Trump’s climate policy shift could save American farmers from disaster



While news about President Trump’s tariffs and crackdowns on the questionable financial management of federal agencies has dominated media reports in recent weeks, a quiet transformation has been under way in agricultural policy.

An order to remove climate change references from U.S. Department of Agriculture websites signals a departure from the red tape of climate regulations on domestic farming practices and strings attached to U.S. support of agriculture abroad.

Programs that seek to lower carbon dioxide levels are destructive — period.

Through the U.S. Agency for International Development, the federal government poured millions of dollars into climate-focused programs that could have no positive effect on the climate — promoting “green” orthodoxy over agricultural productivity.

Wasted climate dollars

Some of these programs have been intertwined with other activities in rural agrarian communities. USAID and the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, for example, joined in a “$55 million credit guarantee to address the economic impact of COVID-19 by supporting loans to farmer producer organizations, ag-tech companies, and companies engaged in clean energy solutions for the agriculture sector.” A $1.5 million program aimed at "empowering" female climate activists in northern Kenya.

USAID also partnered with organizations like the Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, which operates in developing countries and focuses on so-called research themes that include “low-emissions” development, climate services and safety nets, scaling “climate-smart” agriculture, and gender and social inclusion.

All these expenditures came under the umbrella of USAID’s 2022-2030 climate strategy, a $150 billion "whole-of-agency approach" to establish an “equitable world with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.’

Climate mandates stifle farming

USAID's financial support for farmers and businesses has been contingent on adherence to an absurd climate agenda and perverse views of human nature that have nothing to do with feeding hungry people.

The administration’s freeze on this funding cuts off money to hundreds of such programs that interfered with the employment of sensible farming practices in places like Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

It’s not just farmers abroad who will benefit from the dismantlement of USAID’s climate initiatives. Among the first casualties of the current policy shift will be the unscientific $3.1 billion program to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions on farms across 55 U.S. states and territories through 135 projects.

Imagine a program intended to help crops grow but that robs them of the carbon dioxide that enables photosynthesis. CO2 is necessary for plant life — and ultimately all life.

NASA credits the greening of much of the planet over the past 100 years to the increase in atmospheric CO2. Programs that seek to lower carbon dioxide levels are destructive — period.

Worldwide impact

Without President Trump’s bold moves, U.S. farmers likely would have fallen under the constraints of externally imposed climate frameworks that have, in many cases, stifled innovation and reduced U.S. farmers' competitiveness on the world stage.

The USDA targets greenhouse gas emissions under the Climate Smart Agriculture and Forestry program. These initiatives include forcing U.S. farmers to employ lower-pressure irrigation systems to decrease fossil fuel energy use. Other measures are aimed at manipulating the quantity and quality of dietary nutrients to reduce methane emissions from animal digestive tracts. It was probably just a matter of time before critically important nitrogen fertilizers were targeted as a source of greenhouse gas emissions — as they have been in some other countries.

By contrast, countries such as China and India have prioritized productivity and food security over such practices. They have invested heavily in fossil fuel-based agricultural technologies and products, achieving record crop yields for their massive populations.

Adding insult to injury, the climate money these nations received purportedly for “climate justice” may have financed fossil fuel projects. Too often, American taxpayers have paid the bill for overseas projects that do little if any good.

The highly politicized, fabricated climate crisis, which is based on erroneous climate models and exaggerations of a so-called greenhouse effect, should not overshadow the immediate economic and operational concerns of farmers in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Trump’s withdrawal from international climate initiatives, including the U.N.’s Paris Climate Accords, marked a win for American farmers and taxpayers. His decision ended U.S. participation in costly and unrealistic mandates — such as the Net Zero agenda — that have strained global economies and fueled unrest among farmers and the broader public.

University of Maine Flinches, Agrees To Protect Women’s Sports Following Trump Admin Funding Threat

The University of Maine (UMaine) system decided to “side with sanity,” according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), agreeing not to allow male athletes to compete in female sports following a federal funding threat from the Trump administration. According to USDA, the UMaine system (a network of eight universities) will comply with President Donald […]

University of Maine System falls in line with Trump's prohibition on men in women's sports



The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced on Feb. 22 that it had "initiated a compliance review of the University of Maine following the State of Maine's blatant disregard for President Trump's Executive Order 14201, Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports."

Weeks later, the University of Maine System, which consists of seven universities and a law school, revealed that its funding from the USDA has been temporarily paused pending a review of its compliance with Title IX and Title IV, which ban sex and race-based discrimination.

The USDA announced Wednesday that the UMS has fallen in line with President Donald Trump's directive to keep men out of women's sports but coupled the news of restored funding with a threat: "Any false claim by the UMaine can, and will, result in onerous and even potentially criminal financial liability."

'The choice for the rest of Maine is simple.'

Compliance apparently meant the UMS confirming to the Trump administration that it does not permit male athletes to identify as females in order to establish individual eligibility for National Collegiate Athletic Association-sanctioned women's sports; that it does not permit men to participate in individual or team contact sports with women; and that it complies with NCAA regulations, specifically the prohibition on male student athletes participating in NCAA-sanctioned women's sports.

"UMaine's decision to side with sanity is a win for women and girls in Maine," the agency said in a statement. "The choice for the rest of Maine is simple: protect equal opportunities for women, as required by law, or lose funding."

The agency previously indicated that it has funded the University of Maine to the tune of $100 million in recent years.

According to the UMS, the University of Maine received nearly $30 million in USDA awards for research and various initiatives in fiscal year 2024. The Portland Press Herald indicated that the UMS has $56.1 million in active USDA grants.

UMS Chancellor Dannel Malloy expressed confusion when the funding was first paused, claiming that the university system had already complied with the administration's rules and requests. The Maine Morning Star indicated Malloy sang the same tune Wednesday when the USDA made its announcement.

"The University of Maine System has always maintained its compliance with state and federal laws and with NCAA rules," Malloy said in a statement, adding he is "relieved to put the Department’s Title IX compliance review behind us."

'We will not allow men to beat up, injure, and cheat our women and our girls.'

Whereas the USDA had good news for the UMS, the Department of Health and Human Service's Civil Rights Office put other Maine institutions in the dog house, declaring that the Maine Department of Education, the Main Principal's Association, and Greely High School were each in violation of Title IX for enabling men to compete in women's sports.

A subpar male athlete from Greely High School in Cumberland stole first place in the girls' pole-vault competition at the Maine Indoor Track Meet on Feb. 17. This was possible only because the Maine ED told schools in the state to defy Trump's executive order banning male transvestites from competing in girls' or women's sports. The Maine Principals' Association followed suit.

"The Maine Department of Education may not shirk its obligations under Federal law by ceding control of its extracurricular activities, programs, and services to the Maine Principals' Association," Anthony Archeval, acting director of the Office for Civil Rights at HHS, said in a statement. "We hope the Maine Department of Education, the Maine Principals' Association, and Greely High School will work with us to come to an agreement that restores fairness in women's sports."

When Trump signed his executive order banning male transvestites from competing in girls' or women's sports, he stated, "Under the Trump administration, we will defend the proud tradition of female athletes, and we will not allow men to beat up, injure, and cheat our women and our girls."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Vaccinating chickens will create 'mutation factories,' RFK Jr. warns



U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has raised the alarm against vaccinating poultry in order to bring down America's astronomical egg prices. Kennedy suggested in a recent interview that doing so might transform farms into incubators for mutant viruses, creating problems far more serious for the population than eggs that cost $1 a piece.

Egg prices have spiraled out of control in recent months and years.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicate that between 1994 and 2022, the price of a dozen grade A eggs remained south of $3, and with few exceptions, hovered around or below $2. Prices began to skyrocket in 2022 and have hit record highs in recent weeks.

Last month, egg prices hit an all-time average high of $4.95 per dozen. In the first week of March, egg prices were reportedly averaging about $6.85 nationally. In some places, the Associated Press reported that consumers have been shelling out as much as a dollar per egg. The USDA predicted that egg prices will increase by 41.1% this year.

While there are multiple factors at play, these unprecedented egg prices are largely the result of mass exterminations of commercial and backyard bird populations ordered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

'They're teaching the organism how to mutate.'

The stated purpose of these culls is to curb the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5) viruses. The agency has directed the extermination of over 166.41 million birds since the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspect Service first confirmed HPAI belonging to the clade 2.3.4.4b in a commercial flock in the U.S. on Feb. 8, 2022.Well over 30 million egg-laying birds have been culled since Jan. 1.

Absent these interventions, the virus would supposedly inflict devastating economic damage and possibly even pose health risks to humans — even though there has only been one recorded human death from HPAI in the U.S., and there are no documented cases of person-to-person spread.

Desperation over egg prices has prompted renewed interest in possibly vaccinating birds against the virus. The administration appears to be receptive.

While Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins noted that vaccines "aren't a stand-alone solution," she recently indicated that the USDA is committing $100 million for vaccine research and development.

There are multiple avian HPAI vaccines available, one of which received a conditional license from the USDA last month for use in chickens. However, the U.S. and the U.K. have resisted large-scale rollouts because vaccination could mask infections, delay detection, and ultimately lead to the need for larger culls. Another concern over vaccines that has been expressed on both sides of the Atlantic is the possibility that vaccination would prompt a false sense of security, thereby compromising biosecurity and again undermining efforts to protect supply.

Vaccination would also amount to an admission that the virus has become endemic rather than epidemic.

Kennedy, more than happy to acknowledge the wild endemicity of HPAI, raised an entirely different concern in a recent interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity.

"All of my agencies have recommended against the vaccination of birds," said Kennedy, "because if you vaccinate with a leaky vaccine — in other words, a vaccine that does not provide sterilizing immunity, that does not absolutely protect against the disease — you turn those flocks into mutation factories."

"They're teaching the organism how to mutate," continued Kennedy. "And it's much more likely to jump to animals if you do that."

Kennedy indicated that the agency heads at the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Food and Drug Administration have suggested that vaccinating chickens "is dangerous for human beings."

'Those should be the birds that we breed.'

Not only did the HHS secretary advocate against vaccinating birds, he cast doubt on the value of culling flocks, suggesting that "you should let the disease go through them."

The culling operations cost Americans both at the grocery store and in their taxes.

The federal government pays poultry producers market value of the birds they are directed to cull. Farmers do not alternatively receive compensation for animals that die of the virus. As of January, over 1,200 producers received these federal indemnity payments, costing taxpayers over $1.1 billion.

Governing.com reported that 67 companies that have received indemnity payment have had at least two infections. There have been 18 facilities with three or more outbreaks. Since 2023, half of these payments have reportedly gone to just a handful of giant corporations.

Rather than shell out more money to kill flocks, delay the acquisition of immunity, and possibly incentivize complacency where biosecurity is concerned, Kennedy suggested, "We should be testing therapeutics on those flocks; they should isolate them; you should let the disease go through them; and identify the birds that survive, which are the birds that probably have a genetic inclination for immunity — and those should be the birds that we breed."

Kennedy intimated that shoppers should not be concerned about consuming eggs or poultry products from a bird population where HPAI is endemic. After all, the CDC has indicated that "cooking poultry and eggs to an internal temperature of 165˚F kills bacteria and viruses, including avian influenza A viruses."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump admin slashes Maine university funding after state keeps men in women's sports



Maine has begun to reap the whirlwind over its refusal to comply with President Donald Trump's Feb. 5 executive order banning male transvestites from competing in girls' or women's sports.

The University of Maine System, which consists of seven universities and a law school, revealed in a statement Tuesday that its funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been temporarily paused.

The UMS said that it received a copy of an email on Monday from the USDA's Office of the Chief Financial Officer that directed the department's "awarding agencies and staff offices to temporarily no longer issue any payments or authorize any other releases of funding to Columbia University of the University of Maine System."

The USDA noted that it has poured over $100 million into the University of Maine in recent years.

According to the UMS, the University of Maine received nearly $30 million in USDA awards for research and various initiatives in fiscal year 2024. The University of Southern Maine also has been receiving various USDA awards. The Portland Press Herald indicated that the UMS has $56.1 million in active USDA grants.

'Your population doesn't want men playing in women's sports.'

The department email noted further that "this pause is temporary in nature while USDA evaluates if it should take any follow-on actions related to prospective Title VI [of the Civil Rights Act] or Title IX violations. Please take any necessary actions to effectuate this direction from leadership. This pause will remain in effect until further notice."

UMS Chancellor Dannel Malloy suggested that he was unaware of any "mistakes" the university system has made, reported the Herald.

"It's disappointing. The letter that we got didn't give a reason," say Malloy. "They're looking into things. We've complied. We've answered questions."

The UMS reportedly told the USDA that it is complying with the updated NCAA policy that excludes cross-dressing men from women's sports.

Trump called Democratic Gov. Janet Mills out at a Feb. 21 governors' meeting at the White House for her refusal to comply with his popular executive order. Just days earlier, a subpar male took advantage of Mills' defiance and crushed his female competitors in the girls' pole-vault competition at the Maine Indoor Track Meet.

"You better do it because you're not going to get any federal funding at all if you don't," said the president. "And by the way, your population, even though it's somewhat liberal, although I did very well there, your population doesn't want men playing in women's sports."

'Taxpayers' hard-earned dollars will not support institutions that discriminate against women.'

According to a recent New York Times/Ipsos poll, 79% of Americans want to see athletes compete in sports teams that align with their sex.

Mills told Trump she would see him in court, to which the president responded, "I look forward to that. That should be a real easy one."

The USDA announced on Feb. 22 that it had "initiated a compliance review of the University of Maine following the State of Maine's blatant disregard for President Trump's Executive Order 14201, Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports."

"President Trump has made it abundantly clear: taxpayers' hard-earned dollars will not support institutions that discriminate against women," stated Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services also launched an investigation into whether the Maine Department of Education, including the UMS, was complying with Trump's order. HHS quickly determined that the state was in violation of Title IX for allowing men to compete in girls' and women's sports and referred the case to the Justice Department.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Republican Senators Tackle Food Stamp Benefits For Desserts And Sodas

While past campaigns to reform federal nutrition benefits have failed, Republicans are now operating with a new mandate on national health.

FACT CHECK: Claim That Navy JAG Arrested USDA Inspector General Phyllis Fong Is Satire

A post shared on Facebook claims the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) Corps purportedly arrested U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Inspector General Phyllis Fong. Verdict: False The claim is false and originally stems from a Jan. 30 article published on the satire site “Real Raw News.” A spokesperson for Navy JAG denied the claim’s […]

Watchdog Report: Federal Funding Of The Desserts And Sodas Driving America’s Obesity Epidemic Needs To End Now

A new report from the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) urges states to eliminate subsidies for candy and sugary sodas.

Inspector General Escorted Out Of Office After Defying Trump’s Dismissal

'They have been relieved of their duties in order to make room for qualified individuals'