'Bad taste': Ex-Disney CEO Bob Iger defends decision to suspend Jimmy Kimmel for Charlie Kirk remarks



Don't blame Trump for Jimmy Kimmel's suspension last year, says former Disney CEO Bob Iger — it was purely an in-house decision.

"We thought it was in bad taste," Iger told the Financial Times, referring to the late-night host's on-air remarks about Charlie Kirk shortly after his death.

'An ill-timed and probably inappropriate comment.'

Murderous monologue

Five days after Kirk was assassinated during a college tour stop in Utah on September 10, 2025, Kimmel addressed the killing in his opening monologue, declaring that the "MAGA gang [is] desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."

Two days later, on September 17, Disney suspended production of "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" Production was resumed on September 23.

Iger, who was CEO of Disney from 2022 to 2026, denied speculation that complaints from the Trump administration were the real reason ABC and parent company Disney pulled the show.

Iger also revealed that Kimmel was asked to apologize for his remarks, saying "We just wanted him to acknowledge that it was an ill-timed and probably inappropriate comment."

RELATED: Jimmy Kimmel picks host to replace him for a bit — and she's a vitriolic Trump-hater

Michael Le Brecht II/Disney/Getty Images

Persecution complex

Speculation that the executive branch was behind Kimmel's suspension stemmed chiefly from an appearance FCC Chairman Brendan Carr made on a podcast, where he said, "We can do this the easy way or the hard way," regarding the talk-show host.

"These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead," Carr remarked, per Variety.

Kimmel, too, claimed he was the victim of a government plot to silence him; however the alleged plot would only last five days. Upon returning to the network, Kimmel's show aired a compilation of news stories surrounding his suspension, where multiple channel were shown calling his return to ABC a "huge" and "pivotal" moment in history.

RELATED: Jimmy Kimmel doubles down on Melania ‘widow’ jab — will this be the nail in his coffin?

Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images/Disney

Hero to zero

As Blaze News reported at the time, Kimmel received multiple standing ovations from his audience, becoming visibly emotional as he recalled messages of love he had received for being the alleged target of a government censorship plot.

Kimmel's remarks were a reversal of his previous comments, as he told his viewers that he was not actually trying to pin any certain ideology on Kirk's assassin.

"I have no illusions about changing anyone's mind," Kimmel said. "But I do want to make something clear because it's important to me as a human. And that is you understand that it was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man. I don't think there's anything funny about it."

In April, Kimmel joked about first lady Melania Trump having "a glow like an expectant widow."

Two days later, another assassination attempt was made on President Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, considered the third attempt on the president's life.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Amanda Seyfried: It was 'factual' to call Charlie Kirk 'hateful' days after death — why the backlash?



Actress Amanda Seyfried had an interesting reason for why she thinks people took issue with her comments about Charlie Kirk.

The then-39 year old commented on Kirk shortly after his assassination and now says the backlash she faced was because people wanted to bash her and tear her down.

'I commented on one thing.'

Hateful plateful

In the days after Kirk was murdered at a campus speaking tour stop in Utah, Seyfried responded to a compilation video of the political commentator — purporting to showcase his rhetoric — and said, "He was hateful."

Seyfried later justified her comments, writing on Instagram that she was "angry about misogyny and racist rhetoric."

In a recent interview with GQ Magazine, Seyfried stood firm while being described as still in disbelief over the discomfort she brought people with her remarks.

"A, I'm allowed to f**king voice my feelings, and B, do it in a way that's not unkind necessarily," she told the U.K. outlet.

Seyfried then chalked up the counterbalance of anger toward her as a societal impulse to bring people down.

"There's just an outsized fear and hatred and impulse to bash and to tear down. And I experienced a very small fraction of that."

The actress added, "I want my kids to be able to feel safe to voice their opinions as long as they're not harmful."

The Allentown, Pennsylvania, native still found herself confused, asking what to do and what to say. "And then all of a sudden I find myself with a f**king bodyguard at the airport, and I'm like, 'This is crazy.'"

RELATED: Hate-spewing Jimmy Kimmel mocks homeless Spencer Pratt with U-Haul gag

Fuel fool

Seyfried seemingly found no issues with describing Kirk as hateful so soon after his killing, and on September 17 — just seven days after his death — she called for "spirited discourse," exactly what Kirk was known for at the time of his murder.

"I don't want to add fuel to a fire. I just want to be able to give clarity to something so irresponsibly (but understandably) taken out of context. Spirited discourse — isn't that what we should be having?" Seyfried wrote as a caption for an Instagram post.

In a text image, the actress added, "We're forgetting the nuance of humanity. I can get angry about misogyny and racist rhetoric and ALSO very much agree that Charlie Kirk's murder was absolutely disturbing and deplorable in every way imaginable."

RELATED: 'I'm not f**king apologizing': Amanda Seyfried lashes out at critics for 3 words she said about Charlie Kirk

Jeff Vespa/Getty Images

No apologies

By December, Seyfried had apparently soured on her previous proposal of having actual discourse when she told outlet Who What Wear, "I'm not f**king apologizing."

She then downplayed the fact that she commented on the popular debater's murder so quickly after it had happened:

"I mean, for f**k's sake, I commented on one thing. I said something that was based on actual reality and actual footage and actual quotes," she claimed about Kirk.

"What I said was pretty damn factual, and I'm free to have an opinion, of course. Thank God for Instagram. I was able to give some clarity, and it was about getting my voice back because I felt like it had been stolen and recontextualized — which is what people do, of course."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Chicago Cross Burning Is Latest Example Of Left-Wing Extremism Being Blamed On GOP

All too often, acts of left-wing violence and extremism are ignored because the left is obsessed with the rather non-existent threat of right-wing extremism.

Britain’s Censorship Regime Was Always Going To Get People Like Henry Nowak Killed

The U.K.'s censorship regime indulges the idea that people who hold certain beliefs do not deserve to live freely — or at all.

Anti-Law-Enforcement Riots Like New Jersey’s Will Escalate Without Stronger Deterrence

The Trump administration cannot stick to occasional prosecutions while allowing the broader ecosystem of anti-ICE extremists to operate with relative impunity.

Retired cop wins $835K from Tennessee county after being jailed for 37 days over Charlie Kirk meme



A retired police officer said he missed his wedding anniversary and the birth of his granddaughter because he was in jail for refusing to take down a meme from Facebook about the death of Charlie Kirk.

Larry Bushart, 61, received $835,000 in a settlement on Wednesday after suing Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems over the incident.

'Respect the First Amendment today, or be prepared to pay the price tomorrow.'

Bushart posted several memes after Kirk was shot and killed in Sept. 2025. One of the memes quoted President Donald Trump on a separate shooting case where he said, "We have to get over it."

While Weems admitted that some of Bushart's posts were protected by free speech rights, he claimed that this particular post had caused people to fear the possibility of political violence.

The meme referenced the president's comments about a shooting at Perry High School in Iowa, but the sheriff said it made people believe Weems was calling for a shooting at Perry County High School in Tennessee.

"This has everything to do with a guy coming onto a Perry County page posting this picture leading people in our community to believe that there was a hypothetical Perry County High School shooting that caused fear in our community — and we done something about it," Weems said to WTVF-TV in Oct. 2025.

When Bushart was arrested, he was informed about the threat to a school.

"At a school?" Bushart responded. "I play on Facebook. I threatened no one."

The sheriff admitted that the police knew Bushart was referring to a different school but added that the public did not know that.

Weems put Bushart in jail, and a local judge set his bail at $2 million.

After 37 days, the felony charge was dropped and Bushart was set free.

Bushart also said he lost his post-retirement job while in jail.

"I am pleased my First Amendment rights have been vindicated," Bushart said after the settlement was reached. "The people's freedom to participate in civil discourse is crucial to a healthy democracy. I am looking forward to moving on and spending time with my family."

RELATED: Beto O'Rourke blames 'powerful memes' and Democratic incompetence for 'incredible performance' of Trump among Mexican-Americans

Cary Davis, an attorney for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, praised the ruling as a warning to other government officials. FIRE represented Bushart in the case.

"It's in times of turmoil and heightened tensions that our national commitment to free speech is tested the most," Davis said.

"When government officials fail that test, the Constitution exists to hold them accountable," Davis added. "Our hope is that Larry's settlement sends a message to law enforcement across the country: Respect the First Amendment today, or be prepared to pay the price tomorrow."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why Son Of Conservative Megadonor Is Running For Congress In Wyoming

'preserve and continue the American First mentality'

Left to Their Own Devices

Perhaps the greatest challenge every current affairs author faces is the inevitable decision of where to draw the line. As events continue to remain all-too-current, they must decide where to finally freeze time in place, put down the pen, and decide that no future "current" events will be included. Then, they must embrace the inescapable sense of anxiety over the universe of future events that, as a result, won't make the cut.

The post Left to Their Own Devices appeared first on .