US Army ADMITS the vaccine hurt soldiers, but no — the Army won’t help them



Karolina Stancik is a U.S. Army veteran who tragically suffered severe heart conditions after being mandated to take the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.

While the Army has shockingly acknowledged in an internal memo that her injuries were vaccine-induced, they discharged Stancik and refused to cover her medical treatment.

“I am 24 years old, I have had three heart attacks, a mini stroke, and I am now getting a pacemaker,” Stancik told investigative reporter Catherine Herridge in an interview.

Stancik told Herridge that the COVID vaccine is when “everything flipped upside down” for her and that she was “left behind and trampled” by the U.S. Army.

“So, the Army admits in an internal memo that they referenced that all of these injuries were caused by the vaccine, and yet, you know, they discharged her by the way, because ‘You’re of no use to us now. You’re disabled now,’” Sara Gonzales says, clearly disturbed.

“How sick and how rotten is this administration that we will force servicemen and women to buy into a narrative and if they don’t and then get hurt, you just toss them aside and feed them to the wolves,” Jaco Booyens agrees.

Booyens' own brother, who he says has “3% body fat and is a top former professional athlete,” all of a sudden got myocarditis.

“His doctors lie to him, they tell him it’s called ‘athlete’s heart,’” Booyens explains. “He’s like, ‘What is athlete's heart?’”

“Fights for his life in ICU for 13 days, turned to the brink of death. This has happened hundreds of thousands, if not millions of times,” he continues, adding, “Anthony Fauci should be in front of an international tribunal for crimes against humanity.”


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Fauci silenced by regular guy in PBS documentary



PBS has just released a new documentary about Anthony Fauci and the COVID response, and it’s way better than any of us expected.

Not because it paints Fauci in a positive, heroic light — which it does — but because it unwittingly exposes Facui for the fraud he is.

In one clip, Fauci goes to an economically depressed neighborhood in the D.C. area with the mayor of D.C., Muriel Boswer.

The clip begins showing Fauci eyeing himself in the mirror as he adjusts his mask, of course, before he describes the neighborhood they’re descending on as a “historic African-American neighborhood.”

According to Fauci, the people living in this neighborhood “don’t get good medical care, they have a high degree of HIV, high degree of COVID-19, the lowest level of vaccination. They’re sort of the disenfranchised group that we’ve got to reach out to.”

Dave Rubin comments on Fauci’s demeanor, saying, “It’s as if he’s at an African safari, like ‘look at the animals over there.’”

Fauci then continues to go door-to-door with Mayor Bowser, in order to push people to get vaccinated. And some of them weren’t having it.

In one scene, a black man stands atop his steps looking down at Fauci and says, “People in America are not settled with the information that’s been given to us, right now.”

He continues, “I’m not going to be lining up, taking a shot or a vaccination for something that wasn’t clear in the first place. And then you all create a shot in miraculous time; it takes years to create vaccination —”

The man is then cut off by Fauci, who claims, “Well, it used to take years. You know how many years were invested in this approach? About 20 years of science.”

The man isn’t having it. He says, “Twenty years is not enough. And nine months is definitely not enough to be taking no vaccination that you all came up with.”

While Fauci says that there were far more COVID deaths than flu deaths that year, Rubin points out the obvious.

“In 2018 there were 52,000 flu deaths. In 2019 there were 28,000. In 2020 there were 25,000. And then all of a sudden, in 2021, which is the year that this took place that he’s talking about … there were only 5K.”

He adds, “I’m starting to think there might be a connection between all of these things. … Could it be that the flu deaths were counted as COVID deaths?”

If only the so-called experts could tell us.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Regular Guy Silences Fauci on His Door-to-Door Vaccine Push | Direct Message | Rubin Report

Regular Guy Silences Fauci on His Door-to-Door Vaccine Push | Direct Message | Rubin Report

Poll: 1 In 4 Americans Thinks Someone They Know May Have Died Due To Covid Shot

That the poll was even conducted indicates a sea change in attitudes toward the Covid shots. It’s now finally acceptable to discuss fatal adverse events.

Unvaccinated blood matchmaking service developing global network



A Swiss nonprofit is building a vast network of unvaccinated individuals with the short-term goal of connecting blood recipients with unvaccinated blood donors across the world. Should its membership hit critical mass, Safe Blood Donation hopes to create an mRNA vaccine-free blood bank.

Blood pressure

"Horrified" by the vaccinated blood he has allegedly studied and convinced that "the whole vaccination thing" is mainly about "controlling people," Swiss naturopath George Della Dietra seeks to provide people with a choice about the kind of blood that flows through their veins.

Dietra told Vice News, "We want to be a platform for people who want to have the free choice of blood donors. ... Whether they think there is a real conspiracy theory going on, that the New World Order [is happening], or if they simply say ‘I just don't want it’ for whatever reason.”

This may be a tall order, especially since Dietra's organization would not bar vaccinated persons from becoming members. After all, there is presently limited supply.

According to the New York Times, roughly 71.1% of the world population has received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Dr. Michael Busch of the Vitalant Research Institute indicated that "less than 10 percent of the blood we collect does not have antibodies."

A September 2021 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 83.3% of donated blood had combined infection- and vaccine-induced antibodies.

The supermajority of prospective donors consequently have blood affected for good or ill by the controversial vaccines or by prior COVID-19 infection.

Newsweek reported last summer that some patients who had successfully forgone receiving a COVID-19 vaccine demanded blood transfusions only from unvaccinated donors.

A New Zealand couple may reportedly lose custody of their 4-month-old son on account of their insistence that he receive blood from unvaccinated people ahead of his lifesaving heart surgery.

Like the boy's parents, patients presently do not have a choice when it comes to vaccinated or unvaccinated blood.

Dr. Louis Katz, chief medical officer for ImpactLife, told Kaiser Health News that as of August 2021, he knew of "no one who has acceded to such a request, which would be an operational can of worms for a medically unjustifiable request."

Even if this "can of worms" were opened, the choice of blood would presently be uninformed since blood centers do not keep data regarding donors' vaccination status and are not required to by the Food and Drug Administration.

Safe Blood Donation's apparent answer to this problem is its searchable database of anonymous, unvaccinated members. Members can also search by region.

The organization claimed that as "soon as we have enough medical partners (for application, collection and processing of the blood), we will start with the mediation."

Far from functional

In its FAQ, Safe Blood Donation noted that it is far from realizing its goal of becoming a blood bank and will first need to acquire 100,000 more members so that "the politicians and lobbyists can no longer avoid taking us seriously."

In the meantime, the organization has advice for those who would like avoid vaccinated blood.

The nonprofit advises members to stipulate in their wills that they are against receiving canned blood, but also recommends against mentioning vaccination, noting that "it is actually not advisable to come out as an opponent of vaccination, because then you are immediately 'the enemy', and no one is interested in helping you."

"Write further that you indicate a relative (if you have one) as a potential blood donor who can be contacted immediately (or who is present in person at a scheduled surgery) who has the same blood type. If you do not have a relative, write to us immediately when the hospital gives the green light to your plan – then we will find one," said the FAQ.

Kaiser Health News noted that persons requiring transfusions can also donate their own blood ahead of time.

While it appears as though Safe Blood Donation intends to work covertly in the interim, it anticipates members might one day be able to produce their membership cards with instructions concerning blood type and have their requests respected.

Vice reported that the nonprofit already has members in at least 16 countries, although Safe Blood Donation's website suggests it has members in over 60 countries worldwide, with at least 25 pumping blood in the U.S..

The initial joining fee is around $50 and approximately $20 per year thereafter.

'It’s time to make life a living hell for anti-vaxxers,' Washington Post columnist writes



A Washington Post columnist lambasted the vaccine-hesitant and praised French President Emmanuel Macron in a Tuesday piece titled, "Macron is right: It’s time to make life a living hell for anti-vaxxers."

What are the details?

James McAuley, global opinions contributing columnist for the Post, recounted Macron's headline-grabbing statements from last week in which he said he intended to push the unvaccinated out of public life in France until they get the jabs.

"The unvaccinated, I really want to piss them off. And so, we're going to continue doing so, until the end. That's the strategy," Macron told newspaper Le Parisien in an interview, Reuters reported.

McAuley seemed to enjoy Macron's actual word choice, noting that "the English translation hardly does the comment justice. In French, the verb he used is 'emmerder,' which means, quite literally, to cover in excrement."

He soon added that Macron "happens to be totally right. There is no justifiable excuse for refusing vaccination, which is the only way the pandemic will ever come close to ending. Macron has set a fine example for other world leaders to follow in refusing to kowtow before ignorance or honor selfishness."

McAuley added that Macron's vulgar commentary, which a number of his opponents denounced, "already seems to have worked. By last Thursday, the first full day after Macron’s comment was made, France’s Health Ministry announced that the number of first vaccinations against the coronavirus had tripled to 66,000 — the country’s highest figure since Oct. 1."

But despite the glut of newly jabbed French citizens, McAuley still tore into them, saying it's "sad ... that the only way to compel citizens to act for the greater good is not to appeal to some higher sense of civic duty but to tell them there will be no restaurant meals if they don’t get their shots."

"Funny how even the loudest vaccine skeptics start to reconsider their convictions when they realize there won’t be able to drink wine on cafe terraces," he concluded. "It’s almost as though their convictions are not so much convictions and actually just, well, what Macron said."

How did folks react to McAuley's column?

A number of Twitter users took umbrage with McAuley's premise and a number of points he made:

  • "The CDC director said 'vaccine doesn't prevent transmission.' Stop spreading false information. Getting the vaccine will not end the pandemic," one commenter said.
  • "What a dumbass you are," another user wrote. "The unvaccinated are not the problem when the vaccine doesn’t actually stop transmission."
  • "I'm vaxxed but this story is desperate," another user said, after which another commenter added, "Desperate? It's downright insane."
  • "You know, for someone who's info is publicly available and is physically incapable of defending themselves, you might want to think twice about advocating the abuse of others to the point of them having nothing to lose," another commenter responded. "Just a thought."

Canadian lawyer hospitalized for vaccine-related heart ailment: 'I accept my role as collateral damage of the vaccine rollout.' He even got a booster.



Based on what happened to Adam Goodman — a Toronto-based lawyer — after his second Pfizer shot, many might have assumed he'd never again go anywhere near a similar needle.

What happened to him?

Goodman said in a Monday op-ed for The Globe and Mail that at first, he thought he was merely experiencing "muscle pain" in his neck and then in his chest.

But a medical checkup revealed it actually was pericarditis — inflammation of the lining around the heart and "one of the two potential significant side effects associated with the mRNA vaccines," he said. The other significant side effect is myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart itself, Goodman wrote.

"Because I thought I was experiencing muscle pain, I let the pericarditis go too long without treatment. As a result, I experienced a dangerous squeezing of the heart called tamponade," he added in his piece. "I spent five days in hospital recovering with the help of a crack team of cardiologists, nurses, and pharmacists at Toronto’s University Health Network and a heavy dose of anti-inflammatory drugs."

'The vaccines are our civic duty'

But despite his serious medical scare as a result of the vaccine, Goodman is still a fan of the shots.

"I accept my role as collateral damage of the vaccine rollout," he added in his op-ed. "Before the current Omicron wave, vaccines helped us get back to some degree of normality. They protect society and our public-health system. Previous generations were asked to undertake far greater risks for the protection of society, including being drafted for war. The vaccines are our civic duty."

As for vaccine opponents, Goodman declared that they use "absolutely false, conspiracy-theory laden arguments" and called them "clearly a lost cause, embracing an anti-science and anti-truth ideology with a fervor rarely seen since the advent of the Enlightenment."

He added that he believes "the positives of the vaccines greatly outweigh the negatives" and that his children are fully vaccinated. Plus, Goodman said he "received a booster shot a few days ago. So far, I’m feeling okay. Instead of an mRNA vaccine, I took the Johnson & Johnson shot, which is a viral-vector vaccine less associated with pericarditis."

He added in his op-ed that he hopes by telling his story of battling a serious vaccine side-effect that the "vaccine hesitant" might also get the shots.

How are readers reacting to Goodman's vaccine stance?

Goodman's op-ed so far has elicited a wide-range of reactions. Some commenters agree with him; some don't. And still others are engaging in debates with each other:

"Mass Formation Psychosis in action," one commenter wrote, after which another commenter linked to an article refuting "mass formation psychosis," which Dr. Robert Malone noted in his recent interview with podcaster Joe Rogan.

Another commenter actually managed a balanced take: "I think the stance that antivaxers are anti-science is naive. There are plenty of scientists and doctors who question the vaccines (for the record I'm pro-vaccine) and the anti-vax people do engage in scientific thinking. The issue is more epistemological and has more to do with trust than being 'anti-science.' If we are going to convince anyone we need to be more nuanced with our thinking and less lazy otherwise our efforts will be easily ignored. You have to dig in a little to the content they are consuming to see their side accurately. Is this dangerous? Probably, but not looking at an argument from just one perspective is truly anti-science."

Pressure To Give Preschoolers Covid Shots Could Shatter Public Trust In Vaccines

It seems as if regulators consider the risk-benefit analysis less important than getting jabs into as many people’s bodies as possible.

As His Presidency Founders, Biden Scapegoats The Unvaccinated

Amid rising inflation, an ongoing border crisis, and a stalled legislative agenda, Biden is looking for someone to blame.
Trump Was Always Pro-Vaccine, Even When Democrats Weren’t

Trump Was Always Pro-Vaccine, Even When Democrats Weren’t

Trump announced this week that not only did he get both rounds of the original COVID jab, but he also got a booster shot.