peterschreiber/Getty Images

Horowitz: New study shows rejection of cornea transplants following COVID vaccination

It was one of the worst human rights violations of the COVID regime, and it’s still going on in most hospitals. Hospitals were de-listing people from organ transplant lists who would not get the COVID shots, no matter how much information came out on how the shots were unsafe and ineffective, particularly among the immunocompromised. From day one, the policy should have been the other way around – kidneys shouldn’t have been wasted on those who got the shots – and now we have the proof.

According to a study published by Japanese researchers last month in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, a number of patients receiving cornea transplants experienced rejections of the cornea tissue following the COVID vaccines. Cornea grafts are considered a much lower-risk transplant procedure than solid organ transplants and tend to have a much lower rejection rate. Which is why the researchers were surprised to find a total of 23 eyes from 21 patients who had undergone corneal graft procedures who experienced rejection anywhere from one day to six weeks following COVID vaccination. In some cases, the rejection occurred suddenly after being jabbed despite the cornea graft having held steady for many years.

Like so many other studies indicating concerning safety signals about the shot, don’t expect any follow-up to this analysis. If our government really cared about safety and science, it would immediately identify these cases of rejected corneal tissue and study them for spike protein and other tissue protein expression markers.

What this study demonstrates is that rather than accusing the unvaccinated recipients of potentially wasting a transplant, we should be studying whether vaccinated recipients might be at higher risk of wasting transplants and whether vaccinated donors run the risk of transferring to the recipients the spike protein through the grafted tissue or in solid organs.

Although the paper has not yet identified a likely mechanism of action causing rejections in eye tissue, Dr. Richard Urso, an ocular specialist, told me he is not surprised that the mRNA expressing the spike would be able to find and inflame tissue that is typically protected from the immune system. “We’re seeing inflammatory markers in tissues that usually don’t receive this protein because the lipid nanoparticles can spread it anywhere in the body. These particles are particularly adept at crossing tight junctions and can deliver the mRNA to parts of the body like the brain and eye. One thing about blood vessels around the eye is that they are covered by pericytes that are full of ACE2 receptors, which makes sense that it would trigger all the pathways for inflammation including natural killer cells.”

ACE2 is the primary receptor the spike protein uses to enter the cells. However, those infected with COVID naturally, although still at risk for ACE2 binding in many parts of the body, are still protected, for the most part, in places like the heart and brain that are hard to penetrate. “The eye and brain are typically protected from immune system overactions because of the tight junctions,” observes Urso, who worked with these tissues in scientific labs for years.

According to Urso, this is also why he suspects one is much more likely to suffer myocarditis from the spike protein expressed through the shots than through natural infection. It’s all about the lipid nanoparticles serving as lifeboats for the spike to interject itself into every tight junction of the body. “The critical piece of evidence in why myocarditis is so much worse among the vaccinated than those with infections is because the heart has tight junctions and they are loosened during exercise, which is why the LNPs can then pass through and attach to the lining of the heart. The LNPs allow the spike to get to places where the virus cannot go. That’s why you see such difference between the level of troponin between those affected by the wild-type disease and those who get the vaccine.”

Perhaps this is why elite athletes who engage in vigorous exercise are constantly on the hook for sudden heart problems, given that the loosening of the junctions allows the LNPs to pass with a greater load of mRNA-coded spike.

Now imagine tainting the entire pool of organ and tissue donors with this spike protein. And yet, the unvaccinated are the ones vilified and excluded from donations? A U.K. study found 13 solid organ donors who likely died from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia stemming from the AstraZeneca shots just during two of the early months of vaccination in 2021. So what happened when 10 of their organs were given to recipients? "There were seven major thrombotic or hemorrhagic postoperative complications in six recipients resulting in the loss of three transplants.” One of the patients died within a day of cardiac arrest.

When this is all over and the dust settles, it will become clear that treating the unvaccinated as spreaders of disease was the greatest blood libel of all time in order to cover up the true threats of the vaccine itself.
FatCamera/Getty Images

Horowitz: Do the COVID shots erase natural immunity?

Why is it that years into this pandemic, the cases continue to proliferate and people seem to get the virus multiple times? A new study might shed light on this question, revealing a disturbing business model of the pharmaceutical companies to ensure that their product is always in demand because it serves as the arsonist while pretending to be the medical equivalent of a firefighter.

A new study published as a letter in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that not only did the Pfizer shots turn negative after five months during the Omicron wave, making a vaccinated individual more likely to get the virus, but they actually erased the immunity provided by prior infection, thereby ensuring that injected people can get COVID again. In a one-of-a-kind observational study of over 273,000 children, the study divided the groups into four camps: unvaccinated children with prior infection, unvaccinated children with no prior infection, vaccinated children with prior infection, and vaccinated children with no prior infection. What were the results?

Shockingly, the authors conclude, “The rapid decline in protection against omicron infection that was conferred by vaccination and previous infection provides support for booster vaccination.”

Except their study should demonstrate the exact opposite conclusion. Take a look at these two figures side by side:

The figure on the left (C) shows the gradual waning of immunity among unvaccinated children with prior infection. The figure on the right shows a precipitous waning of immunity among children who got COVID but then got vaccinated. Among those infected in November 2021 in the vaccine group, their level of protection went down to zero within a half-year, even though they already had the virus!

The authors suggest this is reason to constantly get boosters, but that would only make sense if boosters offered temporary protection but retained the protection accorded from prior infection. Clearly, this data shows that it slides the protection from natural infection backward, as was previously hypothesized from other academic papers.

Then again, if you look at their first two figures (A and B), they appear to show negative efficacy after five months for those without prior infection and just a slightly slower decline into negative territory among the vaccinated children who already had prior infection. In other words, either way – previously infected or not – the vaccine makes the children worse off.

This study lends credence to the findings of an NIH paper from earlier this year showing that only 40% of people with a previous infection in the vaccinated group produced anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, compared to 93% in the placebo group. The possible inhibition of N-antibodies, which are more comprehensive than the S(spike)-antibodies, might be a possible culprit for this negative efficacy even after having already been infected with the virus.

Another explanation might be original antigenic sin, which is the priming of the body to respond to new variants with an antigen to the old strain. A study from Stanford published in Cell earlier this year might shed light on this phenomenon. Researchers observed a decreased immune response to new variants among those vaccinated for the original strain because the shots are teaching the body to respond improperly. “We find that prior vaccination with Wuhan-Hu-1-like antigens followed by infection with Alpha or Delta variants gives rise to plasma antibody responses with apparent Wuhan-Hu-1-specific imprinting manifesting as relatively decreased responses to the variant virus epitopes, compared with unvaccinated patients infected with those variant viruses,” observed the Stanford pathologists. They note that the extent to which this causes original antigenic sin “will be an important topic of ongoing study.”

Important indeed! Just as with Pfizer’s oral therapeutic, Paxlovid, the more you use it, the more you need to use it! Behold the beauty of negative efficacy, rebounding of the virus, erasing natural immunity, and the promise of endless doses to stanch the bleeding.

Imagine that these shots are still being foisted upon children. Even the U.K. government quietly suspended the COVID shots for 5- to 11-year-olds. Yet we still have some cities in America requiring them for school.

What is further astounding is that even if the shots did work to prevent COVID, the upper bounds of illness severity most children present with is no worse than even the minor symptoms from the vaccine. Even putting aside the risk of serious injury, such as heart inflammation, the CDC’s own research shows that a massive percentage of toddlers who got the shots suffered what can only be described as flu-like symptoms. An unfathomable 50%-60% of children 6 months to two years of age experienced systemic reactions to one or both doses of either Pfizer or Moderna. This means they experienced some sort of illness beyond just pain at the injection site.

Furthermore, more than 15% of children 3-5 experienced a “health impact” from the second dose of Moderna, and anywhere from 5%-18% of children couldn’t go to school the next day, depending on the type and dose of shot. About 2% required medical care. Remember, this is for children and for Omicron, at a time when most already got the virus, but now the shot will give them up front COVID-like symptoms, possibly erase their prior immunity, thereby making them get the virus again, and exposing a certain percentage to life-altering adverse effects.

Could anyone possibly have manufactured a more Orwellian counterproductive vaccine if they tried on purpose?

Kinwun/Getty Images

Horowitz: Why is there a sudden shortage of health care workers in Canadian hospitals?

Regarding the phenomenon of doctor shortages and sudden death syndrome in Canada, Leslyn Lewis, member of parliament and candidate for Conservative leader, made the following observation: “If three young women go missing in your neighborhood, and the police response was ‘Well, it is probably not a serial killer,’ that wouldn’t be good enough.” Why are we then not demanding answers about the cause of all these human shortages – from doctors to pilots – and the unusual number of people dropping dead young beginning in 2021 (not 2020)?

In an article titled, “'Not going to get better anytime soon,” CTV calls the doctor and nurse shortage in Canadian hospitals “dire.” One would think something this sudden, jarring, and consequential would have a readily available explanation for its cause, but the media struggle with attempts to cover up the cause. They posit it might be stress, mental health issues, or “secondary” effects of COVID. Nor does there seem to be any urgency on the part of the media or government to get to the bottom of this serious public policy issue.

Well, just like a bunch of missing young girls in a neighborhood might not involve foul play, but you would certainly begin an investigation with that in mind, one would think that this Health Impact News article would serve as a launching point for an investigation into the boosters: 6 Canadian Medical Doctors Died Within 2 Weeks After 4th COVID Booster Shots for Employees Started at One Hospital. First there were the three doctors who died suddenly with an unknown cause of death at Canada’s Trillium Health Partners-Mississauga Hospital in Toronto, then three more in other cities in Canada died – all of them young and some in their 20s. Now Steve Kirsch is reporting the name of 14 doctors across Canada who have recently died young, whose causes of death include “unspecified illness,” “died swimming,” and “died in her sleep.”

Obviously, this doesn’t prove it was from the shot, but given all the other data, science, pathophysiology, and life insurance claims information we are seeing, we should not rule out the shots, as the media has already done.

One could just chalk this up to bad luck if this were just a rash of noticeable sudden deaths among young doctors, but the fact that there is a doctor shortage would lend credence to the theory that many others who don’t die from the shots are getting sick for a few days. Given that they are all required to get boosters in the Canadian health care field, that would account for the sudden shortages. To add insult to injury, or shall we say “infection to injury,” the more you inject, the more you infect, so these same doctors are also more likely to continue getting COVID, which may also contribute to the staff shortages. A U.K. study showed that health care workers infected with the original Wuhan strain who then got multiple vaccines seemed to be more likely to get infected with the new variants. Dr. Robert Malone has explained this is the result of “immune imprinting,” where your body gets trained to respond improperly to the new strains by always responding to the defunct Wuhan strain.

The concern that doctors are suddenly dropping dead due to the shots is more than just anecdotal; this is happening across civilization. The leading cause of death in Alberta is now “unknown.” Over the past 20 years, the top cause of death was either heart attack or dementia, usually accounting for roughly 1,800-2,000 deaths a year. But suddenly in 2021, “unknown” takes the top spot at a whopping 3,362.

Just like doctors, pilots are highly specialized, and their limited numbers make it noticeable when only a small percentage are suddenly absent. There have been cancellations and delays all over the country for months now with no clear explanation why. On Sunday, a total of 6,378 flights were delayed and more than 900 canceled across the United States. In Chicago’s O’Hare airport, 40% of all flights were delayed and 12% were canceled.

It is true that some of them are quitting because of the mandates, and that in itself would create a shortage, but pilots have already spoken out about being injured and watching their employers cover it up.

More and more data points are demonstrating that VAERS was not only correct, but is underreporting the scope of injury. The Daily Sceptic recently pooled five surveys of the American public that show more people self-report vaccine injury or death in their families than COVID injury or death:

The pooled results of five surveys of the American public, now totaling over 2,500 people, show that while 4.4% of respondents reported that a member of their household had died from COVID-19, 8.9% said a member had died as a result of Covid vaccination.
The results also showed that 8.6% said they had been injured by their vaccination, 4.9% that they had sought medical help and 3.2% that they had been hospitalized, while 3.6% said that as a result of vaccination they were no longer able to work a full day or at all. These are percentages of all respondents. If we look only at the 74.0% vaccinated with at least one dose then the figures, as a proportion of vaccinated persons, are 11.7% injured, 6.7% needing medical help, 4.4% hospitalized and 4.8% unable to work. While these figures are self-reported and there is no control group, since the unvaccinated were not asked about adverse events, they are still alarmingly high.

Obviously, each one of these data points is imperfect in its own right, but taken together, there is enough circumstantial evidence to convict a criminal if this were a criminal case. Moreover, this is the best we can do when government and the medical and scientific establishment refuse to put the money into following up on these safety signals with better research and investigations.

Every week now, England is experiencing excess mortality, with deaths over the past six weeks up 14% over the five-year average. Edinburgh Group researchers are noticing the same trend in Scotland.

In Germany, there is a sharp increase both in COVID and non-COVID deaths over the pre-vaccine period of the pandemic.

Why is there no sense of urgency to investigate the cause of this ubiquitous sudden death syndrome other than to immediately exonerate the vaccine as a potential culprit? Why is there no push to begin doing autopsies? Over a year and a half into these glaring safety signals, there is no innocent answer to these questions.

Three Air Force Academy cadets who refused COVID-19 vaccine won't be commissioned, will receive bachelor's degrees instead, may need to repay gov't for education



Three U.S. Air Force Academy cadets who refused the COVID-19 vaccine won't be commissioned as officers and will graduate with bachelor’s degrees instead, the academy told the Associated Press.

A fourth cadet who also refused the vaccine but changed his mind about a week ago will graduate and become an Air Force officer, Academy spokesman Dean Miller added to the AP.

What else?

Miller also said the three cadets "will not be commissioned into the United States Air Force as long as they remain unvaccinated," the outlet reported, adding that the secretary of the Air Force will decide if the trio will owe the government for the costs of their educations in lieu of service.

The Air Force Academy as of Saturday is the only U.S. military academy not commissioning cadets who refuse the vaccine, the AP said, adding that all of the more than 1,000 Army cadets at West Point graduated and were commissioned as officers Saturday — and all were vaccinated. The Naval Academy said Saturday that no Navy or Marine Corps seniors are being denied commissions over vaccine refusals, the outlet said.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, the scheduled speaker at the Air Force graduation Wednesday in Colorado, last year made COVID-19 vaccinations mandatory for service members — including those at military academies — saying the shots are critical to maintaining military readiness and the health of the force, the AP said.

But members of Congress, the military, and the public have questioned whether the military's exemption reviews have been fair, the outlet said, adding that multiple lawsuits have been filed against the mandate, mainly in regard to how few service members have been granted religious exemptions.

Lt. Col. Brian Maguire — an Air Force Academy spokesman — said a week ago all four cadets met with the academy’s superintendent, were told about potential consequences, and had time before graduation to change their minds, the AP reported.

The military academies for years often have required students to repay tuition costs if they leave during their junior or senior years, the outlet said, adding that many such cases involve students with disciplinary issues or similar problems — and the cost can be as much as $200,000 or more.

Chippendales hires lobbyists to help secure COVID-19 relief



Chippendales — the company that promotes exotic male dance troupes — is hiring political lobbyists as it seeks financial relief from a potential new round of federal pandemic aid.

Chippendales has retained the services of the white-show law and lobbying firm Greenberg Traurig to lobby for them on a pandemic-era program that was designed to provide relief for concert halls, movie theaters, and other ventures in the live events industry, Politico reported.

Lobbying records indicate that this is the first time Chippendales has retained federal level lobbyists.

The company’s move to hire lobbyists to help them secure pandemic relief shows how business of all shapes and sizes have been significantly impacted by COVID-19.

During the country’s 2020 economic shutdowns, closures hit the entertainment industry, especially live entertainment, hard. Like many other companies across the nation, Chippendales had to adapt to the “new normal” and even had to cancel its “Get Naughty” tour and live performances in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The company’s performers, adorned in their signature bow ties, cuffs, and short-shorts, posted at-home workout tutorials to keep the brand alive since they couldn’t perform. And instead of gyrating for bachelorettes in person, the company had its dancers host half-hour virtual strip teases through video conferencing services like Zoom, FaceTime, and Google Hangouts.

Now, Chippendales’ dancers have returned to the stage and are even joined by Vinny Guadagnino of “Jersey Shore” fame.

Chippendales has hired lobbyists as lawmakers on Capitol Hill are considering one final round of Covid relief that would provide assistance for small businesses including entertainment venues.

Prior to departing for its Easter recess, the US House of Representatives passed a bill containing Covid relief, but this bill faces strong opposition in the Senate where it needs support from at least ten Republicans who, as a party, have appeared hesitant to spend more on federal covid relief amidst of soaring inflation.

That said, Chippendales is not alone in the pursuit of more federal assistance. Trade groups that put on trade shows, convention hosts, and even escape rooms are joining Chippendales to lobby for federal relief.

Previously, concert venues and theaters had been included in federal relief programs that offered them an equivalent to 45% of their gross earned revenue in relief, and the venues were eligible for even more relief from President Joe Biden’s American Rescue Plan initiative.

Despite this being the first time Chippendales has hired lobbyists, the company has previously worked with the government to trademark its signature collar and cuffs outfits.

​‘Dr. Fauci, give me that ouchie!’: Skepticism over absurd rap reveals who's been the butt of the joke



After a video went viral of Alex Stein serenading folks at a Dallas City Hall open mic session with his own rap hailing the COVID-19 vaccine, the burning question became: Is this guy for real?

It was a minute and a half of unadulterated cringe, featuring lyrics such as: “Vaccinate me, in my thong. Vaccination, right or wrong. Dr. Fauci, give me that ouchie!”

With people like Francis Collins, who decided to share his own little coronavirus ditty, the nurses invited to sing at the White House, and whatever this is, it's embarrassingly clear why it became a question of whether to take Stein's performance as comedy or as serious messaging to be counted as yet another cringe-worthy failed attempt at being relatable to humans with a pulse.

BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales of "The News & Why It Matters" was admittedly unsure of how seriously to take his performance.

“What the hell?!” was Gonzales’ initial reaction, which was not far off from what others were thinking, as well.

You know the rules, if I had to see it, you do, too. Also, I\u2019m sorry.pic.twitter.com/mOXpwKzko3
— TheBlaze (@TheBlaze) 1642007284
I mean. This is satire, right? \n\nRight? \n\n #notacult \n\n#vaccination #VaccineMandatehttps://twitter.com/EvertonBailey/status/1481291957209083914\u00a0\u2026
— The Canadian Fringe \ud83c\udde8\ud83c\udde6 (@The Canadian Fringe \ud83c\udde8\ud83c\udde6) 1645903435
Everything is wrong with the world.pic.twitter.com/Z25OyAgRl2
— Ian Miles Cheong (@Ian Miles Cheong) 1642009491

Curiosity plagued Gonzales, so she invited Stein as a guest on her show to get answers.

“This is where we’re at in society,” Stein said. “There’s so many TikTok nurses doing ICU dances, then you see in the White House Joe Biden has a bunch of people in scrubs singing songs, then it’s totally believable,” Stein added, referring to his own comical performance as something that was easily misconstrued as some form of serious message he was trying to sell.

“The world is so absurd, my actions [made people think] ‘oh, somebody WOULD do that,'” Stein continued. “I mean, Francis Collins, the NIH Director, the top guy, is playing little songs on his guitar like that. What it is, is it’s mocking US … it’s total mockery from the people in power.”

Adding to the mockery in the past few days, the U.S. Capitol announced it would be lifting it’s mask mandate just in time for the State of the Union address, the CDC would now be ditching most mask requirements, and Impact Research issued a memo complete with “strategic thoughts” for Democrats that began, "It's time for Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis phase of the COVID war.”

Watch Alex Stein's latest appearance at Dallas City Hall, complete with a puppet, here.

For the full Alex Stein interview on "The News & Why It Matters," watch the video below. Can't watch? Catch the podcast here.


Want more from The News & Why It Matters?

To enjoy more roundtable rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trudeau says there are no plans to call in military to end Freedom Convoy protest



Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters Thursday that there are no plans to deploy the Canadian military to end anti-vaccine mandate protest in Ottawa.

“One has to be very, very cautious before deploying military in situations engaging Canadians,” said Trudeau, who has fiercely criticized the protesters as a "small fringe minority."

"This is not something we're looking at right now. There is no question of sending in the army," he emphasized.

The prime minister said that the Canadian government will take seriously formal requests to have the military step in to end the protest but added that so far no such requests have been made.

“As of now there have been no requests, and that is not in the cards right now," he said.

According to Reuters, more than 200 trucks and other vehicles have formed a blockade in Ottawa's downtown area since last Friday, when a "Freedom Convoy" descended on the Canadian capital to demand an end to COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

Thousands have protested peacefully, with some calling for Trudeau to step down from power.

Trudeau has condemned the protests, accusing some of the demonstrators of promoting hatred and racism.

“Over the past few days, Canadians were shocked and frankly disgusted by the behaviour displayed by some people protesting in our nation’s capital,” the prime minister said Monday at a news conference.

“I want to be very clear: We are not intimidated by those who hurl insults and abuse at small business workers and steal food from the homeless. We won’t give in to those who fly racist flags. We won’t cave to those who engage in vandalism or dishonour the memory of our veterans.”

News coverage of the protests in Canadian media has referred to the gridlock in Ottawa as an "occupation." There are also claims that "far-right activists" have joined the demonstrators and espoused hateful views toward Muslims, Jews, and other people groups.

Images circulating on social media show some demonstrators with flags depicting a Swastika and other hate symbols.

Trying again https://twitter.com/YoniFreedhoff/status/1487513885661962250\u00a0\u2026pic.twitter.com/yi6yOrPkKm
— Yoni Freedhoff \ud83d\udfe3, MD (@Yoni Freedhoff \ud83d\udfe3, MD) 1643486134

Ottawa police are also investigating after the National War Memorial was desecrated by some of the demonstrators.

The vast majority of protesters who have spoken to the media say they are not racist, sexist, or otherwise hateful and are simply there to protest for their freedom.

“To anyone who joined the convoy but is rightly uncomfortable with the symbols of hatred and division on display: join with your fellow Canadians, be courageous and speak out – do not stand for or with intolerance and hate,” Trudeau said on Monday.

Although there have been allegations of some protesters acting violently, Ottawa police say they've mostly issued traffic tickets and only one person has been criminally charged as of Wednesday, CTV News reported.

Ottawa Police Chief Peter Sloly has said the city is looking at "every single option" to end the demonstration, which has disrupted city life downtown.

"I am increasingly concerned there is no policing solution to this," Sloly said Wednesday. "And that other solutions are going to have to be considered well beyond my ability to dictate."

He named a court injunction or forced removal of the protesters, negotiations, and military assistance as possible means by which to end the protest.

The leaders of the "Freedom Convoy" insist that the protest will continue for "as long as it takes" for the government to end all COVID-19-related mandates. In a statement, they said they had "empathy" for Ottawa citizens who are "bearing this inconvenience" of the protest.

"The responsibility for your inconvenience lies squarely on the shoulders of politicians who have prefer to vilify and call us names rather than engage in respectful, serious dialogue," Chris Barber said.

"The fastest way to get us out of the nation's Capital, is to call your elected representatives and end all C-19 mandates."

Horowitz: It’s time for conservatives to treat Pfizer like Planned Parenthood



In late September, Tennessee state Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson returned a $1,000 check Pfizer PAC had donated for the 2020 election. He then proceeded to sponsor a sweeping bill that ended most vaccine and mask mandates, a bill that was ultimately signed by the governor. Good for him. Now it’s time for the thousands of other state and federally elected Republicans to do the same.

Being pro-life is not limited to concern for the unborn. Those already born are at least as important. With Pfizer leading the charge on COVID fascism – from censoring effective treatments to covering up problems with its deadly shots – it’s time to treat Pfizer the same way Republicans treat Planned Parenthood. The company and any of of its supporters must be persona non grata among anyone who believes in the cause of life.

Nobody blames Pfizer for attempting and failing to make a safe and effective shot. The problem is how the company doubled down on three and now four of these shots, lobbied that children and the naturally immune should get them, and fought to block any shred of liability in immoral contracts global governments signed. If we don’t want America to become Pfizer’s private rat lab, as we are seeing in Israel, we would be wise to cut all ties between Pfizer and the politicians who claim to represent the non-elite, non-globalist, America-first citizens.

A report by Public Citizen published last year found redacted Pfizer contracts with several governments – from Israel and South Africa to the U.S., U.K, Brazil, and Argentina – that revealed how much those countries signed away to this private global empire. These contracts exposed that Pfizer has the right to silence governments, controls the donation of its shots, decides delivery timelines, has removed the courts from all arbitration, and can go after all assets of the nation, including military installations in some countries. Does anyone really believe that any degree of failure and safety concerns would lead to the suspension of these shots – ever? This is the ultimate moral hazard, and we need untainted politicians to finally apply some modicum of check and balance to a company that uses taxpayer funds to create, market, and mandate its product on people’s bodies and then absolves itself from all liability.

For Pfizer to push these shots on children with no benefit, market them on pregnant women without studying it, obscure their own massive adverse event reporting, and continue to push endless boosters despite the lack of efficacy and growth of safety signals makes the company as anti-life as Planned Parenthood.

Pfizer is now experimenting on children and even babies for a virus that is less virulent for them than the flu and for a vaccine that has killed more people than all other vaccines combined. The Big Pharma ogre even announced last month that the trial failed to show positive results for 2- to 5-year-olds, so its answer is to now include “a third dose of 3 µg at least two months after the second dose of the two-dose series” to jack up the children even more. In its own press release, the company mentions its trial on babies as a “Phase 1/2/3 Trial in Children,” meaning that they are combining the phases together rather than working sequentially, as part of the transparent process through which all safely developed drugs have been approved in the past. Pfizer is out of control, and someone needs to put an end to this.

Nobody has ever held Pfizer accountable for its outcomes. Even for adults who are more vulnerable to COVID, there is only one study that matters, and it demonstrates that more people died in the vaccine group than in the placebo group. Pfizer’s six-month follow up was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, and it reveals (p. 7 of pdf) that after six months, 20 people died in the Pfizer group and 14 in the placebo. Originally, it was 15 and 14 respectively, but in the follow-up months, it is noted that three more participants in the trial group died and two in the placebo group died after getting the shot. Pfizer unethically offered the shots to everyone in the placebo group, thereby erasing the long-term control group. However, the numbers speak for themselves. They can claim that there is no evidence they died from the shot all they want, but at the end of the day their own numbers show more all-cause mortality in the trial group.

After the shots have failed and have now gone negative, how can Pfizer be given a license to continue shoving endless shots upon our people every few months on all age groups? Even if there was some absolute benefit against COVID once upon a time, the company’s own data show it’s more than washed away by what is likely vaccine injury, and that was when it was working. Henceforth, the shots are all pain, no gain.

What are the long-term effects of endless shots? Autoimmune diseases that haven’t even been quantified in the short-term vaccine injury and death data. Ariel Munitz, one of Israel’s top immunologists, who has supported the vaccination program until now, warned that going down the path of more boosters could cause “original antigenic sin.” The central concern of Prof. Munitz is that “giving repeat boosters with an ‘out-of-date’ immune reagent may eventually help the virus evade the immune system.” (Tweet translated from Hebrew.)

Specifically, the way this works, according to Munitz, is that “the more antigen we inject, the more they will ‘choose’ B cells that are specific for the strain or antigen we are storing.” The results? “This will cause us to lose populations of B cells that are less specific to the same strain / antigen storage but may be very effective for a new strain of virus that may arrive.” He also gave voice to a concern that “repeated exposures to the same antigen will cause a shift (skewing) of T cells against the same contaminating factor,” which “may eventually lead to loss of memory T cells against other contaminants.” In other words, it can make people respond less efficiently to future pathogens, making them de facto immune-compromised.

How could any Republican who calls himself pro-life allow Pfizer to control our entire country and our bodies without any liability, independent audit, or check and balance? No such independent audit or dissent will ever take place until we cut the money between Pfizer and the politicians. It’s time for a mass campaign for every Republican to return the Pfizer PAC checks they were given and begin representing the people. Pfizer is a greater threat to the born and unborn than even Planned Parenthood.

Flashback: Remember when Rachel Maddow said 'the virus does not infect' vaccinated people?



Folks skeptical of the various COVID vaccines out there have presented all sorts of reasons for their leeriness. Some of them reasonable, some of them ... not so much.

One reason so many Americans have been cautious about the jabs lately is that the new shots don't follow the traditional understanding of how vaccines work: by keeping you from getting whatever bug you've been inoculated against.

You know — the normal understanding of "vaccine."

But what "vaccine" means has been tweaked over the last several months.

The Centers for Disease Control and Infection infamously edited its definitions of "vaccination" and "vaccine."

As the Miami Herald — and many other media outlets — reported in an effort to explain away the CDC's vocabulary change, the term "vaccination" once said "the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease," but the agency replaced "immunity" with the word "protection."

Similarly, "vaccine" was changed from "a product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease" to "a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases."

Of course, those who get off on trashing anyone who dares say their skepticism of the shots might be based on the apparently fluid definitions of "vaccine" and "vaccination" will claim that the new definitions simply reflect the reality of what we've always said about inoculations.

But do they?

Left-wing MSNBC host Rachel Maddow sure didn't think so earlier this year when she was celebrating the vaccines during the March 29 episode of her show.

"Instead of the virus being able to hop from person to person to person, potentially mutating and becoming more virulent and drug-resistant along the way, now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person," Maddow asserted, echoing the understanding most people had at the time of vaccines and how they work.

"A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them," she continued. "The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people."

"That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this, if we just go fast enough to get the whole population," Maddow added.

Interestingly, Maddow's bit wasn't censored by social media or lambasted by the big brains in mainstream media for spreading a false definition of vaccines.

Rachel Maddow on March 29, 2021.pic.twitter.com/OoJTUD0Fb7
— Chris Field (@Chris Field) 1640633617

Just a few months after Maddow stated what was essentially everyone's understanding of what it meant to get vaccinated, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky admitted that the vaccines don't stop people from transmitting COVID but said they do help prevent severe illness and death.

"Our vaccines are working exceptionally well," she told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Aug. 5. "They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death — they prevent it. But what they can't do any more is prevent transmission."

Horowitz: The vaccines are working ... exactly as they were designed



"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." —George Orwell

There is nowhere to run or hide from the growing observations that the closer we come to universal vaccination rates in many countries, the worse the pandemic has become. We have always known that leaky vaccines have the potential to create viral enhancement, but the recent data is unmistakable. At the same time, the COVID cultists are panicking over an emerging variant that actually might be the mildest of all while mainly affecting the vaccinated — a perfect refutation to the mass vaccination push. All signs point to the need to suspend the shots and focus exclusively on monoclonal antibodies and other early treatment. Or is there an ulterior motive?

At this point, we better pray that Omicron becomes dominant in the U.S. as quickly as possible. The most devastating observation of 2021 is that more people have died from COVID under the mass vaccination regime during the existing variant than before there was a single jab. According to the CDC’s “Data Table for Daily Death Trends,” there have been 127,184 COVID deaths from September 1 through November 30 this year, which is 45% greater than the 87,829 recorded deaths over the same period in 2020. And some of the deaths from this year are still lagging and likely to be updated.

Typically, viruses mutate down and become less virulent. Last year, there was much less built up immunity, we had fewer treatment options, and we had zero vaccines. It is nearly impossible to ignore the fact that the narrow-spectrum leaky vaccine has made the virus much worse.

During the peak of the winter wave in January, there were 19 recorded deaths for 15- to 17-year-olds. In August, when the vaccines began to leak and we likely experienced vaccine-mediated viral enhancement, kids noticeably got sicker. Although deaths were still very rare, there were 63 recorded deaths among that age cohort, and the numbers have generally remained higher.

Something strange happened, after the was available, C19 deaths in 15-17 yos were than any other time of the pandemic\n1/21 - 19\n2/21 - 7\n3/21 - 9\n4/21 - 3\n5/21 - 7\n6/21 - 6\n7/21 - 6\n8/21 - 63\n9/21 - 30\n10/21 - 18 \n11/21 - 10\n\n MIS-C ran w/the curve, C19 deaths didn'tpic.twitter.com/YeK9bqM6wx
— Jean Rees (@Jean Rees) 1639098436

Imagine if we had put all the funds for the leaky shots into the monoclonal antibodies and an outpatient treatment regime built on the latest research of dozens of therapeutics that have shown promise in combatting the virus. Yet rather than focus on alternatives and investigate what went wrong with the injections, our establishment leaders are doubling down, even as the failure is undeniably in plain sight. As such, it’s hard to escape the sinister conclusion that they intended this all along.

Consider the fact that Cornell University has an ironclad vaccine and mask mandate, yet 3.5% of the entire campus tested positive last week alone. The school has now switched to online learning.

NEW: Cornell University goes remote after reporting over 900 COVID cases this week, VP for University Relations Joel Malina says "virtually every" case has been found in fully-vaccinated students, many of whom received the booster shot - CNN
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) 1639590883

Consider the fact that before the NFL season started, 52 of 53 players on the L.A. Rams’ roster were vaccinated. Now they lead the league with 11 players on the COVID list.

Consider the fact that Newton, Massachusetts, has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, with 97% of the entire population vaccinated, including 99% of 12- to 15-year-olds and 87% of 5- to 11-year-olds. Yet, despite this and indoor mask mandates, the town has more cases than this time last year and is likely headed toward a record.

Consider the fact that a country like South Korea barely recorded deaths during the entire pandemic, but now has many more cases and deaths, with nearly all adults vaccinated and one of the highest vaccination rates for a country that large (over 50 million).

Consider the fact that England and France, both with very high vaccination rates and large prior COVID waves, have recently set case records.

France has officially set a new high in cases, 4.5 months into vaccine passports, 19 months into mask mandates and with 92% of adults at least partially vaccinated, but at least politicians and experts are still pretending vaccine passports & mask mandates can \u201cslow the spread\u201dpic.twitter.com/9nI0ROjFh0
— IM (@IM) 1639593693

Likewise, Portugal, with the highest double-vaxxed rate in Europe, now has more cases than during the winter peak.

Cases in Portugal are up 554% since they started vaccine passports for major events and nightlife, but I\u2019m sure vaccine passports will work in England after failing literally everywhere else they\u2019ve been triedpic.twitter.com/EYSWtMXi3b
— IM (@IM) 1639595809

Several months ago, a Harvard study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology, the only one to look at thousands of U.S. counties and different countries to study correlation between vaccination rates and case rates, found zero correlation. "In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people,” concluded the author.

The establishment suggests that the shots at least provide some with temporary protection from critical illness. But what good is that if the shots actually make the virus more virulent for everyone and then offer a degree of preventive protection for its consumers while screwing everyone else?

Let’s not forget that Dr. Fauci warned from day one that you need a perfect vaccine because a half-baked one runs the risk of making the virus worse. In an interview with Mark Zuckerberg last March, Fauci said in response to those who wanted rushed vaccines, “If you vaccinate someone, and they make an antibody response, and then they get exposed and infected, does the response that you induce actually enhance the infection and make it worse? The only way you'll know that is if you do an extended study [not on volunteers, but on the public]."

"If you vaccinate someone, and they make an antibody response, and then they get exposed and infected, does the response that you induce enhance the infection and make it worse? The only way you'll know that is if you do an extended study [not on volunteers, but on the public]."pic.twitter.com/OJbXAzGobh
— The Vigilant Fox (@The Vigilant Fox) 1639422119
Dr. Fauci opens up the possibility that the COVID-19 vaccine could be making people more likely to be infected by the virus.\n\n"This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse."pic.twitter.com/j4DXzMp3Bo
— The Vigilant Fox (@The Vigilant Fox) 1639418795

“This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse," he continued when the Facebook CEO pressed him on rushing forward with a vaccine.

A month later, Fauci warned at a press conference that “the worst possible thing you could do” is vaccinate someone and create enhancement.

Said it way before the Zuck chat too.. this is April 2020pic.twitter.com/EJUdKqxJvH
— Drew (@Drew) 1639501740

Well, a year and a half later, isn’t that exactly what we are seeing? Remember, the FDA warned during the initial emergency approval period that "risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown.” And that’s at a time when the FDA didn’t know just how badly these shots would wane ... or did it? Is it perhaps the intent to create the need for endless shots to fix the immune suppression and viral enhancement created by the first round – just like a heroin addict who constantly needs more poison to temporarily assuage the latest withdrawal symptoms, until he descends into a death spiral?


It is now universally accepted that the vaccine first suppresses your immune system, possibly for six weeks following the first shot, before it provides any protection for a few months thereafter. To encourage people to vaccinate even more while the numbers are high is the surest way of enabling more people to get the virus. This will create an endless feedback loop, driving a vicious cycle of suppressed immune systems, vaccine-mediated viral enhancement, and excess mortality from both the side effects and from COVID, which in turn generates fear to pressure more boosters in the hardest-hit areas. The German state of North Rhine-Westphalia is making boosters available for people to take every four weeks. Thus, the more the shots fail, the more the makers succeed.

It’s no longer enough to oppose mandates. It’s time to stand athwart history and yell “STOP” to this entire vicious cycle.