Another white flag! Child sex-change regime continues to collapse under weight of Trump enforcement



President Donald Trump declared war on gender ideology and the corresponding child sex-change regime upon retaking office. Despite the best efforts of non-straight activists and overreaching federal judges, the campaign is off to an excellent start — as recently evidenced by Stanford Medicine's partial surrender.

Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 28 directing all federal agencies to ensure that medical institutions receiving federal funding "end the chemical and surgical mutilation of children" — an initiative that accords with popular opinion, which is majoritively against sex-change drugs and surgeries for children.

"Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children under the radical and false claim that adults can change a child's sex through a series of irreversible medical interventions," wrote Trump. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end."

It's clear that the president meant business — which in practice, has meant putting the sex-change regime out of business.

Children's Hospital Los Angeles — which reportedly had patients as young as 3 and billed millions of dollars for hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and sex-change mutilations for minors — announced last month that it was shuttering its child sex-change center after assessing the "severe impacts" of the Trump administration's actions and proposed policies.

Stanford Medicine revealed last week that it too was shuttering one of its youth sex-change practices.

'Her testes are nonfunctional, and in medicine, don't we often recommend the removal of nonfunctional organs like an appendix?'

The Stanford Pediatric and Adolescent Gender Clinic was founded in 2015 by pediatric endocrinologist Tandy Aye.

During a 2019 TED Talk, Aye suggested age should not determine when kids can have their genitals surgically removed and/or distorted.

"Doctors usually allow those who are 18 to make decisions about their procedures and consent so that you can weigh the risks and benefits," said Aye, a member of the World Professional Association of Transgender Health. "Well then, the transgender patient may be one of the most well-informed patients. Who else has had years of psychological evaluation, months of medical therapy, and has thought of this one procedure for so long?"

Aye suggested that in the case of a little boy sterilized after being pumped full of puberty blockers, conventional medical wisdom would dictate that his testicles should be removed.

"Her testes are nonfunctional, and in medicine, don't we often recommend the removal of nonfunctional organs like an appendix?" asked Aye. "So therefore, does it make sense for Avery to wait until she's 18?"

Some of Aye's colleagues at WPATH admitted behind closed doors that informed consent by minors was all but impossible.

RELATED: Sacrificing body parts and informed consent to the sex-change regime

 Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

It's clear that the Stanford clinic shares Aye's eagerness for putting children on the path to sterility and permanent discomfort, stating in its FAQ that it treats "transgender and gender diverse children, adolescents, and young adults" and "will see younger children before puberty starts for education, social support, and referral to mental health and community resources."

The clinic is, however, pausing the surgical side of its deformative practice.

Stanford told the San Francisco Chronicle in a June 24 statement, "After careful review of the latest actions and directives from the federal government and following consultations with clinical leadership, including our multidisciplinary LGBTQ+ program and its providers, Stanford Medicine paused providing gender-related surgical procedures as part of our comprehensive range of medical services for LGBTQ+ patients under the age of 19, effective June 2, 2025."

"We took this step to protect both our providers and patients," said Stanford. "This was not a decision we made lightly, especially knowing how deeply this impacts the individuals and families who depend on our essential care and support."

'Children deserve evidence-based care, not irreversible harm backed by political activists.'

The decision to pause genital mutilation at the clinic, which will reportedly continue to provide other forms of sex-change "care," was supposedly made before the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Tennessee Republicans' ban on sex-change genital mutilations and sterilizing puberty blockers for minors on June 18.

Similar laws are on the books in 23 other red states.

Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman at the medical advocacy group Do No Harm, told Blaze News in a statement, "It is encouraging that Stanford Medicine has joined the ranks of medical systems ending experimental sex-change surgeries on children. However, Stanford Medicine should remain under scrutiny for its history of performing these procedures and its continued use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on children."

RELATED: Democrats' meltdown over SCOTUS child sex-change ruling reveals they learned nothing about 2024 blowout

 Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

"As the administration continues to investigate and take regulatory action against hospitals that harm gender confused kids, it should by no means give Stanford Medicine a pass until it complies with HHS' recommendations for treating gender dysphoria," continued Goldfarb. "Children deserve evidence-based care, not irreversible harm backed by political activists."

As Goldfarb alluded, the Trump administration is bringing the full weight of the law down on those who would mutilate children on the basis of pseudoscience and false, ideologically driven narratives.

Attorney General Pam Bondi noted in an April 22 memo that pursuant to Trump's executive order, she was directing all Department of Justice employees "to enforce rigorous protections and hold accountable those who prey on vulnerable children and their parents."

Just last week, the FBI launched criminal probes into Boston Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Colorado, and Children's Hospital Los Angeles — all three listed on medical advocacy group Do No Harm's list of the 12 worst offending institutions that promote sex changes for minors.

Time will tell whether the administration will take a similar approach to Stanford.

Blaze News has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Anyone who claims to be 'transgender' is either lying or delusional



There is no such thing as a “transgender child.”

That’s because there is no such thing as a “transgender” person.

Make no mistake: 'Transitioning' a child is medical rape. I dare you to find an example in history of child abuse as depraved as this.

There is not one single human, stretching from the dawn of man through today, who has ever been “trans.” There never will be a person who is “trans.”

'Trans' vs. truth

“Transgender” does not exist. It does not exist in the same way that “dry water” does not exist, in the same way that “cooling fire” does not exist, in the same way that “invertebrate pelicans” do not exist.

There are people who believe, or who claim to believe, they’re the opposite sex from the one they actually are. There are sissy boys and butch girls. There are men who like feminine pursuits and women who like masculine hobbies.

But there are no “transgender” people.

Straightforward, declarative statements about the lunacy of “transgenderism” are the only way to deal with these insane and destructive ideas.

'Not even wrong'

There is no more time for being nice about it. There’s no more time for misplaced “compassion” or any of the other excuses we’ve been making for accepting codswallop that is ruining the lives of children and adults and tearing families apart.

The very notion “transgender” is an example of the kind of idea so nonsensical that it’s what physicist Wolfgang Pauli described as “not even wrong.” The idea that a person could be “born in the wrong body,” that a man could have a “female brain trapped in a male body” is so absurd — so obviously stupid — that almost no one 20 years ago would have given it credence.

Yet, here we are.

Magical thinking

Today, we believe in magical things like transgenderism. Much worse, we believe in “trans kids.” And by “believe,” I mean different things depending on who we’re talking about.

There are people who appear to believe, somehow, that it makes sense that a man can “really be a woman.” That’s one group. It’s small, and it’s unlikely that even the most ardent transgender activists truly believe it deep down. But they’ve convinced themselves they have to “believe” it in order to be good people.

There are many more people who know this is nonsense but who have been cowed by social pressure into pretending they believe it. There are also many people who know it’s insanity but who will not say so under any circumstances because to question an obvious clinical delusion in our era is to invite banishment from one’s family and career.

Stop and consider that.

Believing the impossible

Pretend it’s 20 years ago if you can; try to slough off the very recent propaganda campaign. Just remember the world you lived in where no one was expected to say they believed in men-women. Are you not astonished and alarmed that we have a social norm that demands that you pretend to believe in the impossible?

Does it not disturb you that this particular “impossible” means children being lied to, told they were born in the wrong body, permanently sterilized through chemical castration, and surgically maimed by having their breasts and genitals removed?

How in the hell is any of this real?

RELATED: Report: Puberty blockers foisted upon minors proven to have devastating, irreversible effects

  Photo by Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Slim pickings

Thirty-five years ago, I was a teenager living as a ward of the state in group homes for “troubled” boys. (When parents are abusive, it’s the children who go to jail, not mom or dad.)

One of the places I hung out was a drop-in community center that hosted a weekly meeting for gay young people. From my standpoint at age 50 (as a conservative and a traditionalist, even if that sounds hard to believe), I don’t think kids should be in such places, but that was my life then.

“Patricia” came to the group meetings every so often. Patricia was what we used to call a “transsexual”; a gay man who was so extraordinarily effeminate that he believed he could only be happy by undergoing surgery to give himself the approximation of a vagina and to “live as a woman.” We all know the type.

“It’s slim pickings for me,” he’d say, dragging on a cigarette coated with shimmering pink lipstick. “The only men interested are tranny chasers.”

The only way to get a “date” for men like Patricia was to agree to be treated as a fetish object for men with disordered inclinations. Patricia knew, just like we all knew back then, that this kind of life was a simulation with a sad ending.

Grim spectacles

By the 1970s, transsexuals were starting to show up on daytime talk shows. They were a staple in the 1980s and into the 1990s on programs like "The Sally Jessy Raphael Show," "The Jenny Jones Show," and "The Oprah Winfrey Show."

These episodes were always grim spectacles. The hosts would affect to be sympathetic, but the game was to get eyeballs on the weirdos who couldn’t face the real world. We all knew they weren’t women, they knew they weren’t women. Most people would never encounter a crossdresser, a drag queen, or a transsexual in real life.

When we did, most of us tried to say little and stay polite. Some people would refer to such men (it was almost always men in those days, unlike today) as “she.”

But there was no social commandment to pretend that these men were really women. No one lost their jobs to an online social media mob for “misgendering” transvestites. No companies were sued for not allowing a crossdresser to be the public face of a family business like a funeral home.

We’ve come a long way, baby, and we’ve fallen low. Not only did the Supreme Court rule that employers could not “discriminate” against crossdressers and had to let them fly their freak flag, but the sickest people in our society set their sights on children.

The victimization of Jazz Jennings

In 2007, Barbara Walters sat down with a woman named Jeanette Jennings and her son, born Jaron but now going by "Jazz." Jazz was a little boy whose parents pretended they thought he was a girl. Jazz’s father didn’t like how effeminate his son was, and Jeanette wasted no time tarting up her son in dresses and parading him in front of world media as narcissistic stage mothers have always done.

In lockstep, major media instantly promoted the story along with the idea that it was sane or normal to speak about “transgender children.” Consider this 2007 ABC News headline about the Walters interview: "'I'm a Girl' — Understanding Transgender Children."

There was a trip to Oprah’s couch, too.

Having been raised by a mother deranged with a personality disorder, I’m never surprised by what abusive women will do to their children. What shocks me is how we all tolerate this as a society.

RELATED: Inside California's bipartisan fight to save kids from Big Trans

  Getty Images/David McNew

Cheering on child abuse

No, it’s worse. We don’t merely “tolerate” it. We cheer on what is obviously Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and weep tears of joy about how wonderful it is that mom “cares enough” about her “daughter” to arrange for his castration.

Not clear enough? Take a listen to Jeanette describing what she will do to her son’s private parts if he doesn’t follow the medical regime prescribed to care for the wound they created in his groin.

Make no mistake: “Transitioning” a child is medical rape. I dare you to find an example in history of child abuse as depraved as this.

The kids are put on “puberty blockers” to stop their bodies maturing, then put on hormones for the opposite sex (sterilizing them for life), and some of them are sent to surgeons to have their breasts removed if girls and their testicles cut off and their penises turned inside out if boys.

It is a moral and legal scandal that the parents, doctors, and school staff who do this to children have not been arrested, tried, and imprisoned.

While I have some sympathy for parents who have been terrorized by doctors and social workers who claim their child will commit suicide if mom doesn’t let them trans, it goes only so far. There is no excuse, no mitigating circumstance, that can make this kind of mental and physical torture an understandable parental choice.

Normalizing 'trans kids'

Have you ever uttered the word “trans kids?” Did you really understand what you were saying when you spoke of this monstrosity as if it were normal? Probably not, and that’s the problem. Slowly, by degrees, all of us have been boiled until our moral sense has been stripped away like the scalded skin of the proverbial frog in a pot.

For at least the past 10 years, everywhere you go you’d hear, “Trans rights are human rights.” “Being trans is normal.” “Denying gender-affirming care will make them kill themselves.”

None of this is anywhere near normal. It is the kind of utterance that would have landed a person in a psych ward for an evaluation 20 years ago.

No, it is not “normal” to think you were born in the wrong body. It is not “normal” to agree with your friend, or your child, that they’re the opposite sex. It is not “normal” to poison children and vivisect their genitals, leaving them to suffer mentally and physically until a likely early death.

But liberals, leftists, and those easy to morally manipulate are convinced that trans is real and that the rest of us have to pretend it is or we’re driving vulnerable people to suicide.

Yes, that really is the claim. Here is just one of countless thousands of articles from “advocacy” groups claiming that your child will kill herself if you don’t call her by her “boy name.”

The propaganda worked. Otherwise sane and sensible people (relatively speaking), write mawkish articles portraying obviously mentally sick people as simply “transgender.” The purpose of this is to guilt the rest of us into complying with the lie under the threat of being responsible if some crazy man in a dress, or some poor troubled teen, kills himself.

Portrait of an 'ally'

Substack writer Greg Scaduto is typical of the genre. The prose style is artificially winsome and warm. The tone is, Why, trans women are just a different kind of woman after all. And these ladies are very brave to finally live as their authentic selves. Shouldn’t we really be more kind?

Scaduto presents himself as the 21st-century caring, compassionate liberal man ready to protect the poor “trans women.” The treacly essay revolves around a deluded man who had a “sex change” and who calls himself Maeve DuVally. Throughout, Scaduto refers to this man as “she” and “her,” burnishing his really-swell-guy credentials with prose like this:

There was a warmth now that didn’t exist a minute ago. As if she was relieved someone had opened a door instead of demanding she walk through one already built.

So I told her – kind of offhandedly but also kind of with the quiet urgency of someone who’s maybe trying a little too hard to seem like he’s not trying too hard – that my audience is mostly young white guys.

A duty to help

It’s about 10 years past the time we should have ripped the Band-Aid off this gangrenous lie. Transgenderism isn’t real, but the mental illness and child abuse that drives it is.

Children are being medically mutilated right now as you read this article. The Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding Tennessee’s law banning the “transition” of minors is a good step, but it’s nowhere near enough. If we were a sane country, we would already have jailed every adult who did this to a child under existing child abuse laws.

People like you and me, ordinary people without celebrity status or political power, have a duty to help end this. We have to stop lying to save political face. We have to be willing to make our friends and family “uncomfortable.”

To tell the truth

What does that mean? Everyone should stop:

  • Obeying pronoun commands. Men are “he” and “him,” and women are “she” and “her.”
  • Pretending that “being trans” is real.
  • Pretending that we believe hormone poisoning and gruesome unnatural surgeries are “medical care” that can “finally make an unhappy person feel better.”
  • Submitting to emotional blackmail. The next time someone tells you a trans person will commit suicide if you don’t flatter their delusion, your response should be a shocked “how dare you?”
  • Pretending that we can’t see that it’s Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy when mothers (it’s nearly always mothers, not fathers) deliberately poison their children and claim they have “trans kids.” Call it what it is — child abuse motivated by a dark personality.

I can guess that some readers may find this difficult, abrasive, or shocking. But what we should all find shocking is that an article like this is necessary.

We all know trans is a lie. We’ve always known it.

Now, it’s time to tell the truth.

Congressman ‘Sarah’ McBride Missed The Real Reason Why Support For The Trans Movement Was A ‘Mirage’

The unpopular and dangerous extremes were always the logical conclusion trans ideology was hurtling toward.

Taxpayer-Funded Libraries Promote These Graphic Books To Kids For Pride Month

While librarians and their supporters consistently decry critiques of their LGBT advocacy as censorship, less attention has been paid to the actual content of the books the librarians promote.

Democrats' meltdown over SCOTUS child sex-change ruling reveals they learned nothing about 2024 blowout



A Marquette Law School poll published late last month revealed that 63% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party. Polling by the Economist and YouGov indicated that the disapproval rating for the party as a whole was 58.3% as of May 25.

Democratic lawmakers evidenced their commitment to driving up these numbers and alienating the majority of normal Americans with their hysterical response to the U.S. Supreme Court's Wednesday 6-3 ruling in United States v. Skrmetti, which upheld Tennessee's ban on sex-change genital mutilations and sterilizing puberty blockers for minors.

Not only is Tennessee's Senate Bill 1 lawful, as confirmed by the high court, but such laws reflect the sensibilities of the vast majority of Americans.

A Washington Post-KFF poll found in 2023 that 57% of Americans say gender is biologically determined; 68% oppose the use of puberty blockers by children; and 58% oppose hormonal treatments for teens.

Polling conducted ahead of the 2024 election by NORC at the University of Chicago for the Los Angeles Times found that 54% of Americans favor laws to prevent minors from receiving sex-change drugs or surgeries.

A Center Square Voter's Choice Poll revealed last month that only 29% of voters think doctors should be allowed to prescribe puberty blockers to kids with parental consent. Forty-seven percent of respondents said puberty blockers should not be prescribed to minors under any circumstances.

RELATED: God's justice doesn’t sleep — and the Supreme Court just proved it

  Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Democrats appear to be fully aware of the American public's majoritive revulsion over the mutilation and sterilization of confused children.

In the immediate aftermath of the 2024 election and just prior to stepping down as Texas Democratic Party chairman, Gilberto Hinojosa emphasized to Democrats that their messaging was not resonating with everyday Americans.

'Hate won.'

"You have a choice as a party," said Hinojosa. "You can support transgender rights up and down all the categories where the issue comes up, or you can understand that there's certain things that we just go too far on, that a big bulk of our population does not support."

An American Principles Project poll looking at the impact of campaign ads on various transvestite-related issues in the 2024 election found that 52% of voters who were made aware of failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris' support for sex changes for minors were more likely to vote for President Donald Trump.

APP president Terry Schilling concluded, "There should be no question now that Democrats' gender insanity is a massive political vulnerability for them that Republicans should continue to exploit."

Schilling then urged Republicans "not to forget the main lesson from the election and to keep the pressure on Democrats for as long as they continue to defend their extreme agenda."

Despite the unpopularity of gender ideology, the collapse of its core narratives, and the growing list of victims now speaking out about their mutilation, Democrats are leaning into their support for gender ideology, particularly for child sex-change mutilations.

"Hate won," complained Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), one of the Democrats who begged the Supreme Court in an amicus brief last year to strike the Tennessee law. "The far-right justices of the Supreme Court endorsed hate and discrimination by delivering a win for Republicans who have relentlessly and cruelly attacked transgender Americans for years."

'The fight isn't over.'

Other Democrats followed a similar script.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), whose approval rating according to a recent Harvard-Harris poll was 26%, said in response to the high court's ruling in Skrmetti, "Republicans' cruel crusade against trans kids is all an attempt to divert attention from ripping healthcare away from millions of Americans. We'll keep fighting and we'll keep marching on."

"Today the Supreme Court chose to cast transgender children in the shadows, deciding they are not entitled to the protections of the Equal Protection Clause," wrote Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.). "By upholding Tennessee's ban on medical care for transgender children the Court has legitimized discriminatory treatment of children."

Booker suggested further that the protection of children in over 24 states from irreversible sex-change procedures is not only a "violation of the constitutional protections every child is entitled to" but puts kids "in danger."

Rep. Sarah McBride (Del.), the cross-dressing Democrat formerly known as Tim McBride, claimed that the ruling in Skrmetti "undermines doctors in delivering care to some of the most vulnerable patients in our country."

"As the proud grandma of a young trans man, I know that gender-affirming care can help trans youth live openly and authentically," wrote Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.). "The fight isn't over."

RELATED: Sacrificing body parts and informed consent to the sex-change regime

  Photo by Bob Riha, Jr./Getty Images

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, one of the Democratic lawmakers who has received a fortune in donations from the pharmaceutical industry, stated, "Trans kids suffer when they don't get medically-necessary care. This is a brazen political decision by the Supreme Court."

Contrary to Warren's suggestion, so-called "gender-affirming care" does not ameliorate confused kids' suffering. Rather, it makes matters a whole lot worse.

'Protecting children from making permanent, life-altering decisions about their bodies should be a bipartisan issue.'

Britain's National Health Service in 2020 appointed Dr. Hilary Cass, a British medical doctor who previously served as president of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, to lead an independent investigation into the efficacy of sex-change procedures on minors.

Blaze News previously reported that Cass' 388-page multi-year report revealed that:

  • the "systematic review showed no clear evidence that social transition in childhood has any positive or negative mental health outcomes, and relatively weak evidence for any effect in adolescence";
  • puberty blockers compromise bone density and have no apparent impact on "gender dysphoria or body satisfaction";
  • there is "insufficient and/or inconsistent evidence about the effects of puberty suppression on gender dysphoria, mental and psychosocial health, cognitive development, cardio-metabolic risk, and fertility";
  • there is "a lack of high-quality research assessing the outcomes of hormones for masculinisation or feminisation in adolescents with gender dysphoria or incongruence and few studies that undertake long-term follow-up"; and
  • so-called gender-affirming care is "an area of remarkably weak evidence."

Prior to the release of the Cass Review, a peer-reviewed study in the esteemed quarterly journal BMJ Mental Health revealed that "medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk."

Journalist Mia Hughes revealed in a report published last year by Michael Shellenberger's think tank, Environmental Progress, that prominent members of the World Professional Association of Transgender Health — the organization that literally wrote the book on "transgender" care — have themselves raised issues with the drugs and procedures that Markey, Schumer, Booker, McBride, Schakowsky, Warren, and other Democrats are desperate to protect.

— (@)  
 

WPATH members quoted in Hughes' report discussed the inability of minors to comprehend the long-term consequences of sex-change procedures, the debilitating side effects of such procedures, and problems with obtaining informed consent.

RELATED: 'Neither scientific nor medical': Leaked WPATH files shed light on the horror show that is 'gender-affirming care'

  Luis Soto/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Alleigh Marre, executive director of the American Parents Coalition, said in a statement obtained by Blaze News, "Sadly, many on the left have been captured by radical gender activists and appear determined to allow children to be the subject of irreversible and experimental gender interventions."

"Protecting children from making permanent, life-altering decisions about their bodies should be a bipartisan issue," continued Marre. "This ruling establishes important precedent in states seeking to end or regulate gender practices for minors, which have unfortunately become increasingly easy to obtain."

"Democratic leaders would do well to recognize that the Skrmetti decision is not a judgment against any group, but a vital affirmation of common sense, parental rights, and biological reality," Kelsey Reinhardt, president of CatholicVote, told Blaze News. "These are principles that the American people have consistently supported."

The Republican National Committee noted on X, "Democrats want taxpayers to fund sex changes for MINORS! SICK!"

Attorney General Pam Bondi applauded the SCOTUS decision, encouraging "other states to follow Tennessee’s lead and enact similar legislation to protect our kids." Tennessee is one of the 25 Republican states that have laws on the books protecting children from sex-change procedures.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

God’s justice doesn’t sleep — and the Supreme Court just proved it



In a landmark 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban on so-called gender-affirming care for minors. Wednesday’s ruling in United States v. Skrmetti affirms the state’s authority to protect children from irreversible medical interventions, declaring that such laws do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Tennessee’s Senate Bill 1 prohibits medical providers from prescribing puberty blockers, administering cross-sex hormones, or performing surgeries on minors for the purpose of treating gender dysphoria. With this ruling, the court established a powerful precedent, strengthening similar laws in more than two dozen states and shielding them from federal interference.

The Supreme Court now affirms what parents, pastors, and pediatricians have known for years: Children deserve protection — not ideological exploitation.

This is more than a legal or political victory. It’s a profoundly spiritual one.

Judgment in Pride Month

The timing of the court’s decision — handed down in the middle of Pride Month — is impossible to ignore. For years, the month of June has been co-opted to celebrate sexual perversion and radical gender ideology. Parades, corporate campaigns, and cultural rituals now elevate confusion and self-expression above truth and morality.

But God’s timing often intersects with the idols of a wayward culture.

Just as He once shattered the authority of Egypt’s gods through plagues and humiliated the pagan deities of Canaan through Israel’s victories, He now confronts the false gods of modern America. The gods of Pride Month have names: self-worship, mutilation, and moral relativism.

This ruling, like Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization before it, arrived in a season when the world celebrates rebellion. But God never abdicates. He acts — often decisively.

The right to protect children

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing in concurrence, emphasized the state’s legitimate interest in protecting children from unproven and dangerous procedures. “States could reasonably conclude,” he wrote, “that the level of young children's cognitive and emotional development inhibits their ability to consent to sex-transition treatments.”

Thomas reminded the nation that legislatures — not courts — are charged with protecting the vulnerable. The Constitution allows states to say no to radical experiments on children. That’s common sense. That’s moral responsibility.

RELATED: Matt Walsh’s crusade pays off: SCOTUS protects Tennessee kids from gender mutilation

  Photo by Jason Davis/Getty Images for The Daily Wire

The court’s ruling also reinforces policies advanced by the Trump administration, which has taken steps to push back against transgender mandates. The court now affirms what parents, pastors, and pediatricians have known for years: Children deserve protection — not ideological exploitation.

‘The least of these’

At its core, this decision defends “the least of these" (Matthew 25:40). In Matthew 10:42, Jesus declares, “And if anyone gives even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones ... truly I tell you, that person will certainly not lose their reward.”

Advocates of transgender medicine call their approach “compassionate.” But compassion doesn’t mutilate. It doesn’t sterilize. It doesn’t tell children they were born in the wrong body.

Real compassion tells children the truth: They are fearfully and wonderfully made. God knit them together in their mother’s wombs (Psalm 139:13-14). He doesn’t make mistakes.

The lie that “God got your body wrong” devastates young minds. Puberty blockers, double mastectomies, and genital surgeries don’t bring peace. They usher in trauma, regret, and permanent damage.

By upholding these bans, the Supreme Court gives children the gift of time — time to grow, to mature, and to embrace their God-given identities without the pressure of irreversible decisions.

Tear down the idols

Now comes the charge to the church. This moment demands courage.

American culture has erected new high places. Gender ideology sits at the top. It demands worship, conformity, and silence. But like King Josiah, who tore down the altars of Baal, or Gideon, who smashed the Asherah poles, Christians must act.

Now is not the time for retreat. Now is not the time for timidity. The culture may roar, but the God of heaven still rules.

The Supreme Court’s ruling reminds believers that God still moves. He has not abandoned America. He still defends the innocent. He still topples idols.

Faithfulness bears fruit

Galatians 6:9 tells us not to grow weary in doing good. This ruling is the harvest of those who prayed, labored, and stood firm when the world called them hateful. Their perseverance bore fruit — in law, in policy, and in culture.

Let this be a turning point.

Let this be the moment when the nation remembers who created it. Let this be the moment when the church reclaims its voice. Let this be the moment when truth reasserts itself — and children are protected from those who would harm them in the name of progress.

America is not forsaken. God is still at work, and His purposes will prevail.

Pride Month Is In Retreat, But We Need More Consistent Sexual Ethics

It is impossible to build a culture of human flourishing atop an ethic of self-indulgence because that self-indulgence slides to new lows.

'Rogue' Biden judge ignores biological truth, blocks Trump's common-sense passport policy



Gender ideologues' narrative about sex, identity, and the supposed benefits of medical transvestism has collapsed in recent years under the weight of comprehensive scientific studies. Polling shows the American public also majoritively rejects their core claims and policy aims.

With science and public opinion largely against them, gender ideologues now appear to be primarily fighting their war against common sense in the courts, where they are, for the most part, losing. Meddlesome U.S. district court judges are, however, doing their part to delay the final defeat of gender ideology, at least where the law and federal policy are concerned.

'Gender ideology is internally inconsistent.'

A day before the Supreme Court's decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on sex-change genital mutilations and sterilizing puberty blockers for minors, a Biden judge blocked the Trump administration from requiring passports to accurately reflect the holders' sex.

White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement to Blaze News, "This is yet another attempt by a rogue judge to thwart President Trump's agenda and push radical gender ideology that defies biological truth."

"There are only two genders, there is no such thing as gender 'X,' and the president was given a mandate by the American people to restore common sense to the federal government," added Kelly.

RELATED: Trump claims another scalp in war on gender ideology: Children's Hospital LA to shutter child sex-change center

 Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

On his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order rejecting gender ideology and instructing the government to recognize only two sexes, male and female.

"'Gender ideology' replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true," Trump said in his order.

The president noted further that "gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but nevertheless maintains that it is possible for a person to be born in the wrong sexed body."

The president directed his secretaries of state and homeland security to ensure that government-issued identification documents, including passports and visas, were reality-affirming — as they had been until 2021, when the Biden administration began allowing people to choose their own sex marker as well as a third marker, "X," instead of an "M" or an "F" marker.

RELATED: The culture war isn’t a distraction — it’s the main front

 Blaze Media Illustration

Several transvestites joined the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Massachusetts, and Covington & Burling LLP in a lawsuit over the passport policy earlier this year.

U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick granted them a preliminary injunction in April preventing the State Department's enforcement of Trump's Executive Order 14168 while the lawsuit played out — but only as it applied to six of the plaintiffs.

Kobick suggested that the plaintiffs' inability to extend their self-deception to their federal documents would make them more "likely to experience worsened gender dysphoria, anxiety, and psychological distress, and they will face a greater risk of experiencing harassment and violence."

The Massachusetts-based Biden judge expanded her injunction on Wednesday after the plaintiffs amended their complaint and moved to apply the preliminary injunction to other potentially affected gender-benders whom they wanted broadly to be certified as a class.

Adopting the language of gender ideologues, Kobick granted the plaintiffs class certification, meaning that the lawsuit can now apply to "people whose gender identity is different from the sex assigned to them under the Passport Policy and/or who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria," people who simply want their passport to indicate the wrong sex, and "all people who currently want, or in the future will want, a U.S. passport and wish to use an 'X' sex designation."

'The government has failed to meet this standard.'

"Even assuming a preliminary injunction inflicts some constitutional harm on the Executive Branch, such harm is the consequence of the State Department's adoption of a Passport Policy that likely violates the constitutional rights of thousands of Americans," wrote Kobick.

RELATED: Behind the rainbow curtain: Who is funding the trans agenda targeting kids?

 Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

"The Executive Order and the Passport Policy on their face classify passport applicants on the basis of sex and thus must be reviewed under intermediate judicial scrutiny," added the Biden judge. "That standard requires the government to demonstrate that its actions are substantially related to an important governmental interest. The government has failed to meet this standard."

Li Nowlin-Sohl, a senior staff attorney for the ACLU's LGBTQ and HIV Project, called the ruling "a historic win in the fight against this administration's efforts to drive transgender people out of public life. The State Department’s policy is a baseless barrier for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex Americans and denies them the dignity we all deserve."

When asked about the ruling, a State Department spokesperson told Blaze News that as a general matter, officials "do not comment on pending or ongoing litigation."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!