Horowitz: Death, injury, no liability, and now a part of the child vaccination schedule
I never could have imagined coming out with a book – “Rise of the Fourth Reich” – on COVID fascism nearly three years into the “Great Reset” that would be more relevant now than during the lockdowns themselves. But it should now be clear beyond a shadow of a doubt that the botched vaccines weren’t some sort of mistake. It was done on purpose with no remorse. The only remorse will be on our part for not fighting it while we still can.
Can you conjure up a worse example of fascism than denying schooling to children who don’t get a dangerous injection that is 100% exempt from liability and shielded from all market controls? Now that the CDC is knowingly promoting dangerous vaccines, it’s time for red states to counterattack and remove all vaccines that are not subject to liability from mandatory school immunization schedules.
Even as Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates concede that this generation of vaccines are nowhere near up to par, the CDC quietly added the COVID shots to the Child Immunization Schedule last week.
It’s now right up there with the sickening designation of HepB – an STD-based illness with flimsy data behind the vaccine – for babies.
In what other sphere of medicine do we place a private product on a government-recommended list that every single human being alive is to be given, with the threat of medical apartheid as an enforcement tool, regardless of their unique needs? Oh, and the thing promoted most by government – up until and including school mandates – just happens to be exempted from liability. Mandating a biologic product in the bodies of children while exempting the manufacturers of liability is the worst form of fascism imaginable.
Evidently, it’s not generous enough to cover the vaccine immunity shield until October 2025, per the invocation of the PREP Act, which was amended five times. Officials know that there will be death and injury for years to come. So by placing the vaccines on the Child Immunization Schedule, they will enjoy complete indemnity forever, pursuant to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. So, while Biden plans to terminate the emergency declaration in May, the damage and destruction in its wake will be with us forever.
Merriam-Webster defines fascism as a regime “that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.” There is no greater example of this than engaging in apartheid of schoolchildren on account of not getting a product promoted by government, funded by government, and absolved of all liability by government – to be injected into your own body.
It is a disgrace how very few red states have moved to confront this form of fascism. In West Virginia, to this very day, officials do not accept religious exemptions from vaccine mandates, which shouldn’t exist to begin with. House Health and Human Resource Committee Chair Amy Summers has been bottling up HB 535, which would provide a philosophical exemption. Some states are trying to water down these bills to apply only to the COVID shots. But the COVID shots should be taken off the market altogether. The other shots need to be investigated one by one, but in the meantime, there is never an excuse to force another human being to get something that you can avail yourself of if you think it is so protective.
Furthermore, all states must abolish the entire concept of a child immunization schedule. It’s OK for a patient and doctor on an individual basis to select which vaccines they deem appropriate for the child. The notion that every child, in order to function, needs an ever-growing list of biologic products regardless of their health status runs counter to all principles of medicine.
For example, who in the world needs a diphtheria shot, and why is it tethered to tetanus? Why do babies need STD shots? Is there really a need for a rotavirus vaccine, which is basically for a stomach virus? Why is rubella shoved on every kid when it’s only a problem for fetuses and so should be a non-starter aside from pregnant women? Men should never be pressured to get that shot. After so many years of so many of these shots, we should have a clear idea of how many people died or got disabled from these ailments prior to the introduction of vaccines, how many die now, and how many were injured by the shots. Much to my surprise, we don’t really have good answers for what we were told is obvious. These are the sorts of questions that states must begin contemplating through the creation of a commission on vaccines.
In the meantime, there is no reason any human being should be forced into Pfizer’s scheme. That was always true, but it is downright immoral after everything we’ve learned about the vaccine industry the past few years. It is simply indefensible to force a human being to take a product promoted, marketed, distributed, and absolved of liability by the federal government because it violates every principle of the Nuremberg Code by shielding the manufacture from all accountability forces inherent in a true free market that make a product safer. Although states have no power over the liability shield, there is nothing stopping a state government from saying that anything not subject to liability cannot be placed on the state’s recommended childhood schedule for schools.
Honda just issued a “do not drive” warning for various 2001-2003 models of Honda Accord, Civic, CR-V, Odyssey, Pilot, and Acura because of faulty airbags suspected of killing 30 globally since 2009. Yet the COVID shots, with 17,000 VAERS-reported deaths in the U.S. alone in two years – when we know VAERS is woefully underreported by a factor of 20-40 – are still on the market and now part of the CIS! These numbers are horrific enough, but what would happen if you multiplied them by 20 or 30?
What’s the difference between car manufactures and vaccine makers? Honda is on the hook for liability for its cars; Pfizer has no liability for what it gets government to forcibly fund, market, promote, and mandate on our bodies. And remember, the condition granted in return for indemnity was the creation of VAERS and the understanding that as soon as signals started blinking, the shots would be pulled from the market. Here we are two years into an unfathomable degree and scope of injury and death, and the shots are now getting a permanent promotion.
Just off the bat, we know from a Saudi study that anywhere between 11% and 20% (depending on the batch) of people who took the AstraZeneca shot experienced neurological side effects.
Then we know, based on Pfizer’s own baby and toddler trial, that 1 in 77 (1.4%) young children experienced severe adverse events. Table 21 on page 42 states that 61% of babies 6 months to 2 years old experienced a “systemic reaction within 7 days.” This means that it’s not just irritation of the injection site but something more along the lines of fever, chills, or muscle aches. How can something like this be placed on the CIS?Let’s face it: Pharmaceutical companies have a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profits for shareholders. If government promotes them in every way imaginable and absolves them of liability, their responsibility leads them to maximize profit without concern for safety. With that simple understanding, how do you ask the last baby to die for a lie?