Bill Maher's shocking defense of Christians — and what it reveals
For decades, Bill Maher has mocked religion with missionary zeal. He built his career sneering at scripture, scorning believers, and branding Christianity a fairy tale for fools.
Few men have done more to cement their place as America’s most committed unbeliever. And to his credit, Maher has never hidden his contempt. Week after week on "Real Time," he lampooned pastors, derided prayer, and preached his own brand of secular gospel — cheap, cynical, and completely godless.
If even he can recognize evil when he sees it, what excuse remains for those who claim to serve God?
That’s what makes his latest remarks so shocking.
On a recent episode of his show, Maher did something few in the modern West dare to do: He defended Christianity. He spoke not with irony, but with indignation, condemning the genocide of Christians in Nigeria. If this were any other group, he argued, it would be on every front page — and he’s right.
"The fact that this issue has not gotten on people's radar — it's pretty amazing," Maher said. "If you don't know what’s going on in Nigeria, your media sources suck. You are in a bubble."
"I'm not a Christian, but they are systematically killing the Christians in Nigeria. They've killed over 100,000 since 2009. They've burned 18,000 churches. ... These are the Islamists, Boko Haram," he continued. "This is so much more of a genocide attempt than what is going on in Gaza. They are literally attempting to wipe out the Christian population of an entire country."
The fact that it takes an atheist to say what many Christian leaders have not and Western journalists will not is a sobering sign of our decay.
While Maher’s words are rare, the blood he described is not. Just a few weeks ago, armed insurgents stormed the Christian community of Wagga Mongoro in Adamawa State in the dead of night. Four were killed, many more wounded. Homes, shops, and a church were set ablaze.
Earlier in August, coordinated assaults swept through farming villages in Benue State. Nine Christians murdered in five days. In June, over 200 butchered in a single weekend — parents, priests, and children alike.
Across Nigeria, Christians are being hunted for their belief. The perpetrators — Boko Haram, the Islamic State in West Africa Province, and radicalized Fulani militias — share one mission: to wipe out Christianity and impose Islamist rule.
It's nothing less than a slow, systematic genocide.
Under former Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, this campaign flourished. Militants gained ground while soldiers stood aside. Entire villages vanished. Churches became tombs. What the world calls “unrest” is, in truth, organized extermination. It's "genocide" by every definition.
Since 2009, more than 50,000 Christians have been slaughtered in Nigeria. Churches reduced to rubble. Priests hacked to death at the altar. Worshippers gunned down mid-prayer. These are not isolated horrors but rather part of a single, unbroken chain of persecution.
Yet in the West, this bloodshed barely registers. If thousands of Muslims, Jews, or atheists were annihilated, it would dominate headlines for months, and rightly so. But when Christians die, the press looks away.
And silence, in this case, is complicity.
RELATED: Atheist offers ironic cure for America's woes
OLYMPIA DE MAISMONT/AFP via Getty Images
Over the past decade, the United States has poured over $7.8 billion in aid into Nigeria — funds meant for peace and progress. Yet the country’s most vulnerable, the rural faithful, are left defenseless. The Nigerian government shrugs, Western governments continue to provide funding, and the media remains silent. It's easier to ignore a massacre than to admit moral failure.
Aid without accountability is blood money. Every dollar sent to Abuja should demand justice — protection for Christian villages, prosecution of terrorists, and dismantling of jihadist networks. Anything less is an endorsement of evil.
Nigeria is not alone. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, ISIS-linked rebels have killed thousands. In Burkina Faso, pastors are executed and churches incinerated. In Mozambique, Christian towns have been erased from the map. Across Africa, a perverse pattern repeats — the union of radicalism and Western indifference, and the victims are nearly always Christian.
But Nigeria stands apart. It is Africa’s most populous nation, its economic and political heart. If it falls, the shock will reverberate across the continent.
So I ask, where is the outrage? Where are the protests, the headlines, the hashtags?
The same media class that rushes to champion every self-proclaimed victim of oppression falls curiously silent when the oppressed are believers. The same outlets that preach “diversity” intentionally turn blind eyes to the destruction of a faith followed by 2.6 billion souls. The hypocrisy would be laughable if it weren’t so lethal.
The modern left has grown so morally inverted that an atheist must now defend the faithful. Bill Maher’s rebuke should pierce the conscience of every journalist, pastor, and policymaker who claims to care about justice.
If even he can recognize evil when he sees it, what excuse remains for those who claim to serve God?
For years, Western leaders, particularly those on the left, have droned on about defending the weak and giving voice to the voiceless. But when the victims are Christian — often barefoot widows in burned-out villages clutching starving children — matters of justice don’t seem to matter. What could be weaker than that? What could be more deserving of compassion?
Nigeria now stands at a crossroads — and so does the West.
The issue isn't whether Christianity can survive persecution — it always has. The question is whether nations built upon its moral foundation still believe in the values they inherited.
Because when an atheist must defend the faith, it isn’t just Christianity under siege. It’s the very conscience of the civilized world.
Two years after October 7: God hasn't been silent
Two years. Two long years since morning broke on Simchat Torah — the holy day whose name literally means “rejoicing in the Torah.” But instead of the sounds of worship and laughter, Israel’s skies were filled with sirens and synagogues were filled with sheer terror and endless tears. The country was under attack.
To the south, smoke rose where children should have been waking to the rising sun. Gunfire sounded instead of music at a wilderness festival for young people or tractors working the Holy Land’s soil. The air carried cries no mother should ever hear.
On this second anniversary of October 7, God’s call is clear.
For the past two years, a silence has fallen heavy on every heart that loves Israel. October 7, 2023, happened just two years ago. It's not a distant memory, and it remains more painful than a healed scar.
On that day — and every day in the two years since — God has been here. In the bomb shelters where prayers mix with fear, God is there. In the corridors of hospitals where the sounds of prayer and pain mingle, God is there. In churches and synagogues and living rooms and bedrooms and classrooms across the globe, where prayers are lifted up to Him, God is there.
For two years, through the grief and the war and the prayers for peace, God has made His loving presence known.
I have seen that love with my own eyes. As president and global CEO of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, I walk the narrow streets of Israel and travel the wide roads of America, and I see His presence through the people of faith that I meet — Christians and Jews who see Israel not through the fog of newsprint or the blur of the screen, but through scripture. They open the Bible and read about Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and they know that to bless Israel is to love God’s people and to live out His word.
And so, two years later, the Fellowship and our millions of supporters carry on this work of blessing God’s people.
We build shelters to shield children from rockets. We build trauma centers where wounds are healed and lives are made whole again. We build new lives for refugees fleeing persecution simply for their faith, and we welcome them to their biblical homeland. And we build bridges — of faith, of friendship, and of fellowship between Christians and Jews.
One of these bridges is adorned with flags. Flags of Fellowship is a global movement in blue and white. Outside churches and synagogues, and in yards and campus quads, tiny hands and wrinkled hands plant Israeli flags in the ground, each one remembering one of the 1,200 lives lost on that dark day two years ago. Each one is a proclamation of God’s love.
RELATED: The genocide that isn’t: How Hamas turned lies into global outrage
Tamir Kalifa/Getty Images
In a world where flags are burned in anger and hatred, these flags radiate hope.
Generosity runs like a river behind those flags. In these two years, the Fellowship has provided more than a quarter-billion dollars of aid. We have raised up hospital wings that withstand missiles. We have delivered food to the hungry, medicine to the frail, shelter to the weary.
These gifts are a proclamation of this love — for Israel and for God’s people.
To all the pastors, grandmothers, college students, and prayer warriors who love Israel with all their hearts — todah rabah. Thank you. Your love is a lifeline. Your love changes lives. Your love saves lives. And your love reminds us that here in Israel, we do not stand alone.
On this second anniversary of Oct. 7, even as we remember the hatred, the desperation, the violence, and the darkness of that day, God’s call is clear. Answer hatred with love. Answer despair with hope. Answer violence with healing. And answer darkness with light.
Why Calling Charlie Kirk A Martyr Matters
How Charlie Kirk’s popularity exposes the cost of silent pulpits
The sudden wave of grief and admiration from young people after Charlie Kirk’s death caught many parents and grandparents off guard. High-schoolers and college students didn’t just know his name — they were fans. They followed him closely, quoted him, and saw him as a guide in confusing times.
But why? Kirk was not a movie star, athlete, or pop-culture influencer. He didn’t set fashion trends or headline concerts. What made him connect so deeply with a generation?
Silence does not comfort the searching. It leaves them adrift.
The answer is simple: Charlie Kirk had answers.
While America’s pulpits too often fell silent about cultural issues, Kirk spoke plainly about them. And young people, desperate for clarity and confused about the way forward, finally had a leader.
Silence in the pulpit
I once interviewed a 19-year-old in Madison Square Park who was visibly frustrated. He insisted he didn’t hate women or minorities and wasn’t extreme politically. He simply wanted the chance to live his life without being branded a "bigot" because of his identity as a white male. His frustration wasn’t anger — it was despair.
What struck me was not just his words, but the hopelessness behind them.
If he attended most evangelical churches in America, he would not have found answers. Many churches, even when disagreeing with progressive ideas, avoid speaking against them. Instead, they sidestep controversy, hoping silence will win them credibility.
But silence does not comfort the searching. It leaves them adrift.
What young people face
Several years ago, a megachurch youth pastor asked me what challenges high-schoolers face. I told him this generation is drowning in questions of identity. They don’t know who they are, how to discern truth, or how to recover from failure. Depression and suicidal thoughts are widespread.
He dismissed my concerns until days later, when both gender-identity questions and suicidal struggles appeared in his ministry. Even then, when I offered to help equip his students, he rejected the offer — in anger.
RELATED: Charlie Kirk's legacy exposes a corrosive lie — and now it's time to choose
WoodyUpstate/Getty Images Plus
This isn’t an isolated story. For decades, many youth leaders have minimized cultural and moral questions, reducing Christianity to behavior management and vague encouragement. Students are left unprepared for the real battles they face.
Of course, I’m grateful for the pastors and leaders who reject this trend, but make no mistake: The trend was very real. Students needed answers. Charlie was giving them.
A hunger for clarity
That's why Kirk struck a chord. He didn't shy away from questions about gender, identity, politics, and morality. Agree or disagree with his conclusions, young people heard in him something they rarely heard from pastors: conviction.
When I was once given 50 minutes to “equip” high-school seniors for college with apologetics, I found the proposition laughable. You’ve had services twice a week for four years, and you think 50 minutes of apologetics is enough to prepare them for the lies and untruth they will face day in and day out?
But it illustrates the deeper problem — leaders who thought silence is safe. They were told by all the church gurus that if they were silent, somehow that would turn into gospel opportunities.
Big mistake. It isn’t until people know the truth that the truth will set them free. Silence brings slavery. And into that vacuum stepped Charlie Kirk.
The lesson for the church
Kirk’s popularity among young people should encourage us: This generation's young people are hungry for answers, and they are not turned off by clarity.
At the same time, it should warn us: If pastors will not equip the next generation with biblical truth about cultural issues, someone else will step in to fill the void.
Charlie Kirk did not captivate young people because he was trendy. He did it because he was clear. And that is precisely what too many pastors have been unwilling to be.
I’m thankful for the exceptions. Men like Rob McCoy, Jack Hibbs, David Engelhardt, and many others have been faithful to equip their congregations.
The challenge is before us now. Will the church continue in fearful silence? Or will it recover the courage to declare what scripture says — not just about heaven and hell, but about identity, morality, truth, and life in the public square?
Young people are listening, and they are desperate for your voice. Let’s learn from the life of Charlie Kirk and boldly speak truth in love.
Christian cake-maker seeks Supreme Court ruling after California says she discriminated against lesbian couple
A Christian baker believes she should not have to design a cake that celebrates an ideology that goes against her faith.
In 2017, Cathy Miller was reportedly approached by a lesbian couple, Eileen and Mireya Rodriguez-Del Rio, at her business, the Tastries Bakery in Bakersfield, California.
'A three-tiered, plain white cake with no writing, engravings, adornments, symbols, or images is not pure speech.'
Miller explained that same-sex couples were not part of her belief system and that she did not wish to design their cake. Miller did, however, recommend another cake decorator in town.
Later that year, California's Civil Rights Department sued Miller and said she violated the state's anti-discrimination laws.
In 2023, a five-day trial ended with a ruling in favor of Miller, finding that she "serve[d] and employ[ed]" people of all sexual orientations and that her "only intent, her only motivation, was fidelity to her sincere Christian beliefs."
However, an appellate court reversed the decision and said in February that Miller's refusal was "not protected expression under the federal Constitution's free speech guarantee."
"A three-tiered, plain white cake with no writing, engravings, adornments, symbols, or images is not pure speech," wrote associate Justice Kathleen Meehan of the California 5th District Court of Appeal, Yahoo reported.
After the California Supreme Court refused to hear her argument, Miller is now asking the SCOTUS to hear her case.
RELATED: Bakery owners found guilty of harboring illegal aliens after immigration raid
Photo by Becket
Miller has allegedly always safeguarded her business with the declaration that her custom creations are all carefully designed and will not "celebrate ideals that violate the Christian sacrament of marriage."
Her written standards also state that Tastries will not design custom bakery items that depict gore or pornographic images, demean others, or celebrate drug use.
While Miller has faced near limitless threats over the years, she said she has been humbled by the "outpouring of support for my freedom to serve my community with joy, compassion, and faith in my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ."
A total of 16 states — along with other legal and faith groups — have asked the Supreme Court to articulate a clear rule regarding the expressive nature of the wedding cakes, so that lower courts can resolve cases on their own. These states are:
Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia.
RELATED: Buc-ee’s gets rich by doing everything Wall Street hates
Photo by Becket
Similar cases have been heard by the Supreme Court in recent history.
The Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commissioncase was decided in 2018, in which a Colorado baker told a same-sex couple that he would not create a cake for their wedding due to his religious opposition to same-sex marriage. Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriage at the time of the event, and the baker said he would still sell them other baked goods.
The Supreme Court sided with baker Jack Phillips, but not because it believed he should be allowed to refuse the service. Rather, the high court ruled in a 7-2 decision that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed religious bias toward Phillips in the case.
In the 2023 ruling for 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a web designer to create "expressive designs for same-sex marriages" and to speak "messages with which the designer disagrees."
Justice Neil Gorsuch's opinion for the case focused on "expressive conduct" and content.
"No government ... may affect a 'speaker's message' by 'forc[ing]' her to 'accommodate' other views," Gorsuch wrote.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A message to Christians after Michigan church shooting
Members of the church of Latter-day Saints faced a heavy weekend as the head of the church, Russel Nelson, passed away on the same morning that a man shot up an LDS church and set it on fire.
At least four were killed.
“Yesterday was a very tough day for anybody who is a member of my faith,” Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck says on “The Glenn Beck Program.”
“I did get a lot of emails from friends who are part of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and most of them were in tears because they were online, and they read the words of so-called Christians,” Glenn says.
These “so-called Christians” were saying things like, “I’m glad they’re dead,” “I’m glad the leader died,” “I’m glad those people died because they’re going to hell anyway because they’re a dangerous cult.”
“When I read that, I wept with the same kind of pain that I had on the death of Charlie Kirk when the non-Christians celebrated his death. ‘I’m glad he’s dead,’” Glenn recalls.
“If your church wasn’t talking about these things yesterday, maybe you should find a new church. I don’t know. There’s been a lot of things going on, and we need pastors that are actually talking about things. They’re not talking about politics; they’re talking about, ‘How do I love my neighbor if my neighbor hates me?’” he continues.
“We need people who are applying it to today, because I want you to understand, there is hatred on the rise. There is violence on the rise. There’s all of this stuff on the rise,” he says, asking, “But what is it really? What is really on the rise?”
He then answers himself with one word, “evil.”
“That’s what’s on the rise: evil, chaos, disorder. That all comes from one author, and it’s evil,” he says, before explaining another horrific murder that occurred in North Carolina over the weekend.
A “madman” targeted a crowded dockside restaurant in North Carolina, firing his rifle into a crowd of diners. He killed three people and injured eight.
“This is happening in small communities. And you’re like, what? What is happening to us?” Glenn says.
“We are now living in Gotham. And you need to understand that the times and the seasons have changed. We’re now living in Gotham, and this is all part of the leftist plan. Destabilize, release people from prison, cause chaos in the streets,” he continues. “This is by design.”
Want more from Glenn Beck?
To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Truth is whatever Hillary says today
If you’ve spent any time in politics, you know progressives contradict themselves so often that exposing their double-talk could keep conservative commentators busy for several lifetimes.
At first, young conservatives may find it thrilling to point out those blunders and imagine that the liberal across from them will be persuaded. But here’s the hard lesson: Only people with integrity change their minds when they find contradictions in their own thinking.
The goal isn’t to win the argument but lose your integrity. It’s to speak truth with courage and charity.
Progressives don’t stumble into incoherence by accident. They wield it like a smokescreen. The confusion keeps conscientious conservatives chasing their own tails. Conservatives, by temperament, want coherence, so they expect others to want it, too. But the record shows otherwise.
Take Hillary Clinton. Last week on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” she urged Americans to stop finger-pointing — before immediately blaming Republicans for the country’s problems. A Yale degree didn’t inoculate her against incoherence. As Charlie Kirk once observed at Cambridge, high IQ is no guarantee of wisdom. Clinton didn’t notice the contradiction, and even if she did, it wouldn’t matter. She is paid handsomely to talk, and truth never slows her down.
Moments later in the same appearance, she called for a return to “truth-based reality,” insisting that facts and evidence must matter again. This from the same woman who affirms that a man can become a woman. Truth wasn’t invited to that party. Now, she tells us it must rule the day.
The effect is dizzying, and that is the point.
What should concern us isn’t simply the logic game. It’s the condition of her soul. What happens to a soul shaped for decades by falsehood and injustice?
Clinton also revealed her deepest fear. She does not fear God. She fears the people of God — especially white, male Christians. She said so on national television just weeks after Kirk was assassinated by a trans-supporting terrorist who bought into rhetoric spewed by politicians like her. And yet, here she is again, pouring fuel on the fire.
The irony didn’t stop there. She wondered aloud how today’s politics could be “so contrary to the founding principles and values this country was built on.” This from the same politician who treats the Constitution as a “living document” to be reshaped whenever it confounds her political prejudices. She wasn’t concerned with founding principles when Donald Trump was banned from Twitter or prosecuted by the Biden Justice Department.
But pointing out contradictions only goes so far. The deeper warning is this: Hillary Clinton is what happens when you spend a lifetime saying whatever advances your career. She is willing to contradict herself publicly — and attack Christians — for money and applause. My own university, Arizona State, paid her $500,000 to host the Clinton Global Initiative.
Socrates put it best: The true philosopher, the lover of the good, doesn’t chase political power, money, or fame. He wants only this — that when he leaves this life, his soul is not defiled by injustice.
RELATED: Charlie Kirk thrived on truth and virtue over grievance-mongering
Photo by Jon Putman/Anadolu via Getty Images
That’s the lesson for young conservatives. Exposing contradictions is fine. It can even be fun. But don’t forget what matters more: Never let your soul become like Hillary Clinton’s.
G.K. Chesterton once wrote that the modern mind cuts down the signposts and then complains no one knows the way home. That is the progressive project in our time: Deny first principles, denounce those who keep them, and demand the comforts those principles once secured.
So take this counsel seriously:
- Guard your soul more than your timeline. Social media glory is cheap; a clean conscience is priceless.
- Pursue coherence because it is true, not because it is clever. Wit is garnish; truth is the meal.
- Fear God more than fashion. Today’s trends are tomorrow’s embarrassments; the fear of the Lord endures.
The goal isn’t to win the argument but lose your integrity. It’s to speak truth with courage and charity, to resist compromise with evil for the sake of applause, and to leave this world with a soul unstained by injustice.
That victory is higher than anything Hillary Clinton will ever claim — and it is the only victory that lasts.
America is now playing by Corkins’ rules — unless we stop it
Floyd Lee Corkins. That name should ring louder than it does.
In 2012, Corkins stormed into the Family Research Council’s Washington, D.C., offices armed and intent on mass murder. A security guard stopped him before he could carry out a massacre. He became the first person convicted of domestic terrorism in the District of Columbia.
Corkins came once. His successors will come again. ... The question is what we’re prepared to do about it.
Yet you probably don’t recall him right away. Why not? Probably because the propaganda leaflets against Chick-fil-A and Christians found in his car tied back to groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center — and the press played down the obvious connection. They helped bury what Corkins meant to announce in blood: that political rhetoric backed by violence was the new normal.
I’ve long warned that when legitimate authorities fail to punish evil, someone eventually decides to take matters into his own hands. Corkins is the left’s demonic version of that. His case teaches a simple lesson: If you’re going to call conservatives Hitler, sooner or later someone will start acting on the metaphor.
That same logic drove the 2017 shooting at a congressional baseball practice, where a Bernie Sanders supporter nearly assassinated a swath of House Republicans. Rhetoric became ammunition. Talking points became bullets.
Fast-forward to 2025. The demons are autographing their shell casings. They want everyone to know exactly who wants us dead. And the corporate left-wing press winks and nods along.
Enter Jimmy Kimmel, a late-night host with fewer viewers than Glenn Beck can pull in an impromptu X Spaces session.
Kimmel should have been irrelevant years ago. But his network kept him on the air. Why? Not because he draws ratings or ad revenue — he doesn’t. He survives because of affinity advertising: the corporate and philanthropic subsidy system that props up “the right people” no matter how much red ink their shows spill. Pfizer, Disney, the Soros family — they all bankroll the propaganda they want in circulation, audience or no.
As the Joker explained while burning an enormous pile of cash, “It’s not about the money. It’s about sending a message.”
That’s why Kimmel could stand on stage and smear conservatives, even after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and still be untouchable. His words carry the same function as Corkins’ bullets: intimidation dressed up as entertainment.
RELATED: Violence gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back
Blaze Media Illustration
The danger isn’t just one unfunny comedian. It’s the ecosystem that shields him. Advertisers and networks subsidize the message, the media excuses it, and the extremists absorb it as permission. That’s how rhetoric becomes carnage.
We face two choices. We can enforce the law, punish violent actors and those who materially enable them, and protect the marketplace of ideas. Or we can accept the Corkins rules: a culture where calling people Hitler is step one and shooting them is step two.
The notion that we can run in place like Mike Pence, emasculating ourselves for the sake of “proper tone” or one last bow to decorum, is a funeral march. Some may find comfort in that tune, but I will not bind my children’s future to it.
Corkins came once. His successors will come again. Kimmel’s sponsors and allies want you to think this is inevitable. It isn’t. The question is what we’re prepared to do about it.
Exclusive: Docs Show How Dearborn’s Muslim Leaders Make It A ‘Hostile Place For Christians And Jews’
Get the Conservative Review delivered right to your inbox.
We’ll keep you informed with top stories for conservatives who want to become informed decision makers.
Today's top stories