VIDEO: Mom fights off home invader's attempted sexual attack — then cops uncover alleged mastermind's chilling betrayal



An Arizona man conspired with an online stranger to have the man's fiancée sexually assaulted at their home while the couple's two young children were inside, according to authorities.

The Buckeye Police Department said in a statement that officers responded to a residence around 6 p.m. Oct. 16.

'The more you threaten her, the more she'll get into it.'

"A woman reported that she was home with her two children when an unknown man walked into her house and attacked her," police stated. "The victim fought off the suspect, who then left the scene before officers arrived."

The alleged victim said her attacker tried to strangle her, and she retaliated by punching, kicking, and choking her assailant.

Court documents said the alleged assailant also kicked the mother's 17-month-old daughter, which caused the toddler to fall and hit her head on a baby gate.

The woman said her 2-month-old son was sleeping in a bedroom during the altercation.

Investigators recovered home security video of the altercation between the mother and the suspect, identified by police as 20-year-old Adrian Ayala.

KTVK-TV reported, "In home security video of the assault, Ayala can be heard telling the victim that her partner sent him to sexually assault her. Ayala told the victim he met her partner on Reddit, police said."

Investigators identified the woman's fiancé as 23-year-old Zarian Dyer, who allegedly conspired with Ayala to orchestrate the attack.

Law enforcement officers said they discovered that Dyer and Ayala were exchanging messages on Reddit.

KPNX-TV reported that the account linked to Ayala sent a message asking if the woman was "in on" the plan, but the other account responded by saying, "Nope."

According to court records, a message from the account allegedly connected to Dyer stated: "You can't tell her I told you or sent you either. You just gotta do it. I understand if it's too much."

A message from the alleged Ayala account asked if they could get in trouble, and the reply advised Ayala to "run to your car and leave, and we can pretend this didn't happen."

Court records indicate that a message from Ayala's alleged account said he would "have to back out" because he was "not comfortable if she not into it."

Court documents show that a message from Dyer's alleged account stated, "The more you threaten her, the more she'll get into it."

Around 5 p.m. on the day of the alleged assault, a message from Dyer's alleged account urged Ayala to "get here faster" because he was attempting to "fake kill time" at a nearby grocery store, according to court documents.

Court documents said police obtained video showing Dyer at a grocery store around 5:30 p.m. Oct. 16 but that he left after approximately 10 minutes, and he didn't purchase anything.

A message from Dyer's alleged account to Ayala at 5:57 p.m. read: "Time's up bro" and told him to "run away when she gets bad."

According to court documents, a 6:04 p.m. message from Ayala's alleged account stated: "I'm so sorry."

Police said a response from Dyer's alleged account read, "I'm deleting this account. You should too."

According to KTVK, Dyer told police that when he arrived at the home, he jumped out of the car and began chasing Ayala. The station added that Dyer claimed the two got into a fight before Ayala took off — but police said home video showed Dyer sitting in his car for 44 seconds before chasing Ayala.

Court records stated that the alleged victim claimed Ayala attempted to remove her clothes, but she was able to escape.

A neighbor heard the woman screaming, so she called police, according to court documents, which added that Ayala told the alleged victim, "Your boyfriend told me you'd be into this."

Investigators identified Ayala through license plate camera data and vehicle records.

The alleged victim said Dyer had gone to the grocery store when the incident took place.

Ayala, of Goodyear, was arrested the next day.

KSAZ-TV reported that when Ayala was arrested, he reportedly told investigators the he "went to the victim’s home after meeting her fiancé online and entering into an agreement with him to sexually assault the victim."

RELATED: Father sexually abuses teen girl while flying with his wife and 4 kids — victim captures 'appalling act' on video

Detectives seized electronic devices belonging to both Ayala and Dyer, according to court records.

Buckeye Police noted that "in reviewing data from those devices, investigators found evidence that Ayala and Dyer were communicating about the planned assault."

Dyer has denied the accusations, according to police.

When confronted with information about the Reddit messages, Dyer "remained quiet with his head down," court documents indicated.

"Each thing Zarian was confronted with, he did not answer directly and deflected to go onto another topic," court records said, according to KTVK.

Dyer was arrested and hit with eight charges, including aggravated assault, sexual abuse, attempted sexual assault, kidnapping, and conspiracy — and his bond was set at $500,000.

Police said a motive was not initially known.

"This case involved the defendant using social media to set up the sexual assault of his girlfriend, the mother of his children, on the co-conspirator's phone," prosecutors stated.

Buckeye Police Department media manager Carissa Planalp told KTVK, "We're fortunate that the injuries were not serious. But investigators knew that they had to develop the information they needed to hold those accountable. It was a very scary, terrifying situation for this family."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Arizona man sentenced for threatening to 'execute' Trump — and Kamala Harris



An Arizona man was sentenced to a little more than three years in prison for threatening to "execute" President Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

Rene Ortiz of Casa Grande issued the written threats on Election Day in 2024, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona.

He wrote that he would shoot 'the incoming fraudulent elected [President of the United States] … at the inauguration on January 20th, 2025.'

The 56-year-old wrote a note asserting that he would "execute the newly elected [President of the United States] by firing an M-16A2 service rifle with a magazine of 6 rounds" and delivered it to the federal courthouse in Phoenix.

That threat was directed at both candidates, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

After Trump won, Ortiz issued another written threat that was delivered to the federal courthouse in Tucson.

In that threat, he wrote that he would shoot "the incoming fraudulent elected [President of the United States] ... at the inauguration on January 20th, 2025."

Ortiz was interviewed by U.S. Secret Service, and he reiterated his intent to attack the president.

He was arrested on Jan. 17, 2025, before the presidential inauguration.

Ortiz was convicted by a federal jury on June 8 and was sentenced by Senior U.S. District Judge Stephen M. McNamee on Tuesday.

More recently, a 24-year-old man named Jaden Read was arrested after posting on social media that he would kill the president when he visited Kansas.

RELATED: Man served time for threatening to kill Trump — then gets arrested for more alleged threats against Trump

"Let's shoot Trump honestly, where's our shooter? I’m tired of living this money life," Read allegedly wrote in Facebook comments.

"Can we shoot him in Kansas please I will myself," he allegedly wrote in another comment.

"[I know] where your speech will be. Already mapped out roofs around," he added.

He was arrested in Clearwater, Kansas, on Saturday.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'Hidden gem': The list of national parks in the US just got bigger



Arizona is adding a new national park, bringing the state's total to four.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed a bill into law designating the creation of Chiricahua National Park, a small park in Southeastern Arizona with some stunning views.

'This new designation will shine a national spotlight on one of Arizona’s hidden gems.'

Previously protected as Chiricahua National Monument since 1924, the new park continues the protection of the rhyolite rock spires formed by an ancient volcanic eruption 27 million years ago.

A National Park Service press release noted visitors will be able to continue to enjoy hiking, camping, scenic drives, and viewing the rich biodiversity in the new park.

“Chiricahua’s towering rock spires, rich Apache heritage, and remarkable biodiversity make it one of America’s most extraordinary landscapes,” Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said in the press release. “This new designation will shine a national spotlight on one of Arizona’s hidden gems, creating opportunities to welcome more visitors, strengthen local economies, and share this incredible landscape with more Americans.”

In addition to the rhyolite rock spires, the park is home to balanced rocks and the historical Faraway Ranch homestead. It is also one of a shrinking number of places to see the uninhibited night sky.

RELATED: Astronomers detect unprecedented radio signal — it's coming from a gigantic planet

National Park Service on X

“Chiricahua has been part of the National Park System for more than a century, and this new designation marks an exciting chapter in its history,” said Jessica Bowron, the comptroller exercising the delegated authority of the director of the National Park Service. “While its name is changing, our commitment remains the same: protecting this remarkable landscape and its cultural heritage while providing opportunities for visitors to experience and enjoy it for generations to come.”

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), perhaps best known for his role in the infamous "seditious six" video posted last year, introduced the bill in 2021. The bill passed the House in March and passed the Senate in September.

Sen. Kelly celebrated the passage of the bill on Tuesday.

“Today is a historic day for Arizona. Making Chiricahua a national park has been a priority of mine since I first came to the Senate, so I’m thrilled this day has finally arrived,” said Sen. Kelly.

“A bipartisan effort from the start, this is a win for the communities in southeastern Arizona and for everyone who worked to protect this extraordinary place so our kids and our grandkids can enjoy it.”

Chiricahua, also known as the "Wonderland of Rocks," will be the 64th national park in the United States.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'They got caught': Maricopa County 'mistake' with 3,126 ballots has Trump fuming



The most populous county in Arizona appears incapable of facilitating a federal election without running into problems.

The Maricopa County Recorder's Office, headed by Republican Justin Heap, revealed on Sunday that thousands of early ballots were mailed out prematurely owing to an alleged vendor error.

'Maricopa is a very, very dishonest county.'

Heap's office noted that it was informed on Friday by the vendor, Runbeck Election Services, "that it had mistakenly mailed 3,126 early ballots the previous day, six days before the scheduled October 7 mailing date. The premature mailing was not authorized by the Recorder's Office, which was notified only after it occurred."

RES claimed in a statement shared by the recorder's office that the vote-by-mail envelope mailers were sent to the U.S. Postal Service Business Mail Entry Unit by its logistics team last Thursday. They weren't supposed to be delivered until this Wednesday.

"These 3,126 packets were processed separately from the primary mailing because they did not qualify for USPS automated mail processing," said RES. "Non-automation mail requires separate handling and processing before being presented to the USPS."

RELATED: Here we go again: Ex-USPS worker charged for allegedly tossing hundreds of mail-in ballots in the trash

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP/Getty Images

RES claimed that the vote-by-mail envelope mailers "had been completed and were being staged at our facility for their scheduled presentation," but the pallet holding them "was included with mail released that evening."

"The affected packets were part of the first voter request file provided to RES for processing," continued the vendor. "They are valid packets, produced from the authorized voter data provided to RES, and are addressed to voters who requested them."

Jeff Ellington, the CEO of RES, emphasized that the county was not to blame, stating in an interview, "It was pure accident, just a human error," reported the Associated Press.

"We regret it. But it was by no means intentional," added Ellington.

Arizona Rep. Abraham Hamadeh (R) noted that "this isn't their first 'mistake.' One error is incompetence. A pattern is a system."

Hamadeh's distrust is well-earned.

After all, according to the White House, Maricopa County experienced a significant election data breach just days ahead of the 2020 general election. The federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency subsequently characterized that election as "the most secure in American history."

During the 2022 election, the county had widespread ballot printing and reading issues at voting centers. In the 2024 election, the county not only had mailing and processing problems but saw thousands of registered voters incorrectly flagged as needing to provide proof of citizenship.

A recent investigation found that numerous noncitizens were erroneously registered to vote.

President Donald Trump blasted Maricopa County on Monday over its latest election-related "error," calling the county "crooked" and suggesting that local officials "should be ashamed of themselves."

"Maricopa sent out thousands of ballots illegally, and they got caught," the president told reporters. "Now they're saying it was an error. Maricopa is a very, very dishonest county."

The Maricopa County Recorder's Office noted that "upon consultation with the Maricopa County Attorney's Office, it was determined that the ballots remain valid and do not need to be voided or reissued. Voters may complete and return them normally. Any ballots received before early voting begins will remain unopened and securely stored until processing begins."

The Maricopa County Elections Department did not immediately respond to Blaze News' request for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Where was God? Frank Turek asks the question after Charlie Kirk



Arizona State University’s Ratio Christi chapter hosted Christian apologist Frank Turek Monday night. The topic especially caught my attention as a philosophy professor: If God exists, why is there evil?

I call this the major objection to belief in God. Atheists may begin elsewhere, but once the other objections are answered, the problem of evil keeps returning. I have found that true whether I am talking with an atheist at a bar watching a ball game or an elite physicist at Cambridge.

What if the very problem of evil that you think disproves God actually points to God?

Turek made the question as pointed as possible. He told the audience that when he and Charlie Kirk were approaching Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, Kirk asked him to pray. Turek prayed for the event to be effective and safe.

“God said no,” Turek told the audience. About 20 minutes later, Kirk was fatally shot. Turek has asked the same question publicly ever since: Where was God?

To some smug atheists, and a few conspiracy-minded people, the story invites a sneer: If Kirk was such a good Christian, why didn’t his God protect him? Why would anyone want to be a Christian if that is the outcome?

Turek answered with a challenge: What if the very problem of evil that seems to disprove God actually points toward him?

His argument came in two parts.

First, before we can say evil disproves God, we have to know what evil is. And to know what evil is, we need some account of the good. Invoking Augustine, Turek described evil as a corruption or privation of something good. Augustine’s formulation is simple: Evil depends on the good it damages.

Students are often confident that they can define the good until the examples get difficult. Happiness seems like an obvious candidate, but people can be happy about wicked things. Happiness alone therefore cannot tell us what is good.

That is where students often retreat into relativism: What is good for you is good for you, and what is good for me is good for me.

Turek’s answer was that human beings share a common human nature. If something is genuinely good for a human being as such, it cannot become bad merely because another person prefers something else.

Then he pushed the argument into explicitly Christian territory. If Christianity is true, what could be better than knowing God? He cited John 17:3, where eternal life is described as knowing God and Jesus Christ.

That brought him back to Kirk. Kirk’s murder was evil; Turek did not pretend otherwise. But he argued that God can bring good from evil. Turek says he still hears from people who encountered the gospel because of Kirk’s life and death. In his language, the ripple was not merely a ripple but a tsunami.

RELATED: What Chris Hansen knows about sin that modern culture forgets

Kelsey McNeal/Disney General Entertainment Content/Getty Images

That was Turek’s first point: The objection from evil assumes that some things are objectively wrong. His argument is that objective moral law requires a standard beyond individual preference and that the ultimate ground of that standard is God. The problem of evil therefore borrows the very moral categories it tries to use against him.

Turek then moved from philosopher to pastor.

In a philosophy class, people will debate the logical problem of evil. In the middle of intense suffering, nobody wants a philosopher to arrive with a chalkboard and draw syllogisms. They want to know why this happened: Why this child? Why this cancer? Why this death?

Turek answers with what he calls the ripple effect. We know very little of the past, only fragments of the present, and nothing of the future except what has been revealed to us. We cannot trace all the consequences flowing from a single event.

God, in the Christian account, is not only powerful and good but wise. He knows the whole of history and can order events toward ends we cannot see. Turek appealed to Romans 8:28: God works all things together for the good of those who love him.

That reminded me of an old pastoral illustration. A couple had grown cold in their faith. Their child died, and they asked their pastor why. He told them to imagine a shepherd trying to lead two stubborn sheep across a river from danger to safety. They refuse. So the shepherd picks up their lamb and carries it across. The sheep follow.

Was that for their good?

The point is not that suffering itself becomes good. It is that suffering can force us to confront questions comfort lets us avoid. It exposes our finitude and can make us consider our own sin. When we recognize how little we know and how much God would have to know, Paul’s question in Romans 9:20 becomes harder to brush aside: Who are we to correct God?

RELATED: Christians are missing the opportunity next door

Banderlog/Getty Images

With those two claims — objective goodness and divine wisdom — Turek took questions.

One student asked why God creates people who will be damned to hell. Turek answered that people who finally reject God receive what they insist upon: separation from Him. If that is what they choose, he asked, on what grounds do they complain about receiving it?

Another asked about animal suffering that no human being ever sees. How could that possibly help us?

Turek’s answer was essentially: How do you know it does not? Human knowledge is extraordinarily limited. The fact that we cannot identify a good purpose for some instance of suffering does not prove that no such purpose exists. He also noted that in the Christian account, the whole creation is affected by human sin.

So is Turek right? Does the problem of evil point toward God rather than away from him? Are atheists borrowing from an objective moral framework they cannot ultimately ground without God?

The audience was clearly intrigued. Skeptics had something substantial to push against, and Christians had to think more carefully about what they claim the Bible teaches concerning good, evil, suffering, and God’s wisdom.

As a philosophy professor deep in the heart of Sun Devil territory, I count that as a good thing.

Jack Smith Spying On Trump Donors Is Latest Dem Ploy To Chill Americans’ Political Speech

If Democrats can't convince Americans to switch parties, they will try to make them scared of expressing their political beliefs.

The kindness con: Fraudsters exploit America’s safety net



Governments have been handing out public work since men were laying stones on the Appian Way. And wherever government hands out money, people line up to get some.

Abraham Lincoln was said to have faced so many office-seekers and applicants for government favors that he finally complained, in his usual earthy fashion, that “there are too many pigs for the teats.”

The Democratic Socialists of America do not own the word ‘kindness.’

The pigs have multiplied.

During the New Deal, Franklin Roosevelt dramatically expanded Washington’s role in the economy. His administration also strengthened organized labor. The Wagner Act of 1935 guaranteed workers the right to organize and bargain collectively, and unions became a central pillar of the Democrat coalition that dominated American politics for decades.

The same political pattern appeared again during the War on Poverty.

Michael Harrington’s 1962 book, “The Other America,” helped force poverty onto the national political agenda. Lyndon Johnson’s anti-poverty task force later brought Harrington to Washington as a consultant.

The federal government also needed a way to measure poverty. That measure was developed principally by Mollie Orshansky, an economist at the Social Security Administration, whose thresholds became the basis of the official federal poverty measure.

Then came the Great Society: Medicare, Medicaid, food assistance, housing programs, and a vast expansion of Washington’s responsibility over Americans’ lives and livelihoods.

The political argument over those programs has raged ever since. But one fact should not be controversial: Americans have transferred staggering amounts of wealth through government because they believe people in genuine need should be helped.

That is kindness on an industrial scale. And wherever kindness operates on an industrial scale, thieves notice.

The Government Accountability Office estimates that the federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion every year to fraud, based on data from fiscal years 2018 through 2022.

That is not “waste” in the loose political sense. The GAO is estimating losses from deliberate fraud.

Look around the country. In Minnesota, the House Oversight Committee says at least $300 million was stolen through the Feeding Our Future child-nutrition scandal. The committee also says federal prosecutors estimate that fraud involving several high-risk Medicaid programs could total billions.

RELATED: The government would like to discuss your allowance

Erhui1979 / Getty Images

In New York, federal prosecutors charged 15 defendants in health care schemes involving more than $10.6 billion in fraudulent billings to Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers.

Arizona’s Medicaid system was hit by another grotesque scheme aimed at programs serving Native Americans struggling with addiction. The state attorney general says losses from the wider scandal reached into the billions. In one recent federal case alone, an addiction-treatment operator was sentenced to 14 years after fraudulently billing Medicaid more than $69 million.

In California, Paul Richard Randall orchestrated a scheme that submitted nearly $270 million in false Medi-Cal claims for expensive medications that were often unnecessary or never provided. Medi-Cal actually paid about $179 million. Randall got 30 years in federal prison.

Across seven Southeastern states, the Justice Department this summer announced 17 cases involving more than $350 million in intended losses involving SNAP, housing benefits, Small Business Administration loans, and tax fraud.

This thieving from American kindness is nationwide.

The Trump administration has now made federal fraud a major target. This month, the government canceled Affordable Care Act policies covering roughly 760,000 people whose enrollments it says were fraudulent or otherwise ineligible. The administration projects about $2.2 billion in savings.

It turns out that industrial-scale redistribution creates industrial-scale opportunities for fraud.

The Biden-era immigration surge adds another political argument. The Congressional Budget Office estimates net immigration at roughly 1.5 million people in 2021, 2.8 million in 2022, 3.3 million in 2023, and 2.7 million in 2024. Much of that increase fell into the CBO’s “other foreign national” category, which includes people who entered without lawful status as well as others admitted under temporary authorities.

But illegal immigrants are generally barred from SNAP, nonemergency Medicaid, SSI, TANF, and most federal housing assistance. States can choose to spend their own taxpayers’ money anyway. California sure does, to the tune of $22 billion a year.

And immigration has a political consequence separate from voting. The census counts residents, not merely citizens, for congressional apportionment. Illegal aliens count in those population totals just like everyone else living in the country.

When Washington spends money on a colossal scale, responsibility becomes diffuse. A federal agency sends money to a state. The state sends it to a provider. The provider bills a program. A nonprofit administers another piece. Somewhere along that chain, the pigs find the teats.

Then everybody expresses shock.

RELATED: Can a $1.2 trillion giveaway become a fiscal bargain?

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Perhaps the 50 states should shoulder far more responsibility for caring for their own poor. Perhaps Washington should stop pretending that every human problem requires another federal funding stream.

The alternative is industrial-scale socialism accompanied by industrial-scale fraud.

Something else eventually gets stolen, too: trust. Every dollar stolen from Medicaid makes taxpayers more suspicious of Medicaid. Every fake food-benefit claim makes it harder to defend assistance for the family who actually needs groceries. Every crooked nonprofit feeds the suspicion that “compassion” has become a business model.

That may be the most destructive theft of all.

The Democratic Socialists of America do not own the word “kindness.” Neither does any political party. Americans who work, pay taxes, and agree to help their neighbors have every right to demand that their money reach the people it was intended to help.

And they have every right to be furious with the pigs at the teats who steal it.

Democrat gives nonresponse when forced to face uncomfortable truth about his party's lack of support



A possible 2028 presidential contender has been forced to respond to a poll showing how few Americans believe Democrats actually care about them.

Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona was being interviewed on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday when host Martha Raddatz pressed him about a poll saying only 34% of Americans believe Democrats care about people like them.

Kelly tried to distract from the unpopularity of the Democratic Party by criticizing the president.

"What does that tell you, what do you do about it if people just aren't feeling it from the Democrats, if you're sort of a default or people stay away from the race?" Raddatz asked.

"Well, I'll tell you what I'm doing about it. I've been traveling across the country basically nonstop for the last six months," said Kelly.

He went on to list the states he's been visiting, including New Hampshire and South Carolina, and added that he'd been to a Navajo parade in Arizona.

"Just talking to people and trying to understand their challenges in their homes, in their schools, in their communities," he added. "We have to deliver, there's no question about that."

After refusing to answer the question, Kelly pivoted to attacking President Donald Trump over the conflict in Iran.

The nonresponse fit into an earlier exchange from the same show where Kelly tried to distract from the unpopularity of the Democratic Party by criticizing the president.

Video of Kelly's nonresponse was posted to social media by the official account of the Republican National Committee.

RELATED: 'Blue wave' expected for midterms looks more like a tiny ripple, says CNN's Harry Enten

While Kelly's trips to the Navajo parade may not ease Democrats' polling woes, the president's popularity has also taken a dive owing to high gas prices and the conflict in Iran.

Democrats are hoping to seize control of at least the U.S. House of Representatives in order to thwart Trump's legislative goals for the latter part of his second term.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Green Party candidate allegedly threatened an attorney, a judge, and their children



A candidate for Arizona's 3rd Congressional District has been arrested for allegedly threatening an attorney, a judge, and their children.

Forty-five-year-old David Redkey allegedly sent threatening messages involving guns via email against a Superior Court judge and an attorney's office, according to prosecutors.

'We have the defendant making direct threats to the victims — sending emails, threatening emails, talking about guns.'

Detectives from the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Threat Management Unit arrested Redkey on Saturday. He was booked into jail and given a $150,000 bond.

Officials said Redkey admitted during questioning that he sent the threats.

Court records indicate Redkey was charged with multiple counts of threatening or intimidating and one count of computer tampering.

"We have some victims being threatened. One of the victims [is] a judge, another an attorney, and, by extension, their children. And frankly, your honor, by extension, those in public service," said a prosecutor in court.

"We have the defendant making direct threats to the victims — sending emails, threatening emails, talking about guns," the prosecutor added. "A gun which was never recovered, your honor. That's a great concern for the state."

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office asked for Redkey's arrest records to be sealed in order to protect the information of the victims.

Redkey was a public school teacher.

RELATED: Activists RAGE against Democrat who admits hiding LGBTQ+ support to appease Muslims

Redkey is a candidate on the ballot for the Green Party, but the Arizona Green Party rejects his candidacy.

A spokesperson for the party said the party opposed Redkey "due to a consistent pattern of abusive behavior that had him banned from the Arizona Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialists of Phoenix."

The candidate's website says he's running to put "people over profits" and restore "integrity to government."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Arizona AG Coordinated With Far-Left 'Abolish ICE' and 'Defund Police' Group While Opposing Border Security Measure, Records Show

Arizona attorney general Kris Mayes (D.) privately coordinated with a far-left group that has called to abolish ICE and defund police as she opposed a border security measure backed by more than 60 percent of the state's voters, records obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

The post Arizona AG Coordinated With Far-Left 'Abolish ICE' and 'Defund Police' Group While Opposing Border Security Measure, Records Show appeared first on .