Young black man DESTROYS woke leftist in CRT debate on Jubilee



A young man who goes by the alias “Mat Nuclear” went viral this week for destroying actress Amanda Seales on the popular debate show “Surrounded” by Jubilee Media.

The 18-year-old went face-to-face with the critical race theorist, who regurgitates the idea that if you have white skin, you have inherently benefited from racism. And even if you’ve never held a racist thought or made a racist comment — your white skin makes you inherently racist.

“You can give everyone here, like, $50,000 — especially people that are in the streets who are committing violent crimes consistently — a $50,000 check. It’s not going to fix anything. It’s not going to increase the median household income in the next 10 years by 10% or 20%,” Nuclear told Seales, who was arguing in favor of reparations.

Nuclear then referred to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which prevented the Chinese from getting citizenship and entering the country.


“We discriminated against them and basically put them under apartheid even here in the United States. Yet they have the highest median household income. How is that possible? How come they don’t complain and feel entitled consistently to beg for reparations and beg for this when they are killing each other 90% of the time, which is the rate that black people kill each other according to the FBI,” Nuclear explained to a shocked Seales.

“Oh, young Mat. I’m not sure where your education came from, but they lied to you,” Seales responded weakly.

Nuclear then went on to attack “systemic racism,” telling Seales that the only racism he’s witnessed is “the application of systemic racism against white people.”

“The University of Western Washington, for example, has been trying to segregate dormitories, using black-only dormitories because black people feel safer amongst each other. But they’re more likely to kill each other than white people are ever to kill them. That’s just the truth,” he explained.

As the argument went on, Seales called Nuclear’s beliefs “scary” and scolded him for debating her.

“You need to think about me as your mama. Do not talk to me in that fashion. So let’s check that now,” she said.

BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler is thoroughly impressed with Nuclear and unsurprised that his opponent was no match for his intellect.

“He did an outstanding job, right? She had zero response,” Wheeler says.

“‘Statistics lie,’ she says, yet she didn’t name one false statistic that he listed,” she continues. “‘Your education failed you,’ she claimed, but she could not debunk any of the history that he referenced. ‘Think of me as your mama; don’t speak to me in that tone,’ she said as he was entirely respectful — and I imagine his mother was extremely proud.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

From schizophrenia to skyrocketing crime: The dark side of weed



A recent report from the Wall Street Journal claims that President Trump is considering reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I controlled substance to a Schedule III controlled substance — which is considered less dangerous.

BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler does not think that’s a good idea.

In a recent post on X, where she was “ratioed” by angry respondents, Wheeler argued against the move.

She wrote, “Marijuana is a dangerous drug that leads to psychosis, schizophrenia, and ultimately violence. We should obviously ban it,” before linking to several studies reflecting her point.


“According to NAM: ‘The association between cannabis use & development of psychotic disorder is supported. ... The magnitude of this association is moderate to large and appears to be dose-dependent,’” her post reads.

“Studies show marijuana may cause up to 30% of schizophrenia cases in young men. Teenagers who use cannabis by age 15 are more than four times as likely to suffer from schizophrenia compared to their peers who do not use cannabis,” she continued.

“The Journal of American Psychiatry found ‘a moderate association between cannabis use and physical violence, which remained significant regardless of study design and adjustment for confounding factors (i.e., socioeconomic factors, other substance use). Cannabis use in this population is a risk factor for violence,’” she added.

Wheeler also pointed out that since marijuana’s legalization in Colorado, “the crime rate has skyrocketed by 21%, traffic fatalities have increased by 57%, and suicides have increased by 23%.”

“Marijuana is making America sicker, more demented, more dangerous, and more disgusting. Why is this even a question? Ban it,” she concluded in her viral tweet.

Wheeler, shocked by the overwhelmingly angry response her tweet received, says “I did not post this intentionally to be rage-bait.”

“I did not post this because I know that marijuana is a hot-button topic, and I know that when I speak this opinion, people have a visceral reaction to this. I did not post this to try to trigger anybody or to antagonize anybody. I actually know that many of you disagree,” she explains.

“My question to you is, has society gotten better or worse since marijuana use has not only been normalized, but legalized? Has society gotten better, or has society gotten worse?” she asks. “Now, the obvious answer to this is that society has gotten much worse.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New York Times’ hit piece on ex-tradwife flops, gets #tradlife totally wrong — again



Canadian conservative influencer Lauren Southern first gained popularity in the mid-2010s when she began working with right-wing Canadian media outlet Rebel Media. However, in 2019, Southern walked away from her public career after she got married and moved to Australia to become a tradwife.

For those unfamiliar with the term, “tradwife” stands for “traditional wife,” which means a woman who embraces traditional gender roles, prioritizing domestic duties, motherhood, and submission to her husband over a career or public life. In recent years, the tradwife trend has evolved into an entire movement under the conservative umbrella, as it’s a reaction to radical left-wing feminism that seeks to obliterate the nuclear family by demonizing motherhood and marriage.

For about a year, Southern disappeared from the public eye altogether. When she eventually re-emerged, it was in a limited fashion, mostly posting political and cultural commentary and content aligned with the tradwife aesthetic, like pictures of her baby bump. From the outside, everything appeared to be going well.

But then in 2021, Southern dropped a bombshell: She was getting a divorce after just two years.

While that news is old, her recently published memoir, “This Is Not Real Life,” has brought renewed attention to Southern’s story, providing juicy details about her failed relationship with both her husband and the tradwife life.

“She said that he berated her, that he was disrespectful to her,” says Liz Wheeler, BlazeTV host of “The Liz Wheeler Show.”

The New York Times recently ran a piece on Southern, using the story of her failed marriage as a cautionary tale about the dangers and impracticalities of traditional marriage.

But the Times is wrong, Liz says. Lauren Southern is not an example of why traditional marriage fails. She’s an example of why “cosplaying traditional marriage” fails.

“Lauren Southern is a perfect example of why the tradwife fad is stupid, because they say that they’re living tradwife life, but what trad? What tradition are they living?” Liz asks.

“Well, they’re not living the Christian tradition because Christian tradition does not call for the husband to dominate the wife. Christian tradition calls for husbands to die unto themselves and, like Christ laid down his life for the church, to lay down their lives for their bride. Wives are called in turn to submit to that sacrifice. Dominance from the husband or subservience from the wife ain’t that,” she corrects.

“What [Southern] is portraying her marriage to be isn’t really any kind of traditional marriage; it’s cosplaying traditional marriage without God.”

So while the New York Times may think its piece is a “gotcha attack on Christianity,” the only thing it’s exposing is the outlet’s own ignorance.

“It just shows how stupid the New York Times is because it shows us that the New York Times falsely perceives ‘trad-ing’ to be Christianity when it’s not,” Liz scoffs.

To hear more of her commentary on Lauren Southern and the New York Times’ misguided op-ed, watch the episode above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Who is funding Zohran Mamdani?



If government-funded grocery stores didn’t tip you off that something was off about New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, some recent findings about his past should do the trick.

Mamdani is currently in a very comfortable lead and according to the polls will likely win NYC’s mayoral race, but a recent report claimed that the beloved socialist is tied to the man who funded and staged the anti-ICE riots.

“The anti-ICE riots that weren’t organic. They weren’t grassroots. They weren’t by accident. They weren’t a coalition of outraged individuals who all gathered together to voice their grievances against the government. No, no. They were paid. They were staged. They were orchestrated,” BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler explains.


The man in question behind these anti-ICE riots is Neville Roy Singham, a billionaire who lives in Shanghai.

“Now remember, American citizens don’t get to just live in China the way that we in America allow foreigners to live in our country. In order to live more than a visit to China, that requires special permission from the Chinese Communist Party, which evidently was obtained by Roy Singham, who lives there with his wife,” Wheeler says.

His wife, Jodie Evans, is the founder of the anti-war organization Code Pink.

“You know those angry naked feminists that march around? That’s Jodie Evans’ organization,” she says. “Roy Singham is the man behind the violent riots that we have seen in recent years in the United States of America. Roy Singham funds pro-Hamas groups on college campuses.”

When Zohran Mamdani was in college, he started a chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, which Wheeler says “in and of itself is association with Roy Singham,” but it “just touches the surface.”

On July 12, 2025, the New York Post published an exclusive report on a woman associated with Mamdani’s campaign.

“This report received a fraction of the attention it deserved given what a bombshell revelation it includes,” Wheeler says.

The report claims that the niece of Roy Singham spearheaded the Jews for Zohran Mamdani campaign in order to give the “Israel-bashing candidate” cover from anti-Semitism accusations and win Jewish voters.

Jews for Zohran Mamdani is also working with city comptroller Brad Lander and Rep. Jerry Nadler to persuade more Jews, such as Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Dan Goldman, to back Mamdani for mayor.

“Zohran Mamdani is not just the front-runner, he’s the presumptive winner,” Wheeler says. “He might soon be mayor of the biggest city in the United States, but his rise to prominence was not organic, wasn’t grassroots.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

NEW demonic photos from inside Epstein’s Manhattan mansion



A recent New York Times expose reveals photographs and letters from inside Jeffrey Epstein's former New York City residence — and they’re nothing short of disturbing.

"Dozens of framed prosthetic eyeballs lined the entryway. A sculpture of a woman wearing a bridal gown and clutching a rope was suspended in a central atrium."

"And the director Woody Allen described how the dinners reminded him of Dracula’s castle, 'where Lugosi has three young female vampires who service the place,'" the article reads.

In the office, according to the New York Times, Epstein had a green first edition of “Lolita” on display — a novel that features a grown man developing a sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl before repeatedly raping her.

Epstein’s private jet had been nicknamed the Lolita Express by locals on Epstein Island who repeatedly saw him bringing what appeared to be underage girls back to the island.


The massage room reportedly featured paintings of naked women, a large silver ball and chain, and shelves shocked with lubricant. Epstein would regularly bring teenage girls to this room to massage him while he was naked.

“Sometimes he masturbated in front of them, according to court records and interviews with victims. Sometimes he raped or assaulted them,” the New York Times says.

“The crimes that this man committed against young girls are heinous. And this New York Times expose, listen. I’m the first person to criticize the New York Times for being biased, for being propagandists, for being outright liars, for vilifying not only their political opponents but actually laundering the lies created by the deep state in order to take out Donald Trump,” BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler says.

“But this expose gives us, in my opinion, a very chilling reminder of just how demented Jeffrey Epstein was. You walk into his Manhattan townhome, and this stuff is demonic. And it’s an unsettling reminder of the evil that Epstein perpetrated,” she continues.

“This is why,” she adds, “we react so angrily when things about Jeffrey Epstein are hidden from us. Because as much as our culture has gone off the rails, the one thing that almost every person in the United States of America agrees on is that crimes against children are evil.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Yes, SCOTUS should end gay marriage — but it’s WAY bigger than who stands at the altar



On July 24, former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis formally petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which legalizes same-sex marriage, marking the first significant challenge to the ruling since its inception. Davis, who was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples due to her religious beliefs, is appealing a $360,000 judgment against her for emotional damages and attorney fees, arguing that her First Amendment rights protect her from liability and that Obergefell was wrongly decided.

“Just like abortion, the left tries to tell us that [same-sex marriage] is untouchable, that this cannot be overturned. I'm not so sure that they're correct about that,” says Liz Wheeler, BlazeTV host of “The Liz Wheeler Show.”

She reads a line from Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrent opinion published following the overturning of Roe v. Wade: “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’ we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.”

“‘Substantive due process,’” says Liz, “is this legal philosophy held by leftist jurists that reads rights into the Constitution where they are not enumerated.”

“It's just a way of judicial activists – ideologues who are on the bench – to invent meaning to the Constitution where the Constitution had no such meaning.”

Like abortion, which is “guaranteed nowhere to anyone in the Constitution,” same-sex marriage is yet another example of substantive due process.

“Even if you're pro-gay marriage, even if you are libertarian and you don't think we should be telling other people what to do, if you read the Constitution of the United States, start to finish ... is gay marriage ever referred to?” asks Liz. “No, it's never referred to.”

“You cannot contest the reality that the Constitution of the United States contains no such reference to gay marriage directly or indirectly.”

“Even if you think that the legislature of the United States should make gay marriage legal, which you're obviously wrong on that for multiple different reasons, that's different than the Supreme Court pretending there is a Constitutional right to gay marriage in the Constitution when there's not,” Liz explains.

If SCOTUS agrees to take Davis’ case, there’s a chance — albeit a “low” one, says Liz — that the Court might re-evaluate Obergefell and reverse its original decision.

“It's probably not going to be heard by the Supreme Court,” she says, but “it should be because Kim Davis had her religious freedom ... violated by the government, and she's one of the only Americans right now that has standing to challenge Obergefell because she was hurt by it.”

However, even if Obergefell is overturned, it’s unlikely to change much in terms of who can legally get married, Liz explains. “The United States Congress has passed a piece of legislation codifying gay marriage to a certain extent. It requires any state that doesn't allow same-sex marriage to recognize ... any valid marriage from any other state. So it kind of effectively nationally forces gay marriage in all the states,” she says.

And yet, she hopes Obergefell is reversed anyway because what it will really be reversing is the idea that the government has the right to redefine a word.

“Marriage means the union between one man and one woman, and they said, ‘No, no, we're going to redefine that. It now means the union between any two consenting adults regardless of their sex.’ When government has the power to redefine a word, they can redefine any word,” says Liz. “And if they can redefine words, if they are the arbiters of truth, then they're tyrants.”

To hear more of her commentary, watch the episode above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Hunter Biden rejects Epstein suicide story, cites evidence of foul play



The official narrative is that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide via hanging in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019.

Of course, nobody believes that — including Hunter Biden, apparently.

In a recent interview on “Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan,” Hunter made it clear that he doesn’t buy the Epstein suicide narrative any more than the rest of the country does.

Liz Wheeler played a clip of his surprising comments on a recent episode of the “The Liz Wheeler Show.”

“Do you think it was, like, a suicide?” Callaghan asked.

“No, nobody does. I mean, really — except for, all of a sudden, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino,” Hunter scoffed.

He then listed multiple reasons why the suicide narrative falls flat.

He first brought up renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who observed the autopsy and resolutely determined that Epstein almost certainly died by homicidal strangulation, not suicide by hanging.

“He talks about all the different ... fractures in his neck and how it was impossible that he could have done that,” Hunter said.

He then pointed to Michael Franzese’s recent interview with NewsNation, during which he claimed suicide was virtually impossible in the cell Epstein occupied. Franzese was a former mob boss who was incarcerated in the exact same cell as Epstein years prior.

“I spent seven months on that tier and in those cells, and the first thing I have to say: There’s just no way you are able to commit suicide. There’s just no way. There’s just no way to hang yourself. There’s nothing from the ceiling. There’s nothing from the — you’d have to be a midget and work really hard to try to hang yourself,” he said.

Hunter’s third reason for dismissing the suicide narrative was the security footage of the night Epstein died. “You have the tape that comes out, and it’s not just one minute missing from the tape, it’s actually three minutes,” he said.

He then brought up Jean-Luc Brunel, a French associate of Jeffrey Epstein, who reportedly hung himself in his prison cell in February 2022, and Virginia Giuffre, Epstein’s most vocal accuser, who also reportedly died by suicide in April 2025.

“Now I’m feeding into the conspiracy, but clearly, I mean, who believes that he killed himself? Nobody,” Hunter concluded.

Liz was pleasantly surprised with Hunter’s candor and how much he knew about the controversy.

“You can tell this is not someone who is just commenting on the wavetops of the news. He’s actually following this story extremely closely because he knew all of the details,” she says.

Callaghan also asked Hunter who he thought killed Epstein.

To hear Hunter’s answer, watch the episode above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The single most important factor in prosecuting Russiagate conspirators



Now that Russiagate is out of the bag and National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has passed the case to the Department of Justice for criminal investigation, the burning question on everyone’s mind is: Who will face charges?

Author, legal scholar, and attorney Hans Mahncke, however, says there’s a more important question that needs answering first.

On a recent episode of “The Liz Wheeler Show,” he joined Liz to discuss the single most important factor in potential criminal prosecutions related to Russiagate.

“I do not want to see piddly little perjury charges, a slap on the wrist essentially, for these people who attempted to stage a coup against a duly elected president using false information ... and [weaponized] the government against us — we the people. I want serious charges,” Liz says.

“What can these individuals be charged with?” Liz asks.

“I would start off with not the what but the where,” Mahncke says.

“If the idea is to charge them in Washington, D.C., or across the river in Arlington, so that's the Eastern District of Virginia, you might as well just not charge them at all. ... Because there is no way a jury in those places is going to convict these people.”

“Is there a way to avoid those jurisdictions?” Liz asks.

“Absolutely, there's many creative ways, but it just seems that Democrats are much better at using these creative ways,” Mahncke says, pointing to the case of Douglass Mackey, known as "Ricky Vaughn," who was convicted in 2023 for conspiring to interfere with the 2016 presidential election by posting deceptive memes encouraging Hillary Clinton supporters to vote by text.

“He had nothing to do with Manhattan or New York or anything like that. No connection at all. He lived in Florida. ... They charged him up there because they knew they would get a friendly jury who would convict him,” Mahncke says.

“The way they tied it in, it was like, ‘Well, his Twitter feed was being read in New York, hence we can charge him there.’ Well, all these [Russiagate] crimes that these people committed, they affected the people in Oklahoma, in Texas, in West Virginia.”

“You can definitely create angles to go to Florida or any of these other places, so that would be my overriding priority. Make sure you do it in the right jurisdiction. Otherwise, just don't do it at all.”

To hear more of Mahncke’s analysis, watch the episode above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Liz Wheeler notices something others missed in Obama’s Russiagate statement



Following National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification of a trove of documents related to Russiagate, President Trump, in a recent press conference, was clear that former President Barack Obama should be targeted by the Department of Justice in its criminal investigation.

“From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration?” one reporter asked.

“Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama,” President Trump responded candidly. “He started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there and Clapper ... Brennan – they were all there.”

“If you look at those papers, they have them stone cold, and it was President Obama,” he reiterated.

“Look, he's guilty. It's not a question.”

Shortly after the press conference, an Obama spokesperson named Patrick Rodenbush issued a statement in response to President Trump’s comments.

Liz Wheeler, BlazeTV host, shares a tweet from MSNBC producer Kyle Griffin, who shared the statement:

— (@)

Liz couldn’t help but notice something peculiar about this statement: “He never actually denied it.”

“The first thing that you do if you're falsely accused is you say, ‘That is false. That is categorically false. That is not true,”’ says Liz. “It's human nature."

Liz recalls when Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was falsely accused of sexual assault during his Supreme Court nomination in 2018. He stood before the Senate Judiciary Committee and delivered a “passionate emotional defense” of his character.

“He used words that didn't sound like they were written by a speech writer. They were just from his gut ... and it resonated with the American people because we know that when you're falsely accused of doing something, your reaction is visceral,” says Liz.

The response from Obama’s spokesperson contained no such denial of guilt.

“Barack Obama didn't deny it. He said, ‘The allegations are ridiculous,”’ says Liz.

To hear more of her commentary, watch the episode above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Trump is listening: Finding out what Ghislaine Maxwell knows



The Department of Justice has suddenly appeared to be making some serious headway in the Epstein case, as Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has taken the time to interview Epstein’s convicted associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

“Justice demands courage. For the first time, the Department of Justice is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell to ask: What do you know?” Blanche wrote in a post on X.

Despite the positive optics, BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler hasn’t totally forgiven the DOJ just yet.

“How do we even react to this? How about someone ask Attorney General Pam Bondi, ‘How exactly did you conclude that there was no client list, no blackmail operation, and that Epstein definitively committed suicide with the Department of Justice having never ever spoken to Ghislaine Maxwell?” Wheeler asks on “The Liz Wheeler Show.”


“You might be wondering, ‘Why is Liz not happy about this development that the Department of Justice is actually going to pursue an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell,’ who, by the way, is the only person serving in prison for anything related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes against children,” she continues.

While it’s taken far too long for progress to be made, Wheeler is “grateful” that the DOJ seems to have heard concerns like her own.

“Your voices, they make a difference,” Wheeler says. “And I feel like when those of us in President Trump’s base or just those of us as American citizens, as voters, when we raise our voices and let our opinions be known, sometimes it feels like we’re just shouting into the void.”

“And I want to assure you as someone who is both part of the base and standing beside you, but someone who also has a view into the inside, you are not shouting into the void,” she continues, adding, “President Trump is listening to his base.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.