Trump’s border blitz puts military muscle to work



President Donald Trump has moved faster than anyone expected to secure the U.S.-Mexico border. His latest action — deploying the U.S. military to the Roosevelt Reservation, a 60-foot-wide strip of federal land spanning the border in California, Arizona, and New Mexico — is a necessary step to defend American sovereignty.

A White House memorandum issued April 11 authorizes the military to take temporary control of the corridor, detain individuals attempting illegal entry, and support key security operations, including barrier construction and surveillance. With drug cartels, human traffickers, and other criminal threats exploiting the southern border, this deployment offers a direct, long-overdue response to a crisis the political class has allowed to fester for years.

The military brings what civilian authorities can’t: logistical power, surveillance, and manpower. We’ve seen it work before.

Established in 1907 by President Theodore Roosevelt to safeguard the border, the Roosevelt Reservation provides the ideal legal framework for President Trump’s latest deployment. By designating the strip as a “National Defense Area,” Trump has empowered the military to act decisively within a clearly defined legal perimeter.

This renewed focus on border security comes none too soon. Under President Biden, the situation along the reservation deteriorated. In 2022, frustrated by the White House’s inaction, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) ordered shipping containers stacked along the reservation to block illegal crossings. His successor, open-borders Democrat Katie Hobbs, wasted no time removing them.

The Trump memorandum directs the Departments of Defense, Interior, Agriculture, and Homeland Security to transfer jurisdiction of the Roosevelt Reservation to the Pentagon. This move allows U.S. troops to detain border trespassers until Border Patrol can process them.

This isn’t “militarizing” the homeland — it’s using federal authority to defend it. The chaos Biden unleashed now demands real action. Trump’s strategy puts American citizens, not politics, first.

The need for this action is clear. Even with reports of fewer illegal crossings, the southern border remains a pipeline for deadly drugs like fentanyl — which killed more than 70,000 Americans in 2023. Cartels continue to exploit weak enforcement, using remote corridors like the Roosevelt Reservation to move narcotics and human trafficking victims deeper into the country.

Critics rushed to label Trump’s deployment an overreach, but their objections don’t hold up. Some claim the move violates the Posse Comitatus Act, the 1878 law restricting military involvement in domestic law enforcement. One activist even called the strategy a “crazy” attempt to skirt the law by labeling illegal aliens as trespassers on military land.

That argument is nonsense. The Posse Comitatus Act allows exceptions during national emergencies, and Trump’s declaration of a border emergency provides that authority.

What’s more, the military’s role under the April 11 memorandum is narrow and lawful. It simply detains border trespassers on federal land until civilian authorities take over. This mirrors past deployments under both Republican and Democratic presidents. The Pentagon isn’t rounding up citizens or patrolling cities. It is securing a narrow federal corridor explicitly designated for border protection.

Some Democrats and activist groups claim that deploying the military escalates tensions unnecessarily, especially since illegal border crossings have declined since Trump took office. But that argument misses the point. Crossings dropped because of Trump’s tough policies — not because the threat disappeared.

Cartels are opportunistic and fast-moving. They seize on any lapse in enforcement. The Roosevelt Reservation’s rugged terrain and rumored smuggling tunnels make it a prime target. A military presence deters those operations before they escalate.

Waiting for the next crisis — like the 2022 surge that saw more than 2.5 million migrant encounters — isn’t strategy. It’s surrender.

Open-border activists argue that Border Patrol or local law enforcement should secure the border alone. But that ignores reality. Of the border’s 1,954 miles, more than 700 run through rugged, hard-to-patrol terrain. Civilian agencies are already overwhelmed.

The military brings what civilian authorities can’t: logistical power, surveillance technology, and manpower. This isn’t theoretical. We’ve seen it work before. In 2018, during Trump’s first term, Operation Faithful Patriot provided vital support for wall construction in high-traffic zones — reducing illegal crossings where they were most severe.

Extending this strategy to the Roosevelt Reservation isn’t radical. It’s obvious.

Trump’s order rests on a simple truth: A nation without borders is not a nation at all. The new memorandum isn’t just defensible. It’s essential. Anyone who doesn’t see the military’s role in this crisis is clinging to the same mindset that let things spiral out of control in the first place.

Ballots Cast Without Proof Of Citizenship ‘Exploded’ After Lawfare Crippled Arizona Election Laws

About 1,700 people in Arizona voted in 2018 with a federal-only ballot. Two years later, the number grew to 11,600 individuals.

Arizona Federal Judge Temporarily Rules Males Can Compete In Girls’ Sports

A judge blocked Arizona's Save Women's Sports Act, arguing the two male plaintiffs will suffer 'irreparable harm' if they can't compete as girls.

Dem Gov Signs Executive Order Mandating Sex Change Coverage For State Employees

Conservative groups in the state have been quick to oppose the law

Former GOP Swing-State Governor Reveals His Next Project

'The free enterprise system matters to me'

Two States Now Have Universal School Choice — And Yours Could Be Next

On Tuesday, Iowa became the second state in the country to pass universal school choice. Several red states are looking to follow suit.

Dem congressman attacks 'heartless' GOP governors as 'pricks' for busing migrants. But multiple sources bust his narrative.



Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) disparaged Republican governors on Tuesday for busing migrants away from the southern border.

But several sources, including a pro-migrant organization, undercut his narrative about those migrants who were bused to Vice President Kamala Harris' residence on Christmas Eve.

What did Castro say?

Speaking on MSNBC, Castro was asked to deliver a message to Republican Govs. Ron DeSantis, Doug Ducey, and Greg Abbott.

His response? Stop being "pricks" and "heartless."

"I would ask them to stop being pricks, first of all, because that’s what they’re doing," Castro said. "And stop being heartless, but also to actually help us solve this issue, solve this challenge rather than just become the next Republican president in a few years."

Castro also claimed that Republican governors are "just trying to be mean" and "demonstrate how tough they are" by busing migrants.

The specific incident that precipitated Castro's comments was the busloads of migrants who were dropped off outside the Naval Observatory, the official residence of the vice president, on Christmas Eve.

GOP Governors With Presidential Ambitions Court Trump's Base With Cruelty To Migrantswww.youtube.com

But what do others say?

Other than reaffirming the Democratic narrative about Republican governors, Castro did not offer any evidence to back his claim that DeSantis, Ducey, and Abbott are being "heartless."

On the other hand, people with direct involvement with migrant transportation say the migrants themselves agree to the transportation because it gets them closer to their final destination, often cities far from the border in which they have family and friends.

For example, the Val Verde Border Humanitarian Coalition, a nonprofit organization that helps migrants, called the Christmas Eve drop-off at Harris' residence "a Christmas to remember." Why? Because it actually served the migrants, who were "grateful" for the ride.

"On this Christmas Eve, our dedicated NGO partners in Washington DC received three Texas State Buses on this bitterly cold night," the group wrote on Facebook. "Migrants left VVBHC yesterday and are exhausted, but also grateful to be much closer to their final destinations along the East Coast. Definitely a Christmas to remember for all involved."


Indeed, Abbott spokesperson Renae Eze confirmed the migrants traveled "willingly."

"These migrants willingly chose to go to Washington, D.C., having signed a voluntary consent waiver available in multiple languages upon boarding that they agreed on the destination," Eze said. "And they were processed and released by the federal government, who are dumping them at historic levels in Texas border towns like El Paso, which recently declared a state of emergency because of the Biden-made crisis."

The Fight For Educational Freedom Is Just Warming Up

With many recent victories for educational freedom, the opportunity for more reform has greater potential than in decades past.