Levin: Flashback to 1984 Ted Kennedy: 'This was a major effort to get the Soviet Union to interfere in our election'

Friday night on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin spoke with presidential historian Paul Kengor about a grossly overlooked incident in which a prominent politician sought election help from a dangerous foreign enemy.

The U.S. politician was Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy, the foreign power was the Soviet Union, and the election was the 1984 presidential race.

According to a 1983 KGB document, which wasn't reported until years later in 1992, a friend of Kennedy's reached out to the Kremlin to help the Soviets deal with Ronald Reagan in exchange for assistance undermining the president in the upcoming 1984 election.

The memo lists a number of ways that Reagan's chances for re-election might have been weakened and outlines a number of proposals such as Kennedy meeting with Soviet officials in Moscow, those officials meeting with Kennedy in the United States, and others.

Naturally, the document's discovery was largely ignored by the American media.

"This was a major effort to get the Soviet Union to interfere in our election," Levin said.

"Yeah, I think it's fair to characterize it that way," Kengor responded.

Kengor then went on to compare the Kennedy-KGB memo to the current debate over President Trump, the Ukrainian government, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter:

"Imagine if Ronald Reagan knew about this memo, Mark, right, in 1984, right? After Ted Kennedy's shenanigans. And he knows that Kennedy is considering a challenge to Reagan in 1984. And imagine Reagan's frustration if he would have known that no one in the media cared to even ask Kennedy about this, right? Imagine what Reagan's frustration would be like. Imagine the temptation of Reagan to try to do what he would be able to do or his staff could do to try to expose what Kennedy did, knowing that no one in the liberal media was going to expose it or even bother to ever report on it.

"And then if Reagan would have done so, or someone in his staff would have tried to call attention to it, Reagan would have been accused by the liberal media of abusing his power, because he'd be facing a possible presidential campaign challenge by Ted Kennedy in 1984. And I think that's what Donald Trump is facing with Joe Biden.

"Trump wants the liberal media to do its job and expose how Biden abused power, knowing that the liberal media won't do it, so Trump knows that he has to try to expose it himself."

Listen:

Keep reading...Show less

Levin: Remember Clinton's 1990s reelection? Real 'evidence [of collusion] was everywhere'

Tuesday on the radio, in light of the redacted Mueller report dropping Thursday, LevinTV host Mark Levin reminded listeners what real foreign influence in an American presidential election looks like.

"I remember there was a time when a foreign government interfered with our election on behalf of a specific candidate. They say Russia interfered on behalf of Trump, they can't demonstrate that. But I remember when the communist Chinese interfered in a federal election to help the Democrats, and to help Bill Clinton. Do you folks remember this? In the 1990s? And the press, other than maybe the L.A. Times and a handful of others, really could care less. And the evidence was everywhere — everywhere. It was an attempt to influence America's presidential election. This time ... It involved the reelection of Bill Clinton for president, and communist China," Levin said.

"Remember how upset the Democrats were, remember all the committee hearings? You don't either? I don't remember a damn thing," Levin said.

Listen:

Levin read excerpts from an article by Washington Examiner columnist Byron York, and his own upcoming book "Unfreedom of the Press," to remind listeners how Bill Clinton's presidential campaign for reelection in the 1990s was actually funded by the Chinese military, and that former Democratic fundraiser John Huang raised more than $1.5 million from illegal foreign sources, and Chinese officials visited the White House no fewer than 78 times.

"What's this 'What-about-ism'? It's called history. Context is everything. The world didn't begin today," Levin said.

"That was a scandal. Enormous sums of money, pouring into one party, pouring into one candidate, pouring into one defense fund. Testimony under oath, that the Chinese government, specifically the Chinese military, was funding it. You've got none of this in this phony Russia-Trump collusion crap. None of it. You've got nothing," Levin said.

Keep reading...Show less

Dan Bongino’s latest book 'Spygate' now available for preorder

"The Dan Bongino Show" host Dan Bongino shared on Twitter Monday that his new book, “Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald Trump,” is now available for preorder.

The book, co-written with journalist D.C. McAllister, is an in-depth examination of the attempts at sabotage of the Trump 2016 presidential campaign by the Obama administration, the Hillary Clinton campaign, and foreign entities, which has become known as the “Spygate” scandal in conservative media.

Bongino, a former secret service agent during the Obama administration, has written a handful of other books on his time in the White House, including the bestsellers “Protecting the President,” and “Life Inside the Bubble.”

“Spygate” will be released on October 9, 2018, and can be preordered through Amazon.

Levin: What if the press is 'contributing to the deterioration of liberty'?

LevinTV host Mark Levin opened up his radio show Friday evening by reminding his audience to recall, on Memorial Day weekend, that American soldiers fight for what the United States stands for — principles the progressive movement seeks to undermine.

He also discussed how important it is to hold the legacy media accountable for their extreme bias.

What if the press is “contributing to the deterioration of liberty?” he asked. What if the press is “contributing to the deterioration of a constitutional republic and the institutions that undergird it?”

What if the press is “essentially, or mostly, the voice of one political party — or one … ideology — progressivism?” he added.

“You can’t possibly watch Jake Tapper or Don Lemon or Wolf Blitzer or Brian Stelter or virtually all of the hosts on CNN and draw the conclusion that these individuals have, as their purpose, to inform us as opposed to lecture us,” Levin explained.

Don’t miss an episode of LevinTV. Sign up for your FREE 30-day trial now!