James Talarico Says He Wants To See Fewer Abortions. But Why?
A viral exchange over abortion during a CNN town hall exposes the Obama-like dishonesty and condescension of James Talarico.As the nation prepares for its 250th birthday, patriotism is down among the left — with some even saying that just waving the flag feels “MAGA.”
“This one feels different to many Americans,” Erin Burnett said in a CNN interview with Jon Meacham about the Fourth of July.
“There’s a new Gallup poll that saw that just 53% of Americans say they’re very or extremely proud to be American. Ten years ago, that same poll said the number was 81%,” Burnett continued.
“My jaw drops when I see that,” she added. “What do you see here? Is this really about Trump?”
“I hate to say it, but I think it is,” Meacham answered.
“It’s you guys,” BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales says, shocked.
“I mean, what losers. What losers. If you would have asked me during the Obama years or the Joe Biden years, ‘Do you love this country?’ I’d be like, hell yes. And that is why I want better for it. The love for the country doesn’t leave,” she adds.
But CNN isn’t the only outlet denigrating America before its birthday.
“As nation turns 250, many Americans say the Stars and Stripes is now a red flag,” one NBC News headline reads, with the subhead below: “The American flag: To some, it’s Old Glory. To others, it’s a MAGA hat on a stick.”
The article spotlighted a man named Bruce Watson from Massachusetts, who said that while he was “very proud” of his American flag, he fears “his Stars and Stripes may now need an asterisk.”
“If we do fly the flag, we will also put out signs to make it clear that we are not MAGA,” he added.
“By the way, his stupid gay sign says, ‘Our home believes in kindness, hope, peace, justice, equality, science, respect, diversity, and love,’” Gonzales comments.
“Oh, that’s so cute. You know who’s not putting out that sign? Me. I want you to know I’m America first, and I want you to cry harder about it,” she adds.
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Imagine you founded a company with a stop-smoking product that actually works — no nicotine, better than anything on the market. You are the largest investor. You take no salary. You build it into something real, serving 756,000 customers. You are doing exactly what America is supposed to reward.
Then one night, without warning, without a trial, without any finding of wrongdoing, the federal government comes. The government freezes every account you own or are even associated with — personal and business accounts, life insurance, and retirement savings. A court-appointed receiver sells your office furniture. They tell you that you no longer have Fourth Amendment rights. They come for the wedding ring on your wife's finger.
This attack sounds like some hypothetical scenario. It is my story.
I am writing this so that every American understands just what weaponization by the government really means.
The Federal Trade Commission came for me in 2018 using Section 13(b) of the FTC Act — a provision Congress created for injunctions only, not for seizing assets or freezing accounts. The receiver the agency installed consumed nearly $4 million of my money in fees before anyone proved the FTC did not have legal rights to my assets.
When I went to court and asked for access to my own frozen money just to pay lawyers and keep my home, the government's response was: You can go live under the freeway for all we care.
While this was happening, inspired by President Trump's Made in America initiative, I built VPL Medical — the world's first made-in-USA three-ply surgical face mask manufacturing operation, based in California, where I was born and raised.
This was before COVID. When the pandemic hit, VPL Medical was ready. The Department of Health and Human Services awarded us a $14,500,000 contract to deliver 20,000,000 American-made masks to the Strategic National Stockpile. The factory was going to employ 400 Americans. The country didn't want masks from China, and we were ready to deliver.
Then the FTC came for VPL Medical, too. The factory went dark for three months while Americans died and hospitals begged for PPE. The FTC's offer to reopen: Pay the receiver $25,000 per week to run my own company under a law that didn't authorize the demand. I refused. The receiver's first act was to cancel the HHS contract. Twenty million American-made masks and 400 American jobs gone.
In April 2021, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in AMG Capital Management v. FTC that the commission had no authority to seek monetary relief. Nine justices. Zero dissents. My civil FTC case collapsed. The district court returned my company to me. Zero dollars — after four years of destruction, a factory closed during a pandemic, a $14.5 million federal contract canceled, and nearly $4 million consumed by a fraudulent receiver.
There is no mechanism to get that back. You win. And you are still destroyed.
My family and I moved to Ireland to take a break. We were through the nightmare and wanted to recover. Or so we thought.
RELATED: Trump’s anti-weaponization fund puts GOP cowards on trial

When I flew home to see my dying father, I was arrested at Los Angeles International Airport. The Biden DOJ had indicted me for the same conduct the FTC had litigated for four years and won nothing from — conduct the prior Trump administration's DOJ had already reviewed and declined to charge.
The Trump administration's own 2018 “No Piling On” directive explicitly prohibits this practice. The alleged consumer harm: approximately $154, across 756,000 customers who all received their product or a refund. My criminal defense costs: in the millions and climbing.
What is happening in my case now has no precedent in American federal prosecution. The supervising AUSA withdrew in April 2025. No replacement has appeared in 14 months. There is no confirmed U.S. attorney supervising the case. The DOJ unit employing the trial attorney was abolished in September 2025. Thirty-one demands for that authorization have gone unanswered. The prosecution continues anyway.
Six fully briefed motions to dismiss — covering fraud on the court, due process, double jeopardy, evidence suppression, and the “No Piling On” violation — have all been denied by District Court Judge Jesus Bernal, an Obama appointee.
Every player in this case, with the exception of myself, is a Biden or Obama appointee. This is what Biden-Obama weaponization looks like — a rogue agency, an unauthorized prosecution, and politically appointed judges, all targeting an American entrepreneur who built American manufacturing and supported President Trump.
I have filed a restitution claim with the DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund. I am not asking for sympathy. I am asking for what the rule of law promises: that the government must prove its case before it destroys you. Right now, for me, that promise has not been kept. I am writing this so that every American understands just what weaponization by the government really means.
Editor’s note: This article was originally published by RealClearPolicy and made available via RealClearWire.
Not everyone is a winner, and President Trump announced on Tuesday that he wants to put competition back at the forefront for American youth.
To prove this, Trump is reviving a nearly 70-year-old policy that was phased out by President Barack Obama in his second term.
'We want to make sure our kids have the best opportunity to succeed in life.'
The commander in chief brought a number of high-profile athletes, Cabinet members, and children into the Oval Office to sign a memorandum to bring competition back to kids all across the United States.
As part of an executive order signed last July that reinstated the Presidential Fitness Test, Trump announced at the White House that he would bring back the National Physical Fitness Award as well as the Presidential Fitness Award.
According to Harvard Health, President Dwight D. Eisenhower initiated the Presidential Physical Fitness Test in 1956. It included a one-mile run, pull-ups or push-ups, sit-ups, a shuttle run, and a sit-and-reach exercise for flexibility.
The test endured in different forms all the way up until 2013, when President Obama replaced it with the Presidential Youth Fitness Program.
Gone were the awards, once listed on a government website under the President's Challenge. The president's award recognized students who scored at or above the 85th percentile on all five activities, while the national award went to those who scored above the 50th percentile in all five activities.
RELATED: Make America Fit Again: Presidential Fitness Test returns after 13 years
- YouTube
President-elect John F. Kennedy is credited with popularizing the fitness craze in the 1960s after writing an article titled "The Soft American" for Sports Illustrated.
In his writings, Kennedy cited research he had come across that spanned 15 years, comparing the physical fitness of American children versus the fitness of children in Austria, Italy, and Switzerland. Kennedy wrote that for six tests evaluating muscular strength and flexibility, over 57% of American children failed one or more, while less than 9% of the Europeans did.
Kennedy later proposed the President's Council on Physical Fitness, which would later establish the awards program under President Lyndon B. Johnson.
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. referenced his uncle's article at the White House on Tuesday, calling the physical fitness program "an enduring right of passage for us that everybody in my generation remembers."
"It was a benchmark for measuring national physical fitness," the secretary continued, adding that he hopes Americans "help each other get in shape so that we can prepare for our great future that this administration is providing for this country."
RELATED: The left can’t handle Hegseth’s combat stance
- YouTube
Also joining the president in the Oval Office were former professional athletes, including NHL player T.J. Oshie, MLB pitcher Noah Syndergaard, and golfer Gary Player, as well as current pro golfer Bryson DeChambeau.
DeChambeau's remarks were celebrated when he thanked the administration for prioritizing the physical health of American youth.
"We want to make sure our kids have the best opportunity to succeed in life. ... Their physical fitness is a huge priority in helping them become better human beings," he said.
Also in attendance were War Secretary Pete Hegseth, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner, and Education Secretary Linda McMahon.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
A Federalist article published yesterday revealed that the government-funded Global Engagement Center assured the State Department its censorship “test bed” platform would not target U.S. audiences, yet it proceeded to fund a trial specifically aimed at Blaze Media.
“Let me break it down simply,” BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales says.
“Back in 2011, Obama signed an executive order to establish the State Department’s Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications ... to support ‘agencies in government-wide public communications activities targeted against violent extremism and terrorist organizations,’” she recounts.
This was the “seed,” she explains, that would eventually sprout and bloom into a domestic censorship apparatus.
In 2016, Obama then signed an executive order, renaming the existing Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications the Global Engagement Center and tasking it with coordinating U.S. government-wide counterterrorism communications activities directed at foreign audiences abroad to counter terrorist messaging.
“Pay attention to these dates. 2016, [Obama] is out the door,” Sara says.
In the waning days of President Trump’s first term (December 14, 2020, to January 7, 2021), however, a GEC-funded test-bed trial diverted from its stated mission to target foreign disinformation when it set its sights on Blaze Media.
Its other target was Sputnik News, a Russian state-owned news agency and radio service.
“Why would we be as big of a target as a Russian state news agency?” Sara asks. “Is the deep state that threatened by what we talk about?”
“The answer is yes — the deep state actually is that threatened by what we talk about,” she answers definitively.
When Secretary of State Marco Rubio shut down the GEC and its successor office, the Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference, in 2025, the New York Times and other left-wing outlets lamented it.
Sara mocks the coverage the story received: “He closed down the State Department office on foreign disinformation. Why would we want to have disinformation? That’s bad!”
“No, it was just being used to suppress and censor actual American media,” she explains. “Sorry, I’m saying American media like it was plural — like it was like this big venture. ... No, it was just us.”
Why Blaze Media specifically?
Sara believes it’s tied to Blaze Media’s COVID coverage.
“We were one of the only (actually the only) alternative media outlet that was telling the truth during COVID, myself included,” she says. “We were getting demonetized left and right because we were actually telling the truth.”
To hear more, watch the episode above.
To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.