Horowitz: CDC issues alert for child hepatitis, but will we discover the cause?



One after another, we are seeing mysterious illnesses pop up throughout the world, with many young people either dying or getting ill suddenly. Over the past year and a half, we have injected half of all humanity with multiple doses of a dangerous mRNA gene therapy that has already clearly caused numerous neurological, hematological, and cardiac illnesses, and there are over 1,000 others observed by Pfizer in the first few months of the rollout. Yet the government agencies are taking a “see no evil, hear no evil” approach and won’t even investigate the shots as a potential cause of any of these maladies.

The latest craze in the media is the sudden occurrence of severe hepatitis among young children in the U.S. and several European countries. After several weeks of media reports across both continents of mysterious outbreaks of pediatric hepatitis, the CDC issued an alert last Thursday asking pediatricians to be on the lookout for hepatitis, which is liver inflammation, often expressed symptomatically with jaundice and gastroenterological problems.

There have been nine cases of hepatitis in children in Alabama and two in North Carolina, several of whom needed liver transplants. The CDC, in its statement, seems to have eliminated COVID or the typical hepatitis viruses that cause the inflammation as a culprit. However, the agency appears to be focusing its investigation on adenovirus as a potential cause, because it claims some of the kids were infected with adenovirus type 41.

However, while this concern should not be ruled out, notice what is never ruled in? The inflammatory gene therapy that was just introduced to the entire population. Adenoviruses are almost as common and as mild as rhinoviruses in children, and we’ve never experienced this problem before. Why would adenovirus suddenly become pro-inflammatory in the liver without any other confounding factors? Why wouldn’t we look at the brand-new product that is known to cause inflammation and produce auto-antibodies in numerous parts of the body, but most prominently in the liver, where the highest concentration of the lipid nanoparticles is deposited?

While the CDC is correct that inflammation of the liver “can be caused by viral infections, alcohol use, toxins, medications, and certain other medical conditions,” it is missing one major cause: autoimmune hepatitis. Here’s why, at a minimum, you’d want to investigate the shots as a potential culprit or contributing factor:

1) We know that the shots seem to trigger an uncontrolled antibody response all over the body, with the mRNA coding the tissue to produce spike proteins throughout the body. The spike protein triggers the inflammatory auto-antibody response throughout the body, but is carried most prominently to the liver. The Canadian bio-distribution table (p. 23) shows that the Pfizer shot’s lipid nanoparticles are deposited in the liver more than anywhere else after the injection site itself.

After just 48 hours, roughly 16% of the 50-microgram dose was deposited in the liver. Several months ago, researchers at Thomas Jefferson University found that the lipid nanoparticles used in the mRNA vaccines were hyper-inflammatory in mice. “The mRNA-LNP platforms' potency in supporting the induction of adaptive immune responses and the observed side effects may stem from the LNPs' highly inflammatory nature,” concluded the paper, published in Science Direct.

2) The European Medicines Agency has an assessment of the animal trials on Comirnaty and found (p. 49) liver inflammation in some rats:

If you trace the areas of inflammatory responses in the rates, they coincide with the areas that received a substantial deposit of lipid nanoparticles, such as the bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes.

3) In February, a bombshell study was published in Sweden the showed that in vitro, Pfizer mRNA vaccines use a reverse transcriptase enzyme called LINE-1 to potentially reverse-transcribe the genetic code of the vaccine into the DNA. Guess which cell tissues were used in that study? Liver cells! “In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided,” observed the authors. “Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.”

Given what we know about reverse transcription and the concentration of the vaccine depositing in the liver, how could we rule out the vaccine as the cause of liver inflammation?

4) Last year, Dutch researchers posted an observational study of an 82-year old patient who they believe suffered a reactivation of hepatitis C infection after receiving the Pfizer shot, which “manifested with jaundice, loss of consciousness, hepatic coma and death.” A number of acute hepatitis injury cases have been recorded in VAERS and linked back to the shots.

of Hepatitis from the CDC Wonder Data Base\n\nNot exhaustive, just what I have tweeted thus farhttps://twitter.com/JeanRees10/status/1457170848486416385\u00a0\u2026
— Jean Rees (@Jean Rees) 1650161397

The bottom line is that we are seeing epidemics of autoimmune diseases pop up everywhere. Every doctor I’ve consulted on the issue of COVID treatment and vaccine injury attests to a sudden, unnatural spike in Epstein-Barr virus (the virus that causes mononucleosis) and shingles, two autoimmune diseases believed to be triggered by the shots. It doesn’t mean that every sudden mysterious ailment is caused by the shots, but what it does mean is that the medical community will never have interest in even investigating the shots as a contributing factor.

Earlier this year, an Israeli Health Ministry survey found that roughly 24% of people with pre-existing autoimmune disorders reported a worsening or reactivation of their condition after taking a Pfizer booster. There is no doubt that the shots are triggering certain autoimmune disorders. We also know that autoimmune hepatitis exists and certain auto-antibodies can inflame the liver and attack liver cells. When in history have we ever liberally handed out a shot that triggers an uncontrolled antibody response throughout the body to a very pro-inflammatory spike protein that happens to be deposited in the liver?

Just as with the uncanny explanations for youngsters suddenly getting strokes and heart attacks, it will at least be grimly amusing to watch the array of theories presented for the sudden spike in liver inflammation.

Horowitz: What did Pfizer know and when? 3 important findings from recent document releases



It’s no longer January 2021, when we all thought we lived in a world of normal vaccines. It’s no longer OK for elected officials to mindlessly repeat the bromide “safe and effective” without any reflection about the mass injury we’ve witnessed, along with the waning and the negative efficacy, in itself, engendering calls for endless boosters. We have so much information that raises serious questions, not the least of which is from Pfizer’s own documents, now ordered released by a federal judge, thanks to Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, and FOIA requests from groups like the Informed Consent Action Network.

Here are just three of the most recent revelations from these documents that expose the government/pharma narrative to be a lie at its core:

1) Pfizer needed massive staff to process adverse event reports

Several months ago, the FDA released a Pfizer document on adverse events revealing that there were 42,086 adverse events voluntarily reported to the company, of which 1,223 were fatalities, just as of Feb. 28, 2021. A new unredacted copy of that document, which details nine pages of several thousand known categories of adverse effects, reveals the massive scope of injuries that were being reported to Pfizer and raises questions about what company personnel knew, when they knew it, and what they observed in the ensuing months.

In the document, Pfizer reveals that “due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports,” staff were forced to prioritize “the processing of serious adverse events” and the company had to hire large numbers of staff. “To date, Pfizer has onboarded approximately 600 additional fulltime employees (FTEs),” reveals Pfizer on page six of the confidential document. “More are joining each month with an expected total of more than 1,800 additional resources by the end of June 2021.”

Read this paragraph and ask yourself how many people would have taken the shot had they known this and how the failure to disclose this information is in line with the Nuremberg Code. Also, what is the epilogue of the story? What did Pfizer discover in the ensuing months – to this very day – that it is not disclosing to the public?

2) Rate of myocarditis

When it became apparent to the public earlier in 2021 that myocarditis was a known side effect of the shots, the government and the media immediately claimed the incidence rate was exceedingly low. Numerous “studies” tried to downplay the risks. One paper from Kaiser Permanente in JAMA suggested the rate was just 6.6 per million. Another JAMA study from last June found a 1 in 50,000 rate among the military (which we now know was woefully underreported). Well, thanks to ICAN’s FOIA, we now have the Pfizer informed consent document (p. 5) that shows the company recognized the risk can be as high as 1 in 1,000.

So, all of these stories suggesting that young males were more at risk for myocarditis from the virus than from the shots were bogus, and Pfizer knew it. And again, if this is the degree the company is willing to concede, imagine what the true incidence rate is.

Also, what is the degree of subclinical myocarditis? If we know about this many cases shortly after the injection, who’s to say there isn’t another cohort of people with heart damage that has remained subclinical so far but could come to fruition several months later? Remember, with many fewer vaccines administered in 2022, the rate of myocarditis reports to VAERS is averaging 245% higher than last year.

Is this the glimpse into the long-term effects of those who originally had subclinical myocarditis last year, and is this one of the reasons why so many athletes continue to drop?

The FDA has made it clear that it is flying blind on subclinical myocarditis and long-term heart damage. In the Pharmacovigilance Plan Review Addendum for Comirnaty, the FDA conceded (p. 3-4), “Incidence of subclinical myocarditis and potential long-term sequelae following COMIRNATY are unknown.” However, they did note that a previous study on a smallpox vaccine “suggested an incidence of possible subclinical myocarditis (based on cardiac troponin T elevations) 60-times higher than the incidence rate of overt clinical myocarditis.” That would bring down the 1 in 1,000 rate among young males to as low as 1 in 17 for subclinical ticking time bombs!

Why has the government not studied troponin levels of those who got the shot? Why has it not conducted cardiac MRIs to check for scarring? Why are we flying blind over a year into the known myocarditis problems?

The FDA reviewers flatly stated, “Based on review of available data, there are known risks for myocarditis and pericarditis and an unexpected serious risk for subclinical myocarditis, which warrant PMR safety studies to assess these serious risks.” They called on Comirnaty (PfizerBionTech) to conduct studies, but noted that the sponsor rebuffed them. Seven and a half months after their full approval, we still have no studies, and they are due to be complete July 2023!

So looking at the Clinical Study, here is the description.\nThe study is not due to be completed until July 2023.pic.twitter.com/C16sAjzc9X
— Jean Rees (@Jean Rees) 1648394844

3) Pfizer knew about natural immunity

Pfizer never studied the efficacy of the shots exclusively among those with prior infection. Bizarrely, a new document reveals researchers studied them together; however, they break down the results in a way that reveals no need for the shots among those with prior infection. Here is the money quote from p. 12 of Pfizer’s “request for priority review” in May 2021:

Among participants without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection before and during the vaccination regimen (evaluable efficacy population), the estimated VE against FDA-defined severe COVID-19 (protocol definition) occurring at least 7 days after Dose 2 was 95.3% (2-sided 95% CI: 71.0%, 99.9%), with 1 and 21 cases in the BNT162b2 and placebo groups, respectively. Similarly, the estimated VE was also 95.3% (2-sided 95% CI: 70.9%, 99.9%) among participants with or without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, also with 1 and 21 cases in the BNT162b2 and placebo groups, respectively.

Pfizer claims efficacy against severe illness among those who took the shot vs. the placebo group among those without prior infection. Researchers report one case in the trial group and 21 in the placebo group. Then they mix together results of those with and without prior infection, and yet the numbers remain the same at 1 and 21 respectively! That means that among those with prior infection, there were zero cases of serious reinfection in both the trial and placebo groups. They might call that 100% effective, but we can also call that 0% effective. Thus, they knew people didn’t need the shot if they already had prior infection, but they promoted it anyway and still got approval.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. In the coming days, more information will come out about what Pfizer knew and when. The question is will any policies change as a result.

On a final note: At least Pfizer is being forced to release some documents. How come we don’t have a single document from Moderna, which is an even stronger dose? Inquiring minds would like to know.

Horowitz: The vaccines are working ... exactly as they were designed



"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." —George Orwell

There is nowhere to run or hide from the growing observations that the closer we come to universal vaccination rates in many countries, the worse the pandemic has become. We have always known that leaky vaccines have the potential to create viral enhancement, but the recent data is unmistakable. At the same time, the COVID cultists are panicking over an emerging variant that actually might be the mildest of all while mainly affecting the vaccinated — a perfect refutation to the mass vaccination push. All signs point to the need to suspend the shots and focus exclusively on monoclonal antibodies and other early treatment. Or is there an ulterior motive?

At this point, we better pray that Omicron becomes dominant in the U.S. as quickly as possible. The most devastating observation of 2021 is that more people have died from COVID under the mass vaccination regime during the existing variant than before there was a single jab. According to the CDC’s “Data Table for Daily Death Trends,” there have been 127,184 COVID deaths from September 1 through November 30 this year, which is 45% greater than the 87,829 recorded deaths over the same period in 2020. And some of the deaths from this year are still lagging and likely to be updated.

Typically, viruses mutate down and become less virulent. Last year, there was much less built up immunity, we had fewer treatment options, and we had zero vaccines. It is nearly impossible to ignore the fact that the narrow-spectrum leaky vaccine has made the virus much worse.

During the peak of the winter wave in January, there were 19 recorded deaths for 15- to 17-year-olds. In August, when the vaccines began to leak and we likely experienced vaccine-mediated viral enhancement, kids noticeably got sicker. Although deaths were still very rare, there were 63 recorded deaths among that age cohort, and the numbers have generally remained higher.

Something strange happened, after the was available, C19 deaths in 15-17 yos were than any other time of the pandemic\n1/21 - 19\n2/21 - 7\n3/21 - 9\n4/21 - 3\n5/21 - 7\n6/21 - 6\n7/21 - 6\n8/21 - 63\n9/21 - 30\n10/21 - 18 \n11/21 - 10\n\n MIS-C ran w/the curve, C19 deaths didn'tpic.twitter.com/YeK9bqM6wx
— Jean Rees (@Jean Rees) 1639098436

Imagine if we had put all the funds for the leaky shots into the monoclonal antibodies and an outpatient treatment regime built on the latest research of dozens of therapeutics that have shown promise in combatting the virus. Yet rather than focus on alternatives and investigate what went wrong with the injections, our establishment leaders are doubling down, even as the failure is undeniably in plain sight. As such, it’s hard to escape the sinister conclusion that they intended this all along.

Consider the fact that Cornell University has an ironclad vaccine and mask mandate, yet 3.5% of the entire campus tested positive last week alone. The school has now switched to online learning.

NEW: Cornell University goes remote after reporting over 900 COVID cases this week, VP for University Relations Joel Malina says "virtually every" case has been found in fully-vaccinated students, many of whom received the booster shot - CNN
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) 1639590883

Consider the fact that before the NFL season started, 52 of 53 players on the L.A. Rams’ roster were vaccinated. Now they lead the league with 11 players on the COVID list.

Consider the fact that Newton, Massachusetts, has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, with 97% of the entire population vaccinated, including 99% of 12- to 15-year-olds and 87% of 5- to 11-year-olds. Yet, despite this and indoor mask mandates, the town has more cases than this time last year and is likely headed toward a record.

Consider the fact that a country like South Korea barely recorded deaths during the entire pandemic, but now has many more cases and deaths, with nearly all adults vaccinated and one of the highest vaccination rates for a country that large (over 50 million).

Consider the fact that England and France, both with very high vaccination rates and large prior COVID waves, have recently set case records.

France has officially set a new high in cases, 4.5 months into vaccine passports, 19 months into mask mandates and with 92% of adults at least partially vaccinated, but at least politicians and experts are still pretending vaccine passports & mask mandates can \u201cslow the spread\u201dpic.twitter.com/9nI0ROjFh0
— IM (@IM) 1639593693

Likewise, Portugal, with the highest double-vaxxed rate in Europe, now has more cases than during the winter peak.

Cases in Portugal are up 554% since they started vaccine passports for major events and nightlife, but I\u2019m sure vaccine passports will work in England after failing literally everywhere else they\u2019ve been triedpic.twitter.com/EYSWtMXi3b
— IM (@IM) 1639595809

Several months ago, a Harvard study published in the European Journal of Epidemiology, the only one to look at thousands of U.S. counties and different countries to study correlation between vaccination rates and case rates, found zero correlation. "In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people,” concluded the author.

The establishment suggests that the shots at least provide some with temporary protection from critical illness. But what good is that if the shots actually make the virus more virulent for everyone and then offer a degree of preventive protection for its consumers while screwing everyone else?

Let’s not forget that Dr. Fauci warned from day one that you need a perfect vaccine because a half-baked one runs the risk of making the virus worse. In an interview with Mark Zuckerberg last March, Fauci said in response to those who wanted rushed vaccines, “If you vaccinate someone, and they make an antibody response, and then they get exposed and infected, does the response that you induce actually enhance the infection and make it worse? The only way you'll know that is if you do an extended study [not on volunteers, but on the public]."

"If you vaccinate someone, and they make an antibody response, and then they get exposed and infected, does the response that you induce enhance the infection and make it worse? The only way you'll know that is if you do an extended study [not on volunteers, but on the public]."pic.twitter.com/OJbXAzGobh
— The Vigilant Fox (@The Vigilant Fox) 1639422119
Dr. Fauci opens up the possibility that the COVID-19 vaccine could be making people more likely to be infected by the virus.\n\n"This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse."pic.twitter.com/j4DXzMp3Bo
— The Vigilant Fox (@The Vigilant Fox) 1639418795

“This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse," he continued when the Facebook CEO pressed him on rushing forward with a vaccine.

A month later, Fauci warned at a press conference that “the worst possible thing you could do” is vaccinate someone and create enhancement.

Said it way before the Zuck chat too.. this is April 2020pic.twitter.com/EJUdKqxJvH
— Drew (@Drew) 1639501740

Well, a year and a half later, isn’t that exactly what we are seeing? Remember, the FDA warned during the initial emergency approval period that "risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown.” And that’s at a time when the FDA didn’t know just how badly these shots would wane ... or did it? Is it perhaps the intent to create the need for endless shots to fix the immune suppression and viral enhancement created by the first round – just like a heroin addict who constantly needs more poison to temporarily assuage the latest withdrawal symptoms, until he descends into a death spiral?


It is now universally accepted that the vaccine first suppresses your immune system, possibly for six weeks following the first shot, before it provides any protection for a few months thereafter. To encourage people to vaccinate even more while the numbers are high is the surest way of enabling more people to get the virus. This will create an endless feedback loop, driving a vicious cycle of suppressed immune systems, vaccine-mediated viral enhancement, and excess mortality from both the side effects and from COVID, which in turn generates fear to pressure more boosters in the hardest-hit areas. The German state of North Rhine-Westphalia is making boosters available for people to take every four weeks. Thus, the more the shots fail, the more the makers succeed.

It’s no longer enough to oppose mandates. It’s time to stand athwart history and yell “STOP” to this entire vicious cycle.