Kamala Harris is serious about taking stuff seriously in her latest SERIOUSLY embarrassing speech



Vice President Kamala Harris wants you to know that we seriously have to take serious stuff super seriously, and, sadly, we're being perfectly serious — the vice president of the United States has made yet another seriously embarrassing speech.

Our nation's second in command has become known for her embarrassing habit of impersonating a broken record. Like when she got stuck repeating the word "joy" over and over during a painfully awkward interview with MSNBC's Joy Reid. Or the time she weirdly repeated the phrase “the significance of the passage of time” four times in less than 30 seconds. And who could forget the strange "word salad" speech in which she repeated the phrase "work together" six times in a single rambling sentence?

During a statement Wednesday on the tragic July Fourth mass shooting in Highland Park, Illinois, Harris appeared to be trying to convince us all that she's taking "this stuff" very seriously.

“We have to take this stuff seriously, as seriously as you are, because you have been forced to take this seriously,” Harris stated.


\u201cKamala Harris on Highland Park mass shooting: \u201cWe have to take this stuff seriously, as seriously as you are because you have been forced to take this seriously\u201d\n\n\u201d
— The Post Millennial (@The Post Millennial) 1657112878

The vice president was immediately and quite “seriously” lambasted on Twitter:

\u201c@TPostMillennial Better Kamala: The seriousness of what happened here is, by it\u2019s very nature, serious. When we evaluate the seriousness of a situation like this, we can come to only one conclusion; that this is a serious situation and it requires serious consideration from serious people\u201d
— The Post Millennial (@The Post Millennial) 1657112878
\u201c@TPostMillennial Speech writer - "Madame VP, here is your speech for the Highland Park shooting presser".\n\nVP Harris - "No thanks, seriously, I've got this".\u201d
— The Post Millennial (@The Post Millennial) 1657112878
\u201c@TPostMillennial Being serious is seriously a serious concern and people need to seriously be serious on these serious issues.\u201d
— The Post Millennial (@The Post Millennial) 1657112878
\u201c@JakeSheridan_ Is she given a key word/phrase of the day to use and given extra points for the number of times it is used?\n\nOr do her speech writers play a drinking game with the key word/phrase of the day?\u201d
— Jake Sheridan (@Jake Sheridan) 1657067543
\u201c@JakeSheridan_ Me can speak goodly \n\nme know words \n\npew pew bad\n\nm'kay bye\u201d
— Jake Sheridan (@Jake Sheridan) 1657067543
\u201c@JakeSheridan_ But seriously, folks, when we seriously consider the serious implications of these serious actions and times, the severity of the seriousness of what occurred will dawn on us, and we will seriously recognize it is serious.\u201d
— Jake Sheridan (@Jake Sheridan) 1657067543
\u201c@JakeSheridan_ @redsteeze Oh my God I thought this quote was a joke. \nA heartbeat away \n*shivver*\u201d
— Jake Sheridan (@Jake Sheridan) 1657067543

BlazeTV's Stu Burguere, host of "Stu Does America," will be adding this latest nugget of wisdom from Vice President Harris to his ever-expanding collection of "Veep Thoughts by Kamala Harris." Here are a few classics:

Veep Thoughts by Kamala Harris: Work Together youtu.be



Veep Thoughts By Kamala Harris: Ukraine youtu.be


Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Parkland survivor tries to delete CLUELESS tweet about SCOTUS justices — but the internet is forever



Today, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its controversial 1973 Roe v. Wadeopinion, concluding that there is no constitutional right to an abortion.

"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the syllabus of the decision reads.

As expected, the leftist outrage erupted instantaneously, fueled largely by the misinformed idea that overturning Roe v. Wade means abortion will be banned nationwide. But, as stated in the above-mentioned Supreme Court syllabus, the authority has actually been returned to individual states and their duly elected lawmakers.

One such misinformed leftist, Parkland shooting survivor Cameron Kasky, was infuriated that those awful Supreme Court justices "just voted to kill women." So he took to Twitter to urge people to go to the homes of said Supreme Court justices to "let them know how you feel."

"Go to the home of every Supreme Court justice who just voted to kill women. Let them know how you feel," Kasky tweeted.

\u201c@cameron_kasky Might as well let everyone see your tweet\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

The backlash was immediate:

\u201c@cameron_kasky I'm pro-choice. Understand that this is how you got to this ruling. Intimidating judges never ends well. Fight this by protesting at the Supreme Court. If you promote people going to a private home, you will lose more. \ud83e\udd14\u201d
— \ud83d\udfe5\u2b1c\ufe0fDISTRUMPTION2\u20e30\u20e32\u20e32\u20e3 (@\ud83d\udfe5\u2b1c\ufe0fDISTRUMPTION2\u20e30\u20e32\u20e32\u20e3) 1656082992
\u201cLol of course he deleted it.\u201d
— CLFitness (@CLFitness) 1656083472
\u201c@cameron_kasky @TwitterSupport This is an incitement to violence after there has already been an assassination attempt on an SC Justice. This is dangerous.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

Kasky decided to delete his original tweet because he is apparently "sick of republicans talking to [him]." But, unfortunately for Kasky, the internet is indeed forever:

\u201cI deleted my tweet about going to Supreme Court justices houses because I\u2019m sick of republicans talking to me but please let me be clear my opinion stands\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@DiablitoDeOro @neontaster @cameron_kasky Because reasons https://t.co/YefbtBYIHx\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@cameron_kasky You mean THIS ONE? Inciting people to break the law?\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@cameron_kasky No, you deleted it because it was against Twitter safety rules. So, you were told to delete it and you obeyed.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721
\u201c@neontaster @cameron_kasky It was grabbed in time.\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@wadepearson @DiablitoDeOro @redsteeze @cameron_kasky @neontaster All of the Parkland kids like him that lectured everyone on "fight for our lives" will gleefully use their marxist ideals to silence and kill dissenters. Remember, its not about the gun, it's about the control.\u201d
— Noam Blum (@Noam Blum) 1656084578
\u201c@cameron_kasky Insurrectionist.\u201d
— Cameron Kasky (@Cameron Kasky) 1656086721

Speaking from the White House, President Joe Biden dutifully helped spread the misinformation about the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and took the opportunity to prompt voters to elect more Democrats in November so that Congress can write abortion protections into law. Did the president just let slip the real reason Congress hasn't made any effort to start writing such laws in the nearly two months since Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion was "leaked" in early May?

Watch the video below:

“Joe Biden on Dobbs:"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn’t limit it. They simply took it away."”


\u201cJoe Biden on Dobbs:\n\n"Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn\u2019t limit it. They simply took it away."\u201d
— TheBlaze (@TheBlaze) 1656089338

White House press secretary Jen Psaki 'out of the office' this week as Afghanistan falls and President Biden vacations



White House press secretary Jen Psaki is "out of the office" this week while President Joe Biden vacations at Camp David — all while Afghanistan rapidly falls to the Taliban in a stunning takeover, Fox News reported.

What are the details?

The cable network said it sent questions to Psaki's White House email address Sunday morning and then tried to reach her once again Sunday evening — and each time received the same auto-reply: Psaki wouldn't be available this week.

"I will be out of the office from August 15th-August 22nd," Fox News said the auto-reply read. Others received the same auto-reply:

To confirm Fox reporting - We asked Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki for comment about Afghanistan.Here the actu… https://t.co/LszzkKUM2s

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) 1629080272.0

Although Biden is on a scheduled vacation, Republicans ripped his absence amid a colossal disaster in a country that was the primary focal point following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks in the United States — a month shy of 20 years ago.

"Joe Biden has been commander-in-chief for seven months — the current failure in Afghanistan falls squarely on his shoulders," Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said. "His lack of leadership during this pivotal moment has been shameful — it has only served to embolden our adversaries and let down our allies."

Indeed, Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani fled to Tajikistan, the presidential palace in Kabul on Sunday was "handed over" to the Taliban, and U.S. diplomatic members were forced to evacuate the U.S. Embassy in Kabul on helicopters — a scene that drew comparisons to the fall of Saigon at the end of the Vietnam war.

In addition, Biden reportedly "overruled" top U.S. military commanders when he authorized the full withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan. Vice President Kamala Harris also played a "key role" in Biden's decision.

What did folks have to say about Psaki?

Psaki's absence only added fuel to criticism of the Biden administration's handling of the crisis:

World watches a collapse of 20 yrs of US involvement in Afghanistan and WH takes vacation. I guess she will “circl… https://t.co/mYW8UrxQfC

— Gov. Mike Huckabee (@GovMikeHuckabee) 1629079450.0

Jen Psaki is leaving for a week. The Biden administration is in shambles.

— Ian Miles Cheong @ stillgray.substack.com (@stillgray) 1629095859.0

Jen Psaki took a week off when she realized that "circling back" to questions about why America just took the bigge… https://t.co/sBo8dwSJE1

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) 1629084733.0

Jen Psaki has time for vogue photo spreads from Annie Leibovitz. Fall of Kabul? Not so much.

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) 1629086755.0

Anything else?

Biden issued a Saturday statement placing blame on former President Donald Trump for the Afghanistan debacle — after which Trump blasted Biden, saying the current commander-in-chief "gets it wrong every time on foreign policy."

It's also been reported that Biden will address the American people on the Afghanistan situation in the "next few days."

'We felt like Martin Luther King,' says Dem congresswoman arrested at Capitol protesting for voting rights she already has



Democratic Ohio Rep. Joyce Beatty was arrested Thursday afternoon at the U.S. Capitol while protesting with a small contingent of followers in favor of sweeping Democrat-backed voting rights legislation. She later described the demonstration as her Martin Luther King Jr. "moment."

What happened?

Beatty, who is the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, was escorted out of the Hart Senate Office Building in zip ties only minutes after she and a contingent of fellow protesters marched into the building demanding an end to the filibuster and passage of the For the People Act.

"Let the people vote. Fight for justice," Beatty tweeted, also adding, "We will not be turned around. We will keep walking. We will fight for freedom. We will fight for our right to vote!"

Let the people vote. Fight for justice. https://t.co/JnEUPl9KJW

— Joyce Beatty (@RepBeatty) 1626378320.0

We will not be turned around. We will keep walking. We will fight for freedom. We will fight for our right to vote! https://t.co/uyJHXEy8Y0

— Joyce Beatty (@RepBeatty) 1626378131.0

Following the protest, Beatty posted a statement saying, "I stand in solidarity with Black women and allies across the country in defense of our constitutional right to vote. We have come too far and fought too hard to see everything systematically dismantled and restricted by those who wish to silence us. Be assured that this is just the beginning."

What else?

But commenters on social media noted that the congresswoman was essentially protesting for rights she already possesses.

Based on past tweets of hers compiled by conservative commentator Stephen L. Miller, Beatty appears to have had little difficulty exercising her right to vote in prior elections. And she was able to do this even in Ohio, where an ID card is required to vote.

https://t.co/QOfxiJ322b https://t.co/Vtb1xnbclD

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) 1626403761.0

One commenter replied, "America so free you can protest for rights you already got."

Another quipped: "Can you not vote? what happened?"

Anything else?

Beatty later claimed that the demonstration was prompted by numerous election security measures passed in states across the country following the 2020 election, which she argues are intended to suppress minority voting. But none of those state laws have been proven unnecessarily restrictive.

Nonetheless, during a softball interview with MSNBC after her arrest, Beatty glorified the small protest by comparing it to the great civil rights demonstrations of the 1960s.

"Were were in our movement, in our moment. We felt like John Lewis, we felt like Martin Luther King," Beatty said proudly.

Rep. Joyce Beatty Responds To Being Arrested In Senate Office Building www.youtube.com

Earlier that day, she characterized the state of play in modern politics as similar to the civil rights era.

"We might as well still have the dogs and the hoses because we don't have the Voting Rights Act," Beatty said at a rally prior to the event.

'Defund NPR' trends after outlet tweets disclaimer on Declaration of Independence



Conservatives on Twitter skewered National Public Radio over the weekend after the left-leaning news outlet added a notable disclaimer to its annual broadcast reading of the Declaration of Independence.

What happened?

In a Twitter thread posted on Independence Day, the taxpayer-funded outlet noted that the Declaration, one of America's prized founding documents, is filled with "flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies."

"245 years ago today, leaders representing 13 British colonies signed a document to declare independence. It says 'that all men are created equal' — but women, enslaved people, Indigenous people and many others were not held as equal at the time," NPR said in a tweet. "The document also includes a racist slur against Indigenous Americans."

It went on to add: "In this thread of the Declaration of Independence, you can see a document with flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies. It also laid the foundation for this country's collective aspirations — the hopes for what America could be."

🧵 245 years ago today, leaders representing 13 British colonies signed a document to declare independence.It says… https://t.co/sWrnliWK2M

— NPR (@NPR) 1625411033.0

In this thread of the Declaration of Independence, you can see a document with flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisi… https://t.co/Bpf6joXaVw

— NPR (@NPR) 1625411035.0

The same statement was read aloud during NPR's reading of the document along with some further context, provided by a staffer.

"After last summer's protests and our country attempting to confront its history, we want and need to be honest about the words in this document," the staffer said.

What happened next?

In response to the disclaimer, several critics — discontented by the outlet's decision to criticize America on a day set aside for its celebration — called on government officials to "defund NPR."

Florida Republican congressional candidate Lavern Spicer quipped, "Today is a great day for America to declare its independence from NPR which is currently attacking our Constitution."

Today is a great day for America to declare its independence from NPR which is currently attacking our Constitution… https://t.co/lpeE3bHq1V

— Lavern Spicer (@lavern_spicer) 1625483718.0

"Why in the hell are American taxpayers funding this nonsense? #DefundNPR," California Republican congressional candidate Buzz Patterson added.

Why in the hell are American taxpayers funding this nonsense?#DefundNPR https://t.co/x2eXXyniFh

— Buzz Patterson (@BuzzPatterson) 1625448638.0

Sebastian Gorka stated simply: "#DefundNPR Already," as did Kurt Schlichter.

#DefundNPR Already.

— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) 1625502659.0

Defund NPR https://t.co/POqAmzQLYy

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) 1625417325.0

Inez Stepman blasted "what is essentially a trigger warning at the start [of the document] to let people know that they're about to read something offensive."

"Maybe we should add a similar rider to our tax dollars," she suggested.

The Declaration of Independence requires what is essentially a trigger warning at the start to let people know that… https://t.co/yyYVi5l3pL

— Inez Stepman ⚪️🔴⚪️ (@InezFeltscher) 1625489204.0

Political advisor Blair Brandt tweeted: "Defund NPR - an Anti American outlet funded by American taxes."

Defund NPR - an Anti American outlet funded by American taxes.

— Blair Brandt (@BlairBrandt) 1625428072.0

Spectator contributor Stephen L. Miller responded to the controversy by re-upping a column he wrote last summer in which he questioned whether taxpayers should "continue to fund these enterprises, when they clearly focus less on educating the public, and more on pushing commentary and opinion, and now, even libel?"

Yeah some of us wrote that a few months ago https://t.co/gqwtHR1eac https://t.co/QRVwPzuAUF

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) 1625454798.0

'Egg on their face': Media backpedals on Wuhan lab leak theory; journalists try to blame Trump



The mainstream media did some major backpedaling this week on the potential origin of the coronavirus. After months of brushing off the possibility that COVID-19 escaped from a laboratory, left-wing journalists now admit that they are taking the Wuhan lab leak theory seriously, even after they said the theory was "debunked" months ago. Backtracking journalists are blaming former President Donald Trump and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) for the media previously dismissing the now-feasible lab leak theory.

"I think a lot of people have egg on their face," ABC News chief Washington correspondent Jon Karl told Martha Raddatz on Sunday. "This was an idea that was first put forward by Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, [and President] Donald Trump, and look, some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them."

"Because Trump was saying so much else that was just out of control, and because he was, you know, making a frankly racist appeal talking about 'kung-flu,' and the 'China virus,' his notion ... he said flatly this came from that lab, was widely dismissed ... but now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry," Karl said on ABC's "This Week."

ABC's Jon Karl on Wuhan lab leak theory: "I think a lot of people have egg on their face....Some things may be true… https://t.co/BHuaHzRGn4

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) 1622403928.0

New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman also tried to blame Trump and Pompeo for the media's failure to take the lab leak theory seriously.

"I think it is important to remember that part of the issue is when this was first being reported on and discussed back a few months after the pandemic had begun, was that then President Trump and Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, suggested they've seen evidence that this was formed in a lab and they also suggested that it was not released on purpose," Haberman said on CNN last week. "But they refused to release the evidence showing what it was and so because of that made this instantly political."

Washington Post reporter Aaron Blake wrote an article titled, "The vexing 'lab leak' theory on China and the coronavirus," which blamed Trump for the media's immediate dismissal of the lab leak theory.

"Given everything we know about how Trump handled such things, caution and skepticism were invited," Blake wrote. "That (very much warranted) caution and skepticism spilled over into some oversimplification, particularly when it came to summarizing the often more circumspect reporting."

Last week, Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler posted an article titled, "How the Wuhan lab-leak theory suddenly became credible." The article stated, "The Trump administration's messaging was often accompanied by anti-Chinese rhetoric that made it easier for skeptics to ignore its claims."

However, a year earlier, Kessler told Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Twitter, "It is virtually impossible for this virus jump from the lab."

@GlennKesslerWP You should probably revisit this one. https://t.co/QpZu5eNAQT

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) 1621948199.0

New York Times reporter David Leonhardt openly admitted that a "lot of people, including a lot of in the media, leaped to dismiss the lab leak theory because of where it was coming from, and the reality is we don't yet know how Covid started."

"I think people made this mistake. I think a lot of people on the political left and people in the media made this mistake and said 'Wow, if Tom Cotton is saying something, it can't be true.' Or they assumed that," Leonhardt told CNN's Brian Stelter. "And that's not right. Tom Cotton does deal in misinformation about things like election fraud, he's said some things that are just wrong. But that doesn't mean that everything he says is wrong."

"Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd conceded a "growing number of scientists are increasingly open to the lab leak possibility."

"And for many, the lab leak idea got tangled up in politics and conflated with the idea that the Chinese deliberately released the coronavirus into the world," the NBC host said.

Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin blasted the mainstream media for not practicing journalism and letting their "Trump Derangement Syndrome" get the best of them.

"Most MSM reporters didn't 'ignore' the lab leak theory, they actively crapped all over it for over a year while pretending to be objective out of a toxic mix of confirmation bias, source bias (their scientist sources lied to them), group think, TDS and general incompetence," Rogin wrote in a series of tweets on Saturday.

"Also, the lab leak theory didn't change. It didn't suddenly become credible. It didn't jump from crazy to reasonable," he continued. "The theory has always been the same. The people who got it wrong changed their minds. They are writing about themselves, with zero self awareness."

"All these reporters scrambling to defend their own records on the lab leak theory are exposing their own hypocrisy & ignoring their basic error. Just report the facts," he wrote on Twitter. "Don't act like its your job to tell us whats ok to think or talk about. Own up to it when you fail your readers."

The theory that the coronavirus originated from a lab has gained traction in recent weeks.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee say there is "significant circumstantial evidence" that COVID-19 originated from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the Chinese military may have been involved.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who last year "strongly" said coronavirus "evolved in nature and then jumped species," now says he is "not convinced" that COVID-19 emerged naturally, and he recommends an investigation into its origin.

Last week, President Joe Biden directed the U.S. intelligence community to "redouble" efforts to investigate the origin of the coronavirus pandemic.

HuffPo's White House correspondent: Capitol riot was '1000 percent worse' than 9/11



The worst, most damnable take to-date with regard to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot now belongs to Huffington Post senior White House correspondent S.V. Dáte.

What happened?

In a series of Twitter posts on Tuesday, Dáte claimed that the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States — which were carried out by foreign Islamic extremists, killed nearly 3,000 Americans, injured 25,000 more, shut the stock market down for a week, and set off decades-long wars in the Middle East — were nothing in comparison to the extremism of the Jan. 6 riot that took place at the Capitol.

The liberal reporter was responding to a tweet thread by conservative commentator Byron York on Tuesday when he launched into an argument that eventually resulted in him shockingly claiming that the Capitol riot was "1000 percent worse" than 9/11.

After York pilloried fellow commentator George Will's desire to "see January 6th burned into the American mind as firmly as 9/11 because it was that scale of a shock to the system," Dáte jumped in to defend Will.

"Trump Apology Corps in full apology mode," he charged before arguing that "the 9/11 terrorists and Osama bin Laden never threatened the heart of the American experiment" but "the 1/6 terrorists and Donald Trump absolutely did exactly that."

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

"This attempt to whitewash what happened that day is shameful," Dáte continued, noting that while Sept. 11 was an "act of war," Jan. 6 was an "attempt to END OUR DEMOCRACY" carried out by U.S. citizens, including then-President Donald Trump.

Even after one commenter smartly pointed out that one of the hijacked planes on Sept. 11 was bound for the Capitol, Dáte refused to back off his stance.

"United 93 was intended to crash into the Capitol. You think January 6th was worse than that?" the commenter asked, to which Dáte responded, "1000 percent worse."

Image Source: Twitter screenshot

Later on Tuesday, the reporter questioned, "Are people truly having this much trouble distinguishing between an act of war perpetrated by foreign terrorists, and incitement of sedition perpetrated by our own president? Really? If so, American democracy is in serious trouble."

What else?

Dáte's comments were met with swift backlash on social media.

"This is legitimately insane," one commenter wrote on Twitter.

"This might be the worst take I've ever seen," another added.

Right-wing commentator Stephen L. Miller concluded, "This person is a lunatic who belongs nowhere near a job that is meant to inform people."

3,000 dead. 2 buildings destroyed. First responders still dying. It also shut the stock market down for a week. The… https://t.co/5d6EZm6qb6

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) 1621947918.0

'Harris administration?' Biden and Harris both slip up in public about who is in charge



Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), both had public slipups in which they spoke as if Harris was the one running for president, not Biden.

The remarks gained significant attention online due to longstanding speculation about Biden's mental fitness to be president and a belief in the possibility that Harris, who ran for president this cycle as well, might have more influence than a typical vice president if Biden is elected.

Monday, Harris referred to a "Harris administration" during a virtual roundtable with small business owners in Arizona. From Fox News:

However, the California senator appeared to briefly suggest that she was at the top of the Democratic ticket.

"A Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States," she said. She quickly clarified, "The Biden-Harris administration will provide access to $100 billion in low-interest loans and investments from minority business owners."
"A Harris administration together with Joe Biden..."Freudian slip? https://t.co/XEtLji17BX
— Daily Caller (@Daily Caller)1600135720.0

Tuesday, Biden put his running mate's name at the top of the ticket during a campaign event in Tampa, Florida.

"It makes it so much harder for military spouses to find good jobs and build their careers. That has to change," Biden said. "A Harris-Biden administration is going to relaunch that effort and keep pushing further to make it easier for military spouses and veterans to find meaningful careers to ensure teachers know how to support military children in their classrooms and to improve support for caregivers and survivors so much more than we do now."

@redsteeze “Harris Biden administration” https://t.co/J4zRqBtm0H
— Robert (@Robert)1600193806.0

President Donald Trump has persistently questioned Biden's potential authority as president, saying that Biden is simply being used as a "Trojan horse" for a radical far-left agenda that Biden himself doesn't necessarily even support.

Biden's public appearances have been heavily scripted and controlled, perhaps increasingly so in recent weeks. Biden rarely takes questions, and there has been evidence that during live television interviews Biden is relying on a teleprompter to get by—and even then, he doesn't always relay the message clearly.

When asked directly by Fox News host Bret Baier whether Biden uses a teleprompter during live interviews, Biden campaign national press secretary TJ Ducklo refused to answer the yes-or-no question.

"We are not going to — this is straight from the Trump campaign talking points," Ducklo said.

Biden has been heard reading guiding notes such as "top-line message" and "end of quote" while answering questions during TV interviews. When left on his own, Biden has struggled with recalling facts ranging from the number of U.S. military personnel that have died from COVID-19 to the number of grandchildren he has.