Pavlo Gonchar/Getty Images

Horowitz: It’s time to repeal public health and vaccine immunity

Imagine living through 9/11 and the government not having banned box cutters on planes. Well, we have lived through COVID and COVID fascism, which together are responsible for killing and injuring millions of people, yet the same people, processes, and powers behind those policies not only remain unpunished but are now empowered to force their products on schoolchildren with complete immunity from liability. Where is the Republican rallying cry to end immunity for Big Pharma and the bio-security state?

We have all seen those endless Toyota airbag recalls or car seat recalls where manufactures, usually based on very limited risk, must spend millions to compensate for faulty products and perfect them. That is the accountability that exists in every sector except for vaccines. The two culprits behind this are the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act). The former exempts all vaccines on the childhood schedule from any liability or judicial discovery process, and the latter exempts any therapeutic or individual involved in a public health crisis during a declared emergency from liability for negligence.

Here we are two and a half years later, and even the most conservative estimates show millions were seriously injured by the shots and tens of millions had reactions to them. Yet the more the virus becomes an endemic, non-emergency virus, the more medical officials continue to grant new authorizations to versions of the shot that have even less data backing them.

On Wednesday, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met and voted unanimously to add COVID shots to the Vaccines for Children program, which will pay for children to have endless clot shots. It’s widely expected that later today, the shots will be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, which will induce states to prevent children from going to school without them. It will consist of likely two or three COVID shots a year for the first 18 years of a person’s life — of the most dangerous shot in human history.

The real reason they are doing this is to ensure that the manufacturers are permanently protected from liability, even after the declared emergency is terminated and they lose their protection under the PREP Act. With the shot added to the regular childhood schedule, it would be protected under the NCVIA. Name me the Republican in leadership who is even promising to rescind this power and the immunity that goes along with it.

It would be bad enough to exempt the manufacturers from liability, but to mandate the shots on every child in order to attend school while holding the manufacturers exempt from liability is genocidal, especially given that we already know these shots cause a mind-boggling degree of injury. According to the CDC’s own V-Safe pharmacovigilance, 7.7% of those who got the shots sought medical attention for injury. A new Saudi survey shows that between 7% and 13% experienced chest pain, irregular heartbeat, or shortness of breath, aside from the massive percentage who experienced flu-like symptoms.

Thus, we should be discussing making criminals of those behind making these shots, not rewarding its makers by essentially criminalizing children and families for not playing Russian roulette with their bodies. Mandating the use of a private product in order to participate in life and then absolving the maker of that product of all liability – even after ubiquitous injury has been established – is the most odious form of fascism imaginable.

Where is the GOP? Where is Republicans’ promise to block such mandates? How come Florida is the only state to have publicly commented on the ACIP’s impending recommendation and say that Florida will not be following it? Moreover, states have an obligation to update all of their vaccine policies. What we’ve learned from the COVID shots is that any vaccine that actually works should protect its users from those who opted not to get it. The vaccines either work or they don’t. No child should be denied entry into school on account of not having gotten a vaccine. There are already 54 jabs on the childhood schedule, the COVID shots could add two dozen more, and the industry is about to release numerous new vaccines of dubious justification and proof of safety. The time has come to apply the brakes to this runaway train.

Then there are the two liability exemption bills. There is simply no reason why vaccine companies, flush with cash beyond belief and backed by government funding and recommendations (if not mandates), should be absolved from liability. Gone are the days when it was a fledgling industry with just a few shots on the market. Now Big Pharma controls the world and every global government, including even some of those governments’ military assets as liens to the pharmaceutical companies. It is simply indefensible to continue blanket liability immunity.

Besides, in exchange for liability waiver was the fact that the government would studiously monitor and respond to VAERS reports to immediately pull a deficient product. Here we are with millions of adverse events in VAERS and over 70 million in the CDC’s V-Safe, including countless deaths and debilitating injuries, and yet they seek to expand immunity rather than repeal it?

Then there is the PREP Act. It has exempted all pandemic-related malfeasance, including much of the nursing home genocide, from liability. Yet when Biden slipped up and conceded that the emergency was over, and his administration continued the emergency declaration for another 90 days, Republicans passed the budget CR without any protest.

Just how deep does the PREP Act run? Not only has it exempted all makers of defective products like the vaccines and remdesivir, but it even exempts some administrators who gave wrong versions, doses, or concoctions of the therapeutics. For example, there have been numerous examples of children being given adult doses at pharmacies. The North Dakota Department of Health stored thousands of doses at the wrong temperature, according to a new report.

Will anyone be held accountable? Well, the State Appeals Board in Iowa rejected compensation claims for 52 prisoners who were given as much as six times the dosage. The lawyers advised that under the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, “the state is immune from claims arising out of administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.”

More broadly, of the millions injured, and even among the thousands who filed painstaking claims meeting the very narrow eligibility thresholds for compensation, almost none have been compensated, even as other countries begin paying those injured by the shots.

For Republicans to not even campaign on ending blanket vaccine/pandemic immunity, investigate the entire response to and creation of COVID, and compensate those injured by the shots is shocking. And it’s exactly why the pharma fascists are plowing ahead with even more mandates. They know their products are beyond scrutiny from either party. After all, it’s only the bodies of every child born in this country at stake. No big deal.

Fake Unifier-In-Chief Ends First Year In Office The Same Way He Began

When he entered office, Biden promised to be a unifier. After what we've seen this year, it's undeniable he's only been a divider.

Report: Fully vaccinated make up 30%-40% of COVID hospitalizations in Maryland counties — and the number is 'increasing rapidly'



Health data coming out of Maryland is reportedly leading to growing concerns about the waning effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, especially against the Delta variant.

What are the details?

While the data still shows that the majority of state residents hospitalized with the virus are unvaccinated or partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated individuals are starting to account for a larger share.

"Infections, illness, and hospitalizations are increasing rapidly among fully vaccinated people, according to data from the Maryland Department of Health and new research," WBAL-TV reported on Tuesday.

The outlet said the trend has led some public health experts to argue "it's time to reframe thinking" about the message on vaccines to note that they won't necessarily keep you from getting sick, but they will increase your chance of survival.

"Over the past three months in Anne Arundel County, about 30% of the people hospitalized with COVID-19 are fully vaccinated," the report stated. "There's a similar timeframe and trend in neighboring Howard County, where health officials said roughly 30% to 40% of people hospitalized with COVID-19 are fully vaccinated."

Data: More vaccinated people among hospitalized Marylanders www.youtube.com

Anne Arundel County Health Officer Dr. Nilesh Kalyanaraman blamed the trend on waning vaccine efficacy alongside the rise of the Delta variant.

"Because Delta spreads more easily and causes more severe disease, we do see some hospitalizations," Kalyanaraman explained.

A national trend developing among the vaccinated?

While the Maryland data is currently being framed as an outlier, there are indicators that it's part of a national trend.

Public health experts and mainstream media figures for weeks have inundated the American public with the line that unvaccinated individuals presently account for nearly all of the COVID-19 hospitalizations, usually citing a figure between 95% and 98%.

But, as TheBlaze's Daniel Horowitz pointed out earlier this month, those figures were pulled from a ranged 6-month analysis produced by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. When looking more closely at the month-by-month figures, one can see that the percentage share of hospitalizations among fully vaccinated people has been steadily ticking upward since the start of the year.

In June alone, fully vaccinated people made up 16% of the nation's COVID-19 hospitalizations.

"Given the rapid acceleration of waning immunity, inquiring minds would like to know what that number will look like heading into September," Horowitz noted.

'Good reasons to get vaccinated'

Though acknowledging the new data as concerning, health experts in Maryland are still encouraging residents to get vaccinated as a way to boost their immune response against the virus.

"It's critical to get your vaccine to decrease your chance of getting hospitalized," Kalyanaraman told WABL. "And also it turns out, long-COVID, those lingering symptoms, are much less likely to happen in the vaccinated as well, so there are a lot of good reasons to get vaccinated."

Horowitz: 15 studies that indicate natural immunity from prior infection is more robust than the COVID vaccines



It's the 800-poundgorilla in the pandemic. The debate over forced vaccination with an ever-waning vaccine is cresting right around the time when the debate should be moot for a lot of people. Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC's campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines. It's time to set the record straight once and for all that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is broader, more durable, and longer-lasting than any of the shots on the market today. Our policies must reflect that reality.

It should be noted that this exercise is not even necessary now that our own government concedes that immunity from the vaccines, particularly the Pfizer shot, wanes each month. With the Mayo Clinic researchers suggesting, based on old data that likely got even worse since, that Pfizer's efficacy against infection is only 42%, there is no reason to even attempt to compare this degree of immunity to the near-perfect immunity of prior infection, even against Delta. It should be obvious to any intellectually honest person that an unvaccinated individual with prior infection is exponentially safer to be around than someone who had the vaccines but not prior infection.

Remember, a significant portion of the population already got infected, and when the latest Delta wave is over in the South, the region will likely reach clear supermajorities of the population with immunity, as was found in India following the circulation of this very contagious strain of the virus.

Now consider the fact that studies have shown those with prior infection are associated with 4.4x increased odds of clinically significant side effects following mRNA vaccination. Thus, it is as scandalous as it is unnecessary to vaccinate those with prior infection, even if one supports vaccination for those without prior immunity. But as you can imagine, that would take a massive share of the market off the table from the greedy hands of Big Pharma.

To that end, it's important to clarify once and for all, based on the current academic literature, that yes, people with prior infection are indeed immune, more so than those with vaccines. Here is just a small list of some of the more recent studies, which demonstrate the effectiveness of natural immunity — even from mild infection — much later into the pandemic than the study window of the vaccines:

1) New York University, May 3, 2021

The authors studied the contrast between vaccine immunity and immunity from prior infection as it relates to stimulating the innate T-cell immunity, which is more durable than adaptive immunity through antibodies alone. They concluded, "In COVID-19 patients, immune responses were characterized by a highly augmented interferon response which was largely absent in vaccine recipients. Increased interferon signaling likely contributed to the observed dramatic upregulation of cytotoxic genes in the peripheral T cells and innate-like lymphocytes in patients but not in immunized subjects."

The study further notes: "Analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires revealed that while the majority of clonal B and T cells in COVID-19 patients were effector cells, in vaccine recipients clonally expanded cells were primarily circulating memory cells." What this means in plain English is that effector cells trigger an innate response that is quicker and more durable, whereas memory response requires an adaptive mode that is slower to respond. Natural immunity conveys much more innate immunity, while the vaccine mainly stimulates adaptive immunity.

2) Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, May 24, 2021, published in Nature

The media scared people last year into thinking that if antibody levels wane, it means their immunity is weakening, as we are indeed seeing with the vaccines today. But as Nature wrote, "People who recover [even] from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades." Thus, aside from the robust T-cell memory that is likely lacking from most or all vaccinated individuals, prior infection creates memory B cells that "patrol the blood for reinfection, while bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) hide away in bones, trickling out antibodies for decades" as needed.

It's therefore not surprising that early on in the pandemic, an in-vitro study in Singapore found the immunity against SARS-CoV-2 to last even 17 years later from SARS-1-infected patients who never even had COVID-19.

3) Cleveland Clinic, June 19, 2021

In a study of 1,359 previously infected health care workers in the Cleveland Clinic system, not a single one of them was reinfected 10 months into the pandemic, despite some of these individuals being around COVID-positive patients more than the regular population.

4) Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle/Emory University, Washington, July 14, 2021, published in Cell Medicine

The study found that most recovered patients produced durable antibodies, memory B cells, and durable polyfunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells, which target multiple parts of the virus. "Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients," concluded the authors. In other words, unlike with the vaccines, no boosters are required to assist natural immunity.

5) University of California, Irvine, July 21, 2021

The authors conclude: "Natural infection induced expansion of larger CD8 T cell clones occupied distinct clusters, likely due to the recognition of a broader set of viral epitopes presented by the virus not seen in the mRNA vaccine" (emphasis added).

6) University of California, San Francisco, May 12, 2021

Conclusion: "In infection-naïve individuals, the second dose boosted the quantity but not quality of the T cell response, while in convalescents the second dose helped neither. Spike-specific T cells from convalescent vaccinees differed strikingly from those of infection-naïve vaccinees, with phenotypic features suggesting superior long-term persistence and ability to home to the respiratory tract including the nasopharynx."

Given that we know the virus spreads through the nasopharynx, the fact that natural infection conveys much stronger mucosal immunity makes it clear that the previously infected are much safer to be around than infection-naive people with the vaccine. The fact that this study artfully couched the choices between vaccinated naive people and vaccinated recovered rather than just plain recovered doesn't change the fact that it's the prior infection, not the vaccine, conveying mucosal immunity. In fact, studies now show that infected vaccinated people contain just as much viral load in their nasopharynx as those unvaccinated, a clearly unmistakable conclusion from the virus spreading wildly in many areas with nearly every adult vaccinated.

7) Israeli researchers, August 22, 2021

Aside from more robust T cell and memory B cell immunity, which is more important than antibody levels, Israeli researchers found that antibodies wane slower among those with prior infection. "In vaccinated subjects, antibody titers decreased by up to 40% each subsequent month while in convalescents they decreased by less than 5% per month."

8) Irish researchers, published in Wiley Review, May 18, 2021

Researchers conducted a review of 11 cohort studies with over 600,000 total recovered COVID patients who were followed up with over 10 months. The key finding? Unlike the vaccine, after about four to six months, they found "no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time."

9) Cornell University, Doha, Qatar, published in the Lancet, April 27, 2021

This is one of the only studies that analyzed the population‐level risk of reinfection based on whole genome sequencing in a subset of patients with supporting evidence of reinfection. Researchers estimate the risk at 0.66 per 10,000 person-weeks. Most importantly, the study found no evidence of waning of immunity for over seven months of the follow-up period. The few reinfections that did occur "were less severe than primary infections," and "only one reinfection was severe, two were moderate, and none were critical or fatal." Also, unlike many vaccinated breakthrough infections in recent weeks that have been very symptomatic, "most reinfections were diagnosed incidentally through random or routine testing, or through contact tracing."

10) Israeli researchers, April 24, 2021

Several months ago, Israeli researchers studied 6.3 million Israelis and their COVID status and were able to confirm only one death in the entire country of someone who supposedly already had the virus, and he was over 80 years old. Contrast that to the torrent of hospitalizations and deaths we are seeing in those vaccinated more than five months ago in Israel.

11) French researchers, May 11, 2021

Researchers tested blood samples from health care workers who never had the virus but got both Pfizer shots against blood samples from those health care workers who had a previous mild infection and a third group of patients who had a serious case of COVID. They found, "No neutralization escape could be feared concerning the two variants of concern [Alpha and Beta] in both populations" of those previously infected.

12) Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, published in Journal of Experimental Medicine

Many people are wondering: If they got only an asymptomatic infection, are they less protected against future infection than those who suffered infection with more evident symptoms? These researchers believe the opposite is true. "Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2–infected individuals are not characterized by weak antiviral immunity; on the contrary, they mount a highly functional virus-specific cellular immune response," wrote the authors after studying T cell responses from both symptomatic and asymptomatic convalescent patients. If anything, they found that those with asymptomatic infection only had signs of non-inflammatory cytokines, which means that the body is primed to deal with the virus without producing that dangerous inflammatory response that is killing so many hospitalized with the virus.

13) Korean researchers, published in Nature Communications on June 30, 2021

The authors found that the T cells created from convalescent patients had "stem-cell like" qualities. After studying SARS-CoV-2-specific memory T cells in recovered patients who had the virus in varying degrees of severity, the authors concluded that long-term "SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell memory is successfully maintained regardless of the severity of COVID-19."

14) Rockefeller University, July 29, 2021

The researchers note that far from suffering waning immunity, memory B cells in those with prior infection "express increasingly broad and potent antibodies that are resistant to mutations found in variants of concern." They conclude that "memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency and breadth than antibodies elicited by vaccination." And again, this is even before getting into the innate cellular immunity which is exponentially greater in those with natural immunity.

15) Researchers from Madrid and Mount Sinai, New York, March 22, 2021

Until now, we have established that natural immunity provides better adaptive B cell and innate T cell responses that last longer and work for the variants as compared to the vaccines. Moreover, those with prior infection are at greater risk for bad side effects from the vaccines, rendering the campaign to vaccinate the previously infected both unnecessary and dangerous. But the final question is: Do the vaccines possibly harm the superior T cell immunity built up from prior infection?

Immunologists from Mount Sinai in New York and Hospital La Paz in Madrid have raised serious concerns. In a shocking discovery after monitoring a group of vaccinated people both with and without prior infection, they found "in individuals with a pre-existing immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the second vaccine dose not only fail to boost humoral immunity but determines a contraction of the spike-specific T cell response." They also note that other research has shown "the second vaccination dose appears to exert a detrimental effect in the overall magnitude of the spike-specific humoral response in COVID-19 recovered individuals."

As early as March 27, among the many accurate statements Dr. Fauci made before he became a political animal, he declared he was "really confident" in the immunity conferred by prior infection. That was long before 17 months of data and dozens of studies confirmed that. Yet, today, there are thousands of doctors and nurses with infinitely better immunity than what the vaccines can confer who are losing their jobs during a staffing crisis for not getting the shots. Just know that the big lie about natural immunity is perhaps the most verifiable lie, but it is likely not the only lie with devastating consequences we are being told about the virus, the vaccines, and alternative treatment options.