Biden's case to BLOCK Tennessee's child sex-change ban EXPLAINED



The Supreme Court spent last week hearing arguments over a Tennessee law that bans doctors from providing transgender puberty blockers or hormone treatments to minors. It’s a logical law that protects against the mutilation of children, but of course, the left is upset that kids won’t be given what it euphemistically calls “gender affirming care.”

Despite being a state-level case, the Biden administration has intervened, apparently deciding that this will be the battle that concludes its disastrous term.

Josh Hammer, senior editor at large for Newsweek, joins Jill Savage and Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson on “Blaze News Tonight” to discuss the situation.

“Does the Biden administration actually have grounds right now to intervene in a state policy like this?” Jill asks.

Hammer explains that the Department of Justice filed what is called a writ of certiorari — a legal document that requires the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s decision, granted four SCOTUS judges agree to hear the case.

“This case is styled U.S. vs. Skrmetti, which means that the United States is the lead plaintiff here,” Hammer says. “That actually has a very concrete, practical application when it comes to Donald Trump and JD Vance and Pam Bondi, assuming that she's going to be the AG pick come January 20.”

“They can move to withdraw this case, and specifically, they should make a motion to ... dismiss it as ‘improvidently granted,’” meaning that SCOTUS should never have accepted the case for review in the first place, he adds. “There's no reason why the United States should be in the procedural posture of suing Tennessee for a common sensical, civilizationally sound law.”

However, even if the Trump administration moves to “dig this case” and motion is denied, Hammer predicts the outcome will still be favorable.

“I was pretty happy with the way this argument went,” he says.

Peterson, who also watched the hearing, says that “the discrepancy between the two sides” was “astounding.”

“On the one side, you have the ACLU lawyer claiming that less than 1% of minors who undergo this surgery have regrets, and then you have Tennessee and the attorney general saying, ‘No, no, actually 85% desists from transition,”’ he recounts. “You really do have two sides talking in completely different universes.”

Hammer agrees: “What you saw at SCOTUS on Wednesday, I think, are two diametrically opposed conceptions of the human person. You saw two diametrically opposed conceptions of anthropology — of what it means to be human in the first place.”

“On the one hand, you have the ACLU left-wing argument, which is that human life is basically a pick-your-own adventure. ... On the other hand, you have the old-fashioned view — the view of Genesis 1:27: ‘Male and female, God created them,”’ he adds.

Because of the radically opposed viewpoints, “Neutrality here is just not an option.”

“You actually have to put a thumb on the scale from both a political perspective and indeed from a judicial and a jurisprudential perspective here. At some point, you actually have to say that the moral heart of the issue in this particular case dictates that there is male and female and that we are not going to arbitrarily concoct some sort of pseudo classification based on alleged ‘transgender status,’” says Hammer. “I am hopeful that in the majority opinion, or at least in one of the concurrences there, that we will get some morally forthright language.”

To hear more on the case, including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson likening transgender surgeries on minors to interracial marriage, watch the clip above.

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Memo to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson: Sterilizing children is not ‘loving’



It seems that in addition to being a U.S. senator, Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn is also a prophet. The conservative from the Volunteer State asked Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to define the word “woman” during her confirmation hearing in 2022, but the judge who was celebrated as the first black woman to be nominated to the nation’s highest court said she couldn’t define her sex because she is not a biologist.

Skip ahead two years, and Justice Jackson is hearing arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, a case that will determine whether states can prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, the progressive euphemism for puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures for children who “identify” as the opposite sex. At one point, Jackson drew a comparison between Tennessee banning medical treatments that can sterilize children to the ban on interracial marriage that was eventually overturned in Loving v. Virginia.

The color line determined the society our ancestors endured. The gender binary will determine the society our descendants inherit.

Tennessee’s solicitor general had to inform the justice that giving “testosterone to a boy with a deficiency is not the same treatment as giving it to a girl who has psychological distress with her body.” He correctly noted that the former helps a boy develop according to his sex while the latter renders a girl infertile.

The entire exchange should be the stake in the heart of superficial identity politics. Joe Biden appointed Jackson to the Supreme Court because he pledged to make history by putting a black woman on the bench. His black supporters — especially women — celebrated her nomination at the time. To them, her appointment was another milestone in America’s quest to become a more inclusive and tolerant nation.

W.E.B. DuBois famously said that the problem of the 20th century was “the problem of the color line.” To the people who think in superficial identity categories, putting a black woman on the highest court in the land was another step in destroying that barrier. But the fight of the 21st century will be preserving the sex binary, and only a racial idolater would consider legalizing child sterilization progress if a black woman casts the deciding vote.

The color line determined the society our ancestors endured. The gender binary will determine the society our descendants inherit.

The future will be painful for the children failed by parents, doctors, journalists, activists, and politicians who refuse to tell them the truth about who they are. The Biden administration and its progressive allies believe that counseling gender-confused children to accept their bodies as they were created is “conversion therapy” but puberty-blocking drugs, mastectomies, and hysterectomies constitute “gender-affirming care.” Denying basic biology is now required to be in good standing on the left, which is precisely why Ketanji Brown Jackson’s refusal to define “woman” during her hearing was so telling.

Unfortunately, the politics of racial allegiance blinded even the black Christians who otherwise hold to biblical sexual ethics. One pastor in Chicago whose church was formerly part of the Southern Baptist Convention said Justice Brown Jackson’s confirmation was a moment to be “celebrated” and a “gift of grace.” But I’m not sure how any preacher can attribute God’s goodness to a judge who refuses to affirm Genesis 1:27 or gives legal support to child sterilizations done in the name of civil rights.

In a sane world, the Tennessee case would result in a unanimous decision with a short summary clearly stating that men cannot become women (or vice versa), therefore, any hormonal and surgical treatments done under the guise of “transitioning” a person promises a medical outcome that can never be achieved.

Every man who has ever purchased an engagement ring knows that calling a cubic zirconia a diamond — regardless of its cut, clarity, or color — doesn’t change it into one. Composition and presentation are not the same thing.

This same principle applies to sex. A cross-dressing male doesn’t switch sexes by taking pills and putting on makeup. The reason why is quite simple: Women are born, not worn. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson needs to know that mutilating and sterilizing children in the name of civil rights is not loving.

Doctors Performing Trans Experiments On Kids Should Prepare To Be Sued In Texas And Elsewhere

In Texas, cases are mounting against physicians who broke state law by prescribing puberty blockers and hormones to minors.

Pro-Trans Doctors Hide Results Of Taxpayer-Funded Study Because It Shows ‘Transitioning’ Kids Is Harmful

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-24-at-2.09.58 PM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Screenshot-2024-10-24-at-2.09.58%5Cu202fPM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Johanna Olson-Kennedy refuses to publish the results of a study on puberty blockers for trans-identifying kids because 'I do not want our work to be weaponized.'

Blaze News original: Damning new database names and shames hospitals that have subjected thousands of kids to sex-change mutilations



Do No Harm is a medical advocacy group that works with health care professionals, hospital administrators, patients, policymakers, and others to reverse the ideological capture of medicine and medical education.

Since 2022, DNH — which comprises members across all 50 states and in 14 countries — has focused primarily on curbing two harmful ideological currents in particular: DEI-branded racism and radical gender ideology. DNH made a major strategic play this week to help expose the latter.

The organization launched the Stop the Harm database Tuesday, revealing precisely which hospitals and medical facilities around the country are presently subjecting thousands of vulnerable children to sex-change mutilations and sterilizing chemical treatments.

Dr. Roy Eappen, an esteemed endocrinologist and senior fellow at Do No Harm who has spent over three decades treating patients, told Blaze News, "A lot of the activists in this field say things like, 'No children are getting these kinds of treatments, or there are very, very few.'"

Eappen emphasized that the data say otherwise — and now the American public can see the offenders listed and victims tallied for themselves, all in one place.

'It is crucial every parent familiarizes themselves with this database.'

DNH's national database, which provides breakdowns on a state-by-state and institutional basis, revealed that between 2019 and 2023, at least 13,994 children received sex-change medical interventions.

"This first-of-its-kind project provides patients, families, and policymakers with a resource that reveals the pervasiveness of irreversible sex-change treatments for minors in America," Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of DNH, said in a statement.

"The StopTheHarmDatabase.com that the incredible group Do No Harm put together is an incredible body of work," said Alvin Lui, president of the parental rights advocacy group Courage Is a Habit. "It is crucial every parent familiarizes themselves with this database."

DNH researchers analyzed publicly available insurance claims data "from an all-payer claims database that incorporated data from clearinghouses, data aggregators, payors, health systems, CMS, and multiple open data sources" as well as from commercial insurance, Medicaid, Medicare , and VA claims concerning confirmed sex-change-related treatments for minors ages 0 to 17.5.

They determined that a staggering 5,747 American children were subjected to sex-change mutilations over that short period.

Meanwhile, 62,682 prescriptions for sterilizing hormones and puberty blockers were written for 8,579 pediatric patients.

"That doesn't sound like a huge number, but I think it's way too many," said Dr. Eappen.

These figures are minimums as the researchers have admittedly only just scratched the surface.

'This data represents the tip of the iceberg.'

Dr. Eappen noted that the Kaiser Permanente health care consortium has, for instance, withheld its data concerning potential sex-change victims, and Lui noted that the "majority of transgender drugs and surgeries that are provided to children are still paid out of pocket."

Dr. Goldfarb noted that while "this data represents the tip of the iceberg, this is the first step in holding the medical establishment accountable for participating in, and often times promoting, predatory and unscientific medical interventions for vulnerable children."

Lui stressed that the "explosion of children getting sucked up into the cult since 2016 should frighten every parent in America."

While the trend got progressively worse in 2021 and 2022, there were potential signs of the trend tapering off in 2023.

Dr. Goldfarb told Blaze News:

In the majority of states, we saw a spike in minors undergoing sex change treatments between 2021 and 2022. For example, California saw a more than 50% increase between that time (2021-363 patients, 2022-687 patients). PA saw an ~30% increase (2021:105, 2022: 332). The numbers started to decline slightly in 2023, but that is also around the time when many states began to pass legislation banning '[gender-affirming care].' AL was the first to pass legislation in 2022 and was one of the only states to see a decline in minors undergoing sex change treatments in 2022.

Last year, however, Do No Harm observed a trend of fewer patients, "especially in states that have passed legislation banning 'GAC,'" said Goldfarb.

"Our plan with the next iteration of the database is to analyze the 2024 data to see if these states are in fact following the law, and if there is a downward trend in the states that are still allowing 'GAC,' especially now that the danger of ideology is more widely known," added the DNH chairman.

The current database makes abundantly clear that the mutilation and sterilization of America's youth is a profitable enterprise. Over $119.7 million was made during this period on child sex-change medical interventions.

When asked whether money or ideology was the driving force behind the sex-change industry's medicalization of children, who in most cases would alternatively grow out of their confusion, Dr. Eappen said, "I think it's actually a confluence of the two."

"Ideology is a big part of it. But you know, Marci Bowers, who's the chief of WPATH, which is the World Professional Association of Transgender Health, made a million dollars last year as a transgender surgeon," continued Dr. Eappen. "It can be quite a lucrative undertaking."

'You're also making children into patients for life.'

Dr. Melanie Crites-Bachert, a urologist and osteopathic surgeon with expertise in pelvic reconstruction, recently provided Blaze News with some idea of how much surgery centers can make performing various sex-change mutilations.

"A lot of these surgeries can be done in a surgery center. They are very lucrative with reimbursement," said Crites-Bachert. "If somebody were going to have an orchiectomy or castration — my former biller pulled up this information — the Medicare reimbursement is $324. To amputate a penis is $804. Now, keep in mind, therapeutically, you sometimes do need to amputate a penis if there's penile cancer or things like that, but purely amputating a penis is $804. A hysterectomy, an abdominal hysterectomy, is a little over $1,000. A vaginoplasty, which is basically reconstructing the vagina for things like trauma, is $1,161."

Crites-Bachert indicated that these figures represent Medicare reimbursements for therapeutic procedures and that a surgery center can expect 150-200% reimbursement above that from commercial insurance if a patient has commercial insurance paying these procedures.

"You're also making children into patients for life because a lot of these kids have complications from these kinds of surgery. And you're saying that they should be on their hormones basically forever," said Dr. Eappen.

According to Grand View Research, the U.S. sex reassignment hormone therapy market size was an estimated $1.6 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4.05% until 2030.

The Free Press noted that Planned Parenthood, whose business model has long appeared to be harming vulnerable human beings, is presently the country’s leading provider of sex-change hormones for young adults.

The Insight Partners estimated that the global sex-change surgery market will grow to nearly $7 billion by 2031.

Dr. Miriam Grossman, the board-certified child and adolescent psychiatrist who authored the 2023 book "Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist’s Guide Out of the Madness," told Blaze News in September that surgeons and pharmaceutical reps will not be the only ones cashing in on victims of the sex-change regime.

Grossman noted that billions of dollars are "going to be made from reproductive technologies because we're producing a generation of sterilized people who are going to need egg and sperm donations. They're going to need IVF. They're going to need surrogates in order to have children."

'Medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk.'

While there are hospitals that have far higher child sex-change billings, DNH's Stop the Harm database indicated that the 12 worst-offending children's hospitals promoting sex-change treatments for minors are as follows:

Blaze News reached out to the top offenders above for comment but received a response only from Children's Hospital Los Angeles, which noted it was "declining participation" in this report.

The continued medicalization of children is particularly egregious, not only because of the impossibility of getting informed consent from minor patients and in many cases their guardians — a troubling reality even WPATH scientists have admitted in private communications — but because of the ever-growing mountain of scientific literature indicating "gender-affirming care" is at best pseudoscience.

Gender ideologues and profit-incentivized health professionals have long told parents with confused children that they must choose between a "dead son or a live daughter" or between a "living son or a dead daughter” — the suggestion being that ruinous chemical treatments and irreversible surgeries are solutions to a gender-dysphoric child's supposed suicidality.

This claim has collapsed in recent years.

A peer-reviewed study published in January in the esteemed quarterly journal BMJ Mental Health revealed that "medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk."

'You've sentenced a whole bunch of children to infertility and many other problems.'

"All-cause and suicide mortalities did not differ between those gender referred who had and had not proceeded to [sex-change surgeries] when psychiatric treatment history was accounted for," wrote the researchers.

The suicide argument is not the only core gender ideology claim to have recently crumbled.

Dr. Hilary Cass, an esteemed British medical doctor who previously served as president of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, was commissioned by NHS England to lead a multi-year investigation into the U.K.'s sex-change regime, particularly its youth-facing services.

Her final report came out earlier this year, revealing that where so-called gender science is concerned, "There is not a reliable evidence base upon which to make clinical decisions, or for children and their families to make informed choices."

The Cass Review had the University of York undertake a series of systematic reviews on topic, which found that most of the "research" underpinning so-called gender science is of "poor quality," demonstrating "poor study design, inadequate follow-up periods and a lack of objectivity in reporting of results."

In the case of the puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones apparently foisted on children by Boston Children's Hospital and other offending institutions, the review made clear that the uses "are unproven and benefits/harms are unknown."

"In addition to this making it difficult for clinicians to know whether these are appropriate treatments to offer, it is also challenging to provide children, young people and families with sufficient information on which to make an informed choice," said the review. "The duty of information disclosure is complicated by many 'unknown unknowns' about the long-term impacts of puberty blocker and/or masculinizing/feminizing hormone during a dynamic developmental period when gender identity may not be settled."

"I'm appalled that in North America, the Cass Review has not received more attention," Dr. Eappen told Blaze News. "[Dr. Cass] was neutral, and she basically came to the conclusion that most of this should not be done."

Dr. Eappen suggested that the North American medical establishment is keen to ignore the mounting evidence of the sex-change regime's unscientific and harmful practices in part because of its ideological capture — a problem that not only affects medical institutions but various medical professional associations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Endocrine Society. It may, however, also be a matter of guilt and liability.

"When you've done things that are basically irreversible, it's very hard to say that you've done something wrong," said Dr. Eappen. "I mean, you've sentenced a whole bunch of children to infertility and many other problems. How can you say that you made a mistake?"

Dr. Eappen indicated that for each of the victims tallied above, there are also parents who bear some responsibility, and it's "very hard to say that you've done something that's harmed your children."

Chloe Cole, a senior DNH fellow and patient advocate, is among the many Americans victimized by the sex-change regime.

Cole told the Florida Boards of Medicine and Osteopathic Medicine Joint Rules/Legislative Committee in 2022, "At 13, I started taking puberty blockers and testosterone. At 15, I underwent a double mastectomy in which my breasts were removed and my nipples were grafted. And yet, at 16, after years of medically transitioning, I came to realize I severely regretted my transition."

Cole — who recently endorsed President Donald Trump "because he's committed to protecting children from these rash decisions" — said in a statement, "This new project from Do No Harm proves the lies from the medical establishment and radical politicians who argue that cases like mine are rare."

"The stats in this database represent thousands of kids who are being treated like Guinea pigs for unproven, and sometimes dangerous, medical experiments," continued Cole. "I hope politicians and parents alike use this database to see where these treatments are happening and protect their children from being rushed into irreversible, life-altering treatments."

When discussing the best ways to cripple the sex-change regime, Dr. Eappen told Blaze News that:

DNH has helped several legislatures pass laws because if the medical field doesn’t self-regulate itself properly, I think it’s the responsibility of the government to do something about it. I would prefer not to pass laws — I would prefer that doctors look at the risk-benefit ratio and see that the risks outweigh the benefits and act accordingly. But if they're not going to do that, [laws] are one way. The other is lawsuits: make it expensive for them to continue with this kind of procedure.

The Stop the Harm database might, in this regard, serve to provide a list of prospective institutional defendants as well as highlight states where children need legislative protection from the sex-change regime.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Attention parents! New database provides detailed breakdown of which facilities are performing sex-change procedures on minors IN YOUR AREA



Stop the Harm is a database created by Do No Harm that tracks and reports on “gender affirming care” for minors taking place in each state, the goal being to “encourage positive change and protect children” from the insidiousness of gender ideology.

With a click of your mouse, you can easily see the exact hospitals in your state that are offering gender affirming care to children, how many sex-change surgeries they’ve performed, how many prescriptions they’ve written, and how many patients they’ve seen.

The site also provides statistics on the worst offending hospitals and doctors in the nation.

It’s a wealth of resources for parents who want to stay informed on one of the most egregious issues of our time.

“This is an ideology; this is not science, certainly not medicine. Medicine is intended to treat something that is wrong — to heal,” says Liz Wheeler. “Over 90% of children with gender dysphoria will outgrow that feeling once they have hit puberty, once they become adults.”

“So if we actually wanted to help young people with gender disorders, we would send them to counseling; we would wait for them to grow up; and we would adamantly refuse to transition them,” she continues.

While the movement is certainly driven by a destructive ideology, it’s also driven by something perhaps even more nefarious: the love of money.

“You'll never guess how much money these hospitals and doctors profited off of mutilating these children in the name of gender ideology,” says Liz, who invites the director of programs at Do No Harm, Michelle Havrilla, to the program to discuss the revolting statistics on the Stop the Harm database.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“We're told, of course, by the left that sex changes on children don't happen, but what did you find when you were analyzing this data?” Liz asks.

“The data show that approximately 14,000 children throughout the country under the age of 17 and a half have received some type of sex-change treatment — whether it be surgery, such as a body modification surgery, hormones, or puberty blockers — totaling, in terms of claims submitted, $120 million over a four-year period between 2019 and 2023,” says Havrilla, adding that this is “a very, very conservative estimate.”

To amalgamate the statistics in its database, Do No Harm only “looked at insurance data,” as it was barred from accessing other sources of information.

“Kaiser for one does not allow their data to be public. We don't have information on self pay, and we also don't have information on charity pay,” says Havrilla, adding that in the state of California where gender affirming care is rampant, “Kaiser is probably the number one payer in the state.”

“When we looked at California, we saw a total of $23 million of submitted charges within that time frame of 2019 to 2023, so without the addition of Kaiser to that, we suspect that it's probably higher,” she explains.

Another factor that’s skewing the numbers to be lower than reality is the fact that Do No Harm was “very conservative in [its] methodology.”

In order to ensure that treatments were indeed within the category of gender affirming care, Do No Harm “matched [procedures and prescriptions] with a gender diagnosis code or an icd10 code.”

We did this “to make sure that really there was not any ambiguity in what we were presenting,” Havrilla tells Liz.

To sum that up, the stats you’ll find on the Stop the Harm database are already telling (and horrifying), but they’re merely scratching the surface when it comes to the reality of how many children are being butchered by the medical industrial complex that sees our most vulnerable population as an opportunity to get rich.

To hear more about the work Do No Harm is doing to keep parents informed and children safe, watch the clip above.

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Wyoming GOP Gov. Removes Doctor From State Board For Opposing Transing Children

Wyoming radiologist Eric Cubin petitioned the federal court in Cheyenne last week to reinstate him to Wyoming’s Board of Medicine. Cubin was appointed to the board, which oversees the licensing and regulations of the medical profession, by Republican Gov. Mark Gordon in 2023 and reappointed to another four-year term last March. Only weeks after his […]

JD Vance DESTROYS supporters of gender affirming care for minors: ‘And they think WE’RE weird’



The Harris campaign has been relentless in its mission to brand Trump’s VP pick, JD Vance, as a “weird” “white supremacist.”

But Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” knows that couldn’t be further from the truth.

“JD Vance is not a white supremacist, he’s just someone saying basically true things that everybody used to know 20 years ago,” Rubin says.

In a recent interview with the NELK Boys on the “Full Send Podcast,” Vance illustrated Rubin’s point perfectly, when he was asked about medically altering children based on leftist ideology.

“These people think that everything that’s different about men and women is, they use this word ‘socially constructed,’” Vance told the NELK Boys. “Yeah, some of our differences are cultural, some of our differences are just basic biology.”

“They’re so uncomfortable with that, that they try to biologically change men into women and women into men. ‘Cause if you can get rid of the biological differences, then you can get rid of all the differences, too,” he continued.

However, Vance made the point that leftists who believe in gender ideology think the differences are a bad thing.

“It’s a source of one of the coolest parts about being, like, a living, breathing, human being in the world,” Vance said. “Women think about stuff slightly differently than men do, and that is a good thing, and we shouldn’t try to destroy those differences in the name of ‘equality.’”

Vance also explained that the differences between men and women is “not an excuse to sterilize kids, to try to turn a girl into a boy or vice versa.”

And while the left claims the medical procedures children are being subjected to are not permanent, Vance sees it differently.

“If you give hormonal therapy to a 9-year-old kid, that is not totally reversible. I mean these kids have bladder problems and other stuff that’s just gross. And why are we doing this to our kids without any real confidence in the science? It makes you realize a lot of the public health establishment in this country is pretty deranged,” he said.

Vance also is under the impression that if your child wants to undergo hormonal therapies in a state like California, and you disagree with it, you’re at risk of having your child taken away.

“I’m a father of three. That would make me go absolutely like, ‘We’re moving to the hills, keep your hands off my kids, this is crazy town,’” Vance told the NELK boys, adding, “Their view is that we should be teaching kids gender reassignment, and they think that we’re ‘weird.’”

“Doesn’t make a lot of sense,” he added.


Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Boston Red Sox Give Suspended Player’s Salary To A Group Supporting The Surgical Mutilation Of Minors

The Boston Red Sox are giving a player's suspension salary to an LGBT group that backs the chemical and surgical mutilation of minors.

Instead Of Taking On The Billion-Dollar Trans Industry, The Los Angeles Times Attacks Its Victim, Chloe Cole

'Gender transition' advocates are monsters, mutilating children for money, but their former victims are finding the strength to fight back.