution,” he added, estimating that it would take decades to get people to adopt lab-grown meat as the new norm.

The WEF website boasts the adoption of cultivated meat. The organization explains that lab-grown meat begins with “extracting stem cells from a small sample of animal tissue” and placing those stem cells in a bioreactor. The WEF claims that cultivated meats offer “a multitude of benefits,” including reduced environmental impacts, lower resource use, elimination of the need to slaughter animals, and elimination of antibiotic use.

X users in the comments seemed less than enthusiastic about tech foods.

“They will eat steaks from the finest beef. Everyone else cancer cells cultivated in a laboratory,” one user wrote.

“Gross,” another stated.

“WEF is full of demons,” a third wrote.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Carney puts America last at Davos; Trump hits back



The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos offered a picture-perfect illustration of the clash between globalism and America First.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney — a longtime advocate of globalist policies, whether as governor of the Bank of England or as a United Nations goodwill ambassador for climate change — delivered a speech that electrified woke forces around the world.

'Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements.'

Yet while Carney proclaimed a kind of independence from U.S. economic and military hegemony, many seemed to forget that he had just signed a trade deal with China — against the backdrop of his declaration that Canada was joining Beijing’s “new world order.”

Past tense

Carney’s address waved a red flag at the United States and President Donald Trump, though he lacked the courage to name either directly. Instead, he spoke of America in the past tense, obliquely warning that the “rules-based international order,” under which “countries like Canada prospered,” was finished.

“We joined its institutions. We praised its principles. We benefited from its predictability,” Carney said.

And because of that, we could pursue values-based foreign policies under its protection.

We knew the story of the international rules-based order was partially false — that the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient, that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically. And we knew that international law applied with varying rigor depending on the identity of the accused or the victim. This fiction was useful, and American hegemony in particular helped provide public goods: open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security, and support for frameworks for resolving disputes.

Then came the line that sent globalist acolytes into rapture.

“This bargain no longer works. Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.”

But isn’t Carney himself the author — and perhaps the finisher — of that rupture? For years, he has worked against the natural alliance between Canada and its largest trading partner and closest military ally. As we have pointed out before, Carney has labored to replace the United States with China as the world’s economic engine.

RELATED: Trump not worried about Canada's China-centric 'new world order'

Brad Smith/ISI Photos/Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images

A little gratitude

Trump was listening — or at least was promptly briefed. During his own address to Davos, the president castigated both Carney and Canada for taking America for granted. Referring to the development of the Golden Dome defense system, Trump noted that it would, “by its very nature,” defend Canada as well.

“Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way,” Trump said. “They should be grateful also, but they’re not. I watched your prime minister yesterday. He wasn’t so grateful.

"Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that, Mark, before you make your statements.”

By Friday morning, Trump had gone farther, withdrawing Carney's invitation to join his proposed “Board of Peace.”

Trump spent much of his Davos remarks ridiculing the globalist “Green New Scam” and questioning why the United States continues to belong to NATO when it derives so little benefit from the arrangement.

Windbag

But his most biting remarks were reserved for the fantasy that green energy can power a modern economy.

China, Trump noted, makes “a fortune selling the windmills.”

“They’re shocked that people continue to buy those damn things,” he continued. “They kill the birds. They ruin your landscapes. Other than that, I think they’re fabulous, by the way. Stupid people buy them."

Trump’s rejection of globalist orthodoxy was reinforced by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

“Globalization has failed the West and the United States of America,” Lutnick said. “It’s a failed policy. It is what the WEF has stood for, which is export, offshore, far-shore, find the cheapest labor in the world. ... In reality, it has left America behind. It has left the American workers behind.”

“America First,” he continued, “is a different model — one that we encourage other countries to consider, which is that our workers come first. ... Sovereignty is your borders. You’re entitled to have borders.”

All of this carries enormous implications for any renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada agreement.

And Carney appears to have been left with no cards to play. China has already seen his hand.

Trump Tells Europe To Put Its Big Boy Pants On

'Forced us in Europe to step up'

New York Times Fact-Checker Needs a Fact-Check

The New York Times employs a "fact-check" reporter, Linda Qiu, who the paper uses to fact-check President Trump but not New York City's truth-stretching Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Qiu's latest article tackles Trump's big speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. It manages to mangle both what Trump actually said and what the truth is.

The post New York Times Fact-Checker Needs a Fact-Check appeared first on .

Glenn Beck: Trump just put the ENTIRE WORLD on notice in his Davos speech



On Wednesday, January 21, President Trump delivered an address at the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, that has the world buzzing. Glenn Beck calls it “the most consequential speech” since Ronald Reagan’s iconic Berlin Wall address.

“He is breaking up the United Nations. He is breaking up the bureaucracy of the WEF. He is putting Europe on notice,” he says.

He was especially impressed when Trump addressed Greenland — specifically when he said, “You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative, or you can say no, and we will remember.”

“I have never heard a president speak to the world like this,” Glenn remarks.

One thing was very clear from Trump’s Davos speech: “The world is changing,” but the U.S. is “carrying a very, very large stick.”

Trump pulled no punches when it came to calling out countries and world leaders. While he expressed love and respect for Europe, he boldly criticized it for importing foreign cultures that are destroying Western civilization.

“Western culture is dying in Europe because you refuse to stand up for it,” Glenn says, summarizing Trump’s words.

“He took on Canada in a way I have never heard before,” he adds, referencing Trump’s pointed rebuke of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

In response to Carney’s speech, delivered the day prior, in which he indirectly accused the United States of strong-arming weaker nations with economic integration, tariffs, and financial tools, Trump fired back, “Canada lives because of the U.S. Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements."

“He didn't even show [Carney] the deference of being prime minister. It was, ‘Mark, you should watch your words,”’ Glenn recaps. “He is not fooling around, and he is declaring an end to this new world order.”

Carney and other world leaders are pushing for “a new world order where the elites all get together from all over the world, and they make the decisions,” he explains.

But Trump’s speech made it crystal clear where he stands on that idea. Glenn summarizes his response: “That hasn't worked. More bureaucracy will not fix it. More globalization, more melding of our countries together will not fix this.”

Glenn then pulls in his head writer and researcher, Jason Buttrill, to explain the full context of Trump’s Greenland comments.

Jason says that during Trump's first term, he pressured NATO allies — including Denmark, which controls Greenland — to allocate more funding to its own defense instead of relying so heavily on the U.S. Trump specifically pushed Denmark to step up security in Greenland, and the Danes agreed, promising to dedicate roughly $224 million to better surveillance, reconnaissance, and Arctic defenses.

However as soon as Trump left office in 2021, Denmark backtracked.

“They only allocated 1% of that entire $224 million,” says Jason. “Most of that money that they set aside for defense went to social programs.”

Trump’s hardline Greenland comments during his speech, he says, are just “Daddy Trump ... providing the tough love.”

To hear more analysis on Trump’s Davos speech, watch the video above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Pressed on Greenland, Trump tells Davos the US has weapons he 'can't even talk about'



President Donald Trump is dropping more hints about the technology used to capture Venezuela's former communist leader Nicolas Maduro.

During his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the president discussed his thoughts on Greenland as a strategic military location against China and Russia.

After saying how "stupid" the United States was to give the territory back to Denmark after World War II, Trump said the world is in greater danger with Greenland exposed.

'They weren't able to fire one shot at us.'

"Now our country and the world face much greater risks than it did ever before because of missiles, because of nuclear, because of weapons of warfare that I can't even talk about," Trump began. He then started discussing the weapons used in the capture of Maduro.

"Two weeks ago, they saw weapons that nobody ever heard of. They weren't able to fire one shot at us. They said, 'What happened?' Everything was discombobulated. They said, 'We've got them in our sights. Press the trigger.' And nothing happened," he told his fellow world leaders.

The president added that Venezuelan defense forces could not fire any anti-aircraft missiles, saying there was "one that went up about 30 feet and crashed down right next to the people that sent it."

"They said, 'What the hell is going on?'" the president added.

RELATED: Chinese women are spending thousands on virtual boyfriends: 'Maybe because real-life marriage is just ... dull'

Much speculation has been given to the types of advanced technology U.S. forces used in Operation Absolute Resolve, including directed-energy weapons.

One of Maduro's security guards described American troops as shooting with "such precision and speed; it felt like each soldier was firing 300 rounds per minute."

The security guard described the Americans launching a "sonic weapon or whatever it was," which was like a "very intense sound wave," and he "felt like" his head "was exploding from the inside."

"We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood," he recalled.

RELATED: Did Trump use the 'Havana syndrome' weapon on Venezuela?

— (@)

As for the unresponsive defense systems Trump described as "made by Russia and by China," reports have claimed that telecommunications towers were among the first targets destroyed by American forces. A Russian-made surface-to-air missile system was also destroyed in airstrikes, others reported.

"So they're going to go back to the drawing boards," Trump remarked.

Much of what the United States has revealed about its weapons systems is already advanced, such as helmet technology that provides a sort of X-ray vision, supported by an interconnected drone and communications network, as well as anti-drone energy weapons.

Trump was eager to explain America's need to acquire Greenland due to it being an "undefended" and "key strategic location" between the United States, Russia, and China.

"We need it for strategic national security and international security," Trump said as the room remained dead silent.

The president also dismissed notions that the real reason to take Greenland was to acquire rare-earth minerals, saying the real rarity lies with processing and that Greenland's minerals are buried deep under ice.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!