Horowitz: Zogby survey reveals shocking degree of correlation between vaxx and new diagnosis of illness in young people
The amount of evidence mounting showing excess death and injury from the shots is too great to ignore. Whether it’s from VAERS, information from the clinical trials, excess deaths, dropping birth rates, life insurance data, health insurance data, and surveys from around the world, it has become clear that this ain’t your grandfather’s vaccine. At this point, it’s just a question of pinpointing the exact rate of injury and death. However, a new Zogby survey reveals a shocking degree of correlation with vaccine injury that is corroborated by numerous other data points.
According to a Zogby survey commissioned by RFK Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense, 14.8% of all adults answered in the affirmative when asked, “were you diagnosed by a medical practitioner with a new medical condition within a matter of weeks to several months?” This is a very intriguing inquiry, because there is so much mounting evidence of people getting hit by auto immune disorders, heart ailments, blood clots, and strokes following the shots. Obviously, a certain percentage will be incidental, but the sheer magnitude, the type of ailments, and the affected age groups are what’s intriguing.
It would be one thing for older people to say they’ve been diagnosed with a new ailment following the vaccine. One could obviously chalk that up to coincidence because, unfortunately, people are often diagnosed with new ailments as they get older. However, when you break the topline number down by age group, it is actually only 4% among those 65 and older who claim to have been diagnosed with a new medical condition within months of the shot. Among those aged 18-29, it was a whopping 30%, and among those 30-49, it was 23%. There is something seriously wrong when almost a third of 20-somethings could answer a survey like that in the affirmative.
What was further shocking was the types of diagnoses they received. Here were the top five:
- 21% blood clots
- 19% heart attack
- 18% liver damage
- 17% leg clots/lung clots
- 15% stroke
Let’s put the raw numbers in perspective. Among the 18-29 age group, a total of 127 respondents (59%) attested to having gotten one or more of the shots, and among those aged 30-49 it was 206 (60%). Now, we know that 30% of those who got the shots in the youngest group of the survey attest to having been diagnosed with a new condition within a few months. Now, one could suggest that perhaps these people are referring exclusively to lower level conditions like anxiety, allergies, or other minor ailments that are common and hard to pin on the vaccine. But if you dig into the numbers, you will find that 11 had heart attacks, 10 had blood clots, 10 had leg clots, 8 had liver damage, 8 had MS, and 5 developed Bell’s palsy. These numbers are earth-shattering because they represent a large percentage of the respondents, albeit from a somewhat modest sample size.
To be clear, some of the individuals experienced multiple ailments because there were 83 reported new conditions among 38 individuals (out of 127), but if you add up the total of very serious ailments, it shows something is way off.
Now, it is important to recognize that although this survey purports to be a random poll of over 1,000 people, there could be some degree of selection bias with those who feel they were injured being more inclined to speak to a pollster. So, let’s say that some of these numbers are slightly overstating the overall rate of injury — either way, they are cataclysmic. Among the 22% of those 18-49 who reported getting the shots and suffering a new medical condition within a few months, 43% of them reported the condition being serious and 10% reported severe illness or that they were still recovering. Again, some of this is incidental, but it’s hard to attribute the lion’s share of sudden serious or severe new medical conditions in a young age group to chance when these numbers are exponentially above the background rate for heart ailments and blood clots in this age group.
Dr. Ryan Cole, and Idaho pathologist and early critic of the shots, tells me that he is not surprised by data indicating a higher rate of injury among the young. “There is a very simple pathophysiologic explanation for these trends,” said Cole in an exclusive interview commenting on this survey. “Younger individuals are simply more metabolically active. Consider that age bump that we all dread when our diet and our carefree, youthful eating patterns change because we can no longer eat like we used to. Generally, especially in growing children and teens, our cells are turning over and growing at faster rates.”
Maintaining optimal weight is a benefit of living during your more metabolically active years. However, according to Cole, that youthful metabolism will work against you when it comes to spike protein shots. “When a synthetic spike mRNA sequence enters our cells, it proliferates, for at least 60 days, per the study in 'Cell' by Roeltgen, et. al. Metabolically active cells in youth make spike at a brisker rate and in higher volumes. This spike protein, and its cellular cytotoxic effects, thereby [have] more opportunity to do harm in these more actively proliferating cell lines, including, but not limited to, liver, spleen, thymus, bone marrow, GI, skin, and airway lining cells. The spike also hones to neural tissues which are also more metabolically active in these age cohorts.”
We’re not simply relying on a random poll to raise flags. The VAERS data is clearly pointing to clinicians tracing these specific injuries back to the shots. Here is a presentation of the VAERS data by Dr. Henry Ealy, listen to his segment here:
The data is shocking:
Knowing the underreporting factor and the stigma against doctor’s reporting vaccine injury, these numbers are breathtaking. Even if the shots worked amazingly, they would have been taken off the market using the traditional bioethical model after witnessing a fraction of these reported deaths and serious injuries.
This patterns of disproportionate injury among younger people was evident from day one in VAERS. Last May, Dr. Jessica Rose, a mathematician and immunologist who has become the leading expert in VAERS, published a paper analyzing VAERS cardiovascular adverse event reporting just for the first few months of the distribution during early 2021. She found a clear bias towards the younger age groups than seniors, which lends credence to the self-reporting in this Zogby survey.
This means that our government knew from day one that the youngest people who really didn’t even need the shot even if it worked were at an elevated risk for cardiovascular damage. They plowed on anyway – and continue to do so to this very day.
Dr. Cole tells me it’s not surprising at all that younger people would suffer more heart ailments from the spike proteins than seniors. “Cardiac cells are also more active in children and youth. A recent presentation at the American Heart Association, demonstrates how the spike can inflame cardiac tissue, and balloon/swell heart muscle cells. Additionally, recent studies have shown how the spike can destroy our mitochondria, the power plants of all of our body’s cells. Logic dictates, from a biological activity level that these harms would certainly manifest in a more pronounced manner in those individuals whose tissues are more metabolically active.”
In 1999, Dr. Fauci explained the challenge of developing a safe HIV vaccine because even if it looks “fine” after a year or so, eventually it could “take 12 years for all hell to break loose.” Well, in this case, all hell broke loose from day one, yet not only are the vaccines not pulled from the market, the powers that be plan to introduce a new variant shot with the same mechanism of action without any clinical trials as early as next month. What is going on?