'What in the Davos?' Reverse ATMs are the lazy, dystopian cashless future you imagined



"What is a reverse ATM?"

This question has been asked ad nauseum for the last few years, and the answer is somewhere between an unnecessary step and a cashless society.

'Hardly-user friendly.'

Money walks

An early August post asked, "What in the Davos," referring to the home base of the World Economic Forum in Switzerland, where undoubtedly the most controversial world figures come together to coordinate, undoubtedly, the most controversial policies.

The "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy" meme apparently extends to physical money, as well, as one X user's photo read, "reverse ATMs are available throughout the concourse for your convenience."

According to BluePoint ATM Solutions, a "Reverse ATM" is a cash-to-card kiosk that allows users to convert physical cash into a prepaid card.

The kiosks are everywhere now, especially in New York, where they are seen at venues like MVP Arena and the Saratoga Performing Arts Center. In Texas, the San Antonio Zoo says a cashless experience ensures that guests "spend less time in line."

If there is any question as to whether or not the kiosks are connected to the WEF-prescribed future, there are a plethora of horror stories floating around online that confirm the theory.

RELATED: Elderly Air Force veteran assaulted, robbed after withdrawing cash from ATM; video shows juvenile taking victim's wallet

Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Peasant problems

One traveler to Brussels — the home of European Parliament — panicked when she realized she was nearly out of gas and zero locations in the area "employed an actual human attendant."

Her credit cards didn't work anywhere, but her payments weren't being declined, either. Instead, she realized the pumps operate through reverse ATMs: insert cash, get a ticket, scan the ticket at the pump to get gas.

Turns out this was the case in France, too, Ashley Smith wrote. The blogger noted that in many EU states, paying with a credit card forces a €120 deposit, which refunds the difference depending on gas consumption. At the same time, this is disincentivized given that a signature is required for purchases over €100.

With no humans in sight, it's back to the reverse ATM for the peasantry.

Fintech Finance News reported in 2024 that the reverse ATMs are "hardly-user friendly," and one New York location provided no receipt, the card was not reloadable, and users must go through a "time-consuming process" to reclaim any remaining balances.

Similar experiences have been widely discussed online.

RELATED: Violent punks caught on video ganging up on, brutally beating elderly man by Baltimore 7-Eleven — while wielding rifle, sword

Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto/Getty Images

Card sharks

One Reddit post discussed an ice cream shop in Philadelphia that refused a $10 bill, opting for a reverse ATM payment instead. The card didn't work, and an employee told the customer it wasn't his fault before gifting him the treat anyway.

On another thread, users discussed how much money is left unclaimed on the ATM cards. One user said he left $9 on a card at an amusement park because "everything in the park" costs more than that.

Another said the New York MTA had made $100 from his unused cards in just one year.

Detractors say to use the card elsewhere, as it is likely a prepaid VISA or Mastercard. Companies will say it prevents cash theft and reduces labor. This is of course for the business, not the customer, who has to whip out cash at a less secure location and then take extra steps simply to spare the establishment a few minutes of work.

"Minimize pathogen concerns associated with cash," BluePoint ATM says on its website.

Unfortunately, the Federal Reserve says there is no federal statute mandating that a private business, person, or organization "must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services."

Instead, citizens must rely on bylaws, like that of Philadelphia, where under the city's cashless retail prohibition, establishments "may not refuse to accept cash."

It is unclear whether that extends to the ice cream experience, though.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'You are killing ownership': PlayStation goes digital-only as disc-loving gamers rage



Sony PlayStation dropped devastating news to gamers to start July, and the blowback has been nothing short of monumental.

Gaming companies are already seeing the level of disdain typically reserved for politicians and journalists due to subscription costs, micro-transactions, and the ever-increasing price of games.

'This is what happens when you buy digital.'

Now, Sony has given gamers another reason to rage; it is following the, "You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy," World Economic Forum position from 2016.

That phrase has become a meme for a reason, but PlayStation dove headfirst into the theme on Wednesday morning and announced it is ending the production of its physical game discs and will completely cease by January 2028.

"As consumer preferences and the broader entertainment industry continue to shift away from physical discs to digital, physical game disc production for all new games releasing on PlayStation consoles will be discontinued," senior director Sid Shuman wrote.

Shuman, who used "he/him" pronouns on the post, said the move was a "natural direction for Sony" in order to adapt to "consumer trends."

RELATED: A kid got a mint PS1 from his grandpa, and the internet is freaking out

Shuman claimed "digital media significantly outpaces physical discs" and therefore the company will be able to "align more closely" with how most of its community prefers to play games.

Withering criticism of the Sony announcement was immediate.

"You will own nothing," said popular tech page Pirat Nation.

"You are killing ownership. ... You are killing publishers," replied popular hardware page Does It Play.

"Guys, this is a really bad decision. Wtf," Spawn Poiint commented, a popular gaming YouTuber with over one million subscribers.

One reader responded by showing the awful truth of what it means to be digital only:

"This is what happens when you buy digital," the user wrote, along with a photo of a PlayStation Store alert that said "licensing arrangements" meant the user would no longer be able to watch the content he already had in his library.

RELATED: Electronic Arts avoids disaster with $55B deal from Saudi Arabia, Jared Kushner, and others

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The reality of truly not owning the product one has paid for clearly does not sit will with many people. Publishers have wanted this reality of cheaper production for some time, while it has also been a reality that access to certain games or videos has a shelf life, and that depends on licensing agreements.

Issues have popped up over the years that have prevented game owners from playing their own property, and more predominantly, those who have purchased digital media have got the short end of the stick when hoping to watch some of their favorite shows, only to find they had been deleted due to expired publishing agreements.

Also on Wednesday, PlayStation announced it would no longer support its online store for PlayStation 3, which was released in 2006, and the PS Vita, which launched in 2011.

Sony did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Mark Carney Broke Up With America, But For Some Reason He’s Still Parked Outside

Reality just sits there, waiting quietly until everybody gets done performing the fake noises.

Commencement speaker praises AI and globalism — graduates crush her with boos



A commencement speech went off the rails when a speaker got an unexpected response when she brought up artificial intelligence.

Last Friday, graduates from the University of Central Florida returned for their commencement but were seemingly shocked when one of the guests started speaking about technology that could replace them.

'All right. OK. We've got a bipolar topic here.'

The graduates came from the College of Arts and Humanities and the Nicholson School of Communication and Media, so it came as no surprise that an audience of future artists, designers, and media professionals were none too pleased with what the speaker chose to discuss.

"Profound change. Change is exciting. Very exciting. And let's face it, change can be daunting," speaker Gloria Caulfield told the graduates.

Caulfield is an executive from Tavistock Development Company, a major development firm in Central Florida, and she was keen on delivering points that mirror World Economic Forum policy.

"The rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution," Caulfield continued, but this time, she was met with a chorus of boos.

Caulfield was paralyzed and turned to the dais and asked, "Oh, what happened? OK, I struck a chord."

She then asked the audience, "May I finish?" as she laughed. The speaker continued, only for the crowd to react oppositely to her next remark.

"Only a few years ago, AI was not a factor in our lives," Caulfield said. The crowd erupted in huge applause, again sending the speaker into shock.

RELATED: A twisted German just forced a chatbot to simulate a scarily realistic nervous breakdown

- YouTube

The boobirds would make another appearance though.

Caulfield attempted to say the audience was split, stating, "All right. OK. We've got a bipolar topic here," but when she said, "Now, AI capabilities are in the palm of our hands," she was hit with more monumental boos.

The crowd remained subdued for the remainder of the speech though, which only lasted about 11 minutes in total, throughout which Caulfield described AI use as the next "industrial revolution" several times.

She compared it to the launch of the internet and the widespread use of text messages, which she seemingly thought the audience would tell her she was silly for mentioning; she asked for no "giggles" during those remarks.

"I know it sounds amusing, but at that time, we had no idea how any of these technologies would impact the world and our lives," Caulfield continued. "These were some of the same trepidations and concerns we are now facing. But ultimately, it was a game changer for global economic development," she added.

RELATED: That customer service rep with the American accent might still be an Indian guy — here's how

Gloria Caulfield (L), 2025 in New York City. Sean Zanni/Patrick McMullan/Getty Images

Aside from a sometimes hostile graduating class, Caulfield delivered fairly standard globalist talking points that mirror the WEF's pursual of the fourth industrial revolution.

The WEF said in January that its work, moving forward, will focus on AI innovation, energy transition, cyber resilience, and "frontier technologies."

Caulfield also praised previous "revolutions" for creating jobs at Apple, Google, and Meta, before claiming that AI "alongside human intelligence" will help humanity solve some of its greatest problems.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Canada’s Mark Carney Can’t Even Challenge American Hegemony Without American Help

Canada's brave new challenge to American military power requires American weapons and technical support.

‘Gross’: WEF elites push for fake, lab-grown meat



Social media users reacted to elites discussing the consumption of lab-grown meat products during the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, this week.

A video clip circulated on social media on Thursday of Andrea Illy, an Italian businessman and chairman of the coffee company Illycaffè, pushing for the adoption of tech foods.

'This, I know, it’s kind of a cultural revolution.'

Sam Kass, a former White House chef and senior policy adviser for nutrition under former President Barack Obama, said, “A lot of what we’re starting to see are these replacements for these core foods. I’ve tasted a bunch of, you know, ‘future coffee, fake coffee.’ How do you see that application?”

Kass asked for Illy’s opinion on the matter, noting that, while the technology of cultivated food is “smart” and “interesting,” “from a values perspective” and as a chef, he does not want to see a future “where we’re starting to drink coffee from a factory as opposed to from a tree.”

Illy responded, “There is a terrible cultural resistance from [the] consumer to accept tech foods. But in my opinion, they represent the way forward.”

“We know from statistics ... that 70% of the ecological footprint of agriculture is due to animal proteins,” Illy continued.

RELATED: Say no to synthetic: America needs real meat, not lab slop

Andrea Illy. Photo by Robin Marchant/Getty Images for illy caffe

He argued that the “excessive consumption” of meat “is the first cause of noncommunicable diseases,” which he claimed is “the number one health problem in the Western society.”

Illy suggested reducing meat consumption to a “healthy” level, while considering “the environmental impact.”

“Why should I use animals when I can cultivate meat and get only the best part of it?” Illy questioned.

RELATED: Bugs for thee, beef for me: How big business monopolizes meat

Andrea Illy. Photographer: Jose Sarmento Matos/Bloomberg via Getty Images

“This, I know, it’s kind of a cultural revolution,” he added, estimating that it would take decades to get people to adopt lab-grown meat as the new norm.

The WEF website boasts the adoption of cultivated meat. The organization explains that lab-grown meat begins with “extracting stem cells from a small sample of animal tissue” and placing those stem cells in a bioreactor. The WEF claims that cultivated meats offer “a multitude of benefits,” including reduced environmental impacts, lower resource use, elimination of the need to slaughter animals, and elimination of antibiotic use.

X users in the comments seemed less than enthusiastic about tech foods.

“They will eat steaks from the finest beef. Everyone else cancer cells cultivated in a laboratory,” one user wrote.

“Gross,” another stated.

“WEF is full of demons,” a third wrote.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Carney puts America last at Davos; Trump hits back



The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos offered a picture-perfect illustration of the clash between globalism and America First.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney — a longtime advocate of globalist policies, whether as governor of the Bank of England or as a United Nations goodwill ambassador for climate change — delivered a speech that electrified woke forces around the world.

'Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements.'

Yet while Carney proclaimed a kind of independence from U.S. economic and military hegemony, many seemed to forget that he had just signed a trade deal with China — against the backdrop of his declaration that Canada was joining Beijing’s “new world order.”

Past tense

Carney’s address waved a red flag at the United States and President Donald Trump, though he lacked the courage to name either directly. Instead, he spoke of America in the past tense, obliquely warning that the “rules-based international order,” under which “countries like Canada prospered,” was finished.

“We joined its institutions. We praised its principles. We benefited from its predictability,” Carney said.

And because of that, we could pursue values-based foreign policies under its protection.

We knew the story of the international rules-based order was partially false — that the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient, that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically. And we knew that international law applied with varying rigor depending on the identity of the accused or the victim. This fiction was useful, and American hegemony in particular helped provide public goods: open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security, and support for frameworks for resolving disputes.

Then came the line that sent globalist acolytes into rapture.

“This bargain no longer works. Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.”

But isn’t Carney himself the author — and perhaps the finisher — of that rupture? For years, he has worked against the natural alliance between Canada and its largest trading partner and closest military ally. As we have pointed out before, Carney has labored to replace the United States with China as the world’s economic engine.

RELATED: Trump not worried about Canada's China-centric 'new world order'

Brad Smith/ISI Photos/Xinhua News Agency/Getty Images

A little gratitude

Trump was listening — or at least was promptly briefed. During his own address to Davos, the president castigated both Carney and Canada for taking America for granted. Referring to the development of the Golden Dome defense system, Trump noted that it would, “by its very nature,” defend Canada as well.

“Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way,” Trump said. “They should be grateful also, but they’re not. I watched your prime minister yesterday. He wasn’t so grateful.

"Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that, Mark, before you make your statements.”

By Friday morning, Trump had gone farther, withdrawing Carney's invitation to join his proposed “Board of Peace.”

Trump spent much of his Davos remarks ridiculing the globalist “Green New Scam” and questioning why the United States continues to belong to NATO when it derives so little benefit from the arrangement.

Windbag

But his most biting remarks were reserved for the fantasy that green energy can power a modern economy.

China, Trump noted, makes “a fortune selling the windmills.”

“They’re shocked that people continue to buy those damn things,” he continued. “They kill the birds. They ruin your landscapes. Other than that, I think they’re fabulous, by the way. Stupid people buy them."

Trump’s rejection of globalist orthodoxy was reinforced by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

“Globalization has failed the West and the United States of America,” Lutnick said. “It’s a failed policy. It is what the WEF has stood for, which is export, offshore, far-shore, find the cheapest labor in the world. ... In reality, it has left America behind. It has left the American workers behind.”

“America First,” he continued, “is a different model — one that we encourage other countries to consider, which is that our workers come first. ... Sovereignty is your borders. You’re entitled to have borders.”

All of this carries enormous implications for any renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada agreement.

And Carney appears to have been left with no cards to play. China has already seen his hand.

Trump Tells Europe To Put Its Big Boy Pants On

'Forced us in Europe to step up'

New York Times Fact-Checker Needs a Fact-Check

The New York Times employs a "fact-check" reporter, Linda Qiu, who the paper uses to fact-check President Trump but not New York City's truth-stretching Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Qiu's latest article tackles Trump's big speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. It manages to mangle both what Trump actually said and what the truth is.

The post New York Times Fact-Checker Needs a Fact-Check appeared first on .