Trump mulls unique strategy to crush DC crime wave: ‘We're thinking about it’



President Donald Trump announced during a Tuesday Cabinet meeting that he is considering a bold strategy to confront the ongoing crime crisis in Washington, D.C.

In the event that the city's current leadership fails to deliver on significant crime reduction, Trump stated that the White House might intervene.

Trump's comments were in response to a reporter's question about the New York City mayoral race and whether he would endorse any of the candidates.

'We’re thinking about doing it, to be honest with you.'

Trump described Zohran Mamdani as a “communist,” urging voters not to cast their ballots for the Democratic nominee.

“This is a man who’s not very capable, in my opinion, other than he’s got a good line of bulls**t,” Trump stated.

The president stopped short of endorsing any of the remaining candidates, including current New York City Mayor Eric Adams and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa.

“I’m not getting involved,” Trump remarked. “But I can tell you this, I used to say, ‘We will not ever be a socialist country.’”

“If a communist gets elected to run New York, it can never be the same. But we have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to,” he stated.

“We could run D.C.,” Trump continued.

RELATED: Exclusive: Vance on Mamdani: ‘Who the hell does he think that he is?’

  Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

He explained that the administration is currently “looking at D.C.,” citing the high crime rates.

The president noted that White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is “working very closely” with Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) to address crime, adding that the two are “doing all right.”

A year-to-date comparison from the Metropolitan Police reports that violent crimes are down 25% in 2025, with homicides down 2%, sex abuse down 47%, assault with a dangerous weapon down 22%, and robbery down 26%.

— (@)  
 

Trump contended that if the administration took over D.C., it “would be run so proper.”

“We’re thinking about doing it, to be honest with you,” Trump said. “We want a capital that’s run flawlessly, and it wouldn’t be hard for us to do it.”

RELATED: Metropolitan Police Department refuses public access to Jan. 6 use-of-force reports

  Washington, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Trump later added that his administration has “a good relationship” with Bowser, stating, “We’re testing it to see if it works.”

He returned to discussing New York City, vowing that it would be "run properly."

"I'm going to bring New York back," he promised. "I love New York."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Democrats get their left-wing battering ram



For anyone who read my commentary last week, it should be no surprise that I am overjoyed that state Rep. Zohran Mamdani trounced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the New York City mayoral Democratic primary on Tuesday.

Cuomo is a repulsive creep who, as governor, killed thousands of elderly New Yorkers by filling nursing homes with COVID-infected patients. He then lied persistently about his misdeeds. Adding insult to injury, Cuomo groped and mishandled vulnerable women, an offense that led to his resignation in disgrace.

Except for Mamdani’s use of the verboten term 'socialist' and his outspokenly anti-Israeli positions, someone like him fits quite well into the present Democratic Party.

Finally, Cuomo removed bail for violent criminals, something he tried to cover up in his primary race by promising to be “tough on crime.” The fact that Wall Street plutocrats — led by the feckless former mayor, Michael Bloomberg — were backing this shameless reprobate made me even more eager to see him defeated.

Clearly, I am not happy to see Mamdani victorious because I agree with his politics. Looking at the positions he advocates, I can’t find one that doesn’t turn my stomach — but that is also the case when listening to Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and Amy Klobuchar.

I’ve been told that Mamdani is worse than these other leftists because he calls himself a socialist and bleeds for Hamas. Let me register my doubts that once in office (if he manages to win the general election) he would do anything to nationalize anything. His Upper East Side Manhattan backers, who poured out to vote for him, wouldn’t allow him to act like Castro or Lenin.

What Mamdani would likely do if elected mayor would be to make all the horrible conditions produced by New York’s big-city government even worse. Streets, outside the opulent neighborhoods inhabited by Mamdani’s benefactors, will be overrun by criminal thugs. New York City will become even more of a magnet for LGBTQ+ and Black Lives Matter exhibitionists, and normal people will move out of the urban zoo even faster than they’re doing right now.

Mamdani fits right in

Those claiming that Zohran Mamdani marks some unprecedented plunge into leftist madness haven't been paying attention. High-ranking Democrats such as the Squad, Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, and Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii have long paved the way. Cultural leftists already infest Congress and crowd the statehouses. Aside from Mamdani’s unapologetic use of the word “socialist” and his anti-Israel posturing, he fits quite well in the modern Democratic Party. Nothing about him signals a deeper descent than what voters already hear nightly on MSNBC.

RELATED: New York City’s likely next mayor wants to ‘globalize the intifada’

  Christian Monterrosa/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In the general election, Mamdani may end up splitting the left-wing vote with fellow Democrats, including Mayor Eric Adams, who plans to run as an independent. That kind of vote-splitting could hand the race to Republican Curtis Sliwa, who has positioned himself as the law-and-order candidate. He’s the only one I’d actually like to see win. Still, I won’t pretend I wouldn’t enjoy the irony if Mamdani pulled it off. A Mamdani victory would deliver maximum schadenfreude.

Democrats forsake the working class

For decades, New Yorkers and denizens of other major cities have sabotaged themselves at the ballot box — electing pro-criminal politicians, embracing every deranged social experiment, and lately drooling over criminal illegal aliens. Despite the hand-wringing on Fox News, these urban voters aren’t victims of the Democratic Party. They’ve reshaped it. They turned a once-working-class coalition into a hive of government dependents and ideological psychopaths.

Justice demands that these “progressives” live with the consequences of their own political choices. They asked for this. Let them have it — good and hard. The tragedy, of course, is that normal people will suffer too. Those without the money to flee to private buildings with armed security or relocate entirely will pay the price. That’s why I hesitate to cast Mamdani as some kind of avenging angel.

Still, even with the obvious costs of a Mamdani administration, his rise might accelerate a trend that’s both inevitable and necessary. Sane people with means will keep fleeing cities run by criminals and ideologues. Those who stay behind — those who cheer on the chaos — can live with the rot they helped create.

Nothing new under the sun

Let me close with a brief speculation about politicians like Minnesota’s Ilhan Omar, Mamdani, and their counterparts in Europe — figures who somehow blend radical leftist politics with expressions of Islamic fervor. On paper, devout Muslims ought to align with the Christian right on most social issues. And many Muslim parents across the country have taken a stand, loudly opposing LGBTQ+ indoctrination in schools.

So why don’t Muslim politicians follow suit? Two possible explanations come to mind. Either they’re mimicking the old communist playbook — aligning with fringe social movements as a means to power — or they’re using Islamic identity as a wrecking ball to level what’s left of Western tradition and cohesion.

Let’s not pretend both options are equally likely. I suspect it’s the latter.

A version of this article was originally published in Chronicles.

Deadly arson attack prompts Guardian Angels to patrol New York City subway



The Guardian Angels, a volunteer safety group, pledged Sunday to patrol the New York City subway system following the horrific death of an unidentified woman.

Curtis Sliwa, the Guardian Angels' founder, stated that the group will once again return to the subway to protect straphangers amid an increase in violent crime.

'It was an example of people just not getting involved.'

The squad got its start in 1979 patrolling the transit system. He pledged that the group would increase its presence and training, as it did decades earlier.

"We went from 13 to 1,000 [members] back then within a period of a year," Sliwa told the New York Post. "Because the need was there. The need is here now once again. We're going to step up. We're going to make sure we have a visual presence, just like we had in the '70s, '80s, and '90s."

"We're covering the actual trains from front to back, walking through the trains and making sure that everything is okay," he said. "We're doing this constantly now. Starting today, that's going to be our complete focus because the subways are out of control."

Sliwa told the Post that the Guardian Angels will conduct wellness checks on homeless people and provide them with water. He noted that any observed issues will be reported to the New York Police Department.

He explained that "hundreds of citizens" have requested the Guardian Angels' help on the subway system after an illegal immigrant from Guatemala, 33-year-old Sebastian Zapeta-Calil, allegedly set a woman on fire while riding the subway. The deadly attack reportedly appeared to be unprovoked. Zapeta-Calil was previously deported in 2018 but re-entered the country at an unknown later date.

"There's so many trains that come in and out of here," Sliwa stated. "It's the perfect place because it reminds people that nobody did anything a week ago. Nobody intervened. Nobody pointed to the cops and said, 'This is the guy.' Even the cops didn't do anything."

"It was an example of people just not getting involved," he continued. "And we're here to say, 'You see something, you say something.' You gotta do something."

Despite the apparent increase in violent crime in the city and particularly in the subway system, local leaders continue to claim that they have made headway in making public transit safer.

The same day the woman was brutally attacked, New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) issued a tone-deaf statement on X, reading, "In March, I took action to make our subways safer for the millions of people who take the trains each day."

"Since deploying the @NationalGuardNY to support @NYPDnews and @MTA safety efforts and adding cameras to all subway cars, crime is going down, and ridership is going up," she claimed.

Sliwa told the Post that crime is a problem in the city's subway system partly because law enforcement officers are not actively patrolling the trains.

"We're now back to where we were when I started the group in 1979 on the subways. It's gone full-circle. I've never seen it this bad. Never," he remarked.

A Metropolitan Transportation Authority worker similarly noted the lack of police presence.

"It won't get fixed overnight, but, yeah, it sounds good," the worker told the Post, referring to the Guardian Angels' plan. "I think it'll help. I don't think the cops downstairs are going to like it, but yeah. I don't know if you've noticed, but there are no cops up here."

New York City Democrat Mayor Eric Adams' office called the Guardian Angels' announcement a "meaningless stunt."

Kayla Mamalek, a representative for Adams, told the Post, "Mayor Adams is committed to improving the lives of New Yorkers, which is why he frequently rides the subway to speak directly with everyday riders about how we can make it safer."

"The mayor surged 1,000 police officers per day into the subways, has brought down overall crime and transit crime, delivering real action — not theatrics — but he knows there's still more work to be done," she said.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Disgraced ex-rep Anthony Weiner to co-host brand-new radio show alongside former Republican mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa



Disgraced former New York representative Anthony Weiner — who in 2017 was sentenced to 21 months in a federal prison for transferring obscene material to a 15-year-old girl — has teamed up with former Republican mayoral candidate and Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa for a radio show.

The show, titled "The Left vs. The Right," will air on WABC-AM and debut at 2 p.m. local time on Saturday.

What are the details?

Weiner, 57, told the New York Post's Page Six that just because he's working the radio show doesn't mean he's "going back into public life."

"I am doing a radio show with a friend of mine,” he told the outlet. "It's not a conscious decision. I have a face for radio, but I don't know if I have a place in radio as a career. Sometimes it is what it is."

Sliwa, 67, told the outlet that he believes Weiner being on the radio can help him "become a role model for other people who have had major issues in their life."

Page Six reported that the new show will focus on issues that impact New York City and will "give equal time to the conservative and liberal perspectives."

“There’s a lot of water under the bridge,” Weiner admitted and said he's not afraid to answer questions about his past. “There have been a lot of opportunities for me to process a lot of stuff. A lot of time has passed. I don’t think I would be going on the radio if I didn’t think Curtis or listeners would ask tough questions.”

He continued, "One thing I have learned through this experience: Everybody has tough things. It’s a source of commonality for a lot of people in New York. One of the things that both Curtis and I were clear on, there wasn’t going to be any subject we would avoid for want of embarrassment.”

Sliwa added that Weiner has served his time and is "entitled to a second chance."

"He is trying to get his life back," he explained. "We don’t want to just exile these people. We want to give them redemption, but they have to earn their way back. I think being on the radio he can become a role model for other people who have had major issues in their life.”

Both Weiner and Sliwa are optimistic about being able to diplomatically discuss the biggest issues facing the city, including the rising crime rates.

“When it comes to knowledge of New York and how things operate and how bad things are now, between the both of us you will get information and we will balance one another,” Sliwa added “You get the yin-and-yang. There are very few places where you get two points of view anymore. The listeners can make their own decisions based on all the information we are sharing with them.”

Weiner concluded, “I grew up here, I saw the high-crime era of the ’90s. I think there is gloom-and-doom hysteria that has taken hold now and I think the city’s best days are ahead of it. We have issues, there is no doubt about it. Our government is in good hands, people are strong, and the economy is diverse.”