How State Prosecutors Can Send Tony Fauci To Rot In Prison
Fauci's diary, paired with my own memoir of the pandemic, provides some of the very best evidence that Anthony Fauci should rot in prison.Fauci's diary, paired with my own memoir of the pandemic, provides some of the very best evidence that Anthony Fauci should rot in prison.Fauci's agency backed an experiment aerosolizing lethal Ebola — then he panicked about what it exposed about vaccination
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under Anthony Fauci funded deadly gain-of-function research on coronaviruses at the likely Chinese epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, SARS-COV-2 was apparently not the first deadly virus that created panic in the former NIAID director's office.
'I believe all of this is important for bio defense.'
According to a journal entry obtained by Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and published by Just the News, Fauci privately expressed terror upon learning that his agency had supported a U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases experiment that took Ebola — a deadly virus with a case fatality rate ranging from 25% to 90% in recent outbreaks — and aerosolized it, thereby making it airborne.
Fauci appeared to be more concerned about what damning insights the killer form of Ebola provided into a relevant vaccine than about his agency's role in the production of an airborne plague.
In a journal entry dated March 7, 2016, Fauci wrote that he was informed "about a crazy situation where USAMRIID did an aerosolized challenge of Zika in NHPs and showed that the VSV vaccine did not protect (no surprise). However, they showed that although the 2 control animals died and 16 of 20 vaccinated animals died, there was more inflammation in the lungs of the vaccinated animals – implying that vaccination is bad."
Fauci accused "those guys at USAMRIID" of being "idiots."
RELATED: First domino to fall? Fauci's 'consigliere' pleads GUILTY to role in COVID cover-up
Two days later, Fauci wrote that he had a teleconference with officials from the White House, the CIA, the National Intelligence Authority, the Pentagon, and the Department of Health and Human services "regarding an experiment that the USAMRIID did that challenged [nonhuman primates] with aerosolized Ebola to see if the [vesicular stomatitis virus] vaccine protected. Obviously, it did not. Stupid experiment."
The two unvaccinated primates in the experiment's control group did not have inflammation in the lung, but Fauci noted that the "vaccinated animals had necrosis, inflammation and fibrin in the lungs."
After highlighting the finding that Ebola vaccination was apparently a liability in this case, Fauci stated, "This should have been a classified experiment. The foolish DOD people send the data to the FDA and then circulated as FYI to various embassies including to those in West Africa where we are about to engage on a much larger DSD vaccine trial for Ebola."
"The embassies in West Africa (Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone) as you might expect went bonkers since it looks like we're going to vaccinated [sic] people with the dangers [sic] vaccine," added Fauci.
The Obama administration announced plans in early 2015 to begin testing Ebola vaccines in Africa and conducted Ebola vaccine trials in Africa well into 2016. Fauci publicly stated at the time, "A safe and effective vaccine will undoubtedly be a critical tool."
In his journal, Fauci bemoaned the lack of secrecy about the Pentagon's "bioterror related experiments using a variety of Ebola vaccines to determine their efficacy against aerosolized challenge with people," then suggested that government researchers should refrain from publishing such experiments "since they could indicate a vulnerability."
Fauci concluded the March 9, 2016, entry by writing, "I believe all of this is important for bio defense, but has little to do with naturally emerging Ebola outbreaks. Nonetheless, the idea that the vaccine can do harm is now causing people a great deal of concern."
According to NIAID documents released by Sen. Paul, Fauci's agency funded at least one of the Ebola aerosol experiments.
Paul noted, "The study was conducted at the Army's infectious disease institute at Fort Detrick under a NIAID task order, an engineered exposure that drove the virus deep into the lung in a way natural infection would not. NIAID helped craft the study design. Its own internal report later confirmed: 'NIAID provided funds.'"
That "internal report" was attached to an email sent to Fauci by Michael Kurilla on March 18, 2016, in response to a request from Fauci. "This originated with concerns that NIAID undertook studies that should have been classified (or perhaps even never conducted)," Kurilla wrote.
In a March 10, 2016, email to an underling at NIAID, Fauci noted that he "almost fell off [his] chair" when the Pentagon admitted at the multi-agency that it funded the experiment with NIAID.
Fauci subsequently demanded more information about his agency's involvement with the experiments, telling subordinates in a March 11 email, "No one will get hurt if they made a mistake, but then they told me the truth. If someone does not tell me the truth and I find out they did not, then they are gone."
Last month, Fauci's former senior adviser and longtime acolyte David Morens pleaded guilty to his role in the attempted cover-up of federal records pertaining to the origin of the COVID-19 virus and to a clandestine initiative to restore U.S. funding to the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The NIAID, USAMRIID, and a legal representative for Fauci did not respond to Blaze News' requests for comment. Kurilla could not be reached for comment.
Sen. Paul told Just the News, "Americans deserve to know what kind of risky research their taxpayer dollars are funding. It is clear additional oversight is needed into what Dr. Fauci's institute was paying for long before COVID."
Dr. Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, told Blaze News that the Ebola aerosol experiments were unjustified:
Ferret models of Ebola virus infection by the intramuscular route and the intranasal route already had been performed and published. There was no legitimate justification for performing an animal study — especially an extremely costly primate study — of Ebola virus infection by aerosols in an aerosol chamber. The fact that the NIAID funded and DOD performed this redundant, pointless, and extremely costly study underscores the over-funding, excess capacity, and waste in U.S. bioweapons-agents research and the opportunities for reductions in over-funding, excess capacity, and waste in U.S. bioweapons-agents research.
Ebright added that Fauci's "main reaction to the study was that its existence and its results needed to be classified, in order to prevent policymakers and the public from learning about its existence and drawing conclusions from its results."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Legacy Media Implode Over Losing White House Passes While The Rest Of America Shrugs
The latest controversy over the White House removing the press credentials of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico further exposes legacy media’s delusions of their own self-importance.Ron Johnson amplifies voices of vaccine-injured Canadians in COVID reckoning
For years, Canadians who say they were seriously injured by COVID-19 vaccines have sought recognition from their government. This week, some of them are getting the opportunity to tell their stories on Parliament Hill — with a powerful U.S. senator joining them.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and one of Washington's most persistent critics of the government's pandemic response, appeared Tuesday at the opening of the Allison Inquiry in Ottawa.
'By the time the COVID vaccines obtained their emergency use authorizations, the cartel was firmly in control of the narrative.'
The four-day inquiry is chaired by Conservative Member of Parliament Dean Allison and organized with the Covid Testimony Association. Its stated purpose is to hear testimony from Canadians who attribute serious injuries to COVID-19 vaccination. It is being held on Parliament Hill, although it is not an official parliamentary inquiry.
Questioning the narrative
Johnson opened his testimony by questioning fundamental elements of the public health response to COVID-19, including the treatment of natural immunity and doctors who advocated early treatment.
“Haven't we always believed that early disease detection prompts early treatment and produces better outcomes? Why was that fundamental tenet of medicine not only ignored but sabotaged?” Johnson asked. “Why were frontline doctors who had the courage and compassion to treat COVID patients from the start of the pandemic censored, vilified, and had their careers destroyed?”
“How could health officials deny the effectiveness of natural immunity when approximately half of the people testing positive for COVID were asymptomatic?” he continued. “Isn't that a sign that your natural immunity is preventing you from getting ill?”
Johnson's war
Johnson has been pursuing many of the same questions in Washington as chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
In April, the subcommittee released a 38-page interim report alleging that FDA officials failed to act on a newer data-analysis method that identified previously undetected safety signals that the agency's existing methodology had failed to detect.
The investigation drew renewed attention in July as Johnson's committee continued examining how federal officials handled reports of possible vaccine side effects and whether potential safety signals were adequately disclosed to the public. Later that month, Johnson requested transcribed interviews with Dr. Anthony Fauci and four former FDA officials about their roles in the pandemic response, including vaccine safety and efficacy
In August, Johnson's investigation obtained Fauci's government-issued cell phone, containing more than 34,000 text messages and 500 voicemails. Johnson and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) subsequently began releasing material from the phone as part of their continuing investigation into the government's pandemic response.
Follow the science?
Johnson brought that investigation to Ottawa on Tuesday, where he used his appearance at the Allison Inquiry to deliver a broader indictment of the pandemic response.
“By the time the COVID vaccines obtained their emergency use authorizations, the cartel was firmly in control of the narrative,” Johnson said, using his term for the government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, media organizations, and technology companies he blames for suppressing dissent during the pandemic.
He recalled slogans including “follow the science,” “safe and effective,” and “no one is safe until everyone is safe.”
“Which, by the way, if the vaccines were that effective, why would you care whether somebody else is vaccinated?” Johnson asked. “I mean, it never made sense to me. ... These phrases were used ad nauseam to bludgeon the public into submission.”
From 'injury' to 'impact'
Canada does have a federal program to compensate people who have suffered serious and permanent injuries following vaccination. The Vaccine Injury Support Program began in 2021 and was initially administered by a third party before being taken over by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
The program itself has faced scrutiny. PHAC terminated its contract with the original administrator after an audit found serious problems with its handling of claims. The agency subsequently took over administration of the program and renamed it the Vaccine Impact Support Program in April.
The Allison Inquiry says it received more than 1,400 applications from people willing to testify about alleged vaccine injuries.
Johnson also alleged that federal regulators failed to adequately investigate vaccine safety signals.
“A few months into the vaccine rollout, my investigations have shown that the FDA and CDC were not doing sincere safety surveillance,” he said. “And it appears this willful ignorance was a worldwide phenomenon.”
What about Dr. Tam?
That question of what Canadian health authorities knew eventually brought the hearing to Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada's former chief public health officer.
During questioning, Conservative MP Ellis Ross asked Johnson whether Tam's name had surfaced in the millions of pages of federal documents obtained by his investigation.
“I've not heard of Dr. Tam. I may have, but, you know, the name didn't register,” Johnson replied. “What I will do is I'll have that as a search term with the emails and texts and I'll see. We'll check it out.”
Johnson then addressed his staff, telling them to add Tam's name to their searches.
“We'll put that in. We'll see if there's any [mentions],” he said.
Johnson went on to say his investigators were finding what he described as “a great deal of cooperation between Fauci and federal health officials and Chinese officials,” but said he was not yet prepared to disclose specifics.
“As we get more and more information, we'll start releasing that,” Johnson said. “We kind of got to put the whole package together, but stay tuned on some of those things.”
Lindsay Clancy Jurors Are Reminiscent Of The Covid Cult
The majority badgered and bullied the holdout juror who didn't 'trust the experts' on the 'science' of postpartum psychosis. Sound familiar?Dr. Ebright to 'Rufo & Lomez': Fauci's pardon isn't dated to 2014 by accident — it's dated to a very important grant
Just hours before leaving office, former President Joe Biden issued a pardon for Anthony Fauci, granting the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases a pass for possible federal crimes going back to Jan. 1, 2014.
The pardon's 10-year span seems to be anything but arbitrary.
'Anthony Fauci, in his role as NIAID director, repeatedly and flagrantly, misfeasantly, violated US government policies.'
Florida Sen. Ashley Moody (R) asked Fauci during a congressional hearing on July 29, "Did you specifically ask that it be dated back to the beginning of 2014?"
As he had more than 100 times that day, Fauci declined to answer, citing the Fifth Amendment.
Nevertheless, Moody persisted, "I'm just very interested why it was this date. Did it have anything to do with the fact that 2014 was also the year that the NIAID or [National Institutes of Health] began funding EcoHealth Alliance's 'Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence' grant?"
RELATED: First domino to fall? Fauci's 'consigliere' pleads GUILTY to role in COVID cover-up
While Fauci dodged Moody's question, Dr. Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, revealed the damning significance of the pardon's start date to Christopher Rufo and Jonathan Keeperman on the Tuesday episode of BlazeTV's "Rufo & Lomez."
"I can say that Anthony Fauci approved a research grant that supported high-risk virus discovery research and very high-risk virus gain-of-function research on SARS coronaviruses in Wuhan, China, starting in 2014," Ebright told Rufo and Keeperman.
In 2014, EcoHealth Alliance — the now-defunct organization that was run by debarred British zoologist Peter Daszak, a Fauci ally — sub-awarded the NIH-NIAID grant for the project "Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where dangerous experiments were conducted on coronaviruses.
"I can also say that Anthony Fauci, in his role as NIAID director, repeatedly and flagrantly, misfeasantly, violated U.S. government policies that were put in effect in 2014 to protect the public from laboratory-generated pandemics — specifically a pause that was put in place in October 2014 that precluded federal funding of gain-of-function research on influenza viruses, MERS viruses, and SARS viruses," Ebright claimed.
In the wake of several biosafety incidents at federal research facilities, the Obama White House and the Department of Health and Human Services announced on Oct. 17, 2014, that the government was "launching a deliberative process to assess the potential risks and benefits associated with a subset of life sciences research known as 'gain-of-function' studies."
During this deliberation period, government funding was paused for new studies involving gain-of-function experiments on influenza, SARS, or MERS viruses. In addition to cutting off funding, the Obama administration urged researchers presently engaged in gain-of-function experimentation to "voluntarily pause their research while risks and benefits are being reassessed."
The HHS' Tracking Accountability in Government Grants System website shows that the grant to EcoHealth Alliance was secured from the NIAID just months before the pause and that it continued receiving taxpayer funds well into the pandemic.
Ebright claimed further that while the federal pause "most definitely covered the research in that grant proposal," Fauci and his office "continued the funding in flagrant violation, open violation of the pause."
Ebright noted that the first Trump administration ended the 2014 pause on funding for gain-of-function research and conditioned new approvals on greater scrutiny "about proposed research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens," or P3CO.
"Anthony Fauci personally approved for renewal the grant that was started in 2014, was approved for renewal in 2019 in violation of the P3CO policy. It was approved without the required HHS secretary-level review," claimed Ebright.
"Anthony Fauci funded research that directly contributed to the cause of COVID, ... to 20 million deaths, and $25 trillion in economic damages," Ebright claimed in summary.
"It is plausible, I think, likely that the date of the pardon specifically matches the beginning of the approval of that grant and the series of misfeasant events beginning in late 2014 that continued the funding in violation of U.S. government policies."
Blaze News did not immediately receive a response from a legal representative for Fauci.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Leftists Will Never Self-Reflect, And They Will Never Apologize For The Horrors They Inflict
Remorse and atonement do not exist in the leftist mindset.Fauci’s Egomania Destroyed Lives Both On A Large Scale And On A Personal Level
It's clear that Fauci was driven by his own selfish interests.Today's top stories
thefederalist.com
www.theblaze.com
www.theblaze.com