Trump must do to American Marxism what Reagan did to Soviet Marxism



Anybody with an IQ hovering just above double digits did not really believe that Joe Biden wouldn’t pardon his son Hunter in the end. The lie was always the point. That’s why I don’t bristle at being called a conspiracy theorist any longer.

The initial trigger for my entrance into such a brave new world was what happened with Brett Kavanaugh. The final trigger was being told during COVID-19 that natural immunity doesn't exist. And the very same people who told those lies also said that Biden was too principled, too honorable, to pardon his son. Folks, they will lie to us about literally everything.

We are dealing with worldviews that are not reconcilable and cannot peacefully coexist on this earth.

Not only is being called a conspiracy theorist not a bad thing, but it’s probably a sign at this point that you're awake and paying attention. You know, unlike Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who just compared the side effects of a child getting his genitals chopped off to taking aspirin. Congratulations, you’re not insane like her!

So the question then becomes how we should respond to such demonic gaslighting going forward. In the past, I tried to be high-minded about that and stressed the need to be careful about seeking vengeance because of what can happen when the rabbit finally gets the gun. But that is yesterday’s war. Once you’ve seen Kavanaugh turned into a marauding rapist, you start to question whether diffusing power is still a morally available or even desirable option in a land where only one side is playing by a broken social contract.

We're in a war now, so now I am firmly in the camp that we must wield the power that has been given to us with extreme prejudice. We are dealing with worldviews that are not reconcilable and cannot peacefully coexist on this earth, just as the Soviet and Western views of the world could not coexist. And the Soviets were the one side willing to act as if that was the case for the better part of two decades until a guy named Ronald Reagan came along and said enough is enough.

You want a Cold War? I'm going to give it to you.

Now the Soviet Union no longer exists. That’s power.

Unfortunately, though, much of the Soviet Marxist cultural rot ended up downloading itself into our mainframe here at home after it was defeated over there. And here’s some not-so-breaking news: The endlessly smug, sanctimonious gaslighting from the “trust the experts” class isn’t going to just going to go away on its own. The press is packed with absolute liars who are addicted to whipping it out and urinating right in your face while telling you it’s raining.

You can’t share a country with them because they don't want to share it with you. We're the ones that would be inclined to say, listen, if you guys all want to live in California and Oregon, figure it out and leave the rest of us alone. But we tried that for about 25 years, and all we got for our mediation efforts was a promise from the left to turn Texas blue. So that’s gonna be a no from me, dawg. We’re just going to have to teach you a lesson from the old school. Where’s my belt?

And they will deserve it. Because leftist progressives enjoy hurting people. They allowed open borders, and if your daughter got raped and murdered, so be it, as long as they could cheat in elections. They gave all your money to the crime syndicate in Ukraine and then laughed at you when the ensuing inflation raised the prices of everyday goods beyond your reach. They “transitioned” your kids. They mandated a poisonous jab. That’s what all the lies and gaslighting brought upon you, and it was on purpose.

In the face of such a rap sheet, yes indeed, there must be justice and retribution from a godly people bent on never letting it happen again. At an absolute minimum, what Trump should do is issue pre-emptive pardons to himself, every member of his administration, every one of his donors, every one of his closest advisers and associates, heck, anyone who has ever taken a picture with him. Lawfare, you say? You wanna get nuts? Let’s get nuts.

Oh, and everybody currently in prison for January 6 gets pardoned instantly, and the cop who shot Ashli Babbitt gets charged with murder. Because just like the Soviet Union in the 1980s, the only thing these people are going listen to is the threat of mutually assured destruction. The option for mercy has run its course. They chose the way of pain. Let’s honor their request.

Republicans Announce Legislative Plans To Punish The Performance Of Child-Mutilating Transgender Surgeries

The Safeguarding The Overall Protection of Minors (STOP) Act would reportedly put heavy fines on doctors who perform transgender procedures on minors.

Speaker Mike Johnson’s Response To The Trans Bathroom Fracas In Congress Was Cowardly

This shouldn’t be hard or need any clarification. Rep. McBride is a man, and Johnson should have said so plainly.

Girl with suspected autism punished by UK 'Serious Case Panel' for asking trans soccer opponent with beard, 'Are you a man?'



A girl with suspected autism was punished by a so-called National Serious Case Panel in the United Kingdom for asking a bearded transgender soccer opponent, "Are you a man?" the Telegraph reported.

The 17-year-old cried when the panel found her guilty of “discrimination” for her remarks during a match against a trans-inclusive team, the Telegraph added.

'The FA has declared open season on women and girls in football with its disastrous policy, which means that no one can question a male player participating in a women’s game.'

The outlet — citing a previous report in Telegraph Sport — said it was the "latest case to cause outrage over the Football Association’s policy of allowing those born male to play in the women’s game."

The girl's county Football Association charged her with saying, “Are you a man?” as well as, “That’s a man," and “Don’t come here again,” or similar comments, the Telegraph said.

She was banned for six matches, four of which were suspended, after a three-hour hearing last week during which she denied expressing transphobia at the "friendly" game in July, the outlet noted.

The girl also wept during a 30-minute grilling conducted via video conference, the Telegraph said, adding that she had been facing a ban of up to 12 games.

An individual on the call said the hearing was “farcical” and added that panel members repeatedly “misgendered” the alleged victim as “he," the outlet reported, adding that the girl also was said to have been repeatedly asked, “How many LGBQT+ players do you have in your team?”

More from the Telegraph:

Her parents were outraged both by the hearing and the outcome, with her mother telling Telegraph Sport: “We’ve always taught our daughter to ask questions, and if she doesn’t feel comfortable or she doesn’t feel safe then she should go to somebody in charge and ask the question. In safeguarding training at places of work, you’re always told that you should question everything but she’s been told and effectively sanctioned by the FA for doing so. She asked, ‘Are you a man?’, and she admitted to that. The FA is essentially saying that no woman, when faced with what appears to be a male on the pitch, is entitled to ask a question.”

The girl’s plight had previously been cited by former FA chairman Lord Triesman, who wrote to the governing body’s current chair and chief executive last month to complain about its trans policy. The FA has continued to permit players born male to compete in female-only events, despite being urged in May by then-Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer to adopt the “unambiguous position” of a ban.

The outlet noted that Fiona McAnena — director of campaigns at Sex Matters — told Telegraph Sport: “The FA has declared open season on women and girls in football with its disastrous policy, which means that no one can question a male player participating in a women’s game. Anyone who does could find themselves suspended just for asking. Disciplining women and girls for saying what they see plainly in front of them makes a mockery of the game. The FA’s new strategy for women’s and girls’ football is worthless as long as this transgender inclusion policy is in place. How can the FA talk about a commitment to true equality in community football while undermining the rights and safety of the very players it claims to be supporting?”

The girl was brought up on charges after the opposing team lodged a complaint through Kick It Out, which is English football’s anti-discrimination watchdog, the Telegraph said, adding that the trans player and the opposing team’s captain testified that the girl was persistently transphobic.

The outlet noted it has concealed the accused girl's identity due to her age and because she's "on the assessment pathway for autism."

'I raised a concern about the risk of serious injury as a 17-year-old girl playing against a biological male who was much larger than me and a very physical player, which was possibly a safety issue as I did not want to get dangerously injured right before the start of the new season.'

The girl admitted in a written statement submitted in her defense that she asked, “Are you a man?” to a player she described as having “a beard," the Telegraph reported. She also admitted asking the referee for guidance about the player’s eligibility to participate in women’s football “given my concern for my safety after already suffering a number of overly physical challenges," the outlet added.

However, the girl repeatedly denied her words constituted transphobia, the outlet said, adding that it is understood that the game's referee heard nothing he deemed discriminatory.

More from the Telegraph:

The girl said in her written statement she had become “confused” about the participation of the trans player during the match in question as the latter “wore jewelry and sunglasses” and was not in opposition kit.

She added: “The moment the player clarified they were transgender (which I previously hadn’t considered), I respected their answer fully, dropped the situation and immediately shifted my focus back to the game before seeking guidance from the referee. At no point was my question meant to be hurtful or malicious as I only intended to seek clarity in an unfamiliar situation. Knowing now that the player was transgender, I understand that there were better ways to approach this question.”

The girl also said the opposing team's captain accosted her during a water break, telling her that she shouldn't have an issue with playing against a transgender opponent, the outlet added.

“I raised a concern about the risk of serious injury as a 17-year-old girl playing against a biological male who was much larger than me and a very physical player, which was possibly a safety issue as I did not want to get dangerously injured right before the start of the new season," the girl said, according to the Telegraph. "Despite this, I made it clear that if the player met the eligibility criteria of the FA I would respect the rules and accept the risk involved in continuing to play the match. My safeguarding officer and the referee were both present for this conversation.”

The girl added that she was “truly disheartened that these allegations have been made against me," the outlet reported, adding that she also said "I have always supported and respected the diversity within my team, including members who are in the LGBTQIA+ community.”

The Telegraph added that the girl’s mother said none of her daughter’s teammates had been approached to make statements ahead of an upcoming hearing but that they were “100 percent behind her."

According to the outlet, the Football Association decided against publishing written reasons for the case.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'We're biologically different': Women plead with United Nations to keep men out of their sports before someone gets 'killed'



Former athletes and activists spoke this week at a United Nations assembly urging the international body to encourage sanctions on men who try to compete in women's sports.

Olympic silver medalist Sharron Davies and former West Virginia athlete Lainey Armistead were among those who spoke at the Wednesday event in New York City, describing the obvious advantages men have over women in athletics.

'NO males at all in women's sport.'

"I'm here today because we've all seen what happens when males are allowed to compete on women's teams. ... It's demoralizing and unfair, and just plain wrong," Armistead said.

The soccer player explained that while West Virginia has laws that ensure only biological women can compete in women's sports, she still heard stories at her university about women getting hurt during competitions against men in female athletics.

"In just the last three years, the one male athlete who has been allowed to compete against girls in West Virginia has already displaced nearly 300 girls. And that's just one athlete."

Davies was much more blunt in her speech, speaking on the simple biological differences that should be seen as "common sense."

"Females are at a physical disadvantage," she said. "This doesn't mean that we're worse or better; it just means that we’re biologically different."

Davies is a former Olympic swimmer who won silver in Moscow in 1980, competing in three Olympics in total. She also won two gold, two silver, and two bronze at the Commonwealth Games between 1978-1990.

"I don't know a single person that wants to exclude anybody. However, we do want to see women have fair and safe sport. And we cannot wait until a woman is seriously injured or worse still, killed, to be able to deal with the science and the obvious and the common sense," she added.

Davies has consistently called for sex screening to return to the Olympics, stating explicitly that even in the 1970s it was a simple process.

"A sex screening test takes one minute once in your life only (because humans can't change biological sex) which is a simple swab to the inside of your cheek. I had one at the Montreal Olympics. Not at all intrusive especially when Olympic athletes have to consent to drug testing," she wrote on X in July.

"NO males at all in women's sport," she urged in September. "Inclusion is now exclusion of females from their own races by males!"

— (@)

Lawyers from the Alliance Defending Freedom — including Kristen Waggoner and Reem Alsalem, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls — joined the athletes.

Both called for the international sports community to ensure women can participate in athletics without being at risk of harm from men.

"Our plea to the world is to learn from the mistakes that have been made — and that are now being corrected — so that your daughters can walk into a future of fair and safe sports," Waggoner asked.

Alsalem, a longtime advocate in the space, said that the failure to protect the female category has been one of the most egregious forms of discrimination against women.

She added that the essence of being female has been "willfully pushed aside" despite the pain, distress, and humiliation women are facing at the hands of men who want to beat them in their own competitions.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Exclusive: Nevada women's volleyball captain doubles down on team's refusal to play transgender opponent



The captain of the University of Nevada women's volleyball team told Blaze News in an exclusive interview that she's disappointed her school decided not to support the team's decision to forfeit a game against a squad with a transgender player.

"Unfortunately our university decided not to back us, and they decided they're going to have the match as scheduled," Nevada Wolf Pack captain Sia Liilii said.

'No student athlete should ever be pressured to play a game where they don’t feel safe — period.'

As Blaze News previously reported, San Jose State University's women's volleyball team features a 6'1" male athlete named Blaire Fleming, born Brayden.

Fleming's presence on the SJSU squad has been the unofficial reason behind four forfeitures by teams at Boise State, Southern Utah, Utah State, and Wyoming.

Even Fleming's own teammate has spoken out about the unfair advantage the male athlete has over female players.

Nevada was next in line to withdraw from a match against SJSU after the Wolf Pack players released a statement announcing their refusal to participate in a match that would jeopardize their safety.

However, school officials decided to override the will of the players and declare that the match against SJSU would proceed as scheduled.

The University of Nevada claimed the players made their decision and statement "independently" and "without consultation with the University or the athletic department."

However, Liilii said she and her teammates tried to go through the proper channels and inform school administrators how they felt, but the university still decided to push forward with the scheduled match.

"The vast majority of us decided that this isn't right, [that] we need to protect women's sports, and we're going to forfeit," the team captain explained.

She added, "To know that the university didn't acknowledge the fact that we're the team that is going to play against [Fleming] was really frustrating, and the way they went about it was not OK."

Liilii said administrators later scheduled a meeting with the team to apologize and let players know the school would not be punishing them if they choose to sit out against SJSU on Oct. 26.

When asked about the contradiction between the school not punishing players while publicly refusing to back their decision to forfeit, Liilii told Blaze News she felt the school was finding a way to distance itself from the players' stance while still following state and NCAA rules surrounding gender diversity.

But Liilii added that she's received a lot of support, particularly from politicians such as Tulsi Gabbard and U.S. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), both of whom recently attended a Nevada women's volleyball game.

"Thank you Sam Brown, Tulsi Gabbard, and Mark Wayne Mullin [sic] for showing your support at our match against Utah State tonight!" Liilii wrote on X.

— (@)

"Although our university hasn't supported us in this decision, our governor ... [Joe] Lombardo came out with a statement which was really reassuring, too," LiiLiii noted.

Lombardo issued a statement on X about the ordeal, saying in part, "No student athlete should ever be pressured to play a game where they don’t feel safe — period."

"I wholeheartedly respect the decision of the players," the governor added.

— (@)

"We do have people behind us that are supporting us, and that is really important," Liilii said.

The Nevada captain added that she hopes she will soon "see the light at the end of the tunnel" regarding this controversy.

Regarding whether or not the Nevada volleyball players will protest, participate, or sit out during the SJSU match, Liilii said, "you'll just have to see."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'No balls necessary': Women's soccer team apologizes to transgender community for 'too many balls' ad campaign



A new franchise in the National Women's Soccer League has issued an apology for airing a commercial asserting there are "too many balls" in Boston sports.

The BOS Nation Football Club posted a one-minute video on X Tuesday that features cameos from Tom Brady and a member of the Boston Bruins. The video focuses on Boston's championship culture and highlights the "trophies, banners, rings, and balls" in the city.

'At a time when trans women are being excluded from sport at every level, is "too many balls" really the tagline you want to go with here?'

"Old balls, new balls, steel balls, cold balls, even goat balls," the narrator says.

The video then shifts focus on how Boston could use a new women's team.

"Boston loves its balls, but maybe there are too many balls in this town," the voiceover continues, before introducing the club.

"We are BOS Nation, where anything is possible. No balls necessary," it concludes.

The entire campaign was in jest, and some might say completely harmless given the context, but that didn't stop the team from crumbling under criticism from activists.

Notably, a WNBA writer said the ad felt like it excluded transgender people.

"The thing that bothers me the most about this campaign is how TERFy it comes across," Frankie de la Cretaz wrote. "At a time when trans women are being excluded from sport at every level, is 'too many balls' really the tagline you want to go with here?"

The acronym "TERF" stands for "trans-exclusionary radical feminists," meaning feminists who don't believe males can become females.

De la Cretaz also wrote about feeling "unsafe" at a WNBA game because a fan was wearing a Make America Great Again hat.

Amid the hubbub, the BOS Nation Football Club deleted its campaign video then issued a groveling apology to anyone offended.

"While we had hoped to create a bold and buzzworthy brand launch campaign, we missed the mark," the team said in a statement. "We fully acknowledge that the content of the campaign did not reflect the safe and welcoming environment we strive to create for all, and we apologize to the LGBTQ+ community and to the trans community in particular for the hurt we caused."

The team's statement also declared that "we are proud to be part of the most inclusive sports league in the world and are committed to upholding the unifying values that define the NWSL and our club."

The team then thanked those who held them accountable and called for them to "do better."

"We hear you and we will, together," the statement concluded.

— (@)

As has become typical with members of woke activist mobs, the apology was not received well, and they immediately started demanding that the team change its name:

  • "Just change the name and fire the people who were involved in approving this advertising, and it will help," the top response read.
  • "Now apologize for the name and actually choose a name," another reply demanded.
  • "At its face, defining women on the existence of men is just a really weak marketing play in 2024," another user declared.

The NWSL has been celebrating activism for years, including "Pride Month" and Juneteenth.

The league also has instituted "ongoing efforts" to expand diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that focus on "promoting equality and social justice within the sports community and society at large."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Nevada women's volleyball players announce forfeit against squad with transgender athlete, but school rejects their vote



The University of Nevada said its female volleyball players did not consult with the school or its athletic department when they voted to forfeit a match against San Jose State University — which features a male on its women's team — and that the match will go forward "as scheduled."

Blaze News has chronicled the ongoing controversy surrounding SJSU and its male athlete, who goes by the name Blaire Fleming, born Brayden.

'No players will be subject to any team disciplinary action for their decision not to participate in the match.'

At 6'1'', Fleming's inclusion on the women's volleyball team has resulted in four opposing teams forfeiting matches against SJSU: Boise State, Southern Utah, Utah State, and Wyoming.

Nevada appeared to be the next team to throw in the towel after the ladies from the Wolfpack released a statement announcing their refusal to participate in a match that would jeopardize their safety.

"We, the University of Nevada Reno women's volleyball team, forfeit against San Jose State University and stand united in solidarity with the volleyball teams of Southern Utah, Boise State University, the University of Wyoming, and Utah State University," the statement read, according to OutKick's Dan Zaksheske.

The statement added that "we demand that our right to safety and fair competition on the court be upheld. We refuse to participate in any match that advances injustice against female athletes."

An outspoken SJSU player, Brooke Slusser, praised Nevada for its forfeit decision.

"Round of applause to the girls of the Nevada Wolfpack volleyball team. Deciding to go against what the school was forcing on you as young women and taking a stand for what you believe takes courage! Another great step in the right direction for women’s sports!" Slusser wrote on X.

— (@)

However, after the Nevada women issued their notice to forfeit, school officials responded with a statement of their own, denying the validity of the team's decision.

"On Oct. 13, 2024, the majority of members of the University of Nevada, Reno, women's volleyball team sent a statement to the University advising the institution that they were forfeiting its scheduled match with San Jose State University on Oct. 26, 2024," the statement read.

"The players' decision and statement were made independently, and without consultation with the University or the athletic department. The players’ decision also does not represent the position of the University," the school continued.

School representatives then cited state law, federal law, and NCAA regulations as the basis for their decision: "The University and its athletic programs are governed by the Nevada Constitution and Nevada law, which strictly protect equality of rights under the law, and that equality of rights shall not be denied or abridged by this state or any of its subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin. The University is also governed by federal law as well as the rules and regulations of the NCAA and the Mountain West Conference, which include providing competition in an inclusive and supportive environment."

School officials added that "the university intends to move forward with the match as scheduled, and the players may choose not to participate in the match on the day of the contest. No players will be subject to any team disciplinary action for their decision not to participate in the match."

It was suspected in recent weeks that the Nevada women's volleyball team was considering its forfeit after the mother of player Carissa Chainey gave an interview to the Daily Signal in which she remarked that she is "scared for every single player" who plays against Fleming due to a heightened injury risk.

SJSU has avoided addressing its competition advantage with a male player and has simply listed the forfeits as "no contest" on its schedule.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Big Pharma's 'lifetime slaves': Why a detransitioner ENDORSED Trump



Chloe Cole was convinced by medical doctors at only 12 years old that she was transgender, leading her down a path of irreversible medical procedures.

Now, the prominent detransitioner is 20, and she’s voting for Donald Trump.

“I have been incredibly frustrated with the U.S. government and its complacency in allowing so many children and young women and men who are vulnerable, like me, to go down this path without either helping those of us who have already been hurt, or just looking the other way when children and youth are being harmed,” Cole tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.”

“I absolutely refuse to endorse a candidate who is not only allowing it to happen but also actively encouraging parents and families to allow their children to go down these paths,” she adds.


While Cole has seen “a lot of remarkable change being made,” including that 26 states have now passed laws to protect children from going through what she did, she doesn’t believe we’re making progress quickly enough.

“Even amongst states that are more conservative, there still is this pervasive lie that parts of the treatment are reversible, that it’s safe to allow children to go on it,” Cole explains. “It is completely dangerous.”

Horrifyingly enough, Savage adds that over 5,700 minors had transgender surgery between 2019 and 2023, and over 14,000 have received care for dysphoria.

Cole believes that the high numbers are due to the practice being “incredibly lucrative,” which fits what the advocacy group Do No Harm has found.

The group has reported that doctors submitted charges of around $119 million for the procedures done on children in that four-year time frame.

“It really makes sense as to why doctors would be incentivized to do this young and younger and throughout long periods of the patient’s life. Because the younger that you go, the further that a patient is going to go into it, and the further that you go, the more interventions, the more medications, the more surgeries,” Cole explains.

“We’re creating lifetime slaves to the pharmaceutical and to the health care industries,” she adds.

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cruz Opponent Claims He Doesn’t Want Boys In Girls’ Sports, But He Backed Law Making It A Civil Right

Rep. Colin Allred is making the claim in spite of the fact that he voted for legislation mandating boys be allowed in girls' sports and opposed a bill that would have prohibited it.