Trump claims Cameron lost Kentucky governor's race 'because he couldn't alleviate the stench of Mitch McConnell'



Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron (R) lost the Bluegrass State's gubernatorial election to incumbent Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, and former President Donald Trump, who had backed Cameron in the contest, is blaming Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for Cameron's loss.

"Daniel Cameron lost because he couldn't alleviate the stench of Mitch McConnell," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I told him early that's a big burden to overcome. McConnell and Romney are Kryptonite for Republican Candidates. I moved him up 25 Points, but the McConnell relationship was 'too much to bear.' Tate Reeves, on the other hand, surged to a win for Governor in Mississippi after my involvement. Congratulations to Tate!"

Cameron previously served as legal counsel to McConnell. "As legal counsel to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Cameron participated in the successful confirmation of conservative federal judges, including Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch," according to ag.ky.gov.

Trump endorsed Cameron in 2022 long before Cameron went on to win the Kentucky GOP gubernatorial primary in 2023.

"Wow, Daniel Cameron of Kentucky has made a huge surge, now that they see my strong Endorsement, and the fact that he's not really 'a McConnell guy,'" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Saturday. "They only try to label him that because he comes from the Great State of Kentucky. Anyway, Go Daniel, great future for you and your State—You will bring it to new levels of success, and I will help you!"

Trump has endorsed McConnell in the past. "Senator Mitch McConnell (@Team_Mitch) always delivers for the people of Kentucky, who will hopefully re-elect their powerful Senate Majority Leader. Mitch has helped us Make America Great Again, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement!" Trump tweeted in June 2020.

After losing the contest, Cameron asked people to pray for the governor, his team, and the whole commonwealth, noting that "what ultimately matters, is that we know that Christ is on the throne."


Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

@Kirk Cameron Invites You to His Campfire

@Kirk Cameron Invites You to His Campfire

Pima County Democratic Party deletes 'F*ck the Fourth' tweet advertising Tucson Women's March event



As Americans gear up to celebrate Independence Day, the Pima County Democratic Party posted, then later deleted, a tweet that said, "F*ck the Fourth. See you at Reid Park." The tweet featured a graphic advertising a Tucson Women's March event — the graphic invites people to "Mourn" at the "F[***] The Fourth" event. "Bring comfortable shoes, water, lawn chairs, posters, and your anger," the sign instructs.

A Tucson Women's March post on Instagram said, "Don’t f*ck with our freedom" — the post described the event as a "Peaceful sit in and sign holding," and added, "Gather on 22ND near Country Club and we will spread east along the sidewalk as people gather!"

The Pima County Democratic Party issued a statement describing it as "a mistake" to post the graphic, while noting that it does support the planned event.

"PCDP posted a graphic advertising a women's march which, we agree, was in poor taste. We were eager to share the event, and in our haste we used the graphic provided by the event organizer. That was a mistake, and we will do better," the PCDP tweeted.

\u201cWell, here\u2019s their statement in response to this now-deleted tweet:\u201d
— Cameron Arcand (@Cameron Arcand) 1656713570

"Make no mistake, however. We support the event which will be on July 4 at 7 pm at Reid Park. The event was organized to help women in our community grieve for the loss of their bodily autonomy, which we consider an elemental right," the PCDP added. "Our posting of the graphic upset some people. We urge you to save your outrage for the women in this state who will die of botched abortions. Arizona is not a good place to be a woman right now."

\u201c3/3 Our posting of the graphic upset some people. We urge you to save your outrage for the women in this state who will die of botched abortions. Arizona is not a good place to be a woman right now.\u201d
— Pima County Democratic Party (@Pima County Democratic Party) 1656713386

While leftists have been up in arms about a Supreme Court ruling that enables states to ban abortions, the decision marks a monumental step forward for the pro-life movement.

"The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives," the opinion states.

Parkland survivor tries to delete CLUELESS tweet about SCOTUS justices — but the internet is forever



Today, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its controversial 1973 Roe v. Wadeopinion, concluding that there is no constitutional right to an abortion.

"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the syllabus of the decision reads.

As expected, the leftist outrage erupted instantaneously, fueled largely by the misinformed idea that overturning Roe v. Wade means abortion will be banned nationwide. But, as stated in the above-mentioned Supreme Court syllabus, the authority has actually been returned to individual states and their duly elected lawmakers.

One such misinformed leftist, Parkland shooting survivor Cameron Kasky, was infuriated that those awful Supreme Court justices "just voted to kill women." So he took to Twitter to urge people to go to the homes of said Supreme Court justices to "let them know how you feel."

"Go to the home of every Supreme Court justice who just voted to kill women. Let them know how you feel," Kasky tweeted.

\u201c@cameron_kasky Might as well let everyone see your tweet\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

The backlash was immediate:

\u201c@cameron_kasky I'm pro-choice. Understand that this is how you got to this ruling. Intimidating judges never ends well. Fight this by protesting at the Supreme Court. If you promote people going to a private home, you will lose more. \ud83e\udd14\u201d
— \ud83d\udfe5\u2b1c\ufe0fDISTRUMPTION2\u20e30\u20e32\u20e32\u20e3 (@\ud83d\udfe5\u2b1c\ufe0fDISTRUMPTION2\u20e30\u20e32\u20e32\u20e3) 1656082992
\u201cLol of course he deleted it.\u201d
— CLFitness (@CLFitness) 1656083472
\u201c@cameron_kasky @TwitterSupport This is an incitement to violence after there has already been an assassination attempt on an SC Justice. This is dangerous.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

Kasky decided to delete his original tweet because he is apparently "sick of republicans talking to [him]." But, unfortunately for Kasky, the internet is indeed forever:

\u201cI deleted my tweet about going to Supreme Court justices houses because I\u2019m sick of republicans talking to me but please let me be clear my opinion stands\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@DiablitoDeOro @neontaster @cameron_kasky Because reasons https://t.co/YefbtBYIHx\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@cameron_kasky You mean THIS ONE? Inciting people to break the law?\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@cameron_kasky No, you deleted it because it was against Twitter safety rules. So, you were told to delete it and you obeyed.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@neontaster @cameron_kasky It was grabbed in time.\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@wadepearson @DiablitoDeOro @redsteeze @cameron_kasky @neontaster All of the Parkland kids like him that lectured everyone on "fight for our lives" will gleefully use their marxist ideals to silence and kill dissenters. Remember, its not about the gun, it's about the control.\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@cameron_kasky Insurrectionist.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

Speaking from the White House, President Joe Biden dutifully helped spread the misinformation about the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and took the opportunity to prompt voters to elect more Democrats in November so that Congress can write abortion protections into law. Did the president just let slip the real reason Congress hasn't made any effort to start writing such laws in the nearly two months since Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion was "leaked" in early May?

Watch the video below:

“Joe Biden on Dobbs:"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn’t limit it. They simply took it away."”


\u201cJoe Biden on Dobbs:\n\n"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn\u2019t limit it. They simply took it away."\u201d
— TheBlaze (@TheBlaze) 1656089338

Plan to terminate Title 42 order is the Biden admin's most unpopular move so far, according to Morning Consult



Politicians on both sides of the political aisle have publicly opposed the Biden administration's plan to nix a Title 42 order, and a recent Morning Consult/Politico survey indicates that the move, which is opposed by a majority of registered voters, marks the administration's most unpopular policy yet.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced last week that the termination of the order will go into effect on May 23.

The move could result in an even larger influx of migrants along America's southern border.

The poll, which was conducted from April 1 to April 4, found that while 42% strongly oppose the Biden administration's plan to lift the border controls put in place by the Trump administration in 2020, 13% somewhat oppose the move, 18% somewhat support it, and just 16% strongly support it.

According to Morning Consult, 56% of registered voters are against the move, which represents "the largest backlash against a Biden administration policy among dozens tracked by Morning Consult since January 2021."

New @MorningConsult/@politico survey shows 56% of voters oppose Biden's plan to sunset Title 42 border controls, making it his most unpopular decision yet.\n\nRead more from me here: https://morningconsult.com/2022/04/06/biden-approval-rating-immigration-title-42/\u00a0\u2026pic.twitter.com/x0XIswGpBE
— Cameron Easley (@Cameron Easley) 1649245662

Sen. Joe Manchin has panned the plan as a "frightening decision" and warned that it will lead to even more migrants flooding the southern border.

"Title 42 has been an essential tool in combatting the spread of COVID-19 and controlling the influx of migrants at our southern border," Manchin said in a statement. "We are already facing an unprecedented increase in migrants this year, and that will only get worse if the Administration ends the Title 42 policy. We are nowhere near prepared to deal with that influx. Until we have comprehensive, bipartisan immigration reform that commits to securing our borders and providing a pathway to citizenship for qualified immigrants, Title 42 must stay in place."

Americans are already suffering under the financial burden caused by inflation and high gas prices, issues which, if they persist, will represent significant liabilities for Democrats heading into the midterm elections later this year.

If a surge of migrants inundates the border after the Biden administration lifts the Title 42 order next month, the situation will likely serve as an added drag on Democrats during the election cycle — and Biden, who has already had lackluster job approval ratings for some time, could see his ratings slip even farther if the U.S. experiences a spike in migrants at the border.

The public safety implications of border security are manifest: U.S. Customs and Border Protection press releases frequently highlight the apprehension of criminals, including sex offenders.

Tim Scott says 'America is not a racist country.' Liberals immediately try to prove him wrong by calling him racist epithets.



After Republican Sen. Tim Scott (S.C.) delivered an impassioned rebuttal to President Joe Biden's address to a joint session of Congress on Wednesday, declaring that despite the president's claims, "America is not a racist country," liberals on Twitter immediately tried to discredit his claims by launching racial epithets at him.

What did he say?

In the speech, Scott acknowledged that while America's racial "healing" remains an unfinished task, no amount of divisive rhetoric from Democratic politicians and progressive media figures could diminish the progress the country has made toward racial equality.

Such progress is powerfully embodied in his own family's history, Scott suggested, pointing out that his family has gone from "cotton to Congress" in the span of one lifetime — a fact which, egregiously, was called into question by liberal Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler last week.

Sen. Tim Scott delivers GOP rebuttal to Biden's remarks | FULLyoutu.be

The South Carolina lawmaker went on to note that, in many cases, Democrats are the ones who exhibit racism in their politics and policy.

He recalled that last year, after the deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, he built a police reform bill to address concerns over unchecked instances of police brutality in America. But Democrats blocked the bill from ever being debated in Congress by using a political tactic they now insist is racist — the filibuster.

"My friends across the aisle seemed to want the issue more than they wanted a solution," he charged.

He later referred to Georgia's new voting law, which actually expands early voting opportunity in the state, but which Democrats — including the president — have falsely branded as the new "Jim Crow."

Republicans have an interest in making it "easier to vote and harder to cheat," Scott said, but Democrats, on the other hand, are only interested in "virtue-signaling."

"Race is not a political weapon to settle every issue the way one side wants. It's far too important," Scott said to close out discussion on the topic.

What was the response?

Stopping at nothing to discredit his assessment that "America is not a racist country," liberals immediately launched a racist offensive against Scott on social media, using racial epithets.

Following Scott's speech, mentions of "Uncle Tim" surfaced so many times on Twitter that it became a trend.

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Others shied away from that specific term, but still delivered the same racist message.

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

What was your excuse for these 4 tweets? https://t.co/N3fQby2X2U https://t.co/0tl9ogvTrh
— Cameron Cawthorne (@Cameron Cawthorne)1619667500.0

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro wrote: "There is a certain irony to the fact that Leftists have determined to be as racist as possible to Tim Scott in order to prove him wrong when he says America isn't racist."

While appearing on CNN, WaPo media critic rips CNN for Cuomo brothers' 'love-a-thon': 'It's a major black eye for network'



Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple went scorched earth during an appearance on CNN. While appearing on CNN's "Reliable Sources," Wemple bashed the liberal cable TV news network for allowing CNN host Chris Cuomo to have "love-a-thons" with his brother Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D).

Chris Cuomo is the anchor of CNN's "Cuomo Prime Time," which is self-described as a "news program where Cuomo tests power with newsmakers and politicians from both sides of the aisle." However during the coronavirus pandemic, Cuomo welcomed his New York governor brother on the show to deliver an unchallenged and glowing narrative of his leadership.

Many times the interviews were completely unprofessional and chummy. There were jokes that the governor only appeared on the show because their mom made him and then there was a strange segment that involved a gigantic Q-tip. All this positive coverage despite New York having the second-most coronavirus deaths per million and there being bombshell reports that New York's nursing home deaths were far higher than Cuomo's administration admitted.

Cuomo has not appeared on his brother's CNN show since the flurry of sexual harassment allegations against the governor started to storm in.

Flash forward to Sunday, Wemple was a guest on "Reliable Sources" to discuss the media coverage of Andrew Cuomo and his scandals. Wemple did not hold back at pointing out the bias of a news network previously handing out flattering publicity to a political figure by his own brother.

"I would be remiss, Brian, if I didn't mention CNN's own huge media story here with Chris Cuomo, the anchor at the nine o'clock hour, who covered Andrew Cuomo and had all these wonderful love-a-thon interviews with him, more than ten of them," Wemple told CNN host Brian Stelter.

"And they suspended the conflict of interest rule for Chris Cuomo for those interviews, yet all of the sudden they've enforced it again now that Andrew Cuomo is in the midst of a historic scandal in the Albany State House," Wemple continued.

"So, I think that is a major black eye for CNN," Wemple proclaimed. "I will say that you and other people have covered the Cuomo story very aggressively, so I do want to be fair about this, but it is a major black eye for this network."

Stelter looked stone-faced as Wemple ripped his network during an interview on CNN.

WaPo’s Erik Wemple said it is a “major black eye for CNN” that they suspended the conflict of interest rule for Chr… https://t.co/3I8nWfEPro
— Cameron Cawthorne (@Cameron Cawthorne)1615739208.0

To his credit, this isn't the first time that Wemple has called out a left-leaning cable TV news host. In 2019, Wemple bashed MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow for her partisanship and "rooting" for the Steele dossier to be true instead of being more concerned with the truth.

When small bits of news arose in favor of the dossier, the franchise MSNBC host pumped air into them. At least some of her many fans surely came away from her broadcasts thinking the dossier was a serious piece of investigative research, not the flimflam, quick-twitch game of telephone outlined in the Horowitz report. She seemed to be rooting for the document.

And when large bits of news arose against the dossier, Maddow found other topics more compelling.

She was there for the bunkings, absent for the debunkings — a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry.

Poll: 5 of Biden's 7 most unpopular executive orders are on immigration



President Joe Biden has not even held office for a full month but has already taken more than 40 executive actions that, according to a new Morning Consult poll, are mostly popular with one outstanding exception. That exception is Biden's executive order to greatly expand the number of refugees admitted to the United States.

According to the survey, Biden's refugee order is the only executive action he's taken that is downright unpopular, with 48% of voters opposing his plan to allow 110,000 more refugees to seek safe haven in the United States in the upcoming fiscal year and 39% of voters supporting the action.

Under President Donald Trump's administration, refugee admittance was capped at a historic low of 15,000 people, whereas Biden has increased the cap to a historic high of 125,000 refugees.

Biden's refugee order was the least popular of 28 executive actions tracked by Morning Consult since Inauguration Day.

New from me: @MorningConsult has polled 28 executive actions issued by @POTUS since Jan. 20. His move to expand t… https://t.co/fAxaS7KzZu
— Cameron Easley (@Cameron Easley)1612960443.0

"The finding from the latest survey, conducted Feb. 5-7 among 1,986 registered voters with a margin of error of 2 percentage points, reinforces the notion that immigration will be tricky political territory for the president," Cameron Easley writes for Morning Consult. "Orders pertaining to immigration and immigrant rights constitute five of his seven least popular actions among voters, and are particularly animating for Republicans."

Breaking down the numbers on Biden's refugee order shows 3 in 5 Republican voters "strongly oppose" raising the refugee cap to 125,000 people. A similar number of Republican voters strongly opposed Biden ending construction of the U.S.-Mexico border wall and also opposed ending the immigration and travel restrictions from Muslim-majority countries flagged as hotbeds of terrorism.

Republicans are most strongly opposed (66%) to the Biden administration's decision to reverse Trump's policy and count illegal immigrants in the census.

The other two most unpopular Biden executive orders have to do with energy policy. The cancelation of the Keystone XL Pipeline is Biden's third-most unpopular order, with 42% of voters supporting the decision to kill the pipeline project, 28% opposed, and 20% unsure. Biden's order to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies has 45% support, 34% opposition, and 21% unsure.

Biden's most popular executive action was his order mandating that people wear masks on public transit such as planes, trains, and buses to protect against the spread of the coronavirus. The survey found that 78% of voters supported the mask mandate and just 15% opposed it. Biden's second-most popular executive order was a similar mask mandate on federal property.

Kentucky AG to release Grand Jury tapes in Breonna Taylor case

"We have no concerns with grand jurors sharing their thoughts on our presentation because we are confident in the case we presented," a spokeswoman for the attorney general said.

WATCH: White House Press Secretary BLASTS CNN’s Brianna Keilar for advocating for mob justice

In a Tursday press conference, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany absolutely blasted CNN personality and news anchor Brianna Keilar for being a mob justice apologist.