YouTube bans Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes AGAIN immediately after saying it would support 'free expression'



Less than two days after YouTube was alleged to be giving banned creators a second chance, the platform has reportedly banned controversial commentators Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones.

The news comes after Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) made announcements about how Google, parent of YouTube, was prepared to make a series of policy changes after admitting to the fact that "White House pressure" during the Biden administration led to censorship of "political debate on COVID and elections."

'To clarify, we terminated this channel as it's still against our rules for previously terminated users to start a new channel ...'

Rep. Jordan wrote on X, "Due to our oversight efforts, GOOGLE commits to offer ALL creators previously kicked off YouTube due to political speech violations to return to the platform."

Testing out the new alleged commitments, both Alex Jones' Infowars platform and Fuentes reportedly started new YouTube channels. According to Infowars, it started a channel called AlexJonesLive, while Fuentes reportedly started RealNickFuentes.

On Thursday morning, Infowars said its channel had been removed, while AF Post, along with some Fuentes supporters, said his page was taken down by YouTube as well.

It was not long before YouTube responded to both claims directly and revealed that the pages were not taken down by mistake.

RELATED: Google admits to political censorship under Biden and says thousands of YouTube accounts will be reinstated

— (@)

Replying to Infowars, YouTube said, "To clarify, we terminated this channel as it's still against our rules for previously terminated users to start a new channel — the pilot program for terminations isn't available yet and will be a limited pilot program to start."

The platform added, "We'll have more to share on how the pilot program will work, who is eligible, and how creators can access it very soon."

In response to the report by AF Post, YouTube similarly wrote that the company "terminated these channels as it's still against our rules for previously terminated users to start new channels."

On its own X page, YouTube explained again that the pilot program is not yet live and that it will continue to terminate "new channels from previously terminated users in accordance with these guidelines."

RELATED: War Department contractor warns China is way ahead, and 'we don't know how they're doing it'

— (@)

A spokesman for Rep. Jordan told Blaze News that the new YouTube program will only "extend at a minimum to any users banned for policies no longer in effect."

The spokesman added, "The policies that have been rolled back the most were the COVID-19 and elections policies. This will include thousands of Americans and likely disproportionately conservatives. Others may be welcomed back onto the platform as well."

Jordan's office explained that, as they understand it, YouTube meant that the "limited" portion of the program referred to only users who were banned for policies that were no longer in effect. Still, Jordan's team referred to this as a "massive change," stating they believe it to be the first time YouTube has made a policy shift in this manner.

"But the main fact remains unchanged," the spokesman continued. "ANY account banned for policies no longer in effect WILL be allowed back onto the platform."

Blaze News asked Rep. Jordan's team if they know when the expected pilot program is set to begin; his team said they did not, but that they "expect a much larger announcement in the coming days from YouTube and that people will start returning to the platform soon."

"Our understanding is that YouTube is referring to it as a pilot program because it is a new step YouTube has not taken before, and there may be issues to work through with the rollout," the spokesman added.

— (@)

Fuentes spoke on his channel's deletion his X page on Thursday, noting YouTube's comment about reinstating "channels they approve under a 'limited pilot program.'"

"Sounds a little ridiculous. Can't we just have free speech?" he asked. "I've been banned since February 2020 when I was 21 years old."

He continued on his show, "America First," and revealed it was Jones' idea to do a "stress test" on YouTube by creating new accounts.

"It didn't last even 12 hours," he explained. "YouTube should have free speech; you said you have a renewed commitment to free speech. But you're still banning people?"

Vivek Ramaswamy, Republican candidate for governor of Ohio, said that while he thinks Fuentes may not like him, he still finds it "un-American" for his channel to be removed.

"Our country is at its best when we're able to hear one another," Ramaswamy wrote on X. "Nick Fuentes & Jimmy Kimmel probably don't like me, for different reasons. I don't care. It's still un-American to muzzle the peaceful expression of opinions. And no, that's not a legal point, it's a cultural point."

YouTube did not respond to Blaze News' questions about its pilot program.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

AI chatbots share blame for confusion in wake of Charlie Kirk shooting



Confusion and conspiracy theories abounded in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk last Wednesday. While people attempted to sift through the information they glimpsed in the fog of the aftermath, several prominent AI chatbots may have hindered more than they helped in the pursuit of truth.

A CBS News report revealed several serious issues with multiple chatbots' handling of the facts in the aftermath of Kirk's death and the ensuing manhunt for the alleged shooter.

'It's not based on fact-checking. It's not based on any kind of reportage on the scene.'

The report highlighted several factual inaccuracies stemming from xAI's Grok, search engine Perplexity's AI, and Google's AI overview in the hours and days after the tragedy.

RELATED: Therapists are getting caught using AI on their patients

Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

One of the most important instances came when an X account with 2.3 million followers shared an AI-enhanced photo turned video of the suspect. The AI enhancement smoothed the suspect's features and distorted his clothing considerably. Although the post was flagged by a community note warning that this was not a reliable way to identify a suspect, the post was shared thousands of times and was even reposted by the Washington County Sheriff's Office in Utah before it issued a correction.

Other false reports from Grok include labeling the FBI's reward offer a "hoax" and, according to CBS News, statements that reports concerning Charlie Kirk's condition "remained conflicting" even after the official report of his death was released.

S. Shyam Sundar, a professor at Penn State University and the director of the university's Center for Socially Responsible Artificial Intelligence, told CBS News that AI chatbots produce responses based on probability, which may often lead to inaccurate information in unfolding events.

"They look at what is the most likely next word or next passage," Sundar said. "It's not based on fact-checking. It's not based on any kind of reportage on the scene. It's more based on the likelihood of this event occurring, and if there's enough out there that might question his death, it might pick up on some of that."

Artificial intelligence's sycophantic tendencies may also be to blame, as the third episode of "South Park's" latest season recently highlighted.

Grok, for example, gave a highly flawed response on Friday morning to one user indicating that Tyler Robinson, 22, was opposed to MAGA while his father was a supporter of the movement. In a follow-up question, the user suggested that Robinson's "social media posts" indicated that he may be a MAGA supporter, and Grok quickly changed its tune in its response: "Reports indicate Tyler Robinson is a registered Republican who donated to Trump in 2024. Social media photos show him in a Trump costume for Halloween, and his family appears to support MAGA."

A Grok post timestamped roughly an hour later on Friday denied that he had any known political affiliation, thus showing a discrepancy in responses between users of the same chatbot.

The other AIs fared no better. Perplexity appears to have labeled reports about Kirk's death a "hypothetical scenario" several hours after he was confirmed deceased. According to CBS News, "Google's AI Overview for a search late Thursday evening for Hunter Kozak, the last person to ask Kirk a question before he was killed, incorrectly identified him as the person of interest the FBI was looking for."

While artificial intelligence may be useful for aggregating resources for research, people are realizing that these chatbots are highly flawed when it comes to real-time reporting and separating the wheat from the chaff.

X did not respond to Return's request for comment.

After His Murder, New York Times Assassinates Charlie Kirk’s Character

After Charlie Kirk was murdered, allegedly by a shooter who accused him of 'spreading hate,' the NYT falsely accused Kirk of making antisemitic statements.

Disney Settles With Gina Carano In Wrongful Termination Lawsuit

The Walt Disney Company and Lucasfilm announced Thursday that they have settled with actress Gina Carano in a lawsuit she filed against the entertainment giants last year for alleged wrongful termination. “We have reached an agreement with Gina Carano to resolve the issues in her pending lawsuit against the companies,” a Lucasfilm representative said in a statement. […]

UN associate loses blue check on X after getting hit with US sanctions



Regarding the conflict in the Middle East, many international groups have attempted to curb the United States' policies that support its allies abroad. However, the social media platform X, in cooperation with the United States, has slapped one of its major international detractors with sanctions, set to go into effect later this week.

Francesca Albanese, an Italian associate with the United Nations covering the conflict between Israel and Palestine, lost her verified status on X on Monday. This news comes as the sanctions imposed on her by the United States are set to take effect this week.

'Stripping that badge sends a clear message: Anyone who targets US officials and companies and supports terrorists will suffer consequences, no matter their title.'

In a July 9 press statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he would be imposing sanctions on Albanese, the "Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied since 1967."

Albanese is being sanctioned pursuant to an executive order that sanctions those who "have directly engaged in any effort by the ICC to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute a protected person without consent of that person's country of nationality." The sanctions are set to go into effect August 8, according to a Treasury Department document.

RELATED: Rubio not taking guff from ICC — hammers foreign judges over targeting of US and Israel

Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

On X, Rubio called out Albanese for her "illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt [International Criminal Court] action against U.S. and Israeli officials, companies, and executives."

Rubio explained that her actions are a "gross infringement" on the sovereignty of both the U.S. and Israel because neither country is party to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court.

"This is a major achievement," said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, the organization that led the campaign against Albanese. "Verification on X provided Albanese with many advantages — greater visibility, algorithmic amplification, and an appearance of credibility. Stripping that badge sends a clear message: Anyone who targets U.S. officials and companies and supports terrorists will suffer consequences, no matter their title."

According to the United Nations' website, special rapporteurs "are independent experts appointed to monitor and report on human rights issues worldwide. These experts serve in their personal capacity, are not UN staff and receive no financial remuneration for their work."

The sanctions will reportedly freeze Albanese's U.S. assets, bar her from entering the country, and prohibit U.S. citizens from selling to her.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here.

Democrats get too honest about life under President Biden, delete embarrassing post



The official Democratic Party X account made a monumental blunder late Thursday when it was a little too honest about the state of the country under President Biden.

It was just after dinner time when the Democrats' account attempted to do what it typically does: dunk on President Trump.

The account decided to make a post mocking "Trump's America," but unfortunately for Democrats, it immediately backfired.

'The democrats really thought they had something there.'

The Democrats posted an image on X titled "U.S. Grocery Prices Reach Record Highs in 2025," followed by the caption, "Prices are higher today than they were on July 2024 all in major categories listed below."

The attached graph showed prices of cheese, alcohol, grocery, dairy, produce, and meat.

In addition to the confusing double-speak, the graph showed that prices skyrocketed in 2021 and continued to creep upward through 2024.

It did not take long for readers to notice that the Democrats were accidentally highlighting the stark increase in prices that caused so much suffering under President Biden's term.

President Trump's rapid response team replied to the post almost immediately and pointed out that most of the prices started going down when President Trump took office.

Reporters soon noticed the Democrats had apparently deleted their post, but luckily an X user managed to archive the image for the whole world to see.

RELATED: Democrats left with egg on their face after cost of a dozen plummets under Trump

Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images

"Obviously, the Democrats deleted it," Fox News host Carley Shimkus said on Friday morning.

She added, "They were saying that all of these prices have gone up in 2025. That's what the headline read. But when you read the graph, the highest points were during Joe Biden's administration."

Readers reacted to the Democrats with shock and awe, with one user writing on X, "The democrats really thought they had something there."

Another X user replied that it seemed "insane that not one person actually looked at the graph before green lighting the post."

While it is true that prices could always stand to come down more, the fact remains that cost of living under the current president has gone down in key areas.

RELATED: Illegal labor isn’t farming’s future. It’s Big Ag’s crutch.

US President Joe Biden (L) visit Mario's Westside Market grocery store alongside US Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV) in Las Vegas, Nevada, on July 16, 2024. Photo by KENT NISHIMURA/AFP via Getty Images

Not only did Americans enjoy a more affordable Fourth of July in 2025 under Trump, but the president has certainly followed through on one of his biggest promises that greatly affects families.

The price of eggs had dropped by 61% between Trump's inauguration and June, with even CNN admitting that the president's "egg price fiction has suddenly become reality."

Egg prices have ticked up in July to an average of $3.37 per dozen at the time of this writing, according to Trading Economics. However, this is nowhere near the more than $8 Americans were paying in March after prices exploded at the end of Biden's term.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Daily Wire's Michael Knowles faces de-banking over alleged 'legally binding order'



A major payment processing platform revealed that it halted payouts to a Daily Wire political commentator due to "a legally binding order."

On Monday, Michael Knowles accused payment platform Stripe of possibly "de-banking" him. He speculated that the suspension was a reaction to his political opinions.

'Looking forward to resolving this issue with Tennessee.'

"Hi, @Stripe. Are we still doing this de-banking thing? Was it something I said?" Knowles wrote. "If we say that men can't be women, if we donate to pro-life charities, if we oppose two men buying eggs, renting wombs, and commoditizing babies."

"Does that come at the cost of de-banking?" he questioned.

In a multi-post thread, the Daily Wire host explained that payments from his monetized X account "abruptly stopped" six months ago. Assuming it was "an innocent mistake," he reached out to Stripe's user support to rectify the issue.

Stripe's support team confirmed that it had "temporarily disabled" his payouts, stating that it sent a message to X in October with more details about the pause, according to screenshots uploaded by Knowles.

The payment platform reportedly instructed him to contact X directly to obtain more information.

"I would recommend contacting your platform for more information, as we can't provide any further information on this account hold," a screenshot of a support email reads.

RELATED: Wikipedia blacklists Blaze News and other right-leaning sources, ensuring it's a one-stop liberal propaganda shop

Photo Illustration by Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Knowles said that he then asked X for assistance on the matter, but its team referred him back to Stripe.

"We have confirmed this issue is not on our end — and you will need to login [sic] to Stripe and contact them to sort this out," an X team member reportedly wrote.

Knowles concluded that Stripe's decision to suspend his account was likely a retaliatory act due to his political views, emphasizing that he had not violated any of the platform's stated "prohibited businesses" rules.

"Since I haven't been distributing fake IDs, selling drugs, or jamming telecommunications equipment, it seems Stripe concluded that my political opinions had somehow violated their policy against encouraging 'unlawful violence' against certain demographics," Knowles stated. "Of course, I've never encouraged 'unlawful violence' against anyone. But in the absence of any real explanation from Stripe, I can only conclude that they've now decided that certain conservative opinions amount to 'illegal' activity."

RELATED: Major bank announces end of de-banking policies on guns and political affiliation

Michael Knowles. Photo by Jason Davis/Getty Images for The Daily Wire

Stripe responded to Knowles, requesting that he contact them directly to resolve the issue.

A few hours later, Stripe reached out again, offering additional information about the circumstances surrounding the pause. Yet its second post raised more questions than it answered.

"By way of follow-up, we can confirm that the restrictions placed on your account were not taken unilaterally by Stripe, but were the result of a legally binding order that was issued to us. Our support team previously reached out to X regarding this matter. In order to maintain your privacy, we are following up with you in a separate email with additional information," Stripe wrote.

While it remains unclear what the order pertains to, Knowles provided an update on the issue on Tuesday afternoon.

"I'm pleased to say Stripe has reached out to resolve this strange issue, which appears to have begun with a government administrative error rather than intentional de-banking," Knowles wrote. "As we investigate, I'm even more pleased to say that we're also exploring legislative solutions to the lack of transparency that often makes these issues unresolvable for countless Americans. Will discuss more on the show and keep everyone posted as this develops."

Stripe responded, stating, "Thanks for working with us. Looking forward to resolving this issue with Tennessee. At Stripe, our role is to process payments — we do not take action on accounts based on political speech."

When reached for comment, Stripe referred Blaze News to its response to Knowles on X.

X did not respond to a request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!