There was something DANGEROUS in Biden’s Speech — and Jen Psaki loved it



After dropping out of the 2024 presidential election on Sunday, President Joe Biden has finally addressed the nation from the Oval Office.

During his address, the president made it clear that he is ready to launch radical reforms of the Supreme Court with his remaining time in office.

MSNBC’s Jen Psaki is thrilled.

“The other thing that struck me, and I circled it, when he talked about reforming the Supreme Court,” Psaki said on a panel. “All you all know this is not a phrase that would have come out of the mouth of President Joe Biden even while he’s been President Joe Biden.”

“It was a reminder, I think, that leadership is about being consistent and people knowing what to expect from you. It’s about being open to evolving,” Psaki added.

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” has heard enough.

“They’re saying the quiet part out loud,” Rubin comments to David Sacks. “Joe Biden himself, if his brain was still in his head, would never be for expanding the Supreme Court. But he’s handing the reins away, and she’s basically saying that’s exactly what Kamala is going to do.”

Sacks notes that Elizabeth Warren and others like her have been “openly tweeting that they want to pack the Supreme Court.”

“They’re saying that’s a good idea. It’s transparent,” Sacks says. “Packing the Supreme Court, first of all, would destroy the Supreme Court.”

“It’s one of the last functioning institutions in our democracy, and they want to undermine and destroy it,” he adds.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

New York Democrat threatens to nuke filibuster and pack Supreme Court in order to grab guns



A Democratic lawmaker on the House Judiciary Committee casually threatened to blow up the Senate filibuster and pack the U.S. Supreme Court to confiscate guns during markup on a series of gun control proposals Thursday.

"Enough of your thoughts and prayers, enough," committee member Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) said, pounding the table during debate on the gun control package. "You will not stop us from advancing the Protecting Our Kids Act today. You will not stop us from passing it in the House next week. And you will not stop us there."

He continued: "If the filibuster obstructs us, we will abolish it. If the Supreme Court objects, we will expand it. And we will not rest until we have taken weapons of war out of circulation in our communities.

"Each and every day we will do whatever it takes to end gun violence. Whatever it takes," he vowed.

\u201cRep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) promises "whatever it takes to end gun violence." \n\n"If the filibuster obstructs us, we will abolish it. If the Supreme Court objects, we will expand it. And we will not rest until we have taken weapons of war out of circulation in our communities."\u201d
— Chris Pandolfo (@Chris Pandolfo) 1654185330

The Democratic-led committee is meeting in an emergency session Thursday to debate eight gun control bills collectively called the Protecting Our Kids Act. Moving the omnibus legislation out of committee and onto the House floor for a vote is a priority for Democrats, who want to score political points by putting Republicans on the record opposing gun control after the recent mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas.

Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said that the American people are "begging for us to address" gun violence in remarks opening debate on the package.

"Let us not wait one second longer," he said, claiming that the legislation put forward by Democrats is "wildly popular" with the American public.

However, the proposals Democrats are pushing are almost certainly too extreme to become law. The House bills would raise the age requirement to buy a semi-automatic rifle from 18 to 21 years old; criminalize the import, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of high-capacity magazines; and put new regulations on bump stocks among other measures.

The Democratic Senate majority is not big enough to pass any of these bills without Republican support, and it is highly unlikely there are 10 Republican senators willing to help Democrats reach the 60-vote threshold to overcome a GOP-led filibuster.

But Jones is in a position to benefit from denying reality and threatening to burn down American institutions to get what Democrats want. He's running in a tough primary election for New York's newly drawn 10th Congressional District, where he will face former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio in a contest to see who can show Lower Manhattan and Brooklyn voters who's more progressive.

Part of the benefit of being an incumbent congressman is having a national platform to toss red meat to your base, as Jones did Thursday.

Democrats to unveil legislation to pack the Supreme Court with 4 more justices



Democrats in the House and Senate are planning to introduce legislation to expand the Supreme Court from the current 9 members to 13.

The plan to pack the court was first reported by Ryan Grim of The Intercept on Wednesday. It is sponsored in the Senate Sen. Ed Markey (D) of Massachusetts and in the House by Rep. Jerry Nadler (D) of New York.

Far-left partisans have pressed for Democrats to push the controversial plan since former President Donald Trump was able to fill the seat held by liberal justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative.

While President Joe Biden had refused to say before the election if he would support the plan, Democrats appear to be eager to rush headlong into the plot.

The report was later confirmed by NBC News and inspired a contentious interaction during a House committee hearing when Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) demanded to know from Nadler if the report was true.

https://t.co/4QcxdgE6me
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Rep. Jim Jordan)1618446285.0

Nadler refused to answer the question and said that Jordan was acting inappropriately.

Democratic Rep. Mondaire Jones of New York, was less shy to admit to the court-packing plan.

"Our democracy is under assault, and the Supreme Court has dealt the sharpest blows. To restore power to the people, we must #ExpandTheCourt. That's why I'm introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 with @RepJerryNadler, @RepHankJohnson, and @SenMarkey to add four seats to SCOTUS," he tweeted.

The Supreme Court has been composed of nine members since 1869, for 152 years. The Constitution does not set out how many members must be on the Supreme Court.

That convention was almost broken when Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt suggested in 1937 that he might expand the court with jurists who would be sympathetic to his unconstitutional plans to combat the Great Depression. Members of his own party balked at the plan and he was forced to abandon his "court-packing" scheme.

Despite the long history of Democrats trying to pack the highest court of the land, it is unlikely to be successful given the 50-50 split in the Senate and the presence of some moderate Democrats who are reticent to support far left legislation.

Here's more about the Democrats' newest plot to pack the court:

House, Senate Democrats plan to add 4 Supreme Court justices: Reportwww.youtube.com