Malkin: False accuser Shaun Lying King's record of harm

This week, "journalist, activist and humanitarian" Shaun King will give a keynote speech at the annual Innocence Network conference in Atlanta, Georgia. The theme of the event, whose attendees work to prevent and undo wrongful convictions, is "The Presumption of Innocence."

I've covered many flabbergasting things over the course of 25 years as a columnist, author, blogger and documentary host, but this one takes the cake.

It was just three months ago that King recklessly exploited the shooting death of 7-year-old Jazmine Barnes in Houston, Texas, to stoke racial fear and hatred. The little girl and her family, who are black, got caught in crossfire at a Walmart parking lot. The Black Lives Matter activist and columnist for the Intercept immediately pounced -- using his huge Twitter platform, followed by 1.1 million people, to cast the incident as a racial hate crime. King splashed a photo of Robert Cantrell, a white man who had been arrested for robbery the same day as the Barnes shooting, all over social media.

"We've had 20 people call or email us and say he is a racist, violent a--hole and always has been. Just tell me everything you know," Social Justice Detective King incited on Twitter. Cantrell's family members faced vitriol and death threats online as a result of the irresponsible gossip-mongering. After two black men were arrested for the murder, King sputtered to save his reputation -- first by claiming credit for passing on a tip that led to the arrests (which he kept quiet about while stoking anti-white hatred), and then by doubling down with a fake-but-accurate defense.

"We live in a time where somebody could do something like this based purely on hate or race," he smugly argued. "And that it turned out to not be the case I don't think changes the devastating conclusion that people had thought something like that was possible."

There's nothing "humanitarian" or exemplary about such an attitude. This is race-hustling cynicism at its worst. It's par for the twisted course for King, who is a serial apologist for treating people as guilty until proven innocent and for threatening those who call him out (including critics within the progressive left who have alleged he has ripped off the movement).

In May 2018, the Lying King led the witch hunt against innocent white Texas state trooper Daniel Hubbard by spreading the false claims of a black woman who lied about Hubbard raping her during a traffic stop. That admitted liar, Sherita Dixon-Cole, escaped prosecution based on a technicality. King's reward? Moving up from the New York Daily News to a coveted position at the Harvard-affiliated Fair Punishment Project, which in part conducts research to prevent more wrongful convictions.

In 2014, King promoted the anti-cop "hands up, don't shoot" lie debunked by none other than the Obama Justice Department, yet he still doesn't care about the truth. "I'm not going to parse evidence or make some complex technical argument that Michael Brown did or didn't have his hands up," he defiantly retorted. "To me, it doesn't matter if he did or he didn't. It never has."

As former New York City Police detective Sergeant John Paolucci, who is on the board of Uncuff the Innocent, which advocates for wrongfully convicted police officers, told me: "When the agenda is to instill in people a fear of the police, one creates an environment conducive to more deadly confrontations. ... Having worked the most high-profile police involved cases in the media, I'm well aware that the whole truth is never reported in these investigations and the probative value of evidence that favors the police is diminished or omitted entirely when it hits the news."

In 2015, King gloried in the wrongful rape convictions of former Oklahoma City police officer Daniel Holtzclaw, whose flawed case and forensic errors led six internationally renowned scientists to call for a retrial. He has failed to follow up because, of course, the truth doesn't fit his narrative.

The "journalist" also maintained the same obstinate stance after his disgraceful sliming of football star Peyton Manning in 2016, when he attempted to ride the #MeToo publicity wave by recycling -- and woefully misinterpreting -- a 13-year-old court filing regarding a settlement with a female trainer who had claimed she was sexually harassed, and then changed her story seven years later. Instead of admitting error, he played victim.

It's disturbing enough that King is being honored at the Innocence Conference, where many lawyers, activists, scientists and exonerees I admire will attend. Even worse, King heads up a publication called "The North Star," which purports to "speak truth to power" and is aimed at young people of color.

Wrongfully convicted Marine Tim Wright and his wife, Danielle, wonder: "How can an individual with a reputation of making countless false accusations against white men, racially profiling whites and stirring up racial discourse in America be trusted with the hearts and minds of future generations of minority children?"

Or anyone, for that matter? This malicious individual who has repeatedly profited from undermining the presumption of innocence has no place pretending to defend it. That's speaking truth to power.

COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Keep reading...Show less

WTF MSM!? The sky is falling: Shutdown edition

The humanity …

Sob stories … As the vast majority of people across the nation continue with their lives, those in the northeast media bubble want us to know that the ongoing shutdown is going to be catastrophic. That’s the narrative developing across the media landscape today.

The media know that most people aren’t affected by the partial shutdown of the government. But to them, government is life, and when government is not working, it is of great concern. So they want to make sure you know what’s going on. Here are just some of the stories pushing the “sky is falling” narrative from the past few days.

  • WaPo: Millions face delayed tax refunds, cuts to food stamps as White House scrambles to deal with shutdown’s consequences
  • CNN: Hundreds of TSA screeners, working without pay, calling out sick at major airports
  • WaPo: HUD staffers did not realize a program providing rent assistance was ending. Send 1500 letters to landlords to stave off evictions.
  • Miami Herald: Shutdown affecting people waiting for government backed mortgages
  • The State: Government shutdown could stall research, impede victims’ services
  • Rolling Stone: The shutdown’s next victims are America’s poorest families

The media want us to feel bad for all of these people. They are trying to build sympathy to end the shutdown. What I see in all of these stories is that government is too big when it affects people’s lives like this. Expect to see more stories like this in the future.

Will Trump’s border address be covered? … On Tuesday night, President Donald Trump will address the nation on the “humanitarian and national security crisis on our southern border.” The address is scheduled for 9 p.m. ET. Over the weekend, CNN’s resident thought cop Oliver Darcy pondered whether or not cable news networks should air Trump’s comments in real time.  That sets up an interesting question. Will these networks cover Trump’s address live?

Here’s what Darcy wrote:

And on Friday, CNN, MSNBC and Fox News all carried Trump as he rambled for approximately 15 minutes before taking questions about the government shutdown and other topics at a Rose Garden press conference.

In effect, the practice of airing Trump's remarks in real-time, as networks did this week, gives the President a platform to reach millions of people at once and dominate the conversation -- and Trump often uses the opportunity to deceive viewers by peddling misinformation and falsehoods.

Trump's comments are almost always followed by informed analysis and fact-checking, but some media critics say cable news networks should still rethink carrying Trump on-air as he delivers remarks. The issue has even united some individuals on differing ends of the political spectrum.

CNN has confirmed that it will carry the address. If some of the other networks refuse to air the address, Darcy’s narrative from this weekend will have played a part in making that happen.

Keep reading...Show less