South Korea's January 6: Is the deep state to blame?



As I write this, South Korea stands on the precipice of its most significant political crisis in decades.

The Constitutional Court has launched impeachment proceedings against President Yoon Suk Yeol, who stands accused of declaring martial law to block the reversal of his suspension of civilian rule.

'Right-leaning people have told me that they find Yoon's personality unresponsive and distant. Leftists dislike him as a matter of course.'

Now barricaded in his residence under heavy security, Yoon refuses to appear in court or cooperate with investigations into charges of insurrection. His defiance has thrown South Korea’s democracy into uncharted territory, plunging the nation into a perilous political storm.

Yet while this crisis is uniquely Korean in its immediate context, the deeper story carries clear traces of American influence. The origins of South Korea’s “deep state” — a covert network of military, intelligence, and corporate power — can be traced back to U.S. involvement during the Cold War. The turmoil unfolding today is, in many ways, a direct consequence of those historical interventions.

Cold War seeds

Following World War II, the United States carved the Korean Peninsula in half, creating an artificial divide between North and South. In its quest to establish a bulwark against communism, the U.S. installed Syngman Rhee, a staunch anti-communist, as South Korea’s president. To solidify control, Washington integrated former Japanese collaborators into the nation’s security apparatus, building an authoritarian system designed to suppress dissent and maintain order.

The Korean War entrenched these dynamics further. The conflict, framed as a battle between democracy and communism, became a proxy war, with America deeply embedded in South Korea’s military and intelligence systems. By the war’s end, in 1953, South Korea was firmly bound to a militarized political order aligned with U.S. strategic priorities.

Figures like Park Chung-hee, who seized power in 1961, emerged as key architects of this hierarchical system, one deeply intertwined with U.S. Cold War strategy in Asia. At the request of the United States, Park committed approximately 320,000 South Korean troops to fight alongside U.S. forces in the Vietnam War — a contribution second only to that of the United States itself.

Officially, this massive deployment was framed as a way to strengthen ties with Washington, combat the spread of communism in East Asia, and elevate South Korea’s standing on the global stage. However, this partnership also solidified U.S. influence over South Korea’s military and political apparatus, embedding a framework of control that combined economic ambition with authoritarian suppression of dissent.

Park’s rule, praised by the U.S. for driving rapid industrial growth, simultaneously relied on the heavy hand of state security forces to silence opposition — entrenching a system that still casts a shadow over South Korea today.

Parallels with the American deep state

The parallels between South Korea’s deep state and its American counterpart are impossible to ignore. In the United States, unelected entities like the CIA and NSA operate with near-absolute freedom, running covert operations and mass surveillance programs that skirt democratic accountability.

Meanwhile, corporate giants like Google, Amazon, and BlackRock have cemented their place within this system, ensuring their interests often outweigh those of the public. The result is a seamless merger of private and governmental power, where transparency and accountability are nonexistent.

In South Korea, this pattern repeats itself through the chaebols — massive conglomerates like Samsung and Hyundai — that dominate the country’s economy and exert a disproportionate influence on policy. These family-run corporations have long been entwined with the government, creating a system where power remains concentrated and largely unchecked. President Yoon’s martial law declaration is a timely reminder of how deeply these forces are entrenched.

A fascinating figure in a fractured system

To understand Yoon’s fall from grace, one must examine his rather unique rise to power. As Peter Paik, an award-winning poet and professor at Yonsei University in Seoul, explains to Align, Yoon’s career has been a study in contradictions.

“President Yoon Suk Yeol was a prosecutor who made his name investigating prominent political figures," says Paik. "He was originally seen as a bulldog of the liberal side, having carried out the investigation of the National Intelligence Service for interfering in the presidential election of 2012 on behalf of the conservative candidate and eventual winner, Park Geun-hye. He paid a price for this investigation, as he was banished from Seoul to a provincial city, Daegu, after carrying it out.”

Yoon’s tenure as prosecutor-general was marked by high-profile investigations into corruption at the highest levels. Paik continues:

Appointed by liberal President Moon Jae-in to investigate corruption at the highest levels of government, Yoon succeeded in convicting conservative former Presidents Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye, and both ended up serving time in prison. Yoon had been appointed the prosecutor-general by liberal President Moon Jae-in, but the two came into conflict. Yoon investigated President Moon's choice for justice minister, Cho Kuk, who was eventually convicted of forging documents to enable his children to gain admission into prestigious universities.

Yoon’s decision to align with the conservative People Power Party and run for president alienated him from former allies. He promised transparent leadership but quickly disappointed the public, as Paik notes.

Yoon promised to provide open and transparent leadership but soon disappointed people who found him aloof, remote, and inflexible. Even conservatives found it difficult to warm to him. Right-leaning people have told me that they find Yoon's personality unresponsive and distant. Leftists dislike him as a matter of course.

The shadow of shamanism

Yoon’s presidency has been plagued by scandals, including allegations of shamanistic influence and controversies surrounding his wife, Kim Keon-hee. Paik remarks on these peculiarities.

There was a stir when Yoon was photographed with the Chinese character for "king" painted on his palm, which people speculate came from a shamanic ritual aimed at helping him to win the presidency. There are rumors that Yoon's decision to declare martial law arose from advice given to his adviser by a shaman — apparently the date on which he did so was considered to be an auspicious one.

Kim Keon-hee has also drawn criticism for alleged corruption and her controversial past.

“Kim Keon-hee, his wife, is accused of having plagiarized her Ph.D. thesis in English literature. She is also rumored to have worked as an upscale bar hostess, which is essentially the same thing as a courtesan. She has had extensive plastic surgery since she was a teenager. The presidential couple have no children but own several dogs" — a seemingly trivial detail, until you ask yourself: How many presidential couples in history have had no children?

The road ahead

South Korea’s political polarization mirrors the deep fractures within its governance. Paik paints a grim picture of the nation’s future.

“Politics are extremely polarized in South Korea — the rival parties show almost no willingness to cooperate with each other. Once the liberals gained a majority, they sought to impeach Yoon. The country is likely to experience more political convulsions ahead.”

Yoon’s impeachment trial is not just a referendum on his presidency but a test of South Korea’s democratic resilience. The deep state, born of Cold War exigencies and American intervention, remains a potent force shaping the nation’s trajectory. Whether South Korea can emerge from this crisis stronger or will fall deeper into political turmoil remains to be seen. One thing is certain, however: The roots of this crisis stretch far beyond its borders, into the corridors of power in Washington.

‘Let this serve as a great reminder’ — why South Korean martial law decree is a warning for America



Yesterday, South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law for the first time in 50 years. Within moments of this declaration, police and armed troops assembled en masse around the National Assembly parliament building. Mobs of citizens gathered in protest, and opposition lawmakers tried to push through the military blockade to get to the voting chamber and overturn Yeol’s decree.

Video footage captures struggles between angry civilians and heavily armed military personnel. Thankfully, tensions did not turn violent, and martial law was overturned quickly.

However, the incident, brief as it is, serves as a warning for all Americans.

“Globally, [South Korea is] ranked first in education, first in soft power, fifth in military might, sixth in innovation. This is one of the most developed countries in the world, so why are we seeing the military come out in the streets and rise up against its own people?” asks Sara Gonzales.

She then points out that South Korea’s government is structured very similarly to that of the United States — with one critical exception.

“South Korea has no Bill of Rights, so there's nothing prohibiting government from seizing that power,” says Sara.

South Korean citizens are already “very, very limited in the guns that they are able to own,” and even when they legally purchase a weapon, it must “be stored at police stations when not in use.”

“Tell me how that's helpful when it's the police force that's coming at you, and they won't let you go to the police station to get your citizen-owned firearm,” says Sara, who hypothesizes that if our Bill of Rights, specifically our Second Amendment, didn’t exist, “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and Barack Obama and all of these leftist tyrants would ... have already tried something like this.”

“Let this [incident in South Korea] serve as a great reminder of how bad it can get if you allow your government ... to chip away at your Second Amendment right, which is, of course, what the left is trying to do,” she warns.

To hear more of Sara’s commentary and see the footage from South Korea, watch the episode above.

Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

How Far Will Corporate Media Go To Cover For And Re-Elect Joe Biden?

The president’s press conference cheat sheet raises serious questions about journalistic ethics as well as his declining mental state.

Congress Applauds South Korean President For Condemning ‘Disinformation’

Members of Congress applauded South Korean President Yoon Suk-Yeol as he lambasted “disinformation” and “propaganda” as threats to democracy during an address to a joint session on Wednesday. Yoon, who is on a state visit to the U.S., argued that disinformation harms the rule of law, and exhorted members of Congress to fight against it […]

South Korean president accused of 'major diplomatic mishap' after remarks insulting US caught on hot mic



South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was accused of a "major diplomatic mishap" Wednesday after his insult of the United States was caught on a hot mic.

What did Yoon say?

President Joe Biden delivered a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in which he pledged to increase American contributions to the U.N. General Fund, action that would require congressional approval.

After meeting with Biden on Wednesday, Yoon was caught on camera insulting Congress, suggesting lawmakers may block Biden from fulfilling his promise.

"How could Biden not lose damn face if these f***ers do not pass it in Congress?" Yoon told his aides, a comment caught on a hot mic, Agence France-Presse reported.

Park Hong-keun — the top member of South Korea's Democratic Party, the opposing party to Yoon's People Power Party — condemned Yoon and alleged his "foul language tarnishing the U.S. Congress caused a major diplomatic mishap."

Yoon's office, however, defended the remarks.

"He wasn't speaking publicly on the stage but in passing, and although I don't know who recorded it and how, I actually think it should be verified," said an official for the South Korean presidential office.

"I think it's highly inappropriate to draw a link between private remarks and diplomatic accomplishments," the official added, apparently referring to Park's criticism. "It's quite regrettable that a diplomatic disaster is being talked about over something like that when he is doing everything to complete a demanding schedule in the national interest of the Republic of Korea."

Although he has only been president since May, Yoon is unpopular. His approval rating tanked to just 24% recently before rising to a paltry 32%, AFP reported.

What did the WH say?

The White House has not responded directly to Yoon's remark.

However, after Biden informally met with Yoon, the White House released a statement explaining what the world leader's discussed.

"The two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to strengthen the U.S.-ROK alliance and ensure close cooperation to address the threat posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK)," the White House readout of the meeting said.

"The Presidents also discussed our ongoing cooperation on a broad range of priority issues including supply chain resilience, critical technologies, economic and energy security, global health, and climate change," it added.